Round 11 — BAM Teams
5 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 11 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA | CHINA QFL | 8 | 0 | 8.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | ZHIHAOLE SCHOOL | CALIFORNIAN ACES | 4 | 4 | 0.00 | 5.53 | protocol → |
| 3 | VENEZUELA | CHINA GIRLS SX CLUB | 5 | 3 | 5.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GREEN PRIMARY SCHOOL | ARGENTINA | 4 | 4 | 0.00 | 5.68 | protocol → |
| 5 | WERNIS | FCBC | 4 | 4 | 4.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 11↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 11 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R11 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARGENTINA | 62.48 | 5.68 | 11 |
| 2 | CALIFORNIAN ACES | 60.86 | 5.53 | 11 |
| 3 | ITALIA | 58.80 | 8.00 | 11 |
| 3 | VENEZUELA | 58.80 | 5.00 | 11 |
| 5 | CHINA GIRLS SX CLUB | 46.80 | 3.00 | 11 |
| 6 | WERNIS | 43.80 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 7 | CHINA QFL | 41.80 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 8 | FCBC | 30.80 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 9 | ZHIHAOLE SCHOOL | 28.80 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 10 | GREEN PRIMARY SCHOOL | 25.80 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 11 | MIDNIGHT SUNS | 20.40 | 4.80 | 11 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 11 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R11 | BAM% |
|---|
ITALIA vs CHINA QFL 8 : 0 VP (match 10600) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA | CHINA QFL | |
| 13 | 3NT | S | ♣3 | +2 | 660 | 94% | 3NT | S | ♣2 | +1 | 630 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 3♥ | N | ♣3 | +1 | 170 | 100% | 2NT | E | ♥Q | -3 | 150 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 15 | 3NT | W | ♦3 | -3 | 150 | 100% | 1NT | W | ♣8 | +3 | 180 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 3NT | S | ♥4 | +2 | 460 | 83% | 3♣ | S | ♥4 | +2 | 150 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+3.6 | NS+0.2 | 8 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 67% | ||||
| 14 | 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | -3 | 150 | 89% | ||||
| 15 | 3NT | W | -3 | 150 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +3 | 180 | 89% | ||||
| 16 | 3NT | S | +2 | 460 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | S | +2 | 150 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+3.6 | 8 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE SCHOOL vs CALIFORNIAN ACES 0 : 5.53 VP (match 10601) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE SCHOOL | CALIFORNIAN ACES | |
| 13 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 61% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 15 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 72% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 72% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | ||||
| 14 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 61% | ||||
| 15 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 72% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 72% | ||||
| 16 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 4 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VENEZUELA vs CHINA GIRLS SX CLUB 5 : 3 VP (match 10602) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VENEZUELA | CHINA GIRLS SX CLUB | |
| 13 | 3NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 630 | 67% | 3NT | N | ♥10 | = | 600 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 2♥ | N | ♠8 | +1 | 140 | 72% | 3♣ | W | ♥A | +1 | 130 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 15 | 3♦x | N | ♣Q | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2NT | W | ♣7 | +1 | 150 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 3NT | N | ♥3 | +2 | 460 | 83% | 3NT | S | ♦3 | +2 | 460 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.8 | 5 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 56% | ||||
| 14 | 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 94% | ||||
| 15 | 3♦x | N | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | W | +1 | 150 | 72% | ||||
| 16 | 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | +2 | 460 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 5 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GREEN PRIMARY SCHOOL vs ARGENTINA 0 : 5.68 VP (match 10603) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GREEN PRIMARY SCHOOL | ARGENTINA | |
| 13 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 14 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 61% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 15 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 72% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 72% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | ||||
| 14 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 61% | ||||
| 15 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 72% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 72% | ||||
| 16 | Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 4 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WERNIS vs FCBC 4 : 4 VP (match 10604) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WERNIS | FCBC | |
| 13 | 3NT | S | ♠5 | +2 | 660 | 94% | 3NT | S | ♣2 | +1 | 630 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 14 | 4♣ | W | ♥A | = | 130 | 94% | 3♥ | N | ♠8 | = | 140 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 15 | 1NT | W | ♠8 | +2 | 150 | 72% | 3♣ | W | ♦7 | = | 110 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 3NT | S | ♠10 | +2 | 460 | 83% | 3NT | S | ♥4 | +1 | 430 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.8 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 13 | 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 67% | ||||
| 14 | 4♣ | W | = | 130 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 72% | ||||
| 15 | 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 56% | ||||
| 16 | 3NT | S | +2 | 460 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|