Round 20 — M-OPEN BAM
27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 20 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ALZADA | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | SANBORN | WITO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | TAKK | GAMMA GRAFISK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | KURTS ANGELS | TEAM ATLANTIC | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | ANITAS SANS | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | HOFFEMAN | MARIE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | YABBIES | NONSTOP | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | PUNCH | SOLHEIM | 2 | 2 | 1.60 | 1.60 | protocol → |
| 9 | VIDIGAL | LES MISERABLES | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | GRAIZER | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | TRONDERMIX | THE PATRIOTS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | TUPPEN | ROSSARD | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | OPTIMISTS | MIXED | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | MAHAFFEY | LEGEANKA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | MOSTINGAN | DARLING | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | SILVERFOX | ZEN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | TOMFOOLERY | BOHNSACK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | PANDORA | KIBE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | MINA | PASSO DOUBLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | TOGRAM | BEIJING TRINERGY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | MELBOURNE 1 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | MIKLAGARD | MALUISH | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | SJODAL | VI E KLAR | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | NI LLIV | ROSENTHAL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | WARD PLATT | BADGER | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | CAYNE | BERGEN AK | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | MELWOOD | GOLD | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 20↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 20 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R20 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SANBORN | 53.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 2 | MOSTINGAN | 50.40 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 3 | ROSENTHAL | 49.20 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 4 | GRAIZER | 49.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 5 | KIBE | 48.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 6 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 48.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 6 | GAMMA GRAFISK | 48.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 8 | MAHAFFEY | 47.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 8 | SJODAL | 47.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 10 | ALZADA | 47.00 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 11 | PUNCH | 46.60 | 1.60 | 20 |
| 12 | SILVERFOX | 45.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 13 | CAYNE | 44.80 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 14 | BADGER | 44.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 14 | YABBIES | 44.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 16 | MIKLAGARD | 44.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 17 | BOHNSACK | 43.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 17 | ROSSARD | 43.40 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 19 | WITO | 43.20 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 20 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 43.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 20 | TAKK | 43.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 22 | VIDIGAL | 42.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 23 | KURTS ANGELS | 42.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 23 | WARD PLATT | 42.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 25 | TOMFOOLERY | 41.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 26 | DARLING | 40.20 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 27 | TUPPEN | 40.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 27 | ZEN | 40.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 29 | SOLHEIM | 39.60 | 1.60 | 20 |
| 30 | LES MISERABLES | 39.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 30 | NONSTOP | 39.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 30 | PASSO DOUBLE | 39.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 30 | TRONDERMIX | 39.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 34 | MELWOOD | 38.80 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 35 | MALUISH | 38.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 36 | BERGEN AK | 38.20 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 37 | MARIE | 38.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 38 | GOLD | 37.60 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 39 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 37.40 | 4.00 | 20 |
| 40 | MINA | 35.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 41 | MIXED | 34.80 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 42 | THE PATRIOTS | 34.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 43 | MELBOURNE 1 | 34.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 43 | NI LLIV | 34.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 45 | OPTIMISTS | 33.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 46 | TEAM ATLANTIC | 33.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 47 | ANITAS SANS | 32.40 | 2.40 | 20 |
| 47 | TOGRAM | 32.40 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 49 | HOFFEMAN | 31.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 50 | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 30.80 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 51 | VI E KLAR | 26.00 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 52 | LEGEANKA | 25.20 | 0.00 | 20 |
| 53 | PANDORA | 25.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 20 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R20 | BAM% |
|---|
ALZADA vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 4 : 0 VP (match 23922) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALZADA | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | |
| 9 | 4♥x | S | ♣4 | -2 | 300 | 58% | 3NT | E | ♦5 | +1 | 630 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 2♥ | W | ♥A | +3 | 200 | 54% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 4♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | ||||
| 10 | 2♥ | W | +3 | 200 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SANBORN vs WITO 2 : 2 VP (match 23923) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SANBORN | WITO | |
| 9 | 3NT | E | ♥9 | +1 | 630 | 80% | 3NT | E | ♦5 | = | 600 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 2♣ | S | ♠A | +1 | 110 | 94% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 66% | ||||
| 10 | 2♣ | S | +1 | 110 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TAKK vs GAMMA GRAFISK 0 : 4 VP (match 23924) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAKK | GAMMA GRAFISK | |
| 9 | 3NT | E | ♠9 | +1 | 630 | 80% | 1♦ | N | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | ♥K | = | 620 | 72% | 2♠ | E | ♥A | +2 | 170 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 1♦ | N | -2 | 100 | 59% | ||||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KURTS ANGELS vs TEAM ATLANTIC 2 : 2 VP (match 23925) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KURTS ANGELS | TEAM ATLANTIC | |
| 9 | 3NTx | E | ♠9 | +1 | 950 | 99% | 3NT | E | ♦2 | +1 | 630 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 72% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS-1.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3NTx | E | +1 | 950 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | ||||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ANITAS SANS vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 23926)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ANITAS SANS | BYE | |
| 9 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| 10 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| 10 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOFFEMAN vs MARIE 1 : 3 VP (match 23927) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOFFEMAN | MARIE | |
| 9 | 3NT | E | ♦4 | +1 | 630 | 80% | 5♣ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | E | ♦2 | = | 620 | 72% | 4♥ | W | ♦2 | = | 620 | 72% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 83% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 72% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YABBIES vs NONSTOP 2 : 2 VP (match 23928) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YABBIES | NONSTOP | |
| 9 | 3NT | E | ♦5 | = | 600 | 66% | 1♠ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 88% | 3♠ | W | ♥A | +2 | 200 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3NT | E | = | 600 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 1♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | W | +2 | 200 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PUNCH vs SOLHEIM 1.6 : 1.6 VP (match 23929) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PUNCH | SOLHEIM | |
| 9 | Adj. | N | ♦K | 0 | 76% | Adj. | S | ♣2 | 0 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 10 | Adj. | W | ♥A | 0 | 81% | Adj. | W | ♥A | 0 | 81% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | Adj. | N | 0 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Adj. | S | 0 | 76% | |||||
| 10 | Adj. | W | 0 | 81% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Adj. | W | 0 | 81% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VIDIGAL vs LES MISERABLES 4 : 0 VP (match 23930) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VIDIGAL | LES MISERABLES | |
| 9 | 3♣ | E | ♣3 | +2 | 150 | 51% | 3NT | E | ♦5 | +1 | 630 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3♠ | E | ♥A | +1 | 170 | 70% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3♣ | E | +2 | 150 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | ||||
| 10 | 3♠ | E | +1 | 170 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA GEELY AUTO vs GRAIZER 0 : 4 VP (match 23931) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA GEELY AUTO | GRAIZER | |
| 9 | 3NT | E | ♠9 | = | 600 | 66% | 5♣ | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | E | ♣3 | +1 | 650 | 95% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3NT | E | = | 600 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 83% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TRONDERMIX vs THE PATRIOTS 2 : 2 VP (match 23932) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TRONDERMIX | THE PATRIOTS | |
| 9 | 4♥x | S | ♣5 | -3 | 500 | 61% | 3NT | E | ♥9 | +2 | 660 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | W | ♣8 | = | 620 | 72% | 2♠ | W | ♦Q | +2 | 170 | 70% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 4♥x | S | -3 | 500 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 660 | 93% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TUPPEN vs ROSSARD 3 : 1 VP (match 23933) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TUPPEN | ROSSARD | |
| 9 | 3♣ | W | ♣3 | +1 | 130 | 52% | 4NT | E | ♥8 | = | 630 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 72% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 72% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 4NT | E | = | 630 | 80% | ||||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 72% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
OPTIMISTS vs MIXED 2 : 2 VP (match 23934) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | OPTIMISTS | MIXED | |
| 9 | 5♣ | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 83% | 3NT | E | ♥8 | = | 600 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 650 | 95% | 4♥ | W | ♣8 | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 66% | ||||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAHAFFEY vs LEGEANKA 4 : 0 VP (match 23935) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAHAFFEY | LEGEANKA | |
| 9 | 1♠ | N | ♠10 | +1 | 110 | 90% | 1♦ | N | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | W | ♣8 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 1♠ | N | +1 | 110 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 1♦ | N | -2 | 100 | 59% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MOSTINGAN vs DARLING 3 : 1 VP (match 23936) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MOSTINGAN | DARLING | |
