Round 19 — M-OPEN BAM
27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 19 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WITO | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 3 | 1 | 3.20 | 0.80 | protocol → |
| 2 | ALZADA | GAMMA GRAFISK | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | SANBORN | TEAM ATLANTIC | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | TAKK | ANITAS SANS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | HOFFEMAN | KURTS ANGELS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | YABBIES | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | PUNCH | MARIE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | VIDIGAL | NONSTOP | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | SOLHEIM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | THE PATRIOTS | LES MISERABLES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | GRAIZER | TUPPEN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | OPTIMISTS | TRONDERMIX | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | LEGEANKA | ROSSARD | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | MIXED | MOSTINGAN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZEN | MAHAFFEY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | DARLING | BOHNSACK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SILVERFOX | PANDORA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | MINA | TOMFOOLERY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | BEIJING TRINERGY | KIBE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | PASSO DOUBLE | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | TOGRAM | MIKLAGARD | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | SJODAL | MELBOURNE 1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | NI LLIV | MALUISH | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | BADGER | VI E KLAR | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | ROSENTHAL | CAYNE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | GOLD | WARD PLATT | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | BERGEN AK | MELWOOD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 19↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 19 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R19 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SANBORN | 51.00 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 2 | MOSTINGAN | 47.40 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 3 | KIBE | 46.40 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 4 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 46.00 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 5 | ROSENTHAL | 45.20 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 6 | GRAIZER | 45.00 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 6 | PUNCH | 45.00 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 8 | GAMMA GRAFISK | 44.00 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 8 | MIKLAGARD | 44.00 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 10 | MAHAFFEY | 43.40 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 10 | SJODAL | 43.40 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 12 | ALZADA | 43.00 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 12 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 43.00 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 12 | TAKK | 43.00 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 15 | ROSSARD | 42.40 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 15 | YABBIES | 42.40 | 2.40 | 19 |
| 17 | WARD PLATT | 42.00 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 18 | CAYNE | 41.80 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 19 | SILVERFOX | 41.40 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 20 | WITO | 41.20 | 3.20 | 19 |
| 21 | TOMFOOLERY | 41.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 22 | BADGER | 40.40 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 23 | KURTS ANGELS | 40.00 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 23 | ZEN | 40.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 25 | BOHNSACK | 39.40 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 26 | DARLING | 39.20 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 27 | LES MISERABLES | 39.00 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 28 | VIDIGAL | 38.40 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 29 | SOLHEIM | 38.00 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 30 | GOLD | 37.60 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 31 | BERGEN AK | 37.20 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 32 | NONSTOP | 37.00 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 32 | PASSO DOUBLE | 37.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 32 | TRONDERMIX | 37.00 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 32 | TUPPEN | 37.00 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 36 | MARIE | 35.00 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 37 | MELWOOD | 34.80 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 38 | MALUISH | 34.40 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 39 | MELBOURNE 1 | 34.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 39 | NI LLIV | 34.00 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 41 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 33.40 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 41 | MINA | 33.40 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 43 | MIXED | 32.80 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 44 | THE PATRIOTS | 32.40 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 45 | OPTIMISTS | 31.40 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 46 | TEAM ATLANTIC | 31.00 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 47 | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 30.80 | 0.80 | 19 |
| 48 | TOGRAM | 30.40 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 49 | ANITAS SANS | 30.00 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 49 | HOFFEMAN | 30.00 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 51 | VI E KLAR | 26.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 52 | LEGEANKA | 25.20 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 53 | PANDORA | 23.00 | 0.00 | 19 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 19 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R19 | BAM% |
|---|
WITO vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 3.2 : 0.8 VP (match 23895) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WITO | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♠A | +2 | 150 | 69% | 3NT | N | ♠3 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 1♣ | W | ♦A | -4 | 200 | 53% | Adj. | E | — | 200 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +2 | 150 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| 8 | 1♣ | W | -4 | 200 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| Adj. | E | 200 | ||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALZADA vs GAMMA GRAFISK 4 : 0 VP (match 23896) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALZADA | GAMMA GRAFISK | |
| 7 | 2NT | N | ♠3 | +1 | 150 | 69% | 2♠ | E | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | N | ♠K | = | 420 | 96% | 2♦ | N | ♠7 | +1 | 110 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2NT | N | +1 | 150 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 50% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | N | +1 | 110 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SANBORN vs TEAM ATLANTIC 4 : 0 VP (match 23897) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SANBORN | TEAM ATLANTIC | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♠A | +2 | 150 | 69% | 3NT | N | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 3NT | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +2 | 150 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TAKK vs ANITAS SANS 3 : 1 VP (match 23898) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAKK | ANITAS SANS | |
| 7 | 2♠ | E | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 50% | 3NT | N | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 50% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOFFEMAN vs KURTS ANGELS 1 : 3 VP (match 23899) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOFFEMAN | KURTS ANGELS | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♥6 | +1 | 130 | 58% | 3NT | N | ♠4 | = | 600 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+1.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 93% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YABBIES vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 23900)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YABBIES | BYE | |
