Round 9 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 9 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HAPPY BRIDGE | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | ITALIA U26W | BELGIUM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | INDIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | 50 50 | ZHIHAOLE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | SERBIA U26W | SXSPARK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | HONG KONG | INDIA U16 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | SXTULIP | DABROWKA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | ITALIA 2 | CROATIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | INDIA-B U26 | CHILE U26W | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | URUGUAY | SHSLLS1 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | SERBIA U21 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CROATIA U16 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | MAN EATING COBRAS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | JAPAN U21 | POLAND KIDS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | DABROWKA PO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | CHILE | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 9↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 9 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R9 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HONG KONG | 27.48 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 2 | JAPAN U21 | 26.94 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 3 | ITALIA U26W | 26.79 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 4 | SHSLLS1 | 26.67 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 5 | CROATIA | 25.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 6 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 24.91 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 7 | INDIA-B U26 | 24.85 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 8 | DABROWKA | 24.04 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 9 | SXSPARK | 23.76 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 10 | ITALIA 2 | 21.85 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 11 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 20.73 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 12 | BELGIUM | 20.40 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 13 | CHILE | 19.76 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 14 | SERBIA U21 | 18.97 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 15 | POLAND KIDS | 18.52 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 16 | URUGUAY | 18.21 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 17 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 17.88 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 18 | INDIA U21 | 17.82 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 19 | SXTULIP | 17.58 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 20 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 16.82 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 21 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 16.55 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 22 | INDIA U16 | 15.67 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 23 | CHILE U26W | 15.61 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 24 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 15.39 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 25 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 15.09 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 26 | SERBIA U26W | 14.33 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 27 | 50 50 | 13.58 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 28 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 12.64 | 2.40 | 9 |
| 29 | ZHIHAOLE | 12.30 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 30 | DABROWKA PO | 11.70 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 31 | CAPRISUN | 11.52 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 32 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 11.06 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 9.15 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 9 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R9 | BAM% |
|---|
HAPPY BRIDGE vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 85082)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HAPPY BRIDGE | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA U26W vs BELGIUM 3 : 1 VP (match 85083) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA U26W | BELGIUM | |
| 3♥x | N | ♦K | = | 530 | 97% | 3♥ | N | ♦A | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♠5 | +1 | 630 | 82% | 3N | S | ♥8 | +1 | 630 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥x | N | = | 530 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 3N | N | +1 | 630 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs INDIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 85084) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | INDIA U21 | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 82% | 4♦ | E | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 2♣x | E | ♥J | -2 | 300 | 73% | 3N | S | ♥7 | = | 600 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 66% | ||||
| 2♣x | E | -2 | 300 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs ZHIHAOLE 0 : 4 VP (match 85085) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | ZHIHAOLE | |
| 4♦x | E | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♥x | N | ♦K | = | 590 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 94% | 3Nx | N | ♠2 | = | 750 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+2.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | N | = | 590 | 100% | ||||
| 3N | N | -1 | 100 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3Nx | N | = | 750 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs SXSPARK 0 : 4 VP (match 85086) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | SXSPARK | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 82% | 3♥ | N | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠4 | = | 600 | 50% | 3N | S | ♥8 | +1 | 630 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 90% | ||||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG vs INDIA U16 3 : 1 VP (match 85087) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG | INDIA U16 | |
| 3♥ | N | ♦A | = | 140 | 66% | 4♦ | E | ♥8 | = | 130 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠4 | = | 600 | 50% | 3N | N | ♠2 | = | 600 | 50% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 97% | ||||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 50% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | N | = | 600 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXTULIP vs DABROWKA 0 : 4 VP (match 85088) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXTULIP | DABROWKA | |
| 4♦ | E | ♥8 | = | 130 | 97% | 3♥ | N | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 2N | S | ♣2 | +1 | 150 | 81% | 3N | S | ♣7 | +1 | 630 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 90% | ||||
| 2N | S | +1 | 150 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE FUNBRIDGE vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 85089) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | CAPRISUN | |
| 3♥ | N | ♦A | = | 140 | 66% | 3N | E | ♥8 | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣7 | = | 600 | 50% | 3N | S | ♣7 | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -2 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -3 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA 2 vs CROATIA 0 : 4 VP (match 85090) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA 2 | CROATIA | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 82% | 3♥ | N | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 1♠ | E | ♦A | = | 80 | 87% | 3N | S | ♠4 | = | 600 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 90% | ||||
| 1♠ | E | = | 80 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs CHILE U26W 3 : 1 VP (match 85091) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | CHILE U26W | |
| 3♥ | N | ♦A | = | 140 | 66% | 3♥ | N | ♦A | = | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | S | ♥8 | +1 | 630 | 82% | 3N | S | ♠4 | = | 600 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs SHSLLS1 0 : 4 VP (match 85092) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | SHSLLS1 | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2♥ | N | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣7 | = | 600 | 50% | 3N | N | ♣5 | +1 | 630 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +1 | 630 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs SERBIA U21 1 : 3 VP (match 85093) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | SERBIA U21 | |
| 4♦ | E | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 66% | 3♥ | N | ♦A | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠4 | = | 600 | 50% | 3N | S | ♠A | = | 600 | 50% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 50% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs EYE OF THE TIGER 1 : 3 VP (match 85094) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 82% | 4♥ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1♥ | N | ♣K | +1 | 110 | 84% | 3N | S | ♦3 | +1 | 630 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 82% | ||||
| 1♥ | N | +1 | 110 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs MAN EATING COBRAS 1 : 3 VP (match 85095) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 3♥ | N | ♦K | = | 140 | 66% | 2♥ | N | ♠2 | +1 | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | E | ♠6 | = | 90 | 90% | 3N | S | ♦3 | +2 | 660 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+1.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 1N | E | = | 90 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs POLAND KIDS 4 : 0 VP (match 85096) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | POLAND KIDS | |
| 3♥ | N | ♦K | = | 140 | 66% | 5♦ | E | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♣K | +1 | 630 | 82% | 3N | N | ♣K | = | 600 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 66% | ||||
| 3N | N | +1 | 630 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | = | 600 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs DABROWKA PO 2 : 2 VP (match 85097) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | DABROWKA PO | |
| 4♦ | E | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 66% | 3♥ | N | ♦A | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 2♣x | E | ♠6 | -2 | 300 | 73% | 3N | S | ♠4 | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 66% | ||||
| 2♣x | E | -2 | 300 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -2 | 200 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT 4 : 0 VP (match 85098) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | |
| 3♥ | N | ♦A | = | 140 | 66% | 4♦ | E | ♥9 | = | 130 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠4 | = | 600 | 50% | 2N | N | ♣Q | +2 | 180 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 97% | ||||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 2N | N | +2 | 180 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ KQ7 ♥ AQJ653 ♦ 93 ♣ Q4 | ||
| ♠ AJ54 ♥ 742 ♦ Q ♣ 76532 | 17 Dlr N None | ♠ 92 ♥ T ♦ AK87542 ♣ AJ8 |
| ♠ T863 ♥ K98 ♦ JT6 ♣ KT9 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 4 |
| S | 4 | 6 | 9 | 4 | 4 |
| E | 5 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 7 |
| W | 5 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 7 |
| ♠ KJ8 ♥ AQ96 ♦ QJ74 ♣ 86 | ||
| ♠ A94 ♥ 87432 ♦ 532 ♣ 72 | 18 Dlr E N-S | ♠ QT52 ♥ T ♦ KT8 ♣ KQ954 |
| ♠ 763 ♥ KJ5 ♦ A96 ♣ AJT3 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 8 |
| S | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 7 |
| E | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| W | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |