Knockout event — places follow from the bracket: shared places (e.g. 5-8) are teams eliminated in the same phase; an unplayed decider leaves the place shared. Click a team for its players below.

Final placement
Place	Team
1	SXMARS
2	POLAND
3	SXSATURN
4	SXVENUS
5-8	RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT
5-8	EYE OF THE TIGER
5-8	SHARKS
5-8	SHSLLS1

Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.

Rounds included so far (3 of 3): R1 R2 R3. Columns QF·1… = each player's Butler total in that stanza (each knockout phase is played in segments); they sum to Total.

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	POLAND	39	57	protocol →
	Open EWM.Roches – P.Tchoulkine -8.4 / 16 bdClosed NSC.Bens – L.Bonin -12.2 / 16 bd
1	POLAND	25	16	protocol →
	Open EWM.Roches – P.Tchoulkine +21.3 / 16 bdClosed NSC.Bens – L.Bonin -6.8 / 16 bd
Total IMP	64

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	EYE OF THE TIGER	57	39	protocol →
	Open NSM.Stasik – L.Kasperczyk +8.4 / 16 bdClosed EWK.Ciborowski – L.Ciborowska +12.2 / 16 bd
1	EYE OF THE TIGER	16	25	protocol →
	Open NSM.Stasik – L.Kasperczyk -21.3 / 16 bdClosed EWK.Kuflowski – F.Kurlit +6.8 / 16 bd
2	SXSATURN	31	33	protocol →
	Open EWK.Kuflowski – F.Kurlit +3.7 / 14 bdClosed NSK.Ciborowski – L.Ciborowska +0.9 / 14 bd
2	SXSATURN	40	10	protocol →
	Open EWK.Kuflowski – F.Kurlit +11.4 / 14 bdClosed NSL.Kasperczyk – M.Stasik +32.3 / 14 bd
2	SXSATURN	44	15	protocol →
	Open EWK.Kuflowski – F.Kurlit +7.2 / 14 bdClosed NSK.Ciborowski – L.Ciborowska +29.6 / 14 bd
2	SXSATURN	19	46	protocol →
	Open EWL.Kasperczyk – M.Stasik -47.2 / 14 bdClosed NSK.Ciborowski – L.Ciborowska +8.7 / 14 bd
3	SXMARS	23	33	protocol →
	Open NSF.Kurlit – K.Kuflowski +8.3 / 14 bdClosed EWK.Ciborowski – L.Ciborowska -19.7 / 14 bd
3	SXMARS	33	47	protocol →
	Open NSF.Kurlit – K.Kuflowski -14.9 / 14 bdClosed EWM.Stasik – L.Kasperczyk -0.0 / 14 bd
3	SXMARS	39	22	protocol →
	Open NSK.Ciborowski – L.Ciborowska +9.6 / 14 bdClosed EWK.Kuflowski – F.Kurlit +14.8 / 14 bd
3	SXMARS	41	50	protocol →
	Open NSK.Ciborowski – L.Ciborowska -9.0 / 14 bdClosed EWK.Kuflowski – F.Kurlit -9.0 / 14 bd
Total IMP	343

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	SXSATURN	21	54	protocol →
	Open EWZ.Sun – Z.Chang -10.4 / 16 bdClosed NSJ.Huang – Z.Zhuo -27.6 / 16 bd
1	SXSATURN	14	72	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Huang – Z.Zhuo -40.8 / 16 bdClosed NSX.Lin – Z.Wang -26.5 / 16 bd
Total IMP	35

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	SXMARS	29	47	protocol →
	Open NSA.Brogeland – A.Landsvik -4.8 / 16 bdClosed EWJ.Bakhshi – M.Bertheau -7.0 / 16 bd
1	SXMARS	24	38	protocol →
	Open NSM.Bertheau – J.Bakhshi -2.2 / 16 bdClosed EWA.Landsvik – A.Brogeland -12.7 / 16 bd
Total IMP	53

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	SXVENUS	23	78	protocol →
	Open NSS.Yang – M.Xu -22.4 / 16 bdClosed EWN.Xu – Y.Jiang -40.8 / 16 bd
1	SXVENUS	39	50	protocol →
	Open NSS.Yang – M.Xu -2.8 / 16 bdClosed EWN.Xu – Y.Jiang -5.9 / 16 bd
Total IMP	62

