Round 16 — BAM JYG Final
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 16 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GERMANY 2 | CHINA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | GERMANY 1 | BRAZIL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | UNITED FRENCH | SHENGXING TEAM 2 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | BRIDGE ACADEMY AZSUW | FINLAND | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | USA | ITALY YOUNG | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | WHITEWALKERS | EGYPT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | FRANCE | FRANCE YOUNGSTER 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | COLOMBIA | CHINA RDFZ YOUNG | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | SRBIJA VAJS | ITALIA GIRLS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SHENGXING TEAM 1 | SHENGXING TEAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | CHILE JUNIORS | INDIA JUNIORS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | VILLA FABBRICHE | CHILE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | JAPAN | SYNREY RDFZ | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 16↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 16 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R16 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SHENGXING TEAM 1 | 46.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 1 | 🇺🇸 USA | 46.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 3 | 🇮🇳 INDIA JUNIORS | 44.38 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 4 | SYNREY RDFZ | 40.44 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 5 | 🇫🇮 FINLAND | 40.31 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 6 | 🇨🇴 COLOMBIA | 39.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 7 | 🇨🇱 CHILE | 38.44 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 8 | 🇫🇷 FRANCE | 38.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 9 | VILLA FABBRICHE | 37.75 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 10 | UNITED FRENCH | 37.19 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 11 | SHENGXING TEAM | 36.38 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 12 | 🇮🇹 ITALY YOUNG | 35.81 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 13 | 🇨🇳 CHINA | 35.75 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 13 | 🇩🇪 GERMANY 1 | 35.75 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 15 | WHITEWALKERS | 35.69 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 16 | SRBIJA VAJS | 35.06 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 17 | 🇧🇷 BRAZIL | 33.63 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 18 | BRIDGE ACADEMY AZSUW | 33.00 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 19 | 🇯🇵 JAPAN | 31.38 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 20 | 🇪🇬 EGYPT | 31.13 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 21 | 🇨🇱 CHILE JUNIORS | 30.50 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 22 | 🇫🇷 FRANCE YOUNGSTER 2 | 30.44 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 23 | 🇩🇪 GERMANY 2 | 28.56 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 24 | 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ YOUNG | 26.88 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 25 | SHENGXING TEAM 2 | 26.25 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 26 | 🇮🇹 ITALIA GIRLS | 18.94 | 1.00 | 16 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 16 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R16 | BAM% |
|---|
🇩🇪 GERMANY 2 vs 🇨🇳 CHINA 2 : 2 VP (match 58100) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY 2 | CHINA | |
| 31 | 4♠ | S | ♦5 | -3 | 300 | 96% | 3NT | S | ♦10 | -2 | 200 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♦x | W | ♠K | -4 | 1100 | 98% | 2♥ | S | ♣5 | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | S | -3 | 300 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 200 | 68% | ||||
| 32 | 3♦x | W | -4 | 1100 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇩🇪 GERMANY 1 vs 🇧🇷 BRAZIL 2 : 2 VP (match 58101) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY 1 | BRAZIL | |
| 31 | 4♠ | S | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 72% | 4♠ | S | ♥J | -2 | 200 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | ♣5 | -2 | 100 | 100% | 4♥ | S | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 | 🇧🇷 | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 68% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | -2 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UNITED FRENCH vs SHENGXING TEAM 2 3 : 1 VP (match 58102) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UNITED FRENCH | SHENGXING TEAM 2 | |
| 31 | 4♠ | S | ♥J | -2 | 200 | 68% | 4♠ | S | ♥J | -2 | 200 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | ♣2 | = | 420 | 58% | 3♠ | S | ♥5 | = | 140 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 68% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRIDGE ACADEMY AZSUW vs FINLAND 3 : 1 VP (match 58103) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRIDGE ACADEMY AZSUW | FINLAND | |
