Skip to content

🌐 All championships 🏠 Categories 🔍 Players ▲ Top

Tables

← Cumulative standings Round 4 results & standings results standings Round 4 board records

Match protocols

1. BOHNSACK – INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 2. ZEN – PANDORA 3. MOSTINGAN – MINA 4. LEGEANKA – BEIJING TRINERGY 5. BRIDGE OF KING F1 – OPTIMISTS 6. MIKLAGARD – TUPPEN 7. SJODAL – THE PATRIOTS 8. NI LLIV – CHINA GEELY AUTO 9. BADGER – VIDIGAL 10. CAYNE – PUNCH 11. YABBIES – GOLD 12. MELWOOD – HOFFEMAN 13. BERGEN AK – ANITAS SANS 14. TEAM ATLANTIC – WARD PLATT 15. ROSENTHAL – GAMMA GRAFISK 16. WITO – VI E KLAR 17. ALZADA – MALUISH 18. MELBOURNE 1 – SANBORN 19. TOGRAM – TAKK 20. KURTS ANGELS – PASSO DOUBLE 21. BYE – KIBE 22. TOMFOOLERY – MARIE 23. SILVERFOX – NONSTOP 24. DARLING – SOLHEIM 25. LES MISERABLES – MAHAFFEY 26. MIXED – GRAIZER 27. TRONDERMIX – ROSSARD

Rounds

Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8 Round 9 Round 10 Round 11 Round 12 Round 13 Round 14 Round 15 Round 16 Round 17 Round 18 Round 19 Round 20 Round 21 Round 22 Round 23 Round 24 Round 25

Round 4 — M-OPEN BAM

27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records

Round 4 results↑ top

Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.

Table	Home team	Visiting team	BAM (home)	BAM (visit)	VP (home)	VP (visit)
1	BOHNSACK	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
2	ZEN	PANDORA	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
3	MOSTINGAN	MINA	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
4	LEGEANKA	BEIJING TRINERGY	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
5	BRIDGE OF KING F1	OPTIMISTS	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
6	MIKLAGARD	TUPPEN	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
7	SJODAL	THE PATRIOTS	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
8	NI LLIV	CHINA GEELY AUTO	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
9	BADGER	VIDIGAL	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
10	CAYNE	PUNCH	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
11	YABBIES	GOLD	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
12	MELWOOD	HOFFEMAN	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
13	BERGEN AK	ANITAS SANS	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
14	TEAM ATLANTIC	WARD PLATT	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
15	ROSENTHAL	GAMMA GRAFISK	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
16	WITO	VI E KLAR	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
17	ALZADA	MALUISH	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
18	MELBOURNE 1	SANBORN	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
19	TOGRAM	TAKK	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
20	KURTS ANGELS	PASSO DOUBLE	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
21	BYE	KIBE	0	0	0.00	2.40	protocol →
22	TOMFOOLERY	MARIE	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
23	SILVERFOX	NONSTOP	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
24	DARLING	SOLHEIM	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
25	LES MISERABLES	MAHAFFEY	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
26	MIXED	GRAIZER	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
27	TRONDERMIX	ROSSARD	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →

Standings after round 4↑ top

Cumulative board-a-match points through round 4 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players