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	SHARKS	47	29	protocol →
	Open EWN.Lang – F.Yu +4.8 / 16 bdClosed NSH.Shen – Y.Fu +7.0 / 16 bd
1	SHARKS	38	24	protocol →
	Open EWN.Lang – F.Yu +2.2 / 16 bdClosed NSY.Fu – Z.Gao +12.7 / 16 bd
2	SXVENUS	50	18	protocol →
	Open EWY.Fu – Z.Gao +23.0 / 14 bdClosed NSN.Lang – F.Yu +25.6 / 14 bd
2	SXVENUS	35	6	protocol →
	Open EWN.Lang – F.Yu +30.7 / 14 bdClosed NSH.Shen – Y.Fu +9.6 / 14 bd
2	SXVENUS	44	29	protocol →
	Open EWH.Shen – Z.Gao +20.6 / 14 bdClosed NSN.Lang – Z.Wang -1.7 / 14 bd
2	SXVENUS	54	33	protocol →
	Open EWY.Fu – Z.Gao +43.3 / 14 bdClosed NSZ.Wang – F.Yu -12.3 / 14 bd
3	POLAND	33	23	protocol →
	Open EWN.Lang – F.Yu -8.3 / 14 bdClosed NSY.Fu – H.Shen +19.7 / 14 bd
3	POLAND	47	33	protocol →
	Open EWZ.Gao – N.Lang +14.9 / 14 bdClosed NSY.Fu – H.Shen +0.0 / 14 bd
3	POLAND	22	39	protocol →
	Open EWZ.Gao – Y.Fu -9.6 / 14 bdClosed NSN.Lang – F.Yu -14.8 / 14 bd
3	POLAND	50	41	protocol →
	Open EWH.Shen – Y.Fu +9.0 / 14 bdClosed NSN.Lang – F.Yu +9.0 / 14 bd
Total IMP	420

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT	54	21	protocol →
	Open NSS.Li – X.Zhang +10.4 / 16 bdClosed EWY.Wu – Z.Lu +27.6 / 16 bd
1	RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT	72	14	protocol →
	Open NSS.Li – X.Zhang +40.8 / 16 bdClosed EWT.Tang – Z.Lu +26.5 / 16 bd
2	POLAND	33	31	protocol →
	Open NSS.Li – X.Zhang -3.7 / 14 bdClosed EWT.Tang – Z.Lu -0.9 / 14 bd
2	POLAND	10	40	protocol →
	Open NSS.Li – Z.Tian -11.4 / 14 bdClosed EWY.Wu – Z.Lu -32.3 / 14 bd
2	POLAND	15	44	protocol →
	Open NSY.Wu – T.Tang -7.2 / 14 bdClosed EWS.Li – X.Zhang -29.6 / 14 bd
2	POLAND	46	19	protocol →
	Open NSS.Li – X.Zhang +47.2 / 14 bdClosed EWT.Tang – Z.Lu -8.7 / 14 bd
3	SXVENUS	25	32	protocol →
	Open EWT.Tang – Y.Wu +7.1 / 14 bdClosed NSS.Li – X.Zhang -21.1 / 14 bd
3	SXVENUS	31	41	protocol →
	Open EWS.Li – Z.Tian -14.3 / 14 bdClosed NSY.Wu – Z.Lu +0.7 / 14 bd
3	SXVENUS	50	9	protocol →
	Open EWS.Li – X.Zhang +24.7 / 14 bdClosed NST.Tang – Z.Lu +29.7 / 14 bd
Total IMP	336

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	SHSLLS1	78	23	protocol →
	Open EWS.Ma – F.Lin +22.4 / 16 bdClosed NSZ.Xie – J.Wang +40.8 / 16 bd
1	SHSLLS1	50	39	protocol →
	Open EWH.Jiang – F.Lin +2.8 / 16 bdClosed NSZ.Xie – J.Yang +5.9 / 16 bd
2	SXMARS	18	50	protocol →
	Open NSZ.Xie – J.Yang -23.0 / 14 bdClosed EWH.Jiang – S.Ma -25.6 / 14 bd
2	SXMARS	6	35	protocol →
	Open NSJ.Wang – J.Yang -30.7 / 14 bdClosed EWH.Jiang – F.Lin -9.6 / 14 bd
2	SXMARS	29	44	protocol →
	Open NSZ.Xie – J.Wang -20.6 / 14 bdClosed EWF.Lin – S.Ma +1.7 / 14 bd
2	SXMARS	33	54	protocol →
	Open NSF.Lin – S.Ma -43.3 / 14 bdClosed EWZ.Xie – J.Yang +12.3 / 14 bd
3	SXSATURN	32	25	protocol →
	Open NSJ.Yang – Z.Xie -7.1 / 14 bdClosed EWH.Jiang – F.Lin +21.1 / 14 bd
3	SXSATURN	41	31	protocol →
	Open NSS.Ma – F.Lin +14.3 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Wang – Z.Xie -0.7 / 14 bd
3	SXSATURN	9	50	protocol →
	Open NSH.Jiang – F.Lin -24.7 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Wang – Z.Xie -29.7 / 14 bd
Total IMP	296

