SCHERMER John · Tulin
32rank
-21.5Butler · 12 bds
-1.79per board
±3.6swing
-1.43adjusted /bd
by round
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.37/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted -1.43/bd
By role: declaring -3.74/bd (5) · defending -0.40/bd (7)
By vulnerability: not vulnerable -1.79/bd (12)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quarterfinal | N.Chambers | S.Zeligman – V.Melman | Closed | 12 | -21.5 | -1.79 | · |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +4.1 | Quarterfinal | Team Markowicz | 26 | 4♠ | ♠7 | -2 | · |
| +1.0 | Quarterfinal | Team Markowicz | 22 | 2♠ | ♠3 | +2 | · |
| +0.7 | Quarterfinal | Team Markowicz | 27 | 3N | ♥6 | = | · |
| +0.0 | Quarterfinal | Team Markowicz | 17 | 4♠ | ♥6 | = | · |
| +0.0 | Quarterfinal | Team Markowicz | 21 | 4♠ | ♦6 | +1 | · |
| -0.1 | Quarterfinal | Team Markowicz | 25 | 4♠ | ♦K | -1 | · |
| -1.0 | Quarterfinal | Team Markowicz | 24 | 2♦ | ♦3 | = | · |
| -2.6 | Quarterfinal | Team Markowicz | 16 | 3♦ | ♠4 | +2 | · |
| -3.6 | Quarterfinal | Team Markowicz | 18 | 2N | ♣4 | -2 | · |
| -4.0 | Quarterfinal | Team Markowicz | 23 | 6♠ | ♣A | = | · |
| -6.0 | Quarterfinal | Team Markowicz | 19 | 4♠x | ♣4 | -3 | · |
| -10.0 | Quarterfinal | Team Markowicz | 20 | 2♦ | ♣3 | +2 | · |