Place	Team	Pts	R4	Pld
1	MIKLAGARD	15.00	4.00	4
2	GRAIZER	13.00	4.00	4
2	WARD PLATT	13.00	4.00	4
4	BEIJING TRINERGY	11.00	2.00	4
4	GOLD	11.00	3.00	4
4	MALUISH	11.00	2.00	4
7	KIBE	10.40	2.40	4
8	BOHNSACK	10.00	3.00	4
8	CHINA GEELY AUTO	10.00	3.00	4
8	NONSTOP	10.00	4.00	4
8	SJODAL	10.00	3.00	4
8	SOLHEIM	10.00	2.00	4
8	TEAM ATLANTIC	10.00	0.00	4
8	VIDIGAL	10.00	3.00	4
8	WITO	10.00	3.00	4
16	DARLING	9.00	2.00	4
16	MELWOOD	9.00	2.00	4
18	CAYNE	8.80	3.00	4
19	MAHAFFEY	8.40	2.00	4
19	ROSSARD	8.40	2.00	4
21	ALZADA	8.00	2.00	4
21	BADGER	8.00	1.00	4
21	BRIDGE OF KING F1	8.00	1.00	4
21	GAMMA GRAFISK	8.00	3.00	4
21	MELBOURNE 1	8.00	3.00	4
21	MOSTINGAN	8.00	4.00	4
21	NI LLIV	8.00	1.00	4
21	OPTIMISTS	8.00	3.00	4
21	TOMFOOLERY	8.00	3.00	4
21	TRONDERMIX	8.00	2.00	4
21	VI E KLAR	8.00	1.00	4
21	YABBIES	8.00	1.00	4
33	SILVERFOX	7.40	0.00	4
34	ANITAS SANS	7.00	3.00	4
34	BERGEN AK	7.00	1.00	4
34	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN	7.00	1.00	4
34	KURTS ANGELS	7.00	2.00	4
34	PASSO DOUBLE	7.00	2.00	4
34	SANBORN	7.00	1.00	4
34	TOGRAM	7.00	3.00	4
41	LEGEANKA	6.20	2.00	4
42	LES MISERABLES	6.00	2.00	4
42	MIXED	6.00	0.00	4
42	PUNCH	6.00	1.00	4
42	TAKK	6.00	1.00	4
42	THE PATRIOTS	6.00	1.00	4
42	TUPPEN	6.00	0.00	4
48	ROSENTHAL	5.00	1.00	4
49	HOFFEMAN	4.00	2.00	4
49	MINA	4.00	0.00	4
49	ZEN	4.00	3.00	4
52	MARIE	3.00	1.00	4
52	PANDORA	3.00	1.00	4

Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.

Round 4 board-a-match standings↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	R4	BAM%

BOHNSACK vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 3 : 1 VP (match 23490) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BOHNSACK	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN
7	4♠	W	♦3	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♣5	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	5♠	W	♥2	=		450	85%	4♠	W	♥2	+2		480	60%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.4							NS-0.5	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	5♠	W	=		450	85%	2
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.4	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

ZEN vs PANDORA 3 : 1 VP (match 23491) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	ZEN	PANDORA
7	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♣5	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	♣8	+1		450	85%	4♠	W	♦8	+2		480	60%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.4							NS-0.5	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+1		450	85%	2
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.4	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MOSTINGAN vs MINA 4 : 0 VP (match 23492) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MOSTINGAN	MINA
7	4♠	W	♥J	=		620	80%	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	2
8	4♠	W	♦6	+1		450	85%	5♠	W	♣8	+2		510	93%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+1.3							NS-1.2	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	=		620	80%	2
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	2
8	4♠	W	+1		450	85%	2
8	5♠	W	+2		510	93%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+1.3	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.2	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

LEGEANKA vs BEIJING TRINERGY 2 : 2 VP (match 23493) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	LEGEANKA	BEIJING TRINERGY
7	3NT	W	♦3	-1	100		98%	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	2
8	5♠	E	♠4	+1		480	60%	4♠	W	♥2	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.8							NS+0.4	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	3NT	W	-1	100		98%	2
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	2
8	5♠	E	+1		480	60%		2
8	4♠	W	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.8	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.4	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BRIDGE OF KING F1 vs OPTIMISTS 1 : 3 VP (match 23494) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BRIDGE OF KING F1	OPTIMISTS
7	4♠	W	♦2	+1		650	66%	1♠	W	♥J	+4		200	89%		2
8	5♠	W	♦2	+1		480	60%	4♠	W	♦2	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS+0.6	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%		2
7	1♠	W	+4		200	89%		2
8	5♠	W	+1		480	60%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.6	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MIKLAGARD vs TUPPEN 4 : 0 VP (match 23495) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MIKLAGARD	TUPPEN
7	4♠	W	♥J	=		620	80%	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	2
8	5♠	W	♦2	=		450	85%	4♠	W	♦2	+2		480	60%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+1.3							NS-0.5	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	=		620	80%	2
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	2
8	5♠	W	=		450	85%	2
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+1.3	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