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	Total	Avg/bd	Qual.	QF·1	QF·2	SF·1	SF·2	SF·3	SF·4	F·1	F·2	F·3	F·4
1	Z.Gao	SXMARS	86	+104.9	+1.22	+36.9	+12.7	·	+23.0	+20.6	+43.3	·	+14.9	-9.6	·	·
2	Y.Fu	SXMARS	130	+114.7	+0.88	+57.3	+7.0	+12.7	+23.0	+9.6	+43.3	·	+19.7	+0.0	-9.6	+9.0
3	H.Shen	SXMARS	86	+65.9	+0.77	+7.4	+7.0	·	+9.6	+20.6	·	·	+19.7	+0.0	+9.0	·
4	X.Zhang	SXSATURN	102	+68.7	+0.67	+62.2	+10.4	+40.8	-3.7	-29.6	+47.2	·	-21.1	+24.7	·	·
5	T.Tang	SXSATURN	86	+46.5	+0.54	+28.8	+26.5	·	-0.9	-7.2	-8.7	·	+7.1	+29.7	·	·
6	N.Lang	SXMARS	130	+62.4	+0.48	-3.9	+4.8	+2.2	+25.6	+30.7	-1.7	·	-8.3	+14.9	-14.8	+9.0
7	Z.Lu	SXSATURN	102	+42.6	+0.42	+11.4	+27.6	+26.5	-0.9	-32.3	-8.7	·	+0.7	+29.7	·	·
8	M.Roches	EYE OF THE TIGER	32	+12.9	+0.40	+28.9	-8.4	+21.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
8	P.Tchoulkine	EYE OF THE TIGER	32	+12.9	+0.40	+28.9	-8.4	+21.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
10	S.Li	SXSATURN	130	+43.0	+0.33	+68.0	+10.4	+40.8	-3.7	-11.4	-29.6	+47.2	-21.1	-14.3	+24.7	·
11	L.Ciborowska	POLAND	100	+32.3	+0.32	+52.9	+12.2	·	+0.9	+29.6	+8.7	·	-19.7	+9.6	-9.0	·
11	K.Ciborowski	POLAND	100	+32.3	+0.32	+52.9	+12.2	·	+0.9	+29.6	+8.7	·	-19.7	+9.6	-9.0	·
13	F.Yu	SXMARS	116	+36.9	+0.32	+15.2	+4.8	+2.2	+25.6	+30.7	-12.3	·	-8.3	-14.8	+9.0	·
14	K.Kuflowski	POLAND	114	+28.3	+0.25	+23.1	+6.8	·	+3.7	+11.4	+7.2	·	+8.3	-14.9	+14.8	-9.0
14	F.Kurlit	POLAND	114	+28.3	+0.25	+23.1	+6.8	·	+3.7	+11.4	+7.2	·	+8.3	-14.9	+14.8	-9.0
16	Y.Wu	SXSATURN	72	-4.1	-0.06	+14.6	+27.6	·	-32.3	-7.2	·	·	+7.1	+0.7	·	·
17	F.Lin	SXVENUS	116	-15.3	-0.13	+62.1	+22.4	+2.8	-9.6	+1.7	-43.3	·	+21.1	+14.3	-24.7	·
18	Z.Xie	SXVENUS	116	-22.1	-0.19	-13.9	+40.8	+5.9	-23.0	-20.6	+12.3	·	-7.1	-0.7	-29.7	·
19	J.Bakhshi	SHARKS	32	-9.2	-0.29	+73.7	-7.0	-2.2	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
19	M.Bertheau	SHARKS	32	-9.2	-0.29	+73.7	-7.0	-2.2	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
21	L.Kasperczyk	POLAND	74	-27.8	-0.38	+23.2	+8.4	-21.3	+32.3	-47.2	·	·	-0.0	·	·	·
21	M.Stasik	POLAND	74	-27.8	-0.38	+23.2	+8.4	-21.3	+32.3	-47.2	·	·	-0.0	·	·	·
23	S.Ma	SXVENUS	72	-30.5	-0.42	+7.0	+22.4	·	-25.6	+1.7	-43.3	·	+14.3	·	·	·
24	H.Jiang	SXVENUS	72	-36.0	-0.50	-57.3	+2.8	·	-25.6	-9.6	·	·	+21.1	-24.7	·	·
24	Z.Wang	SXMARS	28	-14.0	-0.50	-24.3	·	·	-1.7	-12.3	·	·	·	·	·	·
26	A.Brogeland	SHARKS	32	-17.5	-0.55	+44.2	-4.8	-12.7	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
26	A.Landsvik	SHARKS	32	-17.5	-0.55	+44.2	-4.8	-12.7	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
28	J.Wang	SXVENUS	72	-40.9	-0.57	+36.6	+40.8	·	-30.7	-20.6	·	·	-0.7	-29.7	·	·
29	J.Yang	SXVENUS	72	-42.6	-0.59	+21.5	+5.9	·	-23.0	-30.7	+12.3	·	-7.1	·	·	·
30	C.Bens	EYE OF THE TIGER	32	-19.0	-0.59	-5.8	-12.2	-6.8	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
30	L.Bonin	EYE OF THE TIGER	32	-19.0	-0.59	-5.8	-12.2	-6.8	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
32	Z.Chang	RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT	16	-10.4	-0.65	-42.5	-10.4	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
32	Z.Sun	RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT	16	-10.4	-0.65	-42.5	-10.4	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
34	M.Xu	SHSLLS1	32	-25.2	-0.79	+11.9	-22.4	-2.8	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
34	S.Yang	SHSLLS1	32	-25.2	-0.79	+18.4	-22.4	-2.8	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
36	Z.Tian	SXSATURN	28	-25.7	-0.92	+36.2	·	·	-11.4	·	·	·	-14.3	·	·	·
37	Y.Jiang	SHSLLS1	32	-46.7	-1.46	+137.3	-40.8	-5.9	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
37	N.Xu	SHSLLS1	32	-46.7	-1.46	+137.2	-40.8	-5.9	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
39	X.Lin	RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT	16	-26.5	-1.66	+50.4	-26.5	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
39	Z.Wang	RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT	16	-26.5	-1.66	+50.4	-26.5	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
41	J.Huang	RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT	32	-68.4	-2.14	+3.9	-27.6	-40.8	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
41	Z.Zhuo	RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT	32	-68.4	-2.14	+3.9	-27.6	-40.8	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