| 9 | 5♣x | W | ♥A | -1 | 200 | 94% | 2♥ | S | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 170 | 70% | 3♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 170 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♣x | W | -1 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| 10 | 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILVERFOX vs ZEN 4 : 0 VP (match 23937) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILVERFOX | ZEN | |
| 9 | 1♦ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2NT | E | ♠8 | +2 | 180 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | W | ♣9 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 4♥ | E | ♣3 | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 1♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | +2 | 180 | 54% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TOMFOOLERY vs BOHNSACK 0 : 4 VP (match 23938) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TOMFOOLERY | BOHNSACK | |
| 9 | 3NT | W | ♥6 | +1 | 630 | 80% | 2♥x | S | ♣4 | = | 470 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3♠ | W | ♥A | +2 | 200 | 54% | 4♥ | W | ♣8 | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+1.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 80% | 2 | ||
| 2♥x | S | = | 470 | 100% | ||||
| 10 | 3♠ | W | +2 | 200 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PANDORA vs KIBE 2 : 2 VP (match 23939) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PANDORA | KIBE | |
| 9 | 2♥ | N | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 4♣ | E | ♦5 | = | 130 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♠ | E | ♣2 | = | 620 | 72% | 2♠ | W | ♠10 | +3 | 200 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | E | = | 130 | 52% | ||||
| 10 | 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +3 | 200 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MINA vs PASSO DOUBLE 2 : 2 VP (match 23940) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MINA | PASSO DOUBLE | |
| 9 | 4♣x | W | ♣3 | = | 710 | 96% | 5♣ | E | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥ | E | ♣7 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 3♣x | S | ♣4 | -2 | 500 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 4♣x | W | = | 710 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 83% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 3♣x | S | -2 | 500 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TOGRAM vs BEIJING TRINERGY 2 : 2 VP (match 23941) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TOGRAM | BEIJING TRINERGY | |
| 9 | 5♣ | W | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 83% | 4♥ | S | ♦10 | -2 | 100 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3♥ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 170 | 70% | 4♠ | W | ♠10 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -2 | 100 | 59% | ||||
| 10 | 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MELBOURNE 1 vs BRIDGE OF KING F1 0 : 4 VP (match 23942) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MELBOURNE 1 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | |
| 9 | 3NTx | E | ♥8 | +1 | 950 | 99% | 3NT | E | ♥8 | +1 | 630 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♠ | E | ♠2 | = | 620 | 72% | 4♥ | W | ♣8 | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3NTx | E | +1 | 950 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | ||||
| 10 | 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | -3 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIKLAGARD vs MALUISH 0 : 4 VP (match 23943) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIKLAGARD | MALUISH | |
| 9 | 3♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 69% | 4♠ | W | ♠6 | -4 | 400 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♠ | E | ♣2 | = | 620 | 72% | 2♠ | W | ♠6 | +3 | 200 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -4 | 400 | 98% | ||||
| 10 | 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +3 | 200 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SJODAL vs VI E KLAR 4 : 0 VP (match 23944) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SJODAL | VI E KLAR | |
| 9 | 5♣x | E | ♥3 | -1 | 200 | 94% | 3NT | E | ♦5 | +1 | 630 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 2♠ | W | ♦Q | +2 | 170 | 70% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♣x | E | -1 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | ||||
| 10 | 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NI LLIV vs ROSENTHAL 0 : 4 VP (match 23945) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NI LLIV | ROSENTHAL | |
| 9 | 4♥x | N | ♦K | -2 | 300 | 58% | 5♣ | E | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 650 | 95% | 4♠ | E | ♠10 | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 4♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 83% | ||||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WARD PLATT vs BADGER 0 : 4 VP (match 23946) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WARD PLATT | BADGER | |
| 9 | 2NT | E | ♥4 | +2 | 180 | 54% | 1♦ | N | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 72% | 2♣x | S | ♦A | -1 | 200 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2NT | E | +2 | 180 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 1♦ | N | -2 | 100 | 59% | ||||
| 10 | 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 2♣x | S | -1 | 200 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAYNE vs BERGEN AK 3 : 1 VP (match 23947) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAYNE | BERGEN AK | |
| 9 | 1♦ | N | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 59% | 3NT | E | ♥3 | +1 | 630 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 2♠ | W | ♥A | +2 | 170 | 70% | 3♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 170 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 1♦ | N | -2 | 100 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 80% | ||||
| 10 | 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MELWOOD vs GOLD 4 : 0 VP (match 23948) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MELWOOD | GOLD | |
| 9 | 5♣x | E | ♦5 | -1 | 200 | 94% | 3NT | E | ♥8 | +2 | 660 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 170 | 70% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-1.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♣x | E | -1 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 660 | 93% | ||||
| 10 | 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|