PACHTMAN Ron · Israel Blue
vs par split: bidding +0.30 · play +0.98
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.22/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +1.28/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 94.4% #1 of 31 · declarer play 65.2% #23 of 31 · defence 92.0% #11 of 31
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (4) | 92.9% (14) |
| Declarer play | 60.0% (5) | 66.7% (18) |
| Defence | 100.0% (5) | 90.0% (20) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (6) · ♥ 100.0% (4) · ♦ 66.7% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (5)
vs par by strain: NT -2.08 (13) · a suit +2.21 (47)
vs par by level: part-score +1.54 (22) · game +1.00 (34) · slam +2.25 (4)
By role: declaring +1.01/bd (-1.14 vs par · 35) · defending +2.18/bd (+4.68 vs par · 25)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +2.01/bd (+1.73 vs par · 30) · not vulnerable +0.99/bd (+0.83 vs par · 30)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 2 | E.Ginossar | L.Cima – V.Giubilo | Closed | 20 | +30.6 | +1.53 | +1.00 |
| Round 4 | E.Ginossar | G.Osborne – F.Hinden | Closed | 20 | +20.8 | +1.04 | +1.40 |
| Round 5 | E.Ginossar | D.Schroeder – R.Marsal | Open | 20 | +38.6 | +1.93 | +1.45 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.4 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 10 | 3♦x | ♣Q | -2 | +12 |
| +7.0 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 23 | 1NT | ♥Q | +1 | +0 |
| +7.0 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 21 | 3NT | ♠4 | +4 | +12 |
| +6.6 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 37 | 5♥x | ♠A | -1 | +0 |
| +6.6 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 29 | 4♥ | ♠4 | -4 | +11 |
| +6.6 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 4 | 3♦ | ♣Q | -1 | +12 |
| +6.4 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 29 | 4♥ | ♣5 | -1 | +12 |
| +6.2 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 22 | 4♠ | ♥7 | +2 | +7 |
| +5.8 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 1 | 5♣x | ♠9 | -2 | +5 |
| +5.0 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 25 | 5♦ | ♥K | -1 | +13 |
| +5.0 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 35 | 4♠ | ♠2 | = | +11 |
| +5.0 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 20 | 4♠ | ♦Q | +2 | +13 |
| +4.8 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 13 | 3♠ | ♥A | = | +1 |
| +4.6 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 28 | 4♥ | ♠7 | -2 | +11 |
| +4.4 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 28 | 3♠ | ♣7 | -1 | +6 |
| +4.2 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 6 | 4♠ | ♣4 | = | +0 |
| +4.0 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 26 | 3♠ | ♣4 | = | +0 |
| +3.8 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 16 | 3♣ | ♦A | -1 | +3 |
| +3.2 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 38 | 1NT | ♠A | +1 | +0 |
| +3.2 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 40 | 4♠ | ♥7 | -4 | +6 |
| +2.8 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 39 | 2♠ | ♥A | -1 | +0 |
| +2.8 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 3 | 2♥ | ♠A | = | +0 |
| +2.6 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 21 | 3NT | ♣8 | +2 | +2 |
| +2.4 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 27 | 4♠ | ♦5 | +1 | +0 |
| +2.4 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 36 | 4♥ | ♠A | -1 | +12 |
| +2.0 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 27 | 2♥ | ♥Q | = | +11 |
| +1.6 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 32 | 6♠ | ♦5 | = | +11 |
| +1.6 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 11 | 6♠ | ♣J | -2 | +11 |
| +1.4 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 2 | 4♥ | ♦A | -1 | -6 |
| +1.2 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 8 | 2♥ | ♠9 | +1 | +1 |
| +0.8 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 24 | 3NT | ♣5 | +3 | -11 |
| +0.6 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 26 | 4♠ | ♠3 | = | -1 |
| +0.6 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 5 | 3♣ | ♠10 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.6 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 18 | 3NT | ♥3 | +3 | -13 |
| +0.4 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 22 | 3NT | ♣2 | +2 | -13 |
| +0.4 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 15 | 2♦ | ♠A | = | -1 |
| +0.2 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 31 | 3NT | ♠8 | = | +0 |
| -0.0 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 39 | 5♠ | ♥A | = | +4 |
| +0.0 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 31 | 6NT | ♠4 | = | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 34 | 4♠ | ♦3 | = | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 23 | 4♠ | ♥5 | +1 | -12 |
| -0.2 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 17 | 4♠ | ♦J | = | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 24 | 2♠ | ♥A | = | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 35 | 5♦ | ♠Q | = | +2 |
| -0.8 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 38 | 4♠ | ♥K | +1 | -13 |
| -0.8 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 30 | 4♥ | ♠A | -2 | +1 |
| -0.8 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 9 | 1NT | ♣J | = | -1 |
| -1.2 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 40 | 4♠ | ♣10 | +2 | -1 |
| -1.2 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 37 | 3♣ | ♠9 | -1 | -5 |
| -1.2 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 12 | 2♥ | ♦9 | +1 | -6 |
| -1.4 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 19 | 3NT | ♦9 | +2 | +0 |
| -1.6 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 25 | 2♥ | ♣A | +1 | +0 |
| -1.6 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 36 | 3NT | ♦2 | = | +0 |
| -2.6 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 33 | 4♠ | ♦6 | -1 | -4 |
| -2.6 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 7 | 4♦ | ♥J | -1 | +9 |
| -3.4 | Round 2 | Angelini Bridge Team | 30 | 3♣ | ♥9 | -1 | -10 |
| -3.6 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 32 | 2♦ | ♦4 | = | +2 |
| -4.4 | Round 5 | Burghausen 1 | 14 | 5♥ | ♠2 | +1 | -11 |
| -5.8 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 33 | 3NT | ♠3 | = | -3 |
| -9.8 | Round 4 | Hinden -English Premier League | 34 | 6♦ | ♥5 | -1 | -13 |