Zagreb 2016 — Teams
📅 10 - 12 November 2016 · Zagreb, Croatia
🔗 Official site: db.eurobridge.org →
Tournament standings — teams (VP)↑ top
Cumulative Victory Points. Every team continues to the knockout play-offs for final ranking — the top 4 of each group play for places 1–4, the next 4 for 5–8, and so on (each team’s target places are marked ▶ by its rank). Click a team for its round-by-round results and players below; click a round’s VP to open that match.
| Place | Team | VP | Trend | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | R8 | R9 | R10 | R11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1▶ 1–4 | ONSTEIN | 147.49 | 15.52 | 11.14 | 18.30 | 18.30 | 17.84 | 13.72 | 17.68 | 14.54 | 7.82 | 4.48 | 8.15 | |
| 2▶ 1–4 | BAMBERGER | 133.04 | 16.18 | 14.54 | 6.86 | 3.82 | 12.83 | 16.18 | 18.44 | 5.46 | 16.18 | 18.30 | 4.25 | |
| 3▶ 1–4 | HEIMDAL | 127.27 | 3.61 | 11.50 | 17.84 | 18.71 | 10.00 | 3.82 | 18.84 | 14.54 | 12.18 | 10.77 | 5.46 | |
| 4▶ 1–4 | MONACO | 126.53 | 3.82 | 8.50 | 14.80 | 12.83 | 2.16 | 13.14 | 6.28 | 16.39 | 17.34 | 13.43 | 17.84 | |
| 5▶ 5–8 | ALLEGRA | 122.34 | 10.39 | 8.86 | 15.05 | 16.18 | 14.80 | 5.72 | 15.75 | 13.43 | 10.77 | 9.23 | 2.16 | |
| 6▶ 5–8 | MOSSOP | 103.49 | 15.52 | 8.15 | 2.16 | 15.05 | 7.17 | 6.86 | 2.32 | 20.00 | 9.23 | 2.49 | 14.54 | |
| 7▶ 5–8 | RADKOV | 101.41 | 4.48 | 9.23 | 5.20 | 1.70 | 14.28 | 14.28 | 15.97 | 13.43 | 3.82 | 4.48 | 14.54 | |
| 8▶ 5–8 | RIEHM | 95.90 | 13.43 | 10.39 | 4.95 | 7.17 | 10.00 | 17.84 | 4.03 | 0.00 | 14.54 | 1.70 | 11.85 | |
| 9▶ 9–12 | VILLA FABBRICHE | 92.12 | 9.61 | 5.46 | 1.70 | 1.29 | 6.57 | 2.16 | 13.72 | 6.57 | 16.39 | 17.51 | 11.14 | |
| 10▶ 9–12 | LT ILANKA | 91.17 | 4.48 | 10.77 | 13.14 | 14.00 | 13.43 | 8.15 | 4.25 | 5.46 | 5.46 | 6.57 | 5.46 | |
| 11▶ 9–12 | SKALMAN | 91.07 | 6.57 | 11.85 | 15.52 | 6.00 | 5.20 | 6.28 | 1.16 | 3.61 | 3.61 | 15.52 | 15.75 | |
| 12▶ 9–12 | JT3 | 88.17 | 16.39 | 9.61 | 4.48 | 4.95 | 5.72 | 11.85 | 1.56 | 6.57 | 2.66 | 15.52 | 8.86 |
Cross-table — who played whom↑ top
Each cell is the row team’s VP against the column team (columns numbered by rank; # place, Σ total VP). Hover a cell to highlight both teams and their two head-to-head results; click a score for that match’s protocol.
| # | Team | Σ | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ONSTEIN | 147.49 | 14.54 | 7.82 | 17.84 | 11.14 | 17.68 | 18.30 | 8.15 | 18.30 | 15.52 | 13.72 | 4.48 | |
| 2 | BAMBERGER | 133.04 | 5.46 | 16.18 | 16.18 | 3.82 | 12.83 | 16.18 | 18.30 | 14.54 | 6.86 | 4.25 | 18.44 | |
| 3 | HEIMDAL | 127.27 | 12.18 | 3.82 | 11.50 | 10.77 | 17.84 | 5.46 | 10.00 | 18.71 | 14.54 | 18.84 | 3.61 | |
| 4 | MONACO | 126.53 | 2.16 | 3.82 | 8.50 | 17.84 | 13.14 | 14.80 | 12.83 | 6.28 | 13.43 | 16.39 | 17.34 | |
| 5 | ALLEGRA | 122.34 | 8.86 | 16.18 | 9.23 | 2.16 | 10.77 | 5.72 | 15.05 | 10.39 | 15.75 | 14.80 | 13.43 | |
| 6 | MOSSOP | 103.49 | 2.32 | 7.17 | 2.16 | 6.86 | 9.23 | 15.52 | 20.00 | 2.49 | 14.54 | 8.15 | 15.05 | |
| 7 | RADKOV | 101.41 | 1.70 | 3.82 | 14.54 | 5.20 | 14.28 | 4.48 | 15.97 | 13.43 | 9.23 | 4.48 | 14.28 | |
| 8 | RIEHM | 95.90 | 11.85 | 1.70 | 10.00 | 7.17 | 4.95 | 0.00 | 4.03 | 17.84 | 14.54 | 13.43 | 10.39 | |
| 9 | VILLA FABBRICHE | 92.12 | 1.70 | 5.46 | 1.29 | 13.72 | 9.61 | 17.51 | 6.57 | 2.16 | 6.57 | 16.39 | 11.14 | |
| 10 | LT ILANKA | 91.17 | 4.48 | 13.14 | 5.46 | 6.57 | 4.25 | 5.46 | 10.77 | 5.46 | 13.43 | 14.00 | 8.15 | |
| 11 | SKALMAN | 91.07 | 6.28 | 15.75 | 1.16 | 3.61 | 5.20 | 11.85 | 15.52 | 6.57 | 3.61 | 6.00 | 15.52 | |
| 12 | JT3 | 88.17 | 15.52 | 1.56 | 16.39 | 2.66 | 6.57 | 4.95 | 5.72 | 9.61 | 8.86 | 11.85 | 4.48 |
1 ONSTEIN · 2 BAMBERGER · 3 HEIMDAL · 4 MONACO · 5 ALLEGRA · 6 MOSSOP · 7 RADKOV · 8 RIEHM · 9 VILLA FABBRICHE · 10 LT ILANKA · 11 SKALMAN · 12 JT3
Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.