vs parfull table →

#	Player	vs par
1	Z.Gao	+1.91
2	N.Lang	+0.70
3	X.Zhang	+0.52
4	Z.Lu	+0.51
5	Z.Xie	+0.41
6	S.Li	+0.40
7	K.Kuflowski	+0.39
7	F.Kurlit	+0.39
9	J.Yang	+0.36
10	F.Yu	+0.22
11	Y.Fu	+0.18
12	L.Kasperczyk	+0.12
1	Z.Gao	+1.91
2	N.Lang	+0.70
3	X.Zhang	+0.52
4	Z.Lu	+0.51
5	Z.Xie	+0.41
6	S.Li	+0.40
7	K.Kuflowski	+0.39
7	F.Kurlit	+0.39
9	J.Yang	+0.36
10	F.Yu	+0.22
11	Y.Fu	+0.18
12	L.Kasperczyk	+0.12
12	M.Stasik	+0.12
14	T.Tang	+0.06
15	H.Shen	-0.14
16	L.Ciborowska	-0.34
16	K.Ciborowski	-0.34
18	Y.Wu	-0.43
19	F.Lin	-0.44
20	H.Jiang	-0.62
21	S.Ma	-0.75
22	J.Wang	-0.89
23	Z.Chang	+1.25
23	Z.Sun	+1.25
25	M.Roches	+1.16
25	P.Tchoulkine	+1.16
27	J.Bakhshi	+1.00
27	M.Bertheau	+1.00
29	Z.Tian	-0.04
30	Y.Jiang	-0.25
30	N.Xu	-0.25
32	X.Lin	-0.69
32	Z.Wang	-0.69
34	C.Bens	-0.78
34	L.Bonin	-0.78
36	M.Xu	-1.03
36	S.Yang	-1.03
38	A.Brogeland	-1.62
38	A.Landsvik	-1.62
40	Z.Wang	-2.25
41	J.Huang	-2.75
41	Z.Zhuo	-2.75

