Salsoyouth 2022 — U26 Women Teams
📅 7 - 14 August 2022 · Salsomaggiore, Italy
🔗 Official site: db.worldbridge.org →
Tournament standings — teams (VP)↑ top
Cumulative Victory Points. The 4 highlighted teams (marked ▶) advanced to the Semifinal (the knockout stage). Click a team for its round-by-round results and players below; click a round’s VP to open that match.
| Place | Team | VP | Trend | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 ▶ | NORWAY GIRLS | 73.63 | 9.61 | 20.00 | 15.25 | 16.59 | 12.18 | |
| 2 ▶ | ITALY U26W GREEN | 68.07 | 10.39 | 10.00 | 19.33 | 15.52 | 12.83 | |
| 3 ▶ | INDIA U26G | 57.84 | 14.80 | 10.00 | 3.75 | 14.00 | 15.29 | |
| 4 ▶ | ITALY U26W WHITE | 45.09 | 5.20 | 16.59 | 11.00 | 4.48 | 7.82 | |
| 5 | TAIWAN | 35.71 | 14.54 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 6.00 | 7.17 | |
| 6 | ITALY U26W RED | 17.66 | 5.46 | 3.41 | 0.67 | 3.41 | 4.71 |
Cross-table — who played whom↑ top
Each cell is the row team’s VP against the column team (columns numbered by rank; # place, Σ total VP). Hover a cell to highlight both teams and their two head-to-head results; click a score for that match’s protocol.
| # | Team | Σ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NORWAY GIRLS | 73.63 | 9.61 | 15.25 | 12.18 | 20.00 | 16.59 | |
| 2 | ITALY U26W GREEN | 68.07 | 10.39 | 10.00 | 15.52 | 12.83 | 19.33 | |
| 3 | INDIA U26G | 57.84 | 3.75 | 10.00 | 14.80 | 14.00 | 15.29 | |
| 4 | ITALY U26W WHITE | 45.09 | 7.82 | 4.48 | 5.20 | 11.00 | 16.59 | |
| 5 | TAIWAN | 35.71 | 0.00 | 7.17 | 6.00 | 8.00 | 14.54 | |
| 6 | ITALY U26W RED | 17.66 | 3.41 | 0.67 | 4.71 | 3.41 | 5.46 |
1 NORWAY GIRLS · 2 ITALY U26W GREEN · 3 INDIA U26G · 4 ITALY U26W WHITE · 5 TAIWAN · 6 ITALY U26W RED
Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.
Rounds included so far (5 of 5): R1 R2 R3 R4 R5. Columns R1… = each player's Butler total in that round's match (hover a cell for its avg/board); they sum to Total.
Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top
Player statistics — leaders↑ top
Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.
| # | Player | vs par |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇳🇴 A.Kjensli | +2.18 |
| 1 | 🇳🇴 M.Statle | +2.18 |
| 3 | 🇹🇼 W.Chen | +2.12 |
| 3 | 🇹🇼 H.Yang | +2.12 |
| 5 | 🇮🇹 A.Montesanti | +1.30 |
| 5 | 🇮🇹 M.Tonelli | +1.30 |
| 7 | 🇮🇹 F.Dalpozzo | +1.08 |
| 7 | 🇮🇹 V.Dalpozzo | +1.08 |
| 9 | 🇮🇳 K.Baliram Gurjar | +1.06 |
| 9 | 🇮🇳 V.Kamal Patel | +1.06 |
| 11 | 🇮🇹 S.Capobianco | +0.78 |
| 11 | 🇮🇹 E.Dalpozzo | +0.78 |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇳🇴 M.Statle | 100.0% |
| 1 | 🇹🇼 W.Chen | 100.0% |
| 1 | 🇮🇹 M.Tonelli | 100.0% |
| 1 | 🇮🇳 R.Bhimanaik | 100.0% |
| 1 | 🇹🇼 A.Chang | 100.0% |
| 6 | 🇮🇹 Z.Davide | 92.9% |
| 7 | 🇮🇹 S.Capobianco | 92.3% |
| 8 | 🇮🇳 V.Kamal Patel | 91.7% |
| 9 | 🇮🇳 K.Baliram Gurjar | 90.9% |
| 10 | 🇹🇼 Y.Cheng | 90.0% |
| 11 | 🇮🇹 V.Dalpozzo | 88.9% |
