Round 16 — M-OPEN BAM
27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 16 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ANITAS SANS | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | TEAM ATLANTIC | HOFFEMAN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | GAMMA GRAFISK | YABBIES | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | WITO | PUNCH | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | VIDIGAL | ALZADA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | SANBORN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | THE PATRIOTS | TAKK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | TUPPEN | KURTS ANGELS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | OPTIMISTS | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | LEGEANKA | MARIE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | NONSTOP | MOSTINGAN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | ZEN | SOLHEIM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | BOHNSACK | LES MISERABLES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | GRAIZER | PANDORA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | MINA | TRONDERMIX | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | ROSSARD | BEIJING TRINERGY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | MIXED | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | MIKLAGARD | MAHAFFEY | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | SJODAL | DARLING | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | SILVERFOX | NI LLIV | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | TOMFOOLERY | BADGER | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | CAYNE | KIBE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | GOLD | PASSO DOUBLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | MELWOOD | TOGRAM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | MELBOURNE 1 | BERGEN AK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | WARD PLATT | MALUISH | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | VI E KLAR | ROSENTHAL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 16↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 16 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R16 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GRAIZER | 42.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 1 | SANBORN | 42.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 3 | PUNCH | 41.00 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 4 | MOSTINGAN | 40.40 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 5 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 40.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 6 | ROSENTHAL | 39.40 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 7 | MIKLAGARD | 39.00 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 8 | KIBE | 37.40 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 8 | SJODAL | 37.40 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 10 | ALZADA | 37.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 10 | GAMMA GRAFISK | 37.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 12 | BADGER | 36.40 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 13 | YABBIES | 36.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 14 | CAYNE | 35.80 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 15 | MAHAFFEY | 35.40 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 16 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 35.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 16 | TAKK | 35.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 16 | TOMFOOLERY | 35.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 19 | GOLD | 34.60 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 20 | KURTS ANGELS | 34.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 20 | TRONDERMIX | 34.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 20 | VIDIGAL | 34.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 20 | WARD PLATT | 34.00 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 24 | DARLING | 33.20 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 25 | LES MISERABLES | 33.00 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 26 | BOHNSACK | 32.40 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 26 | ROSSARD | 32.40 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 28 | SOLHEIM | 32.00 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 28 | WITO | 32.00 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 28 | ZEN | 32.00 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 31 | SILVERFOX | 31.40 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 32 | BERGEN AK | 30.20 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 33 | MELWOOD | 30.00 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 33 | NI LLIV | 30.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 33 | TUPPEN | 30.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 36 | TEAM ATLANTIC | 29.00 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 37 | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 28.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 37 | MARIE | 28.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 37 | NONSTOP | 28.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 37 | PASSO DOUBLE | 28.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 41 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 27.40 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 41 | MALUISH | 27.40 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 41 | MINA | 27.40 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 41 | TOGRAM | 27.40 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 45 | MELBOURNE 1 | 27.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 46 | MIXED | 26.80 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 47 | OPTIMISTS | 26.40 | 2.40 | 16 |
| 48 | HOFFEMAN | 26.00 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 48 | THE PATRIOTS | 26.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 50 | ANITAS SANS | 25.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 51 | PANDORA | 23.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 52 | LEGEANKA | 21.20 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 53 | VI E KLAR | 20.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 16 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R16 | BAM% |
|---|
ANITAS SANS vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 2 : 2 VP (match 23814) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ANITAS SANS | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | |
| 1 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2♥ | N | ♣2 | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3♠ | E | ♦2 | = | 140 | 69% | 3♦x | N | ♣A | -1 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 2 | 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3♦x | N | -1 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM ATLANTIC vs HOFFEMAN 1 : 3 VP (match 23815) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM ATLANTIC | HOFFEMAN | |
| 1 | 2♥ | N | ♠A | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2♥ | N | ♣8 | +2 | 170 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 87% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAMMA GRAFISK vs YABBIES 4 : 0 VP (match 23816) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAMMA GRAFISK | YABBIES | |
| 1 | 3♥ | N | ♣5 | = | 140 | 68% | 2♠ | W | ♥Q | +1 | 140 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 3♠ | E | ♥10 | = | 140 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 94% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WITO vs PUNCH 1 : 3 VP (match 23817) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WITO | PUNCH | |
| 1 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 68% | 3♠ | E | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♣7 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 4♠ | E | ♥10 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VIDIGAL vs ALZADA 2 : 2 VP (match 23818) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VIDIGAL | ALZADA | |
| 1 | 2♠ | E | ♠10 | = | 110 | 88% | 2♠ | E | ♣7 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 94% | 4♥ | W | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA GEELY AUTO vs SANBORN 0 : 4 VP (match 23819) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA GEELY AUTO | SANBORN | |
| 1 | 2♥ | N | ♣5 | +1 | 140 | 68% | 3♥ | N | ♣5 | +1 | 170 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3♠ | E | ♥10 | = | 140 | 69% | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 87% | ||||
| 2 | 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THE PATRIOTS vs TAKK 0 : 4 VP (match 23820) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THE PATRIOTS | TAKK | |
