JANISZEWSKI Przemyslaw · BRIDGE FOR BUSINESS
vs par split: bidding -0.21 · play -0.07
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.34/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.44/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 75.0% · declarer play 58.3% · defence 80.0%
Bidding activity — not a pass: 43.8% (57/130)
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | 50.0% (2) | 80.0% (10) |
| Declarer play | 50.0% (4) | 62.5% (8) |
| Defence | 75.0% (4) | 81.2% (16) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 0.0% (3) · ♥ 100.0% (3) · ♦ 100.0% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (3)
vs par by strain: NT -2.00 (11) · a suit +0.32 (31)
vs par by level: part-score +0.80 (10) · game -1.17 (29) · slam +4.67 (3)
By role: declaring -0.13/bd (-3.04 vs par · 22) · defending +0.34/bd (+2.75 vs par · 20)
By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.69/bd (+0.91 vs par · 21) · not vulnerable -0.49/bd (-1.48 vs par · 21)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 5 | J.Ciechomski | J.Balasovs – J.Ilzins | Closed | 14 | +1.6 | +0.11 | +0.79 |
| Round 7 | J.Ciechomski | C.Lorenzini – T.Bessis | Open | 14 | -15.4 | -1.10 | -2.50 |
| Round 8 | M.Blach | J.Kozyczkowski – L.Comanescu | Closed | 14 | +17.8 | +1.27 | +0.86 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +6.4 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 17 | 3♦ | ♦Q | = | +11 |
| +6.2 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 13 | 4♥ | ♥A | +1 | +0 |
| +5.3 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 4 | 3NT | ♦Q | +2 | +1 |
| +4.6 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 22 | 4♠ | ♦8 | -2 | +11 |
| +4.5 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 27 | 4♠ | ♥5 | -1 | +5 |
| +4.3 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 5 | 4♥ | ♦A | -1 | +10 |
| +3.7 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 7 | 6♥ | ♠Q | -2 | +17 |
| +3.6 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 5 | 4♠ | ♦9 | = | +0 |
| +3.5 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 15 | 3NT | ♣9 | = | +0 |
| +2.9 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 18 | 5♦ | ♠5 | = | +0 |
| +2.8 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 26 | 1♠ | ♥8 | +2 | +11 |
| +2.4 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 8 | 2♠ | ♠7 | -1 | +4 |
| +2.3 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 1 | 2♠ | ♣8 | -1 | +4 |
| +1.6 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 6 | 4♥ | ♠3 | +2 | -1 |
| +1.6 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 25 | 4♠ | ♦Q | +1 | +0 |
| +1.4 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 14 | 4♥ | ♠Q | = | +3 |
| +1.0 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 21 | 3NT | ♦Q | +2 | -10 |
| +0.9 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 10 | 4♠ | ♥7 | -1 | +6 |
| +0.7 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 16 | 6♠x | ♣A | -2 | -5 |
| +0.4 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 9 | 4♠ | ♥J | = | +1 |
| +0.4 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 19 | 4♠ | ♣9 | +1 | +0 |
| +0.1 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 9 | 2♠x | ♦A | -2 | -10 |
| +0.0 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 7 | 3NT | ♥2 | -2 | +0 |
| -0.1 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 1 | 5♠ | ♦J | +1 | -11 |
| -0.3 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 6 | 4♥ | ♦Q | = | +0 |
| -0.4 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 2 | 4♥ | ♣7 | -1 | -12 |
| -0.6 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 8 | 3NT | ♠J | +2 | +10 |
| -0.8 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 14 | 3NT | ♦Q | = | -1 |
| -1.2 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 28 | 1NT | ♦6 | +3 | -6 |
| -1.4 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 4 | 3NT | ♠2 | +2 | -2 |
| -1.4 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 12 | 4♠ | ♦9 | -1 | -6 |
| -1.5 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 13 | 3NT | ♣9 | -2 | -8 |
| -1.6 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 20 | 3♦ | ♦J | -1 | +0 |
| -2.0 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 2 | 3NT | ♠5 | = | +0 |
| -2.1 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 24 | 4♥ | ♠A | -1 | -5 |
| -2.6 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 12 | 6♦ | ♣7 | = | +2 |
| -3.1 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 10 | 3NT | ♥Q | -1 | -6 |
| -5.5 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 11 | 4♠ | ♦J | +1 | -11 |
| -5.7 | Round 8 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 23 | 3♣ | ♦A | = | +0 |
| -6.3 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 3 | 2♥x | ♦Q | -3 | +3 |
| -8.9 | Round 7 | DAISY CHAIN | 3 | 4♠ | ♣J | +1 | -8 |
| -11.1 | Round 5 | LATVIA | 11 | 3♦x | ♦Q | -4 | -9 |