Prague 2026 — Swiss Cup SF B
📅 10 – 19 February 2026 · Prague, Czech Republic
🔗 Official site: db.eurobridge.org →
Tournament standings — teams (VP)↑ top
Cumulative Victory Points. The medalists (top 3) are highlighted. Click a team for its round-by-round results and players below; click a round’s VP to open that match.
| Place | Team | VP | Trend | C/O | Qual. | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GILLIS | 121.91 | 3.46 | 56.60 | 16.03 | 15.46 | 19.08 | 11.28 | |
| 2 | 44FUN | 107.28 | 5.00 | 48.92 | 18.98 | 4.54 | 19.18 | 10.66 | |
| 3 | BORTOLETTI | 102.53 | 2.69 | 56.45 | 16.88 | 10.33 | 7.84 | 8.34 | |
| 4 | CAFIERO | 99.34 | 1.54 | 48.18 | 10.97 | 17.77 | 12.16 | 8.72 | |
| 5 | CZECHIA U23 | 89.95 | 1.92 | 46.15 | 13.48 | 2.96 | 16.72 | 8.72 | |
| 6 | GDANSK | 82.85 | 4.62 | 39.21 | 10.97 | 15.85 | 0.92 | 11.28 | |
| 7 | SLOVAKIA BLUE | 78.78 | 3.85 | 36.64 | 3.97 | 4.15 | 13.96 | 16.21 | |
| 8 | POLAND U21 A | 73.91 | 4.23 | 42.12 | 9.03 | 9.67 | 3.28 | 5.58 | |
| 9 | BAMBI | 59.50 | 1.15 | 25.88 | 9.03 | 17.04 | 0.82 | 5.58 | |
| 10 | MALA ZOVE | 54.09 | 0.77 | 19.74 | 3.12 | 10.00 | 6.04 | 14.42 | |
| 11 | CZECHIA U31 | 45.81 | 0.38 | 28.11 | 1.02 | 10.00 | 2.51 | 3.79 | |
| 12 | ASCHAFFENBURG | 42.97 | 2.31 | 0.00 | 6.52 | 2.23 | 17.49 | 14.42 |
Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.
Rounds included so far (8 of 8): R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8. Columns R1… = each player's Butler total in that round's match (hover a cell for its avg/board); they sum to Total.
Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top
Player statistics — leaders↑ top
Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.
| # | Player | vs par |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | P.Danek | +2.20 |
| 2 | S.Gillis | +1.71 |
| 2 | E.Saelensminde | +1.71 |
| 4 | L.Chen | +1.46 |
| 4 | D.Hsieh | +1.46 |
| 6 | F.Nystrom | +1.11 |
| 6 | J.Upmark | +1.11 |
| 8 | M.Cafiero | +1.07 |
| 8 | R.Rosso | +1.07 |
| 10 | O.Karimi | +0.87 |
| 10 | D.Kroening | +0.87 |
| 12 | P.Austberg | +0.86 |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | C.Pennestri | 100.0% |
| 1 | J.Michalski | 100.0% |
| 1 | B.Koros | 100.0% |
| 4 | R.Rosso | 96.2% |
| 5 | C.Bakke | 94.4% |
| 5 | J.Adamczak | 94.4% |
| 7 | E.Lindenthal | 94.1% |
| 8 | M.Cafiero | 93.8% |
| 8 | M.Prokopowicz | 93.8% |
| 10 | L.Comanescu | 93.3% |
| 10 | S.Gillis | 93.3% |
| 12 | W.Wnuk | 93.3% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A.Paone | 95.0% |
| 2 | F.Nystrom | 93.3% |
| 3 | M.Vodicka | 92.3% |
| 4 | B.Brogeland | 90.5% |
| 5 | C.Bakke | 88.9% |
| 6 | S.Grabala | 88.5% |
| 7 | B.Koros | 88.2% |
| 8 | E.Saelensminde | 87.5% |
| 9 | A.Rasmussen | 87.5% |
| 9 | J.Tomcani | 87.5% |
| 11 | P.Austberg | 87.0% |
| 12 | J.Upmark | 86.7% |
| # | Player | on tgt |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | J.Kvocek | 96.3% |
| 2 | M.Adamczak | 96.2% |
| 3 | J.Adamczak | 94.3% |
| 4 | J.Tomcani | 93.9% |
| 4 | W.Wnuk | 93.9% |
| 6 | S.Gillis | 92.5% |
| 6 | E.Saelensminde | 92.5% |
| 8 | N.Vachtarcikova | 91.9% |
| 9 | K.Turant | 91.2% |
| 10 | F.Kubat | 90.9% |
| 11 | F.Nystrom | 90.0% |
| 11 | J.Upmark | 90.0% |
| # | Player | active |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | J.Kvocek | 57.8% |
| 2 | M.Lysek | 54.4% |
| 3 | J.Kozyczkowski | 53.3% |
| 4 | B.Brogeland | 50.9% |
| 5 | M.Vodicka | 50.5% |
| 6 | N.Bocchi | 50.5% |
| 7 | P.Suchodolski | 50.3% |
| 8 | E.Konstacka | 50.0% |
| 9 | A.Gandoglia | 49.2% |
| 10 | A.Jarzabkowski | 49.0% |
| 11 | N.Vachtarcikova | 48.4% |
| 12 | W.Wnuk | 48.0% |
Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top
Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.
| Board | Tables | Swing | Best for NS | Best for EW |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 1 · Bd 3 | 12 | 29.5 | 5♣x +1100 SLOVAKIA BLUE (+15.2) | 5♦x +1100 MALA ZOVE (+14.3) |
| Round 1 · Bd 7 | 12 | 29.2 | 5♣ +300 BORTOLETTI (+19.0) | 7♥ +2210 CZECHIA U31 (+10.2) |
| Round 8 · Bd 18 | 10 | 25.9 | 6♥ +1430 CZECHIA U31 (+11.9) | 3NT +200 44FUN (+14.0) |
| Round 1 · Bd 8 | 12 | 25.8 | 5♠x +100 ASCHAFFENBURG (+11.5) | 5♣x +1400 CAFIERO (+14.3) |
| Round 2 · Bd 20 | 12 | 24.8 | 6♠x +1400 BORTOLETTI (+9.6) | 4NT +300 BAMBI (+15.2) |
| Round 3 · Bd 6 | 12 | 24.8 | 4♥x +800 CZECHIA U23 (+13.0) | 3NT +600 CZECHIA U23 (+11.8) |
| Round 3 · Bd 2 | 12 | 22.9 | 4♠x +1190 CZECHIA U23 (+11.6) | 3♣ -50 44FUN (+11.3) |
| Round 5 · Bd 9 | 10 | 22.3 | 3NT +490 BORTOLETTI (+9.2) | 2♠x +670 GDANSK (+13.1) |
| Round 6 · Bd 21 | 10 | 21.7 | 4♥x +800 CZECHIA U23 (+10.4) | 5♣ +400 BAMBI (+11.3) |
| Round 2 · Bd 24 | 12 | 21.5 | 3♣x +800 CAFIERO (+13.0) | 2♥x +300 POLAND U21 A (+8.5) |
| Round 1 · Bd 9 | 12 | 20.9 | 5♥x +1100 CZECHIA U23 (+12.3) | 3NT +150 44FUN (+8.6) |
| Round 8 · Bd 23 | 10 | 20.4 | 4♥ +620 BORTOLETTI (+11.4) | 4♠x +790 44FUN (+9.0) |
| Round 2 · Bd 21 | 12 | 20.3 | 3NT +600 44FUN (+10.1) | 5♣ +400 CZECHIA U31 (+10.2) |
| Round 6 · Bd 19 | 10 | 20.1 | 5♣x +550 BAMBI (+7.0) | 4♥ +620 GDANSK (+13.1) |