JOURDAIN Patrick · AUSCROWAL
vs par split: bidding -3.11 · play +0.04
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.08/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.57/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 83.3% #177 of 579 · declarer play 50.0% #547 of 579 · defence 100.0% #1 of 579
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 100.0% (1) | 80.0% (5) |
| Declarer play | 50.0% (2) | 50.0% (6) |
| Defence | 100.0% (4) | 100.0% (8) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 50.0% (2) · ♥ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: NT -1.67 (9) · a suit -3.74 (19)
vs par by level: part-score -1.12 (8) · game -2.61 (18) · slam -15.00 (2)
By role: declaring -0.04/bd (-6.50 vs par · 16) · defending -1.09/bd (+1.50 vs par · 12)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.93/bd (-5.07 vs par · 15) · not vulnerable +0.01/bd (-0.77 vs par · 13)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 4 | M.Lewis | A.Madala – N.Bocchi | Closed | 7 | +3.6 | +0.51 | -4.57 |
| Round 6 | M.Lewis | Q.Zhou – J.Peng | Open | 7 | +6.2 | +0.89 | -2.86 |
| Round 7 | M.Lewis | D.Tong – P.Li | Closed | 7 | -5.2 | -0.74 | +1.43 |
| Round 8 | M.Lewis | T.Hanlon – J.Carroll | Open | 7 | -18.3 | -2.61 | -6.29 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.5 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 12 | 3NT | ♠4 | +1 | +0 |
| +6.1 | Round 7 | KUNMING LIJIAN | 17 | 4♠ | ♦5 | = | +7 |
| +4.7 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 8 | 3♠x | ♦K | -3 | +2 |
| +3.9 | Round 4 | LAVAZZA | 27 | 5♣ | ♦A | +1 | +1 |
| +3.7 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 9 | 3NT | ♣7 | +4 | -12 |
| +3.5 | Round 4 | LAVAZZA | 28 | 3NT | ♠5 | -2 | +8 |
| +2.0 | Round 7 | KUNMING LIJIAN | 21 | 4♠ | ♣5 | -1 | +5 |
| +2.0 | Round 8 | ROSENTHAL | 26 | 3NT | ♠4 | = | +0 |
| +1.8 | Round 7 | KUNMING LIJIAN | 18 | 2NT | ♥7 | -1 | +5 |
| +1.7 | Round 8 | ROSENTHAL | 24 | 4♥ | ♠K | = | -1 |
| +0.9 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 13 | 3♠ | ♥A | = | +0 |
| +0.5 | Round 8 | ROSENTHAL | 23 | 1NT | ♣J | = | +1 |
| +0.4 | Round 7 | KUNMING LIJIAN | 20 | 3NT | ♦7 | +3 | -12 |
| -0.0 | Round 4 | LAVAZZA | 22 | 3♥ | ♦K | = | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round 4 | LAVAZZA | 26 | 5♦ | ♣K | +1 | -13 |
| -0.7 | Round 4 | LAVAZZA | 24 | 5♦ | ♣2 | = | +2 |
| -1.0 | Round 4 | LAVAZZA | 25 | 4♠ | ♣A | = | -13 |
| -2.0 | Round 4 | LAVAZZA | 23 | 6♣ | ♥8 | -1 | -17 |
| -2.1 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 11 | 4♣ | ♦5 | = | +0 |
| -3.3 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 10 | 3♣ | ♠8 | -1 | -6 |
| -3.5 | Round 7 | KUNMING LIJIAN | 19 | 3NT | ♠K | -1 | -5 |
| -3.5 | Round 8 | ROSENTHAL | 28 | 4♥ | ♣6 | -2 | -11 |
| -4.2 | Round 6 | JIANGSU BRIDGE ASSOCIATION | 14 | 5♥ | ♠A | = | -4 |
| -5.6 | Round 7 | KUNMING LIJIAN | 16 | 3NT | ♠10 | = | +0 |
| -5.8 | Round 8 | ROSENTHAL | 22 | 6♠ | ♣Q | -2 | -13 |
| -6.4 | Round 7 | KUNMING LIJIAN | 15 | 5♦x | ♥K | = | +10 |
| -6.6 | Round 8 | ROSENTHAL | 25 | 3♠ | ♦K | -2 | -11 |
| -6.6 | Round 8 | ROSENTHAL | 27 | 5♣x | ♠7 | -2 | -9 |