Round 4 — BAM TEAMS QUALIFICATION
16 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 4 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NEVER CLAIM | FRANCE SENIORS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | AJ DIAMENT | DE KNIJFF | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | POLAND | NEMESIS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CUNEO | NONAME | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | HARRIS | MORAN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MARILL | SALAMA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | PAUNCZ | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | ESTONIA | TALMAT | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | TESSIERES | NONAME TUR | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | BYE | BRENO | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 11 | BRUNET | YOUNG SWEDES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | NETHERLANDS RED | LATVIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | PACIFIC | LUPO VELOCE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | FORMIDABLES | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BELL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | MAROSAMITAWA | BYE | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 4↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 4 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R4 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CONNECTOR | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DE BOTTON | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | DRACULA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | EMERALD | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | FRANCE JUNIORS | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | MAHAFFEY | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | NETHERLANDS BLUE | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 1 | VINCIGUERRA | 33.40 | · | 0 |
| 9 | POLAND | 13.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 10 | NONAME | 12.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 11 | BRENO | 11.40 | 2.40 | 4 |
| 12 | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | 11.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 13 | TESSIERES | 10.40 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 14 | LATVIA | 10.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 14 | LUPO VELOCE | 10.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 14 | MORAN | 10.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 14 | NETHERLANDS RED | 10.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 14 | NEVER CLAIM | 10.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 19 | DE KNIJFF | 9.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 19 | FRANCE SENIORS | 9.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 19 | NEMESIS | 9.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 19 | PAUNCZ | 9.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 23 | MAROSAMITAWA | 8.40 | 2.40 | 4 |
| 24 | AJ DIAMENT | 8.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 24 | CUNEO | 8.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 24 | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | 8.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 24 | TALMAT | 8.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 28 | NONAME TUR | 7.40 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 29 | ESTONIA | 7.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 29 | SALAMA | 7.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 29 | YOUNG SWEDES | 7.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 32 | FORMIDABLES | 6.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 33 | BELL | 5.40 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 34 | PACIFIC | 5.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 35 | BRUNET | 4.40 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 36 | HARRIS | 4.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 37 | CHINA LADIES TEAM | 3.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 38 | MARILL | 2.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 4 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R4 | BAM% |
|---|
NEVER CLAIM vs FRANCE SENIORS 2 : 2 VP (match 32990) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEVER CLAIM | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 7 | 5♥x | N | ♠K | -4 | 1100 | 95% | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♥ | E | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 69% | 4♥x | E | ♦A | +1 | 690 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 5♥x | N | -4 | 1100 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | E | +1 | 690 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AJ DIAMENT vs DE KNIJFF 2 : 2 VP (match 32991) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AJ DIAMENT | DE KNIJFF | |
| 7 | 5♥x | S | ♣Q | -4 | 1100 | 95% | 4♠ | E | ♥3 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♠ | N | ♥9 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 3♥ | E | ♥J | +2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 5♥x | S | -4 | 1100 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | E | +2 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND vs NEMESIS 3 : 1 VP (match 32992) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND | NEMESIS | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | ♠2 | = | 420 | 71% | 4♠x | N | ♦5 | -3 | 500 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CUNEO vs NONAME 3 : 1 VP (match 32993) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CUNEO | NONAME | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♠3 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | ♠6 | = | 420 | 71% | 4♥ | E | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HARRIS vs MORAN 3 : 1 VP (match 32994) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HARRIS | MORAN | |
| 7 | 6♠ | W | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 98% | 3NT | E | ♥10 | -1 | 100 | 98% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 2♥ | E | ♦K | +3 | 200 | 58% | 4♥ | E | ♠2 | = | 420 | 71% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 6♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 98% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 98% | ||||
| 8 | 2♥ | E | +3 | 200 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARILL vs SALAMA 1 : 3 VP (match 32995) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARILL | SALAMA | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 4♠ | W | ♠3 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3♥ | E | ♠7 | +1 | 170 | 69% | 3♠ | N | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAUNCZ vs CHINA LADIES TEAM 3 : 1 VP (match 32996) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAUNCZ | CHINA LADIES TEAM | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 4♠ | W | ♥6 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3♥ | E | ♠2 | +2 | 200 | 58% | 4♥ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 71% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 3♥ | E | +2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ESTONIA vs TALMAT 1 : 3 VP (match 32997) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ESTONIA | TALMAT | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♠3 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | ♦K | = | 420 | 71% | 2♥ | E | ♦A | +3 | 200 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | +3 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TESSIERES vs NONAME TUR 3 : 1 VP (match 33054) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TESSIERES | NONAME TUR | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3♠x | N | ♦10 | -2 | 300 | 52% | 3♠x | N | ♠3 | -3 | 500 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs BRENO 0 : 2.4 VP (match 33055) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | BRENO | |
| 7 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 89% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS+1.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 89% | ||||
| 8 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRUNET vs YOUNG SWEDES 1 : 3 VP (match 33056) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRUNET | YOUNG SWEDES | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 71% | 3♥ | E | ♠7 | +2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | E | +2 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NETHERLANDS RED vs LATVIA 2 : 2 VP (match 33057) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NETHERLANDS RED | LATVIA | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♥4 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 4♠ | W | ♠3 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | ♣J | = | 420 | 71% | 4♥ | W | ♣J | = | 420 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PACIFIC vs LUPO VELOCE 2 : 2 VP (match 33058) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PACIFIC | LUPO VELOCE | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3♠x | N | ♦10 | -1 | 100 | 77% | 3♠ | N | ♦10 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FORMIDABLES vs GOVINDACHARI TEAM 1 : 3 VP (match 33059) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FORMIDABLES | GOVINDACHARI TEAM | |
| 7 | 5♥x | N | ♠K | -5 | 1400 | 100% | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 71% | 4♥ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 5♥x | N | -5 | 1400 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLUE CHIP SWEDES vs BELL 3 : 1 VP (match 33060) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLUE CHIP SWEDES | BELL | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3♠ | N | ♥5 | = | 140 | 100% | 4♥ | E | ♦J | = | 420 | 71% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAROSAMITAWA vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 33061) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAROSAMITAWA | BYE | |
| 7 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 89% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS+1.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 89% | ||||
| 8 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|