SJODAL vs THE PATRIOTS 3 : 1 VP (match 23496) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	SJODAL	THE PATRIOTS
7	1NT	W	♦3	+1		120	94%	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	2
8	4♠	W	♣8	+2		480	60%	4♠	W	♥10	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.7							NS-0.5	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	1NT	W	+1		120	94%	2
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	2
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.7	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

NI LLIV vs CHINA GEELY AUTO 1 : 3 VP (match 23497) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	NI LLIV	CHINA GEELY AUTO
7	4♠	W	♣5	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	♦5	+2		480	60%	4♠	E	♦2	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS+0.4	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%		2
8	4♠	E	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.4	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BADGER vs VIDIGAL 1 : 3 VP (match 23498) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BADGER	VIDIGAL
7	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	♦2	+2		480	60%	4♠	W	♦4	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS+0.4	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%		2
8	4♠	W	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.4	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

CAYNE vs PUNCH 3 : 1 VP (match 23499) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	CAYNE	PUNCH
7	2NT	W	♦6	+1		150	92%	3NT	W	♥J	+1		630	74%	2
8	4♠	W	♥2	+2		480	60%	4♠	W	♥3	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.6							NS+0.3	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	2NT	W	+1		150	92%	2
7	3NT	W	+1		630	74%	2
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.6	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.3	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

YABBIES vs GOLD 1 : 3 VP (match 23500) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	YABBIES	GOLD
7	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	♥3	+2		480	60%	4♠	W	♦8	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS+0.4	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%		2
8	4♠	W	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.4	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MELWOOD vs HOFFEMAN 2 : 2 VP (match 23501) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MELWOOD	HOFFEMAN
7	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	♣8	+2		480	60%	4♠	W	♦2	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS-0.5	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BERGEN AK vs ANITAS SANS 1 : 3 VP (match 23502) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BERGEN AK	ANITAS SANS
7	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♦3	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	6♠	W	♣8	=		980	98%	4♠	W	♣2	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-1.3							NS+0.4	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	6♠	W	=		980	98%		2
8	4♠	W	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-1.3	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.4	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TEAM ATLANTIC vs WARD PLATT 0 : 4 VP (match 23503) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TEAM ATLANTIC	WARD PLATT
7	4♠	W	♦3	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♥J	=		620	80%		2
8	4♠	W	♣8	+2		480	60%	4♠	W	♥2	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS+1.3	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%		2
7	4♠	W	=		620	80%		2
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%		2
8	4♠	W	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+1.3	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

ROSENTHAL vs GAMMA GRAFISK 1 : 3 VP (match 23504) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	ROSENTHAL	GAMMA GRAFISK
7	4♠	W	♠3	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♣4	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	♥3	+2		480	60%	4♠	W	♣8	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS+0.4	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%		2
8	4♠	W	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.4	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

WITO vs VI E KLAR 3 : 1 VP (match 23505) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	WITO	VI E KLAR
7	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♠2	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	5♠	S	♣8	+2	510		100%	5♠	W	♣8	+1		480	60%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.7							NS-0.5	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	5♠	S	+2	510		100%	2
8	5♠	W	+1		480	60%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.7	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

