Round 10 — U26 BAM Qualification
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 10 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | AUSTRIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | 50 50 | INDIA-B U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ HU | PRISM FALCONS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GREISNOR | INDIA U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA RDFZ | HAPPY BRIDGE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MAN EATING COBRAS | CAPRISUN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND KIDS | SERBALICIOUS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDIA U16 | SXNEBULA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA-A U26 | SXSPARK | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | DABROWKA | URUGUAY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SERBIA | BELGIUM | 1 | 3 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CROATIA U16 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHILE | HONG KONG | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | CS21MSCHOOL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DABROWKA PO | CONGO | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | ITALIA 2 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | GERMANY | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 10↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 10 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R10 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SXNEBULA | 29.20 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ | 28.40 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 3 | AUSTRIA | 28.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 4 | INDIA-A U26 | 27.80 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 5 | GREISNOR | 27.60 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 6 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 27.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 6 | INDIA-B U26 | 27.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 8 | ITALIA 2 | 25.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 9 | URUGUAY | 24.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 10 | ISRAEL | 23.40 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 11 | PRISM FALCONS | 23.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 12 | SERBALICIOUS | 22.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 13 | CHILE | 21.40 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 13 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 21.40 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 15 | 50 50 | 20.60 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 16 | DABROWKA | 20.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 16 | GERMANY | 20.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 18 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 19.80 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 18 | POLAND KIDS | 19.80 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 20 | HONG KONG | 19.20 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 21 | INDIA U21 | 19.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 21 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 19.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 23 | SERBIA | 17.80 | 2.40 | 10 |
| 24 | INDIA U16 | 15.80 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 25 | DABROWKA PO | 15.40 | 2.40 | 10 |
| 26 | CAPRISUN | 14.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 27 | CROATIA U16 | 13.40 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 28 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 12.80 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 29 | CS21MSCHOOL | 12.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 29 | SXSPARK | 12.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 29 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 12.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 32 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 11.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 33 | CONGO | 5.60 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 34 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 10 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R10 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs AUSTRIA 0 : 4 VP (match 83345) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | AUSTRIA | |
| 4♥x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 86% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 4N | N | ♠3 | +1 | 660 | 52% | 3N | N | ♠3 | +4 | 720 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | ||||
| 4N | N | +1 | 660 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +4 | 720 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs INDIA-B U26 0 : 4 VP (match 83346) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 4♥x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 86% | 4♥ | S | ♣K | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 6♥ | N | ♣A | -8 | 800 | 100% | 5♦ | S | ♠T | +1 | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS0.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | ||||
| 6♥ | N | -8 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | +1 | 620 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HU vs PRISM FALCONS 2 : 2 VP (match 83347) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HU | PRISM FALCONS | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣A | = | 420 | 70% | 4♥x | S | ♣A | = | 590 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♠3 | +4 | 720 | 94% | 3♦ | S | ♠T | +3 | 170 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | S | = | 590 | 97% | ||||
| 3N | N | +4 | 720 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | +3 | 170 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GREISNOR vs INDIA U21 4 : 0 VP (match 83348) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GREISNOR | INDIA U21 | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣A | = | 420 | 70% | 4♣ | W | ♥9 | +1 | 150 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣7 | +3 | 690 | 73% | 5♦ | S | ♠T | +1 | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | W | +1 | 150 | 95% | ||||
