GLADYSH Evgueni · Bridge Club Real
vs par split: bidding +0.08 · play -0.08
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.27/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.43/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 81.8% #12 of 31 · declarer play 100.0% #1 of 31 · defence 90.5% #18 of 31
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 0.0% (2) | 100.0% (9) |
| Declarer play | 100.0% (3) | 100.0% (4) |
| Defence | 100.0% (6) | 86.7% (15) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (3) · ♥ 100.0% (3) · ♦ 50.0% (4) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT +2.30 (10) · a suit -0.40 (30)
vs par by level: part-score -2.08 (13) · game +1.00 (25) · slam +6.50 (2)
By role: declaring -1.82/bd (-4.11 vs par · 19) · defending +1.34/bd (+4.24 vs par · 21)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.24/bd (-0.80 vs par · 20) · not vulnerable +0.92/bd (+1.35 vs par · 20)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 3 | M.Krasnosselski | J.Kalita – M.Nowosadzki | Closed | 20 | -5.4 | -0.27 | +0.70 |
| Round 4 | M.Krasnosselski | G.Paulissen – J.Jansma | Open | 20 | -1.0 | -0.05 | -0.15 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +8.8 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 21 | 5♦ | ♠A | -1 | +5 |
| +7.4 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 34 | 6♦ | ♥3 | -1 | +13 |
| +5.2 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 25 | 2♥ | ♣K | +1 | +0 |
| +4.8 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 11 | 3NT | ♥2 | -1 | +5 |
| +4.0 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 17 | 5♦ | ♠J | +1 | -11 |
| +3.6 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 10 | 5♣ | ♠K | -1 | +12 |
| +3.4 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 4 | 1NT | ♦2 | +1 | +11 |
| +3.2 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 24 | 5♣ | ♦9 | +1 | +11 |
| +2.6 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 6 | 4♠ | ♥K | -1 | +6 |
| +2.6 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 27 | 2♠ | ♥Q | -1 | -9 |
| +2.4 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 18 | 4♠ | ♥8 | = | +0 |
| +2.4 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 23 | 4♠ | ♦9 | +1 | +12 |
| +2.4 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 40 | 3NT | ♠3 | +1 | +0 |
| +1.8 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 36 | 3NT | ♥10 | +2 | +2 |
| +1.6 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 8 | 2♥ | ♥A | = | +1 |
| +1.4 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 35 | 4♠ | ♣A | -1 | -2 |
| +1.0 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 5 | 4♥ | ♠6 | +2 | -13 |
| +0.6 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 1 | 3NT | ♦2 | +1 | +1 |
| +0.2 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 14 | 3NT | ♠9 | +2 | +11 |
| +0.0 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 16 | 3NT | ♥A | +3 | +13 |
| -0.0 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 31 | 6NT | ♥2 | = | +0 |
| -0.2 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 26 | 3♠ | ♥A | -1 | +6 |
| -0.2 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 39 | 1♠ | ♥A | = | +5 |
| -0.4 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 12 | 4♠ | ♣A | = | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 22 | 4♠ | ♥K | -2 | +7 |
| -0.4 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 37 | 3♣ | ♠8 | = | +0 |
| -0.6 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 9 | 4♠ | ♦J | +1 | -1 |
| -0.8 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 3 | 5♥x | ♥J | -4 | +16 |
| -1.2 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 20 | 2♦ | ♥A | +2 | +0 |
| -1.4 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 13 | 2♣ | -1 | -5 | |
| -3.4 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 19 | 4♥ | ♠4 | +2 | -9 |
| -4.2 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 15 | 2♥ | ♣10 | = | -11 |
| -4.2 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 30 | 4♠ | ♥K | -1 | -5 |
| -4.8 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 28 | 3NT | ♠Q | -5 | -12 |
| -5.6 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 33 | 3♣ | ♦J | -1 | -8 |
| -5.8 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 32 | 2NT | ♠5 | -2 | -8 |
| -6.6 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 7 | 4♥ | ♠5 | = | -3 |
| -7.0 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 29 | 4♥ | ♠4 | -4 | -11 |
| -7.6 | Round 4 | Het Witte Huis | 38 | 1♣x | ♣4 | -2 | -9 |
| -11.0 | Round 3 | Consus Kalisz | 2 | 4♥x | ♣6 | -2 | -9 |