Round 25 — BAM Teams
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 25 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ALLEYCATS | CHILE SENIORS | 3 | 1 | 2.50 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | SMILE | TU MAM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | HOLLANDS | INDIA MEN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GO HABS GO JETS | VITAMINA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | DRINTEAM | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | TAMEWARE | LAS VELITAS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | PAKISTAN | CON SUERTE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | KIWI JAMR | PAME | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIAN WOMEN | CARACCI | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | GAUSS | SHOURIE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | GUADELOUPE | BLACK | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | TUTTIFRUTTI | AUSTRIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 25↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 25 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R25 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GAUSS | 66.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 1 | TU MAM | 66.00 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 3 | HOLLANDS | 62.00 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 4 | AUSTRIA | 61.00 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 4 | BLACK | 61.00 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 6 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 58.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 7 | VITAMINA | 57.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 8 | SHOURIE | 56.00 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 9 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 54.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 9 | PAKISTAN | 54.00 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 11 | GO HABS GO JETS | 53.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 11 | TAMEWARE | 53.00 | 4.00 | 25 |
| 13 | DRINTEAM | 52.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 13 | TUTTIFRUTTI | 52.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 15 | KIWI JAMR | 51.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 16 | INDIAN WOMEN | 50.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 17 | ALLEYCATS | 49.50 | 2.50 | 25 |
| 18 | PAME | 48.20 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 19 | CARACCI | 46.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 20 | INDIA MEN | 45.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 21 | GUADELOUPE | 42.00 | 3.00 | 25 |
| 22 | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 40.00 | 2.00 | 25 |
| 23 | CON SUERTE | 38.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 24 | LAS VELITAS | 35.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
| 25 | CHILE SENIORS | 28.00 | 1.00 | 25 |
| 26 | SMILE | 19.00 | 0.00 | 25 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 25 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R25 | BAM% |
|---|
ALLEYCATS vs CHILE SENIORS 2.5 : 1 VP (match 126631) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALLEYCATS | CHILE SENIORS | |
| 4♠x | E | ♥4 | -4 | 800 | 100% | 3♠ | E | ♥5 | -2 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 2NT | W | ♦4 | -3 | 150 | 90% | 3NT | E | ♠10 | -3 | 150 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.8 | NS+1.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | E | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| 2NT | W | -3 | 150 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | -3 | 150 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SMILE vs TU MAM 0 : 4 VP (match 126632) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SMILE | TU MAM | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 3♥ | N | ♣8 | +1 | 170 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♠3 | +2 | 170 | 100% | 2♥ | E | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 80% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | +2 | 170 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOLLANDS vs INDIA MEN 4 : 0 VP (match 126633) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOLLANDS | INDIA MEN | |
| 4♠x | E | ♥4 | -3 | 500 | 94% | 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 1♠ | W | ♦10 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2♦ | E | ♥2 | = | 90 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 1♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GO HABS GO JETS vs VITAMINA 2 : 2 VP (match 126634) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GO HABS GO JETS | VITAMINA | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 4♠x | E | ♠2 | -3 | 500 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | E | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2♥ | E | ♥2 | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 94% | ||||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DRINTEAM vs BRIDGE UNLEASHED 2 : 2 VP (match 126635) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRINTEAM | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 4♥x | N | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 94% | 2♥ | E | ♥2 | = | 110 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-1.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | N | -1 | 100 | 92% | ||||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TAMEWARE vs LAS VELITAS 4 : 0 VP (match 126636) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAMEWARE | LAS VELITAS | |
| 3♥ | N | ♠Q | = | 140 | 76% | 5♥x | N | ♠Q | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 1♠ | W | ♦10 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2NT | E | ♣3 | = | 120 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| 1♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | E | = | 120 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAKISTAN vs CON SUERTE 4 : 0 VP (match 126637) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAKISTAN | CON SUERTE | |
| 4♥ | N | ♣8 | = | 420 | 88% | 4♠ | E | ♥Q | -2 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | W | ♦10 | -2 | 100 | 74% | 2♦ | N | ♣Q | -1 | 100 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| 3♣ | W | -2 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIWI JAMR vs PAME 3 : 1 VP (match 126638) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIWI JAMR | PAME | |
| 5♥x | S | ♣2 | -1 | 100 | 92% | 5♥ | N | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | W | ♠Q | -4 | 200 | 100% | 2NT | E | ♠3 | -2 | 100 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♥ | N | -2 | 100 | 92% | ||||
| 3NT | W | -4 | 200 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | E | -2 | 100 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIAN WOMEN vs CARACCI 2 : 2 VP (match 126639) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIAN WOMEN | CARACCI | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | W | ♦10 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 1NT | W | ♦9 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 1NT | W | -1 | 50 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | W | -1 | 50 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAUSS vs SHOURIE 0 : 4 VP (match 126640) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAUSS | SHOURIE | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 3♠x | E | ♥5 | -2 | 300 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♠10 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2♥ | E | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | E | -2 | 300 | 84% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GUADELOUPE vs BLACK 3 : 1 VP (match 126641) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GUADELOUPE | BLACK | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | E | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 74% | 2♦ | W | ♦4 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TUTTIFRUTTI vs AUSTRIA 3 : 1 VP (match 126642) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TUTTIFRUTTI | AUSTRIA | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | E | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 52% | 1♠ | W | ♠J | = | 80 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | W | = | 80 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG CHINA OPEN vs CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN 2 : 2 VP (match 126643) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 4♥ | N | ♠Q | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | E | ♠10 | -3 | 150 | 90% | 4♥ | E | ♠9 | -3 | 150 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| 3NT | E | -3 | 150 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ T96 ♥ A8762 ♦ – ♣ AKT74 | ||
| ♠ AK73 ♥ J93 ♦ A6542 ♣ 2 | 17 Dlr N None | ♠ QJ54 ♥ K ♦ JT83 ♣ Q983 |
| ♠ 82 ♥ QT54 ♦ KQ97 ♣ J65 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 9 |
| S | 7 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 9 |
| E | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 4 |
| W | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 4 |
| ♠ QJ6 ♥ AJ4 ♦ T9743 ♣ J2 | ||
| ♠ A874 ♥ KQ5 ♦ J ♣ AK976 | 18 Dlr E N-S | ♠ 52 ♥ T987 ♦ K8652 ♣ Q4 |
| ♠ KT93 ♥ 632 ♦ AQ ♣ T853 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| S | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| E | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| W | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 |