Opening leadsfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	F.Kurlit	95.8%
2	T.Tang	94.7%
3	S.Li	90.3%
4	H.Shen	89.5%
4	J.Wang	89.5%
6	Z.Lu	89.3%
7	J.Yang	86.7%
8	Y.Fu	86.2%
9	F.Lin	85.2%
10	Z.Gao	81.8%
11	Z.Xie	80.0%
11	M.Stasik	80.0%
1	F.Kurlit	95.8%
2	T.Tang	94.7%
3	S.Li	90.3%
4	H.Shen	89.5%
4	J.Wang	89.5%
6	Z.Lu	89.3%
7	J.Yang	86.7%
8	Y.Fu	86.2%
9	F.Lin	85.2%
10	Z.Gao	81.8%
11	Z.Xie	80.0%
11	M.Stasik	80.0%
13	K.Kuflowski	78.3%
14	K.Ciborowski	78.1%
15	X.Zhang	77.3%
16	N.Lang	75.9%
17	F.Yu	71.1%
18	L.Ciborowska	70.0%
19	S.Ma	69.2%
20	H.Jiang	68.8%
21	L.Kasperczyk	65.0%
22	Y.Wu	58.3%
23	M.Roches	100.0%
23	M.Bertheau	100.0%
23	Z.Chang	100.0%
23	Y.Jiang	100.0%
23	J.Huang	100.0%
23	Z.Zhuo	100.0%
29	Z.Tian	90.0%
30	N.Xu	88.9%
31	P.Tchoulkine	87.5%
32	Z.Sun	83.3%
33	X.Lin	80.0%
34	A.Brogeland	80.0%
35	A.Landsvik	75.0%
35	L.Bonin	75.0%
37	Z.Wang	75.0%
38	C.Bens	72.7%
39	Z.Wang	71.4%
40	M.Xu	60.0%
41	J.Bakhshi	50.0%
42	S.Yang	16.7%

Declarer playfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	J.Wang	86.4%
2	K.Kuflowski	82.9%
3	N.Lang	82.8%
4	M.Stasik	80.0%
5	H.Jiang	80.0%
6	L.Kasperczyk	77.8%
7	H.Shen	77.8%
8	Y.Fu	77.1%
9	Y.Wu	76.5%
10	T.Tang	73.9%
11	Z.Gao	73.7%
12	X.Zhang	72.7%
1	J.Wang	86.4%
2	K.Kuflowski	82.9%
3	N.Lang	82.8%
4	M.Stasik	80.0%
5	H.Jiang	80.0%
6	L.Kasperczyk	77.8%
7	H.Shen	77.8%
8	Y.Fu	77.1%
9	Y.Wu	76.5%
10	T.Tang	73.9%
11	Z.Gao	73.7%
12	X.Zhang	72.7%
13	K.Ciborowski	72.2%
14	S.Ma	72.0%
15	F.Kurlit	71.0%
16	Z.Lu	71.0%
17	F.Yu	69.2%
18	F.Lin	69.2%
19	Z.Xie	69.0%
20	S.Li	62.5%
21	J.Yang	60.0%
22	L.Ciborowska	60.0%
23	M.Roches	100.0%
23	Z.Sun	100.0%
23	Z.Tian	100.0%
23	Z.Wang	100.0%
27	J.Huang	92.3%
28	J.Bakhshi	85.7%
28	M.Bertheau	85.7%
28	M.Xu	85.7%
31	Z.Zhuo	83.3%
32	P.Tchoulkine	81.8%
33	C.Bens	80.0%
33	Y.Jiang	80.0%
35	A.Landsvik	75.0%
36	L.Bonin	71.4%
37	A.Brogeland	66.7%
37	Z.Chang	66.7%
37	S.Yang	66.7%
40	N.Xu	63.6%
41	Z.Wang	62.5%
42	X.Lin	50.0%

