Philadelphia 2010 — player statistics

Four double-dummy measures per player plus bidding activity, over every board they played, and an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Each table lists all players and is sortable by any column. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

Strength of schedule — opponent-adjusted Butler↑ top

On every board a player meets a specific opposing pair, and strong opponents defend and bid well — which quietly depresses your cross-IMP. Opp /bd is the mean cumulative Butler of the pairs faced, i.e. the strength of the draw (+ tough, − easy). Adj /bd adds it back — a tough draw is credited, an easy one discounted — and Δ is the resulting move against the raw Butler order. Regulars only (≥ 40% of the boards). Click a column header to sort; filter by name or team.

#PlayerTeamBoardsOpp /bdRaw /bdAdj /bdΔ
1R.MilnerHackett62-0.08+1.19+1.11▲4
2G.HallbergHackett93-0.55+1.45+0.90▼1
3J.HollandHackett93-0.55+1.45+0.90▼1
4G.HaydenHackett62-0.08+0.97+0.90▲2
5H.LasutGabrial UI108-0.53+1.34+0.81▼2
6E.ManoppoGabrial UI108-0.53+1.34+0.81▼2
7D.SaculGabrial UI108-0.26+0.77+0.51·
8M.SawiruddinGabrial UI108-0.26+0.77+0.51·
9P.HackettHackett62+0.56-0.12+0.44▲4
10R.RamerTeam Markowicz78+1.18-1.35-0.17▲4
11J.RussyanTeam Markowicz78+1.18-1.35-0.17▲4
12V.MelmanTeam Markowicz77-0.74+0.37-0.37▼3
13S.ZeligmanTeam Markowicz77-0.74+0.37-0.37▼3
14K.CohenCohen108+1.05-1.52-0.46▲2
15N.SattenCohen108+1.05-1.52-0.46▲2
16L.PoeCohen108-0.62-0.08-0.70▼5
17T.WeikCohen108-0.62-0.08-0.70▼5