Round 12 — U26 BAM Qualification
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 12 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | 50 50 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ HU | AUSTRIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GREISNOR | INDIA-B U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA RDFZ | PRISM FALCONS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MAN EATING COBRAS | INDIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND KIDS | HAPPY BRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDIA U16 | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA-A U26 | SERBALICIOUS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | DABROWKA | SXNEBULA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SERBIA | SXSPARK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CROATIA U16 | URUGUAY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHILE | BELGIUM | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DABROWKA PO | HONG KONG | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | CS21MSCHOOL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | GERMANY | CONGO | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 12↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 12 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R12 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHINA RDFZ | 34.40 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 2 | INDIA-A U26 | 33.80 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 3 | GREISNOR | 33.60 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 4 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 33.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 5 | SXNEBULA | 31.20 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 6 | INDIA-B U26 | 31.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 7 | AUSTRIA | 30.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 8 | ISRAEL | 29.40 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 9 | ITALIA 2 | 29.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 10 | CHILE | 27.80 | 2.40 | 12 |
| 11 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 26.40 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 12 | SERBALICIOUS | 26.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 12 | URUGUAY | 26.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 14 | POLAND KIDS | 25.80 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 15 | 50 50 | 25.60 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 16 | PRISM FALCONS | 25.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 17 | GERMANY | 24.40 | 2.40 | 12 |
| 17 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 24.40 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 19 | HONG KONG | 24.20 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 20 | DABROWKA | 24.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 21 | INDIA U16 | 21.80 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 21 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 21.80 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 21 | SERBIA | 21.80 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 24 | INDIA U21 | 21.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 25 | DABROWKA PO | 18.40 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 26 | SXSPARK | 18.00 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 27 | CROATIA U16 | 17.80 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 28 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 17.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 29 | CS21MSCHOOL | 15.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 30 | CAPRISUN | 14.00 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 30 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 14.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 32 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 12.80 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 33 | CONGO | 5.60 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 34 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 12 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 12 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R12 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 83379) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | ITALIA 2 | |
| 3N | W | ♠J | +1 | 630 | 59% | 3♦ | E | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 2N | S | ♠6 | +1 | 150 | 88% | 2♣ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 100% | ||||
| 2N | S | +1 | 150 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 2 : 2 VP (match 83380) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 3♣ | W | ♥7 | +1 | 130 | 82% | 3N | W | ♥7 | +3 | 690 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠x | W | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 71% | 2♦ | N | ♣A | +1 | 110 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +3 | 690 | 100% | ||||
| 2♠x | W | -1 | 100 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | N | +1 | 110 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HU vs AUSTRIA 3 : 1 VP (match 83381) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HU | AUSTRIA | |
| 3N | W | ♥6 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 3N | W | ♥3 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠x | E | ♥T | -1 | 100 | 71% | 2♠ | E | ♥T | = | 110 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 59% | ||||
| 2♠x | E | -1 | 100 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GREISNOR vs INDIA-B U26 2 : 2 VP (match 83382) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GREISNOR | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 3N | W | ♥7 | +2 | 660 | 85% | 3N | W | ♦2 | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | N | ♣A | +1 | 110 | 82% | 2♠x | E | ♥T | = | 470 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 59% | ||||
| 2♦ | N | +1 | 110 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | E | = | 470 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs PRISM FALCONS 2 : 2 VP (match 83383) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | PRISM FALCONS | |
| 3N | E | ♥A | +2 | 660 | 85% | 3N | E | ♦8 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 2♣x | E | ♥T | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2♦ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 660 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 59% | ||||