| 7 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| 8 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| 8 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PUNCH vs MARIE 0 : 4 VP (match 23901) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PUNCH | MARIE | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 3NT | N | ♠4 | = | 600 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 1NTx | W | ♦A | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 93% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 1NTx | W | -4 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VIDIGAL vs NONSTOP 0 : 4 VP (match 23902) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VIDIGAL | NONSTOP | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♥4 | +1 | 130 | 58% | 5♣ | N | ♠A | = | 600 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2♥ | S | ♠K | +1 | 140 | 61% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | N | = | 600 | 93% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA GEELY AUTO vs SOLHEIM 3 : 1 VP (match 23903) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA GEELY AUTO | SOLHEIM | |
| 7 | 3NT | S | ♠3 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 3NT | N | ♠5 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3NT | N | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 3NT | N | ♠9 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | S | -2 | 200 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | N | = | 400 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THE PATRIOTS vs LES MISERABLES 1 : 3 VP (match 23904) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THE PATRIOTS | LES MISERABLES | |
| 7 | 5♣ | S | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 3♣ | S | ♠2 | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♥ | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3NT | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 5♣ | S | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | S | = | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 8 | 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GRAIZER vs TUPPEN 1 : 3 VP (match 23905) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GRAIZER | TUPPEN | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 3♣ | N | ♠A | +2 | 150 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | +2 | 150 | 69% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
OPTIMISTS vs TRONDERMIX 3 : 1 VP (match 23906) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | OPTIMISTS | TRONDERMIX | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♠A | +3 | 170 | 79% | 3NT | N | ♠3 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +3 | 170 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LEGEANKA vs ROSSARD 0 : 4 VP (match 23907) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LEGEANKA | ROSSARD | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♠2 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 3NT | N | ♣J | = | 600 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♥ | S | ♠K | = | 140 | 61% | 2NT | S | ♠K | +1 | 150 | 55% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 93% | ||||
| 8 | 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | S | +1 | 150 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIXED vs MOSTINGAN 2 : 2 VP (match 23908) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIXED | MOSTINGAN | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 63% | 4♣ | N | ♠A | +2 | 170 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 1NT | S | ♠K | +2 | 150 | 55% | 3♦ | N | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | N | +2 | 170 | 79% | ||||
| 8 | 1NT | S | +2 | 150 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZEN vs MAHAFFEY 2 : 2 VP (match 23909) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZEN | MAHAFFEY | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♠2 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2♠x | E | ♦K | -2 | 500 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 3♥x | S | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 2♠x | E | -2 | 500 | 86% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 3♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DARLING vs BOHNSACK 2 : 2 VP (match 23910) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DARLING | BOHNSACK | |
| 7 | 3NT | S | ♣6 | = | 600 | 93% | 4♣ | N | ♠A | +1 | 150 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠J | -3 | 150 | 100% | 3NT | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | S | = | 600 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | N | +1 | 150 | 69% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | -3 | 150 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILVERFOX vs PANDORA 4 : 0 VP (match 23911) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILVERFOX | PANDORA | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♣J | +1 | 130 | 58% | 5♣ | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♥ | S | ♠K | +2 | 170 | 50% | 4♥ | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | N | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| 8 | 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 50% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MINA vs TOMFOOLERY 2 : 2 VP (match 23912) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MINA | TOMFOOLERY | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♠3 | +1 | 630 | 100% | 3♣ | N | ♠A | +2 | 150 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2NT | S | ♠K | = | 120 | 71% | 3NT | N | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | +2 | 150 | 69% | ||||
| 8 | 2NT | S | = | 120 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BEIJING TRINERGY vs KIBE 3 : 1 VP (match 23913) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BEIJING TRINERGY | KIBE | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 3NT | N | ♠2 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 3NT | S | ♠2 | = | 400 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PASSO DOUBLE vs BRIDGE OF KING F1 2 : 2 VP (match 23914) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PASSO DOUBLE | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | |
| 7 | 3NTx | S | ♠3 | -2 | 500 | 100% | 3NT | N | ♠3 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 3♦ | N | ♠9 | +1 | 130 | 66% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NTx | S | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | N | +1 | 130 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TOGRAM vs MIKLAGARD 0 : 4 VP (match 23915) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TOGRAM | MIKLAGARD | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 4♣ | N | ♣J | = | 130 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♦ | N | ♠9 | +2 | 130 | 66% | 3♠ | W | ♠5 | -4 | 200 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 58% | ||||
| 8 | 2♦ | N | +2 | 130 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | W | -4 | 200 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SJODAL vs MELBOURNE 1 2 : 2 VP (match 23916) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SJODAL | MELBOURNE 1 | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 3NT | N | ♠4 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2NT | N | ♦2 | = | 120 | 71% | 1NT | S | ♠K | +2 | 150 | 55% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| 8 | 2NT | N | = | 120 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | +2 | 150 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NI LLIV vs MALUISH 1 : 3 VP (match 23917) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NI LLIV | MALUISH | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♠3 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 3NT | N | ♠3 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 86% | 4♥ | S | ♠K | = | 420 | 96% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BADGER vs VI E KLAR 2 : 2 VP (match 23918) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BADGER | VI E KLAR | |
| 7 | 3♣ | N | ♠3 | +3 | 170 | 79% | 3♣ | E | ♣J | = | 110 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♦ | N | ♠9 | +1 | 130 | 66% | 4♥ | S | ♠K | = | 420 | 96% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | N | +3 | 170 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 74% | ||||
| 8 | 3♦ | N | +1 | 130 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ROSENTHAL vs CAYNE 2 : 2 VP (match 23919) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ROSENTHAL | CAYNE | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♠3 | = | 600 | 93% | 3NT | N | ♠2 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2NT | S | ♠K | +1 | 150 | 55% | 3NT | N | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| 8 | 2NT | S | +1 | 150 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOLD vs WARD PLATT 0 : 4 VP (match 23920) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOLD | WARD PLATT | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 63% | 3♣ | N | ♣7 | +3 | 170 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3NT | S | ♠K | = | 400 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | +3 | 170 | 79% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BERGEN AK vs MELWOOD 2 : 2 VP (match 23921) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BERGEN AK | MELWOOD | |
| 7 | 1♠x | E | ♦K | -1 | 200 | 84% | 3♣ | N | ♠6 | +2 | 150 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | S | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3NT | S | ♠Q | = | 400 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 1♠x | E | -1 | 200 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | +2 | 150 | 69% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|