| 31 | 4♠ | N | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 72% | 4♠ | S | ♦9 | -1 | 100 | 72% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 2♦x | W | ♠K | -3 | 800 | 78% | 4♥ | S | ♣7 | = | 420 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 72% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 72% | ||||
| 32 | 2♦x | W | -3 | 800 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇺🇸 USA vs 🇮🇹 ITALY YOUNG 4 : 0 VP (match 58104) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA | ITALY YOUNG | |
| 31 | 3NT | S | ♠10 | -2 | 200 | 68% | 4♠ | S | ♦10 | -3 | 300 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | ♣7 | +1 | 450 | 60% | 4♥ | S | ♣5 | = | 420 | 58% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 | 🇮🇹 | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | S | -2 | 200 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -3 | 300 | 96% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WHITEWALKERS vs EGYPT 2 : 2 VP (match 58105) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WHITEWALKERS | EGYPT | |
| 31 | 4NT | S | ♦2 | -3 | 300 | 96% | 4♠ | S | ♦10 | -1 | 100 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | ♣2 | = | 420 | 58% | 2♥ | N | ♦K | +2 | 170 | 72% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4NT | S | -3 | 300 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 72% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇫🇷 FRANCE vs 🇫🇷 FRANCE YOUNGSTER 2 0 : 4 VP (match 58106) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE | FRANCE YOUNGSTER 2 | |
| 31 | 4♠ | S | ♦10 | -2 | 200 | 68% | 4♠ | S | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♦x | E | ♠K | -3 | 800 | 78% | 4♥xx | N | ♦K | = | 880 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 | 🇫🇷 | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 72% | ||||
| 32 | 3♦x | E | -3 | 800 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 4♥xx | N | = | 880 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇨🇴 COLOMBIA vs 🇨🇳 CHINA RDFZ YOUNG 4 : 0 VP (match 58107) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | COLOMBIA | CHINA RDFZ YOUNG | |
| 31 | 4♠ | N | ♦2 | = | 620 | 96% | 4♠ | S | ♦10 | -2 | 200 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♦x | E | ♠K | -4 | 1100 | 98% | 4♥ | S | ♣5 | +1 | 450 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.9 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇴 | 🇨🇳 | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 68% | ||||
| 32 | 3♦x | E | -4 | 1100 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SRBIJA VAJS vs ITALIA GIRLS 3 : 1 VP (match 58108) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SRBIJA VAJS | ITALIA GIRLS | |
| 31 | 4♠ | S | ♦10 | -1 | 100 | 72% | 4♠ | S | ♦10 | -2 | 200 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♦x | W | ♠K | -3 | 800 | 78% | 3♦x | W | ♣Q | -3 | 800 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 68% | ||||
| 32 | 3♦x | W | -3 | 800 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦x | W | -3 | 800 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHENGXING TEAM 1 vs SHENGXING TEAM 2 : 2 VP (match 58109) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHENGXING TEAM 1 | SHENGXING TEAM | |
| 31 | 4♠ | N | ♣8 | = | 620 | 96% | 4♠ | S | ♦10 | -1 | 100 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♣ | W | ♦5 | -2 | 200 | 68% | 3NT | N | ♣J | +1 | 430 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | N | = | 620 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 72% | ||||
| 32 | 3♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
🇨🇱 CHILE JUNIORS vs 🇮🇳 INDIA JUNIORS 3 : 1 VP (match 58110) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE JUNIORS | INDIA JUNIORS | |
| 31 | 4♠ | N | ♦Q | -2 | 200 | 68% | 4♠ | N | ♦10 | -2 | 200 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 3NTxx | N | ♦K | = | 800 | 78% | 2♥ | S | ♣5 | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇱 | 🇮🇳 | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | N | -2 | 200 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | -2 | 200 | 68% | ||||
| 32 | 3NTxx | N | = | 800 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VILLA FABBRICHE vs CHILE 0 : 4 VP (match 58111) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VILLA FABBRICHE | CHILE | |
| 31 | 4♠ | S | ♦10 | -1 | 100 | 72% | 4♠ | S | ♦10 | = | 620 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♥ | S | ♣3 | = | 140 | 82% | 3♦x | W | ♣Q | -3 | 800 | 78% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | = | 620 | 96% | ||||
| 32 | 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3♦x | W | -3 | 800 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN vs SYNREY RDFZ 0 : 4 VP (match 58112) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN | SYNREY RDFZ | |
| 31 | 4♠ | S | ♦10 | -2 | 200 | 68% | 4♠ | S | ♦10 | -1 | 100 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 94% | 4♥ | N | ♦K | +1 | 450 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 72% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|