| 3N | S | +3 | 690 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | +1 | 620 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs HAPPY BRIDGE 4 : 0 VP (match 83349) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 73% | 4♥x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♣A | +2 | 660 | 52% | 5♦ | S | ♠T | +1 | 620 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| 3N | N | +2 | 660 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | +1 | 620 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs CAPRISUN 3 : 1 VP (match 83350) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | CAPRISUN | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣A | = | 420 | 70% | 4♥ | S | ♣A | = | 420 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | N | ♣A | +2 | 680 | 55% | 3♦ | S | ♠9 | +2 | 150 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | +2 | 150 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs SERBALICIOUS 3 : 1 VP (match 83351) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | SERBALICIOUS | |
| 4♥x | S | ♣K | = | 590 | 97% | 4♥ | S | ♣A | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♠3 | +3 | 690 | 73% | 3N | S | ♣7 | +3 | 690 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥x | S | = | 590 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | ||||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +3 | 690 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs SXNEBULA 1 : 3 VP (match 83352) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | SXNEBULA | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣A | = | 420 | 70% | 4♥ | S | ♣A | = | 420 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | N | ♣A | +1 | 630 | 62% | 3N | S | ♣7 | +3 | 690 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | ||||
| 3N | N | +1 | 630 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +3 | 690 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-A U26 vs SXSPARK 4 : 0 VP (match 83353) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-A U26 | SXSPARK | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣A | = | 420 | 70% | 4♥ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠T | +4 | 720 | 94% | 3N | N | ♠3 | +3 | 690 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS0.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| 3N | S | +4 | 720 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs URUGUAY 2 : 2 VP (match 83354) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | URUGUAY | |
| 5♦ | E | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 55% | 4♥ | S | ♣K | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♠3 | +3 | 690 | 73% | 5♦ | S | ♣7 | = | 600 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | E | -2 | 200 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | ||||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83355) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA | BELGIUM | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 73% | 4♥ | S | ♣K | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♠2 | +3 | 690 | 73% | 3N | N | ♠3 | +3 | 690 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | ||||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 4 : 0 VP (match 83356) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣A | = | 420 | 70% | 4♥ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | S | ♠T | +3 | 170 | 83% | 3♦ | S | ♣2 | +2 | 150 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| 3♦ | S | +3 | 170 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | +2 | 150 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs HONG KONG 4 : 0 VP (match 83357) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | HONG KONG | |
| 5♣ | W | ♥9 | -1 | 100 | 58% | 4♥ | S | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣x | W | ♦A | -3 | 800 | 100% | 3N | N | ♣A | +1 | 630 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 73% | ||||
| 3♣x | W | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +1 | 630 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs CS21MSCHOOL 2 : 2 VP (match 83358) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | CS21MSCHOOL | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣A | = | 420 | 70% | 4♥x | S | ♣K | = | 590 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣7 | +2 | 660 | 52% | 5♦ | S | ♠T | = | 600 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | S | = | 590 | 97% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs CONGO 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83359) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | CONGO | |
| Pass | — | 0 | 62% | Pass | — | 0 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Pass | — | 0 | 95% | Pass | — | 0 | 95% | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| Pass | 0 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Pass | 0 | 62% | ||||||
| Pass | 0 | 95% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Pass | 0 | 95% | ||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs ITALIA 2 1 : 3 VP (match 83360) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | ITALIA 2 | |
| 4♣ | W | ♥3 | +1 | 150 | 95% | 4♥x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♠2 | +3 | 690 | 73% | 3N | N | ♠3 | +3 | 690 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | W | +1 | 150 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 2 : 2 VP (match 83361) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣A | = | 420 | 70% | 5♣x | W | ♥7 | = | 750 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 58% | 3N | N | ♠3 | +3 | 690 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | W | = | 750 | 100% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ A732 ♥ 97632 ♦ K98 ♣ 2 | ||
| ♠ Q9 ♥ 8 ♦ QJ42 ♣ AK9743 | 19 Dlr S E-W | ♠ T84 ♥ A4 ♦ AT765 ♣ T65 |
| ♠ KJ65 ♥ KQJT5 ♦ 3 ♣ QJ8 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| S | 1 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| E | 9 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 11 |
| W | 9 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 11 |
| ♠ K86 ♥ Q765 ♦ A9 ♣ JT54 | ||
| ♠ T94 ♥ J94 ♦ 8 ♣ Q98732 | 20 Dlr W Both | ♠ A7532 ♥ T32 ♦ T64 ♣ A6 |
| ♠ QJ ♥ AK8 ♦ KQJ7532 ♣ K |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 10 | 7 | 11 | 11 | 8 |
| S | 10 | 7 | 11 | 11 | 8 |
| E | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| W | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 |