Defencefull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	Z.Lu	90.9%
2	T.Tang	89.5%
3	Y.Wu	88.9%
4	N.Lang	86.1%
5	H.Shen	85.7%
6	L.Kasperczyk	85.0%
6	M.Stasik	85.0%
8	F.Yu	83.6%
9	F.Lin	82.4%
10	L.Ciborowska	82.3%
10	K.Ciborowski	82.3%
12	Z.Gao	81.2%
1	Z.Lu	90.9%
2	T.Tang	89.5%
3	Y.Wu	88.9%
4	N.Lang	86.1%
5	H.Shen	85.7%
6	L.Kasperczyk	85.0%
6	M.Stasik	85.0%
8	F.Yu	83.6%
9	F.Lin	82.4%
10	L.Ciborowska	82.3%
10	K.Ciborowski	82.3%
12	Z.Gao	81.2%
13	S.Li	81.0%
14	K.Kuflowski	80.9%
14	F.Kurlit	80.9%
16	Z.Xie	80.7%
17	J.Wang	80.0%
18	S.Ma	79.2%
19	X.Zhang	78.6%
20	H.Jiang	78.4%
21	J.Yang	77.8%
22	Y.Fu	76.8%
23	J.Bakhshi	100.0%
23	M.Bertheau	100.0%
25	M.Roches	88.2%
25	P.Tchoulkine	88.2%
27	Y.Jiang	87.5%
27	N.Xu	87.5%
29	Z.Tian	85.7%
30	J.Huang	75.0%
30	Z.Zhuo	75.0%
32	M.Xu	75.0%
32	S.Yang	75.0%
34	C.Bens	73.7%
34	L.Bonin	73.7%
36	A.Brogeland	72.2%
36	A.Landsvik	72.2%
38	Z.Chang	70.0%
38	Z.Sun	70.0%
40	Z.Wang	68.8%
41	X.Lin	61.5%
41	Z.Wang	61.5%

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top

Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.

Board	Tables	Swing	Best for NS	Best for EW
Final · Bd 5	4	28.6	6♠ +1430 SXVENUS (+14.3)	6♠ +200 SXVENUS (+14.3)
Semifinal · Bd 23	4	27.4	6♠x +800 POLAND (+12.7)	4♠ +620 POLAND (+14.7)
Semifinal · Bd 31	4	25.7	6♥ +100 POLAND (+10.0)	6♥ +1430 SXVENUS (+15.7)
Final · Bd 6	4	25.7	5♦x +1100 SXMARS (+15.0)	5♠x +300 SXVENUS (+10.7)
Semifinal · Bd 8	4	25.0	4♠ +420 SXMARS (+13.0)	4♥x +790 SXMARS (+12.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 32	8	23.4	4♥ +100 SXVENUS (+11.4)	3NTx +1150 SXMARS (+12.0)
Final · Bd 18	4	23.3	6♦ +1370 SXSATURN (+13.0)	4♥x -300 SXMARS (+10.3)
Final · Bd 24	4	23.3	3NT +50 SXMARS (+11.3)	6♦ +920 SXVENUS (+12.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 10	8	22.1	7♦ +2140 SXMARS (+14.4)	3NT -720 RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT (+7.7)
Semifinal · Bd 12	4	22.0	3NT +150 POLAND (+12.0)	1NTxx +760 POLAND (+10.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 3	8	21.9	5♦x +800 SHARKS (+9.3)	4♠x +300 SXVENUS (+12.6)
Semifinal · Bd 50	4	21.7	6♥ +1010 SXSATURN (+8.7)	7♥ +50 SXMARS (+13.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 20	8	21.6	6♣x +1400 SHARKS (+13.0)	5♣ -200 EYE OF THE TIGER (+8.6)
Semifinal · Bd 49	4	21.4	6♣ +50 POLAND (+12.7)	6♣ +940 SXVENUS (+8.7)

Stages

Tables

Rounds

Opatija 2019 — Knockout U16

Knockout bracket↑ top

Tournament standings — final placement↑ top

EYE OF THE TIGER — results↑ top

POLAND — results↑ top

RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT — results↑ top

SHARKS — results↑ top

SHSLLS1 — results↑ top

SXMARS — results↑ top

SXSATURN — results↑ top

SXVENUS — results↑ top

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top