Rounds included so far (11 of 11): R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 R11. Columns R1… = each player's Butler total in that round's match (hover a cell for its avg/board); they sum to Total.
Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top
Player statistics — leaders↑ top
Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.
| # | Player | vs par |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | R.Van Prooijen | +1.21 |
| 1 | J.Verhees | +1.21 |
| 3 | M.Urbanski | +1.20 |
| 4 | M.Gromoeller | +1.13 |
| 5 | G.Helgemo | +0.96 |
| 5 | T.Helness | +0.96 |
| 7 | G.Groetheim | +0.96 |
| 7 | P.Tondel | +0.96 |
| 9 | J.Hackett | +0.73 |
| 9 | J.Hackett | +0.73 |
| 11 | N.Bocchi | +0.66 |
| 11 | D.Brenner | +0.66 |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | B.Drijver | 100.0% |
| 1 | F.Multon | 100.0% |
| 3 | D.Brenner | 92.3% |
| 3 | F.Mazzadi | 92.3% |
| 5 | T.Bergdahl | 90.0% |
| 6 | P.Tondel | 89.5% |
| 7 | T.Tenev | 89.3% |
| 8 | A.Hydes | 87.5% |
| 9 | M.Krupowicz | 86.7% |
| 10 | D.Price | 86.4% |
| 11 | B.Nab | 85.7% |
| 12 | F.Riehm | 85.7% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | M.Urbanski | 100.0% |
| 1 | P.Zimmermann | 100.0% |
| 3 | S.De Wijs | 94.7% |
| 4 | D.Attanasio | 92.3% |
| 5 | V.Zoric | 88.5% |
| 6 | A.Madala | 87.0% |
| 7 | A.Bianchedi | 86.7% |
| 8 | M.Duguet | 85.7% |
| 9 | F.Volcker | 85.0% |
| 10 | M.Gromoeller | 84.6% |
| 11 | J.Fritsche | 83.3% |
| 12 | P.Zawada | 82.4% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | B.Drijver | 95.5% |
| 1 | B.Nab | 95.5% |
| 3 | A.Bianchedi | 93.5% |
| 3 | A.Madala | 93.5% |
| 5 | M.Gromoeller | 92.1% |
| 6 | J.Hackett | 91.7% |
| 6 | J.Hackett | 91.7% |
| 8 | T.Tenev | 90.6% |
| 8 | T.Tiholov | 90.6% |
| 10 | G.Helgemo | 90.6% |
| 10 | T.Helness | 90.6% |
| 12 | P.Hackett | 90.5% |
Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top
Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.
| Board | Tables | Swing | Best for NS | Best for EW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 5 · Bd 18 | 12 | 27.8 | 7♥ +2210 ALLEGRA (+14.7) | 7♥ +200 LT ILANKA (+13.1) |
| Round 7 · Bd 4 | 12 | 24.8 | 6♦x +1740 RADKOV (+14.3) | 4♥ +100 ALLEGRA (+10.5) |
| Round 5 · Bd 13 | 12 | 23.7 | 4♠x -200 MONACO (+10.5) | 6♠ +1430 BAMBERGER (+13.2) |
| Round 10 · Bd 7 | 12 | 22.4 | 5♦x +800 RADKOV (+8.9) | 4♠x +500 BAMBERGER (+13.5) |
| Round 3 · Bd 28 | 12 | 21.9 | 2♠x +670 SKALMAN (+12.3) | 4♥ +420 ONSTEIN (+9.6) |
| Round 9 · Bd 24 | 12 | 20.5 | 6♣ +920 MONACO (+12.0) | 5♦ +200 MONACO (+8.5) |
| Round 3 · Bd 29 | 12 | 20.4 | 3NT +630 HEIMDAL (+11.5) | 2♥ +300 MONACO (+8.9) |
| Round 10 · Bd 8 | 12 | 20.0 | 5♣x +500 JT3 (+11.1) | 5♦x +550 ALLEGRA (+8.9) |
| Round 10 · Bd 2 | 12 | 19.4 | 2♦ -130 ONSTEIN (+6.9) | 1♥x +1100 VILLA FABBRICHE (+12.5) |
| Round 6 · Bd 25 | 12 | 18.9 | 3♠x +800 JT3 (+12.3) | 4♥x +100 ALLEGRA (+6.6) |
| Round 2 · Bd 17 | 12 | 18.4 | 3NTx +550 VILLA FABBRICHE (+8.9) | 5♣x +300 SKALMAN (+9.5) |
| Round 5 · Bd 15 | 12 | 18.3 | 5♠ +680 ALLEGRA (+3.8) | 5♥x +500 VILLA FABBRICHE (+14.5) |
| Round 6 · Bd 22 | 12 | 18.3 | 2♠x +1100 HEIMDAL (+13.6) | 1NT -100 MONACO (+4.7) |
| Round 4 · Bd 6 | 12 | 18.0 | 7♠ +300 MOSSOP (+7.1) | 5♠ +680 HEIMDAL (+10.9) |