| 2♣x | E | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs INDIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 83384) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | INDIA U21 | |
| 3♣ | W | ♦2 | = | 110 | 88% | 2N | W | ♦2 | +1 | 150 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♦7 | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 90 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2N | W | +1 | 150 | 73% | ||||
| 3N | N | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | N | = | 90 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs HAPPY BRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 83385) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 2♥ | S | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 3N | W | ♦2 | +2 | 660 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♥Q | -3 | 150 | 86% | 3♥ | N | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 85% | ||||
| 3N | N | -3 | 150 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | -2 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 83386) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | CAPRISUN | |
| 2♣ | W | ♠J | +2 | 130 | 82% | 3N | E | ♥K | +2 | 660 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2♠ | S | ♥8 | -4 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♣ | W | +2 | 130 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +2 | 660 | 85% | ||||
| 3N | N | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | -4 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-A U26 vs SERBALICIOUS 2 : 2 VP (match 83387) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-A U26 | SERBALICIOUS | |
| 3N | W | ♦2 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 3N | W | ♥7 | +2 | 660 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠x | E | ♥T | = | 470 | 97% | 3N | N | ♠5 | -3 | 150 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 85% | ||||
| 2♠x | E | = | 470 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -3 | 150 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs SXNEBULA 2 : 2 VP (match 83388) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | SXNEBULA | |
| 3N | W | ♥7 | +2 | 660 | 85% | 3N | W | ♥8 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠x | E | ♥T | -1 | 100 | 71% | 3N | N | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 59% | ||||
| 2♠x | E | -1 | 100 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA vs SXSPARK 0 : 4 VP (match 83389) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA | SXSPARK | |
| 3N | W | ♣J | +1 | 630 | 59% | 3N | W | ♦2 | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | E | ♥T | -2 | 300 | 91% | 3N | N | ♠5 | = | 400 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 59% | ||||
| 3♠x | E | -2 | 300 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | = | 400 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs URUGUAY 2 : 2 VP (match 83390) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | URUGUAY | |
| 2N | W | ♦2 | +1 | 150 | 73% | 3N | W | ♥8 | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 3N | N | ♣6 | = | 400 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | W | +1 | 150 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 59% | ||||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | = | 400 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83391) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | BELGIUM | |
| 3N | W | ♥8 | +2 | 660 | 85% | 3N | W | ♣J | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | N | ♣A | +1 | 110 | 82% | 2♠x | E | ♥T | = | 470 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 59% | ||||
| 2♦ | N | +1 | 110 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | E | = | 470 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 4 : 0 VP (match 83392) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 2N | W | ♥7 | +3 | 210 | 67% | 3N | W | ♠J | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 1♠x | E | ♥T | -1 | 100 | 71% | 3N | S | ♠6 | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | W | +3 | 210 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 59% | ||||
| 1♠x | E | -1 | 100 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -2 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs HONG KONG 1 : 3 VP (match 83393) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | HONG KONG | |
| 3N | W | ♥7 | +2 | 660 | 85% | 3♣ | W | ♥7 | +2 | 150 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 3N | S | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | +2 | 150 | 73% | ||||
| 2♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs CS21MSCHOOL 3 : 1 VP (match 83394) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | CS21MSCHOOL | |
| 3♣ | W | ♦2 | +1 | 130 | 82% | 3N | W | ♥3 | +2 | 660 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2♥ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 85% | ||||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs CONGO 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83395) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | CONGO | |
| Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 95% | Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 95% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 59% | Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 95% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 95% | |||||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 59% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ JT63 ♥ 8763 ♦ J92 ♣ J3 | ||
| ♠ 52 ♥ QT5 ♦ K7 ♣ AKQ974 | 23 Dlr S Both | ♠ AQ987 ♥ 42 ♦ A543 ♣ 86 |
| ♠ K4 ♥ AKJ9 ♦ QT86 ♣ T52 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| S | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 3 |
| E | 10 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| W | 10 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 10 |
| ♠ – ♥ AK632 ♦ AKJT ♣ T432 | ||
| ♠ K96 ♥ 85 ♦ Q862 ♣ KJ98 | 24 Dlr W None | ♠ J8752 ♥ QJ974 ♦ 7 ♣ A6 |
| ♠ AQT43 ♥ T ♦ 9543 ♣ Q75 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 7 |
| S | 7 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 7 |
| E | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| W | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 5 |