DAHL Noah · PIDOES
vs par split: bidding -0.50 · play +1.40
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.10/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.22/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 0.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 100.0%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 40.0% (10/25)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 0.0% (1) | 0.0% (1) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (1) | · |
| Defence | 100.0% (4) | 100.0% (2) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♦ 0.0% (1) · ♣ 0.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +3.00 (5) · a suit -1.20 (5)
vs par by level: part-score -0.80 (5) · game +2.60 (5)
By role: declaring +1.45/bd (-0.75 vs par · 4) · defending -0.77/bd (+2.00 vs par · 6)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.20/bd (+1.17 vs par · 6) · not vulnerable +0.60/bd (+0.50 vs par · 4)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 5 | N.Dejgaard | M.Chmielewski – M.Janik | Closed | 10 | +1.2 | +0.12 | +0.90 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +7.3 | Round 5 | VERCO CKIS SKAWINA | 4 | 3NT | ♣T | = | +10 |
| +3.0 | Round 5 | VERCO CKIS SKAWINA | 3 | 1NT | ♣3 | -2 | +0 |
| +2.0 | Round 5 | VERCO CKIS SKAWINA | 1 | 3♠ | ♦Q | +1 | +7 |
| +1.4 | Round 5 | VERCO CKIS SKAWINA | 2 | 4♣ | ♣2 | +1 | -6 |
| -0.3 | Round 5 | VERCO CKIS SKAWINA | 8 | 2♠ | ♣2 | -1 | +1 |
| -0.7 | Round 5 | VERCO CKIS SKAWINA | 5 | 4♠ | ♥9 | +1 | +0 |
| -2.3 | Round 5 | VERCO CKIS SKAWINA | 7 | 1NT | ♥3 | = | -6 |
| -2.4 | Round 5 | VERCO CKIS SKAWINA | 9 | 3NT | ♥8 | +1 | +11 |
| -2.6 | Round 5 | VERCO CKIS SKAWINA | 10 | 4♥ | ♣2 | -2 | -8 |
| -4.2 | Round 5 | VERCO CKIS SKAWINA | 6 | 3NT | ♠7 | = | +0 |