Round 14 — M-OPEN BAM
27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 14 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | YABBIES | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | HOFFEMAN | PUNCH | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | ANITAS SANS | VIDIGAL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | TEAM ATLANTIC | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | THE PATRIOTS | GAMMA GRAFISK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | TUPPEN | WITO | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | OPTIMISTS | ALZADA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | LEGEANKA | SANBORN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | MOSTINGAN | TAKK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | ZEN | KURTS ANGELS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | BYE | BOHNSACK | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 12 | PANDORA | MARIE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | MINA | NONSTOP | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | SOLHEIM | BEIJING TRINERGY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | LES MISERABLES | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | GRAIZER | MIKLAGARD | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | TRONDERMIX | SJODAL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | NI LLIV | ROSSARD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | BADGER | MIXED | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | MAHAFFEY | CAYNE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | DARLING | GOLD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | MELWOOD | SILVERFOX | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | BERGEN AK | TOMFOOLERY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | WARD PLATT | KIBE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | PASSO DOUBLE | ROSENTHAL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | VI E KLAR | TOGRAM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | MELBOURNE 1 | MALUISH | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 14↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 14 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R14 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GRAIZER | 38.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 2 | MIKLAGARD | 36.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 2 | MOSTINGAN | 36.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 2 | SANBORN | 36.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 5 | BADGER | 35.40 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 6 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 35.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 7 | KIBE | 34.40 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 7 | SJODAL | 34.40 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 34.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 9 | PUNCH | 34.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 11 | GOLD | 32.60 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 12 | MAHAFFEY | 32.40 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 13 | VIDIGAL | 32.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 13 | YABBIES | 32.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 15 | ROSENTHAL | 31.40 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 16 | ALZADA | 31.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 17 | CAYNE | 30.80 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 18 | LES MISERABLES | 30.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 19 | SILVERFOX | 29.40 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 20 | GAMMA GRAFISK | 29.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 20 | KURTS ANGELS | 29.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 20 | SOLHEIM | 29.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 20 | WARD PLATT | 29.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 24 | ROSSARD | 28.40 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 25 | TAKK | 28.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 25 | TEAM ATLANTIC | 28.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 25 | TRONDERMIX | 28.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 25 | ZEN | 28.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 29 | BOHNSACK | 27.40 | 2.40 | 14 |
| 30 | DARLING | 27.20 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 31 | TOMFOOLERY | 27.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 31 | WITO | 27.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 33 | BERGEN AK | 26.20 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 34 | NONSTOP | 26.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 34 | THE PATRIOTS | 26.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 34 | TUPPEN | 26.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 37 | MELBOURNE 1 | 25.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 37 | MELWOOD | 25.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 39 | MALUISH | 24.40 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 39 | TOGRAM | 24.40 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 41 | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 24.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 41 | PASSO DOUBLE | 24.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 43 | MIXED | 23.80 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 44 | MINA | 23.40 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 45 | ANITAS SANS | 23.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 45 | MARIE | 23.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 45 | OPTIMISTS | 23.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 48 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 22.40 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 49 | NI LLIV | 22.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 50 | HOFFEMAN | 21.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 50 | PANDORA | 21.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 52 | LEGEANKA | 18.20 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 53 | VI E KLAR | 18.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 14 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R14 | BAM% |
|---|
YABBIES vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 2 : 2 VP (match 23760) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YABBIES | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | |
| 27 | 4♠x | S | ♦A | -3 | 500 | 95% | 2♠ | S | ♦A | = | 110 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 7♣ | S | ♥A | = | 2140 | 97% | 5♠ | N | ♥J | = | 650 | 89% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 4♠x | S | -3 | 500 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 83% | ||||
| 28 | 7♣ | S | = | 2140 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | N | = | 650 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOFFEMAN vs PUNCH 1 : 3 VP (match 23761) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOFFEMAN | PUNCH | |