ALZADA vs MALUISH 2 : 2 VP (match 23506) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	ALZADA	MALUISH
7	3NT	W	♥J	=		600	85%	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	2
8	6♠	W	♦2	=		980	98%	4♠	W	♣8	+2		480	60%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.3							NS-0.5	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	3NT	W	=		600	85%	2
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	2
8	6♠	W	=		980	98%		2
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.3	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MELBOURNE 1 vs SANBORN 3 : 1 VP (match 23507) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MELBOURNE 1	SANBORN
7	3NT	W	♥J	+1		630	74%	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	2
8	4♠	W	♥3	+2		480	60%	4♠	W	♣8	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.3							NS-0.5	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	3NT	W	+1		630	74%	2
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	2
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.3	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TOGRAM vs TAKK 3 : 1 VP (match 23508) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TOGRAM	TAKK
7	4♠	W	♣5	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♠9	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	E	♦2	+1		450	85%	5♠	W	♥2	+1		480	60%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.4							NS-0.5	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	E	+1		450	85%	2
8	5♠	W	+1		480	60%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.4	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

KURTS ANGELS vs PASSO DOUBLE 2 : 2 VP (match 23509) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	KURTS ANGELS	PASSO DOUBLE
7	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	3NT	W	♥J	+1		630	74%		2
8	4♠	W	♥2	+1		450	85%	4♠	W	♣9	+3		510	93%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.4							NS-0.4	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%		2
7	3NT	W	+1		630	74%		2
8	4♠	W	+1		450	85%	2
8	4♠	W	+3		510	93%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.4	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.4	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BYE vs KIBE 0 : 2.4 VP (match 23510)↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BYE	KIBE
7	–		—					–		—
8	–		—					–		—
Σ	BAM / points						NS0.0							NS0.0	0	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	–
7	–
8	–
8	–
Σ	BAM Open					NS0.0	0	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS0.0	0	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TOMFOOLERY vs MARIE 3 : 1 VP (match 23511) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TOMFOOLERY	MARIE
7	1♠	W	♥5	+4		200	89%	3NT	E	♦3	=		600	85%	2
8	4♠	W	♥5	+2		480	60%	4♠	W	♣8	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.6							NS+0.5	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	1♠	W	+4		200	89%	2
7	3NT	E	=		600	85%	2
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.6	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.5	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

SILVERFOX vs NONSTOP 0 : 4 VP (match 23512) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	SILVERFOX	NONSTOP
7	3NT	W	♥J	+1		630	74%	3NT	W	♦3	-1	100		98%		2
8	6♠	W	♦3	=		980	98%	5♠	W	♥2	+1		480	60%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS+0.8	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	3NT	W	+1		630	74%		2
7	3NT	W	-1	100		98%		2
8	6♠	W	=		980	98%		2
8	5♠	W	+1		480	60%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.8	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

DARLING vs SOLHEIM 2 : 2 VP (match 23513) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	DARLING	SOLHEIM
7	4♠	E	♣5	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	♦2	+2		480	60%	4♠	W	♦8	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS-0.5	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	E	+1		650	66%	1	1
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

LES MISERABLES vs MAHAFFEY 2 : 2 VP (match 23514) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	LES MISERABLES	MAHAFFEY
7	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	5♠	W	♦8	+1		480	60%	4♠	W	♦3	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS-0.5	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	5♠	W	+1		480	60%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MIXED vs GRAIZER 0 : 4 VP (match 23515) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MIXED	GRAIZER
7	4♠	W	♥J	+1		650	66%	3NT	W	♦3	-1	100		98%		2
8	4♠	W	♦4	+2		480	60%	4♠	W	♦6	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS+1.7	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%		2
7	3NT	W	-1	100		98%		2
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%		2
8	4♠	W	+1		450	85%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+1.7	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TRONDERMIX vs ROSSARD 2 : 2 VP (match 23516) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TRONDERMIX	ROSSARD
7	4♠	E	♥J	+1		650	66%	4♠	W	♠2	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	♥10	+2		480	60%	4♠	W	♥2	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS-0.5	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
7	4♠	E	+1		650	66%	1	1
7	4♠	W	+1		650	66%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
8	4♠	W	+2		480	60%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg