Round 9 — U26 BAM Qualification
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 9 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | INDIA-B U26 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | 50 50 | PRISM FALCONS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ HU | INDIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GREISNOR | HAPPY BRIDGE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA RDFZ | CAPRISUN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MAN EATING COBRAS | SERBALICIOUS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND KIDS | SXNEBULA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDIA U16 | SXSPARK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA-A U26 | URUGUAY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | DABROWKA | BELGIUM | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SERBIA | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CROATIA U16 | HONG KONG | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHILE | CS21MSCHOOL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | CONGO | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DABROWKA PO | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | GERMANY | AUSTRIA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 9↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 9 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R9 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SXNEBULA | 26.20 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 2 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 25.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ | 24.40 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 4 | AUSTRIA | 24.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 5 | INDIA-A U26 | 23.80 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 6 | GREISNOR | 23.60 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 7 | INDIA-B U26 | 23.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 8 | ITALIA 2 | 22.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 8 | URUGUAY | 22.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 10 | ISRAEL | 21.40 | 2.40 | 9 |
| 11 | PRISM FALCONS | 21.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 11 | SERBALICIOUS | 21.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 13 | 50 50 | 20.60 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 14 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 19.40 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 15 | HONG KONG | 19.20 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 16 | INDIA U21 | 19.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 17 | DABROWKA | 18.00 | 2.40 | 9 |
| 17 | GERMANY | 18.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 17 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 18.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 20 | CHILE | 17.40 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 21 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 16.80 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 21 | POLAND KIDS | 16.80 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 23 | SERBIA | 15.40 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 24 | INDIA U16 | 14.80 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 25 | CAPRISUN | 13.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 25 | DABROWKA PO | 13.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 27 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 12.80 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 28 | SXSPARK | 12.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 28 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 12.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 30 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 11.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 31 | CS21MSCHOOL | 10.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 32 | CROATIA U16 | 9.40 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 33 | CONGO | 5.60 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 34 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 9 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R9 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs INDIA-B U26 1 : 3 VP (match 83328) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | = | 420 | 70% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | = | 420 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠ | E | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 3N | W | ♦5 | -5 | 250 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 70% | ||||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -5 | 250 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs PRISM FALCONS 4 : 0 VP (match 83329) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | PRISM FALCONS | |
| 5♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 70% | 5♠x | N | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♣3 | -3 | 150 | 74% | 4♠x | E | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 5♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | -3 | 150 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | E | -1 | 100 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HU vs INDIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 83330) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HU | INDIA U21 | |
| 5♠x | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 86% | 6♥x | W | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | E | ♣3 | -2 | 300 | 92% | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 6♥x | W | -1 | 100 | 50% | ||||
| 4♠x | E | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GREISNOR vs HAPPY BRIDGE 4 : 0 VP (match 83331) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GREISNOR | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | +1 | 450 | 88% | 5♠x | N | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | E | ♣3 | -2 | 300 | 92% | 4♠ | E | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 5♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| 4♠x | E | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs CAPRISUN 2 : 2 VP (match 83332) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | CAPRISUN | |
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | +1 | 450 | 88% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠x | E | ♥2 | = | 470 | 100% | 4♠ | E | ♦6 | -2 | 100 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 70% | ||||
| 2♠x | E | = | 470 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs SERBALICIOUS 2 : 2 VP (match 83333) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | SERBALICIOUS | |
| 4♠x | N | ♥A | = | 590 | 97% | 5♠x | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 4♠x | E | ♣3 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | N | = | 590 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 5♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | E | -1 | 100 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs SXNEBULA 0 : 4 VP (match 83334) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | SXNEBULA | |
| 5♠x | S | ♥T | -1 | 100 | 86% | 5♠ | N | ♥K | = | 450 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | E | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 3♠x | E | ♦6 | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | N | = | 450 | 88% | ||||
| 4♠x | E | -1 | 100 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | E | -2 | 300 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs SXSPARK 0 : 4 VP (match 83335) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | SXSPARK | |
| 5♥ | W | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 58% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 4♠x | E | ♦6 | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 70% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | E | -2 | 300 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-A U26 vs URUGUAY 2 : 2 VP (match 83336) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-A U26 | URUGUAY | |
| 5♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 70% | 5♦x | W | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | E | ♦6 | -2 | 100 | 52% | 4♠ | E | ♥J | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 5♦x | W | -1 | 100 | 50% | ||||
| 3♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83337) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | BELGIUM | |
| 6♥x | W | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 50% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♣T | -2 | 100 | 52% | 4♣x | S | ♠A | -1 | 200 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥x | W | -1 | 100 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 70% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4♣x | S | -1 | 200 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 0 : 4 VP (match 83338) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | = | 420 | 70% | 4♠x | N | ♥A | = | 590 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | E | ♦6 | -2 | 100 | 52% | 4♠ | E | ♣3 | -3 | 150 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | N | = | 590 | 97% | ||||
| 2♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -3 | 150 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs HONG KONG 2 : 2 VP (match 83339) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | HONG KONG | |
| 5♥x | W | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 50% | 6♠ | N | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | E | ♠2 | = | 140 | 94% | 4♠ | E | ♦6 | -4 | 200 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♥x | W | -1 | 100 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -4 | 200 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs CS21MSCHOOL 3 : 1 VP (match 83340) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | CS21MSCHOOL | |
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | = | 420 | 70% | 5♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | E | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 4♠ | W | ♣2 | -2 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| 3♠x | E | -1 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs CONGO 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83341) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | CONGO | |
| Pass | — | 0 | 62% | Pass | — | 0 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Pass | — | 0 | 89% | Pass | — | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| Pass | 0 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Pass | 0 | 62% | ||||||
| Pass | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Pass | 0 | 89% | ||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 83342) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | ITALIA 2 | |
| 4♠x | N | ♥A | = | 590 | 97% | 5♠x | N | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♦3 | -2 | 100 | 52% | 4♠ | E | ♦6 | -3 | 150 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | N | = | 590 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 5♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -3 | 150 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 2 : 2 VP (match 83343) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 5♠x | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 86% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♣3 | -3 | 150 | 74% | 4♠ | E | ♥5 | -2 | 100 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 70% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | -3 | 150 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs AUSTRIA 4 : 0 VP (match 83344) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | AUSTRIA | |
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | = | 420 | 70% | 6♠x | N | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 5♠x | E | ♣3 | -3 | 500 | 100% | 4♠ | E | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 6♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| 5♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ AKQT97 ♥ 5 ♦ K985 ♣ A6 | ||
| ♠ 5 ♥ T9876 ♦ A732 ♣ KQ8 | 17 Dlr N None | ♠ – ♥ AKQ3 ♦ QJ64 ♣ T9752 |
| ♠ J86432 ♥ J42 ♦ T ♣ J43 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| S | 7 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| E | 5 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 10 |
| W | 5 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 10 |
| ♠ – ♥ AQT ♦ JT852 ♣ QJ742 | ||
| ♠ A43 ♥ K87643 ♦ K ♣ 965 | 18 Dlr E N-S | ♠ QJ965 ♥ 9 ♦ AQ974 ♣ A8 |
| ♠ KT872 ♥ J52 ♦ 63 ♣ KT3 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 7 |
| S | 7 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
| E | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| W | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 |