| 1 | 3♥ | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 74% | 2♥ | N | ♦Q | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 2♥ | E | ♦6 | +2 | 170 | 83% | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 2 | 2♥ | E | +2 | 170 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TUPPEN vs KURTS ANGELS 2 : 2 VP (match 23821) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TUPPEN | KURTS ANGELS | |
| 1 | 3♠x | W | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2♥ | N | ♣5 | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2♠ | E | ♦2 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♠x | W | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
OPTIMISTS vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 23822)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | OPTIMISTS | BYE | |
| 1 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| 2 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| 2 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LEGEANKA vs MARIE 2 : 2 VP (match 23823) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LEGEANKA | MARIE | |
| 1 | 2♥x | N | ♣8 | = | 470 | 98% | 2♥ | N | ♦Q | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♥10 | = | 420 | 92% | 4♦ | N | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♥x | N | = | 470 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONSTOP vs MOSTINGAN 2 : 2 VP (match 23824) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONSTOP | MOSTINGAN | |
| 1 | 2♥ | N | ♠A | = | 110 | 51% | 2♥ | N | ♣5 | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 3♠ | E | ♦2 | = | 140 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZEN vs SOLHEIM 3 : 1 VP (match 23825) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZEN | SOLHEIM | |
| 1 | 2♥ | N | ♣5 | +2 | 170 | 87% | 3♥ | N | ♣5 | +1 | 170 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | = | 420 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 87% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BOHNSACK vs LES MISERABLES 1 : 3 VP (match 23826) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BOHNSACK | LES MISERABLES | |
| 1 | 3♥x | S | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 81% | 3♥x | N | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 81% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 3♠ | E | ♦2 | = | 140 | 69% | 4♥ | W | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 81% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♥x | N | -1 | 100 | 81% | ||||
| 2 | 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GRAIZER vs PANDORA 4 : 0 VP (match 23827) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GRAIZER | PANDORA | |
| 1 | 3♠x | W | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2NT | N | ♠5 | -3 | 150 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♦4 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2♠ | E | ♦4 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♠x | W | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | -3 | 150 | 98% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MINA vs TRONDERMIX 0 : 4 VP (match 23828) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MINA | TRONDERMIX | |
| 1 | 2♥ | N | ♠A | = | 110 | 51% | 3♥ | N | ♣6 | = | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 5♦x | N | ♣A | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2♥ | E | ♦4 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 2 | 5♦x | N | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ROSSARD vs BEIJING TRINERGY 2 : 2 VP (match 23829) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ROSSARD | BEIJING TRINERGY | |
| 1 | 3♥ | N | ♣3 | +1 | 170 | 87% | 2♠ | W | ♠10 | +1 | 140 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♥ | W | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 3♦ | S | ♠5 | = | 110 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 94% | ||||
| 2 | 4♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | S | = | 110 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIXED vs BRIDGE OF KING F1 1 : 3 VP (match 23830) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIXED | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | |
| 1 | 2♠x | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 81% | 2♥ | N | ♣5 | +2 | 170 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3♥ | W | ♦2 | = | 140 | 69% | 2♥ | E | ♦4 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 87% | ||||
| 2 | 3♥ | W | = | 140 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIKLAGARD vs MAHAFFEY 1 : 3 VP (match 23831) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIKLAGARD | MAHAFFEY | |
| 1 | 3♠ | N | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 81% | 3♥ | N | ♣5 | = | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♥ | E | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 4♥ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 2 | 4♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SJODAL vs DARLING 1 : 3 VP (match 23832) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SJODAL | DARLING | |
| 1 | 3♠x | N | ♣A | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2♥ | N | ♣8 | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 5♥x | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 94% | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 94% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| 2 | 5♥x | E | -1 | 100 | 94% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILVERFOX vs NI LLIV 0 : 4 VP (match 23833) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILVERFOX | NI LLIV | |
| 1 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2♥ | N | ♣2 | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♠10 | +1 | 450 | 98% | 2♥ | E | ♦2 | = | 110 | 55% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TOMFOOLERY vs BADGER 4 : 0 VP (match 23834) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TOMFOOLERY | BADGER | |
| 1 | 3♥x | N | ♣5 | +1 | 630 | 100% | 3♠x | E | ♣7 | -2 | 300 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♦4 | -2 | 100 | 94% | 4♠ | W | ♦2 | = | 420 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.9 | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♥x | N | +1 | 630 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | E | -2 | 300 | 96% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAYNE vs KIBE 3 : 1 VP (match 23835) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAYNE | KIBE | |
| 1 | 3♠ | E | ♣7 | -2 | 100 | 60% | 4♥ | N | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3♠ | E | ♥10 | = | 140 | 69% | 2♥ | E | ♠10 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 74% | ||||
| 2 | 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOLD vs PASSO DOUBLE 2 : 2 VP (match 23836) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOLD | PASSO DOUBLE | |
| 1 | 2♥ | N | ♣8 | +3 | 200 | 94% | 3♥ | N | ♣3 | = | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 3♠ | E | ♥10 | = | 140 | 69% | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♥ | N | +3 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 2 | 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MELWOOD vs TOGRAM 3 : 1 VP (match 23837) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MELWOOD | TOGRAM | |
| 1 | 3♥ | S | ♠K | = | 140 | 68% | 2♠ | W | ♠5 | = | 110 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 4♠ | E | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 88% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MELBOURNE 1 vs BERGEN AK 2 : 2 VP (match 23838) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MELBOURNE 1 | BERGEN AK | |
| 1 | 3♥ | N | ♠K | = | 140 | 68% | 3♥ | N | ♠A | = | 140 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 3♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WARD PLATT vs MALUISH 3 : 1 VP (match 23839) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WARD PLATT | MALUISH | |
| 1 | 2♥ | N | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 74% | 2♠ | W | ♦K | = | 110 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | = | 420 | 92% | 4♠ | E | ♥K | = | 420 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-1.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 2♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 88% | ||||
| 2 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VI E KLAR vs ROSENTHAL 0 : 4 VP (match 23840) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VI E KLAR | ROSENTHAL | |
| 1 | 3♠ | W | ♥Q | = | 140 | 94% | 2♥ | N | ♦Q | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2 | 2♥ | W | ♣8 | +2 | 170 | 83% | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1 | 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 2 | 2♥ | W | +2 | 170 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|