SAELENSMINDE Erik · GILLIS
vs par split: bidding -1.21 · play -0.64
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.02/bd (an average draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.06/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 88.9% · defence 83.3%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (2) | 100.0% (3) |
| Declarer play | 66.7% (3) | 100.0% (6) |
| Defence | 80.0% (5) | 85.7% (7) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♥ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (2)
vs par by strain: NT -2.80 (10) · a suit -1.33 (18)
vs par by level: part-score +0.18 (11) · game -2.87 (15) · slam -5.50 (2)
By role: declaring +0.03/bd (-2.62 vs par · 16) · defending -2.48/bd (-0.83 vs par · 12)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.09/bd (-1.14 vs par · 14) · not vulnerable -2.17/bd (-2.57 vs par · 14)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round of 32 | A.Fuglestad | J.Alfejeva – K.Rubins | Open | 14 | -27.3 | -1.95 | -1.71 |
| Round of 32 | A.Fuglestad | K.Rubins – J.Alfejeva | Open | 14 | -1.9 | -0.14 | -2.00 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +14.2 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 15 | 7♥ | ♥10 | = | +0 |
| +8.4 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 16 | 5♣x | ♥2 | = | +4 |
| +4.8 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 23 | 4♠ | ♣K | = | -1 |
| +4.2 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 27 | 1NT | ♠3 | +3 | +6 |
| +4.0 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 2 | 5♦ | ♥A | = | -1 |
| +3.4 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 21 | 4♠ | ♥J | = | +3 |
| +3.3 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 14 | 1NT | ♦4 | +1 | -7 |
| +2.3 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 28 | 2♦ | ♦K | -1 | +8 |
| +2.2 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 20 | 4♥ | ♣Q | +1 | +0 |
| +0.6 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 12 | 1♠ | ♣6 | = | -5 |
| +0.4 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 1 | 4♥ | ♠7 | -2 | +0 |
| +0.2 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 25 | 4♠ | ♦8 | = | -1 |
| +0.1 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 10 | 2NT | ♠4 | = | +10 |
| -0.2 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 4 | 1NT | ♣4 | +2 | +10 |
| -0.9 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 8 | 3♣ | ♠8 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.1 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 11 | 5♣ | ♠K | -3 | -4 |
| -2.1 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 13 | 1NT | ♥2 | -1 | -5 |
| -2.9 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 17 | 2♠ | ♣2 | = | +0 |
| -3.2 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 6 | 1NT | ♣3 | = | -5 |
| -5.2 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 5 | 3NT | ♥2 | -3 | -5 |
| -5.2 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 9 | 4♠ | ♣10 | = | +1 |
| -5.3 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 26 | 4♥ | ♠A | -2 | -9 |
| -7.0 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 3 | 4♠ | ♥2 | = | -3 |
| -7.1 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 22 | 4♠x | ♥A | -4 | -5 |
| -7.8 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 18 | 3NT | ♥3 | = | -11 |
| -7.9 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 19 | 5♣ | ♦Q | +1 | -11 |
| -9.8 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 7 | 2NT | ♦10 | +1 | -10 |
| -10.6 | Round of 32 | VALUE MEDIA TEAM | 24 | 6NT | ♣K | -1 | -11 |