| 27 | 3♦ | W | ♣3 | +2 | 150 | 62% | 3♦ | W | ♥3 | +2 | 150 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | ♦3 | +1 | 680 | 69% | 7♥x | E | ♠K | -6 | 1400 | 65% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 62% | ||||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | +1 | 680 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 7♥x | E | -6 | 1400 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ANITAS SANS vs VIDIGAL 2 : 2 VP (match 23762) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ANITAS SANS | VIDIGAL | |
| 27 | 3♦ | E | ♥3 | +3 | 170 | 74% | 1NT | S | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 6♠ | N | ♦3 | = | 1430 | 79% | 7♠ | N | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3♦ | E | +3 | 170 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 28 | 6♠ | N | = | 1430 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 7♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM ATLANTIC vs CHINA GEELY AUTO 1 : 3 VP (match 23763) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM ATLANTIC | CHINA GEELY AUTO | |
| 27 | 3♦ | W | ♥3 | +2 | 150 | 62% | 4♥ | E | ♦4 | -3 | 150 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 6♠ | N | ♦3 | = | 1430 | 79% | 6♠ | N | ♦2 | = | 1430 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 94% | ||||
| 28 | 6♠ | N | = | 1430 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♠ | N | = | 1430 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THE PATRIOTS vs GAMMA GRAFISK 0 : 4 VP (match 23764) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THE PATRIOTS | GAMMA GRAFISK | |
| 27 | 5♦ | E | ♠K | = | 400 | 83% | 1NT | S | ♦A | -2 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | ♥K | = | 650 | 89% | 4♠ | N | ♦3 | +3 | 710 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 5♦ | E | = | 400 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | -2 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | = | 650 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +3 | 710 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TUPPEN vs WITO 0 : 4 VP (match 23765) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TUPPEN | WITO | |
| 27 | 2NT | E | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 71% | 5♦x | W | ♠9 | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 7♠ | N | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 98% | 6♠ | N | ♦3 | = | 1430 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2NT | E | -1 | 50 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | W | -1 | 100 | 74% | ||||
| 28 | 7♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | N | = | 1430 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
OPTIMISTS vs ALZADA 3 : 1 VP (match 23766) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | OPTIMISTS | ALZADA | |
| 27 | 1♠ | S | ♦A | +1 | 110 | 83% | 2♠ | S | ♦A | = | 110 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 6♠ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 1460 | 93% | 6♠ | N | ♦3 | = | 1430 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1♠ | S | +1 | 110 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 83% | ||||
| 28 | 6♠ | N | +1 | 1460 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | N | = | 1430 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LEGEANKA vs SANBORN 0 : 4 VP (match 23767) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LEGEANKA | SANBORN | |
| 27 | 4♦ | E | ♠Q | = | 130 | 51% | 2♠ | S | ♦A | = | 110 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♠ | N | ♦3 | +2 | 680 | 69% | 6♠ | N | ♦3 | +1 | 1460 | 93% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 83% | ||||
| 28 | 4♠ | N | +2 | 680 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1460 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MOSTINGAN vs TAKK 0 : 4 VP (match 23768) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MOSTINGAN | TAKK | |
| 27 | 2♠ | W | ♦4 | -3 | 150 | 94% | 2♠ | W | ♦4 | -4 | 200 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♠ | N | ♦J | +2 | 680 | 69% | 6♠ | N | ♦3 | = | 1430 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♠ | W | -3 | 150 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | -4 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| 28 | 4♠ | N | +2 | 680 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | N | = | 1430 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZEN vs KURTS ANGELS 4 : 0 VP (match 23769) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZEN | KURTS ANGELS | |
| 27 | 2♠x | W | ♦4 | -2 | 300 | 100% | 3♦ | W | ♥3 | +2 | 150 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♥x | E | ♠A | -4 | 800 | 59% | 4♠ | N | ♦3 | +2 | 680 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♠x | W | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 62% | ||||
| 28 | 5♥x | E | -4 | 800 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +2 | 680 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs BOHNSACK 0 : 2.4 VP (match 23770)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | BOHNSACK | |
| 27 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| 28 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| 28 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PANDORA vs MARIE 0 : 4 VP (match 23771) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PANDORA | MARIE | |
| 27 | 4♦ | E | ♥3 | +1 | 150 | 62% | 2♠ | S | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | ♦3 | +1 | 680 | 69% | 7♥x | W | ♦A | -6 | 1400 | 65% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 4♦ | E | +1 | 150 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | +1 | 680 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 7♥x | W | -6 | 1400 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MINA vs NONSTOP 3 : 1 VP (match 23772) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MINA | NONSTOP | |
| 27 | 3♣ | S | ♦A | = | 110 | 83% | 1♠ | S | ♦A | +1 | 110 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 6♠ | N | ♦3 | = | 1430 | 79% | 5♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 680 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3♣ | S | = | 110 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1♠ | S | +1 | 110 | 83% | ||||
| 28 | 6♠ | N | = | 1430 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | N | +1 | 680 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SOLHEIM vs BEIJING TRINERGY 2 : 2 VP (match 23773) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SOLHEIM | BEIJING TRINERGY | |
| 27 | 3♦ | W | ♥2 | +3 | 170 | 74% | 3♠x | S | ♠J | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 6♣ | S | ♥A | = | 1370 | 61% | 4♠ | N | ♦3 | +2 | 680 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3♦ | W | +3 | 170 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 28 | 6♣ | S | = | 1370 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +2 | 680 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRIDGE OF KING F1 vs LES MISERABLES 0 : 4 VP (match 23774) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | LES MISERABLES | |
| 27 | 5♦ | E | ♠A | = | 400 | 83% | 3♦ | W | ♣2 | +2 | 150 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 3NT | S | ♥3 | +3 | 690 | 53% | 5♠ | N | ♦2 | +2 | 710 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 5♦ | E | = | 400 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 62% | ||||
| 28 | 3NT | S | +3 | 690 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | N | +2 | 710 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GRAIZER vs MIKLAGARD 4 : 0 VP (match 23775) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GRAIZER | MIKLAGARD | |
| 27 | 1NT | S | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 65% | 5♦ | W | ♠3 | = | 400 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | ♦3 | +2 | 710 | 53% | 4♠ | N | ♠4 | +2 | 680 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 1NT | S | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | W | = | 400 | 83% | ||||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | +2 | 710 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +2 | 680 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TRONDERMIX vs SJODAL 0 : 4 VP (match 23776) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TRONDERMIX | SJODAL | |
| 27 | 5♦ | E | ♠A | = | 400 | 83% | 3♠x | S | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | ♣2 | +2 | 710 | 53% | 6♠ | N | ♦4 | = | 1430 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 5♦ | E | = | 400 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | +2 | 710 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | N | = | 1430 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NI LLIV vs ROSSARD 2 : 2 VP (match 23777) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NI LLIV | ROSSARD | |
| 27 | 5♦ | W | ♥3 | = | 400 | 83% | 5♦ | E | ♠A | = | 400 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 28 | 4♠ | N | ♦3 | +2 | 680 | 69% | 4♠ | N | ♦3 | +2 | 680 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 5♦ | W | = | 400 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | E | = | 400 | 83% | ||||
| 28 | 4♠ | N | +2 | 680 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | +2 | 680 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BADGER vs MIXED 2 : 2 VP (match 23778) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BADGER | MIXED | |
| 27 | 4♠x | S | ♦A | -3 | 500 | 95% | 3♦ | E | ♦3 | +2 | 150 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 6♠ | N | ♦3 | = | 1430 | 79% | 5♠ | N | ♦3 | = | 650 | 89% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 4♠x | S | -3 | 500 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | +2 | 150 | 62% | ||||
| 28 | 6♠ | N | = | 1430 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | N | = | 650 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAHAFFEY vs CAYNE 3 : 1 VP (match 23779) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAHAFFEY | CAYNE | |
| 27 | 2♠ | S | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 65% | 3♣ | S | ♦A | -2 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | ♥10 | +1 | 680 | 69% | 5♠ | N | ♦3 | +1 | 680 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | S | -2 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | +1 | 680 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♠ | N | +1 | 680 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DARLING vs GOLD 2 : 2 VP (match 23780) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DARLING | GOLD | |
| 27 | 3♦ | W | ♣2 | +2 | 150 | 62% | 2♠ | S | ♦A | = | 110 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♥x | E | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 94% | 7♠ | N | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 83% | ||||
| 28 | 5♥x | E | -2 | 300 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 7♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MELWOOD vs SILVERFOX 2 : 2 VP (match 23781) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MELWOOD | SILVERFOX | |
| 27 | 5♦x | W | ♠2 | = | 550 | 98% | 5♦ | E | ♠A | = | 400 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 7♠ | N | ♠4 | = | 2210 | 100% | 6♠ | N | ♦2 | = | 1430 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 5♦x | W | = | 550 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | E | = | 400 | 83% | ||||
| 28 | 7♠ | N | = | 2210 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | N | = | 1430 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BERGEN AK vs TOMFOOLERY 2 : 2 VP (match 23782) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BERGEN AK | TOMFOOLERY | |
| 27 | 2♠ | W | ♦4 | -3 | 150 | 94% | 5♦ | W | ♥3 | +1 | 420 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | ♦3 | +1 | 680 | 69% | 6♠ | N | ♣2 | = | 1430 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♠ | W | -3 | 150 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | W | +1 | 420 | 92% | ||||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | +1 | 680 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | N | = | 1430 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WARD PLATT vs KIBE 0 : 4 VP (match 23783) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WARD PLATT | KIBE | |
| 27 | 4♦ | W | ♠2 | +1 | 150 | 62% | 2♥ | E | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | ♦3 | = | 650 | 89% | 3NT | S | ♠8 | +2 | 660 | 84% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 4♦ | W | +1 | 150 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 74% | ||||
| 28 | 5♠ | N | = | 650 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PASSO DOUBLE vs ROSENTHAL 0 : 4 VP (match 23784) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PASSO DOUBLE | ROSENTHAL | |
| 27 | 5♠x | S | ♦A | -4 | 800 | 100% | 3♠x | N | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♠ | N | ♦3 | +2 | 680 | 69% | 7♣ | S | ♦Q | = | 2140 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 5♠x | S | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 28 | 4♠ | N | +2 | 680 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 7♣ | S | = | 2140 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VI E KLAR vs TOGRAM 2 : 2 VP (match 23785) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VI E KLAR | TOGRAM | |
| 27 | 3NT | W | ♠9 | = | 400 | 83% | 1NT | S | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 6♠ | N | ♦3 | = | 1430 | 79% | 4♠ | N | ♦3 | +2 | 680 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 3NT | W | = | 400 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 28 | 6♠ | N | = | 1430 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +2 | 680 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MELBOURNE 1 vs MALUISH 2 : 2 VP (match 23786) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MELBOURNE 1 | MALUISH | |
| 27 | 2♣ | S | ♦A | +1 | 110 | 83% | 3♦ | W | ♥3 | +2 | 150 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 28 | 4♠ | N | ♦6 | +3 | 710 | 53% | 7♥x | E | ♣A | -6 | 1400 | 65% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 27 | 2♣ | S | +1 | 110 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 62% | ||||
| 28 | 4♠ | N | +3 | 710 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 7♥x | E | -6 | 1400 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|