| 11 | 🇹🇼 S.Yen | 88.9% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇳🇴 A.Kjensli | 100.0% |
| 1 | 🇹🇼 H.Yang | 100.0% |
| 3 | 🇮🇹 F.Dalpozzo | 91.7% |
| 4 | 🇮🇹 C.Brusotti | 88.9% |
| 5 | 🇳🇴 K.Brekke | 88.2% |
| 6 | 🇹🇼 A.Chang | 85.7% |
| 7 | 🇮🇹 A.Montesanti | 84.6% |
| 8 | 🇳🇴 M.Statle | 83.3% |
| 8 | 🇮🇳 K.Baliram Gurjar | 83.3% |
| 10 | 🇮🇹 V.Dalpozzo | 81.2% |
| 11 | 🇮🇳 R.Bhimanaik | 80.0% |
| 12 | 🇮🇳 V.Kamal Patel | 80.0% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇳🇴 A.Kjensli | 92.9% |
| 1 | 🇳🇴 M.Statle | 92.9% |
| 3 | 🇮🇹 F.Dalpozzo | 90.9% |
| 3 | 🇮🇹 V.Dalpozzo | 90.9% |
| 5 | 🇮🇹 C.Brusotti | 88.5% |
| 5 | 🇮🇹 Z.Davide | 88.5% |
| 7 | 🇮🇳 S.Basu | 88.0% |
| 7 | 🇮🇳 R.Bhimanaik | 88.0% |
| 9 | 🇹🇼 W.Chen | 87.0% |
| 9 | 🇹🇼 H.Yang | 87.0% |
| 11 | 🇮🇹 A.Montesanti | 85.2% |
| 11 | 🇮🇹 M.Tonelli | 85.2% |
Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top
Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.
| Board | Tables | Swing | Best for NS | Best for EW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 4 · Bd 1 | 6 | 27.4 | 5♥x +2000 🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN (+16.2) | 3♠ -200 🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS (+11.2) |
| Round 5 · Bd 12 | 6 | 23.4 | 5♦x +750 🇮🇹 ITALY U26W RED (+14.4) | 4♥x +590 🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN (+9.0) |
| Round 2 · Bd 20 | 6 | 21.0 | 4♥x +1400 🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS (+14.8) | 3♠ -100 🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE (+6.2) |
| Round 2 · Bd 15 | 6 | 20.4 | 3NT +100 🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS (+9.0) | 3♠x +800 🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS (+11.4) |
| Round 5 · Bd 14 | 6 | 20.4 | 4♥ +50 🇹🇼 TAIWAN (+6.0) | 4♠x +1100 🇮🇳 INDIA U26G (+14.4) |
| Round 4 · Bd 7 | 6 | 18.2 | 4♦ +500 🇮🇳 INDIA U26G (+15.0) | 4♥ +650 🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE (+3.2) |
| Round 3 · Bd 27 | 6 | 17.0 | 6NT +1020 🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE (+3.0) | 7♠ +50 🇮🇹 ITALY U26W GREEN (+14.0) |
| Round 4 · Bd 9 | 6 | 16.8 | 4♠ +200 🇹🇼 TAIWAN (+6.4) | 4♠ +650 🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS (+10.4) |
| Round 1 · Bd 4 | 6 | 16.4 | 5♦ +100 🇹🇼 TAIWAN (+11.2) | 3NT +660 🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS (+5.2) |
| Round 1 · Bd 10 | 6 | 16.4 | 6♦ -1390 🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS (+4.2) | 7♦ +2140 🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE (+12.2) |
| Round 3 · Bd 26 | 6 | 16.4 | 4♥ +650 🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS (+5.4) | 5♥x +200 🇹🇼 TAIWAN (+11.0) |
| Round 4 · Bd 4 | 6 | 16.4 | 3NT +690 🇮🇳 INDIA U26G (+3.8) | 6♣ +100 🇮🇹 ITALY U26W WHITE (+12.6) |
| Round 1 · Bd 7 | 6 | 16.0 | 5♠ -680 🇹🇼 TAIWAN (+11.0) | 6♠ +1430 🇹🇼 TAIWAN (+5.0) |
| Round 2 · Bd 16 | 6 | 15.8 | 3NT +100 🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS (+7.6) | 3NT +660 🇳🇴 NORWAY GIRLS (+8.2) |