Round 1 — BAM Teams
5 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 1 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CALIFORNIAN ACES | MIDNIGHT SUNS | 6 | 2 | 6.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA QFL | VENEZUELA | 2 | 6 | 2.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | ARGENTINA | ZHIHAOLE SCHOOL | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CHINA GIRLS SX CLUB | WERNIS | 6 | 2 | 6.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | FCBC | GREEN PRIMARY SCHOOL | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 1↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 1 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R1 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CALIFORNIAN ACES | 6.00 | 6.00 | 1 |
| 1 | CHINA GIRLS SX CLUB | 6.00 | 6.00 | 1 |
| 1 | VENEZUELA | 6.00 | 6.00 | 1 |
| 4 | ITALIA | 4.80 | 4.80 | 1 |
| 5 | ARGENTINA | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 5 | FCBC | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 5 | GREEN PRIMARY SCHOOL | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 5 | ZHIHAOLE SCHOOL | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 9 | CHINA QFL | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 9 | MIDNIGHT SUNS | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 9 | WERNIS | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 1 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R1 | BAM% |
|---|
CALIFORNIAN ACES vs MIDNIGHT SUNS 6 : 2 VP (match 10540) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CALIFORNIAN ACES | MIDNIGHT SUNS | |
| 1 | 2♥ | S | ♦Q | +1 | 140 | 94% | 3♥ | S | ♦10 | -3 | 150 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3♦x | W | ♣4 | -2 | 300 | 67% | 3♦ | W | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3 | 5♦x | W | ♣A | -2 | 500 | 89% | 4♣x | N | ♠K | = | 510 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 5♠x | S | ♥7 | +2 | 1250 | 100% | 4♥ | W | ♦5 | = | 620 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+3.0 | NS-1.7 | 6 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | S | -3 | 150 | 83% | ||||
| 2 | 3♦x | W | -2 | 300 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 100% | ||||
| 3 | 5♦x | W | -2 | 500 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 4♣x | N | = | 510 | 100% | ||||
| 4 | 5♠x | S | +2 | 1250 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+3.0 | 6 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA QFL vs VENEZUELA 2 : 6 VP (match 10541) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA QFL | VENEZUELA | |
| 1 | 3♥x | S | ♦Q | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2♥ | S | ♦Q | +1 | 140 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3♠ | S | ♦K | +1 | 170 | 61% | 3♠ | S | ♦K | +2 | 200 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3 | 3♠ | E | ♣9 | -3 | 300 | 67% | 5♣ | N | ♦8 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 4♥ | W | ♠9 | -2 | 200 | 67% | 4♠x | S | ♦A | +1 | 990 | 72% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 94% | ||||
| 2 | 3♠ | S | +1 | 170 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | +2 | 200 | 56% | ||||
| 3 | 3♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 4 | 4♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | S | +1 | 990 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 2 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ARGENTINA vs ZHIHAOLE SCHOOL 4 : 4 VP (match 10542) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ARGENTINA | ZHIHAOLE SCHOOL | |
| 1 | 1NT | E | ♥10 | +1 | 120 | 61% | 1♠ | E | ♥9 | = | 80 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♦x | W | ♠6 | -3 | 500 | 78% | 3♠ | S | ♦K | = | 140 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3 | 3NT | S | ♦7 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 5♣x | N | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 6♣x | S | ♦A | -1 | 200 | 89% | 4♥ | W | ♦6 | -2 | 200 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 1♠ | E | = | 80 | 56% | ||||
| 2 | 4♦x | W | -3 | 500 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 83% | ||||
| 3 | 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | N | -1 | 100 | 78% | ||||
| 4 | 6♣x | S | -1 | 200 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 4 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA GIRLS SX CLUB vs WERNIS 6 : 2 VP (match 10543) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA GIRLS SX CLUB | WERNIS | |
| 1 | 1NT | E | ♥10 | +2 | 150 | 83% | 2♥ | S | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | S | ♦K | +2 | 680 | 100% | 4♠ | S | ♦Q | = | 620 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3 | 5♣ | N | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 61% | 6♣x | N | ♠K | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 4♠x | S | ♦A | +2 | 1190 | 89% | 4♠x | S | ♥A | +1 | 990 | 72% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.6 | 6 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 1NT | E | +2 | 150 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 67% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | S | +2 | 680 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | = | 620 | 89% | ||||
| 3 | 5♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 6♣x | N | -2 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| 4 | 4♠x | S | +2 | 1190 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | S | +1 | 990 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 6 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FCBC vs GREEN PRIMARY SCHOOL 4 : 4 VP (match 10544) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FCBC | GREEN PRIMARY SCHOOL | |
| 1 | 1NT | E | ♥8 | +1 | 120 | 61% | 1♥ | S | ♦Q | = | 80 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3♠ | S | ♦K | +1 | 170 | 61% | 3♠ | S | ♦K | = | 140 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3 | 3NT | N | ♠2 | -3 | 150 | 89% | 3♠ | E | ♦10 | -2 | 200 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 4 | 4♠ | S | ♦A | +1 | 650 | 56% | 4♥ | W | ♠6 | -2 | 200 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 1♥ | S | = | 80 | 78% | ||||
| 2 | 3♠ | S | +1 | 170 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 83% | ||||
| 3 | 3NT | N | -3 | 150 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 56% | ||||
| 4 | 4♠ | S | +1 | 650 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 4 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|