Round 5 — M-OPEN BAM
27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 5 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZEN | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | MOSTINGAN | BOHNSACK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | LEGEANKA | PANDORA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | OPTIMISTS | MINA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | BEIJING TRINERGY | TUPPEN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | THE PATRIOTS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | MIKLAGARD | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SJODAL | VIDIGAL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | NI LLIV | PUNCH | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | BADGER | YABBIES | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | HOFFEMAN | CAYNE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | GOLD | ANITAS SANS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | MELWOOD | TEAM ATLANTIC | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | GAMMA GRAFISK | BERGEN AK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | WARD PLATT | WITO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | ALZADA | ROSENTHAL | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SANBORN | VI E KLAR | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | MALUISH | TAKK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | MELBOURNE 1 | KURTS ANGELS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | BYE | TOGRAM | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 21 | MARIE | PASSO DOUBLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | KIBE | NONSTOP | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | TOMFOOLERY | SOLHEIM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | SILVERFOX | LES MISERABLES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | GRAIZER | DARLING | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | MAHAFFEY | TRONDERMIX | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | ROSSARD | MIXED | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 5↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 5 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R5 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MIKLAGARD | 16.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 2 | GRAIZER | 15.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 2 | WARD PLATT | 15.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 4 | GOLD | 14.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 4 | SJODAL | 14.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 6 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 13.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 6 | TEAM ATLANTIC | 13.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 8 | KIBE | 12.40 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 12.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 9 | BOHNSACK | 12.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 9 | NONSTOP | 12.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 9 | SOLHEIM | 12.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 9 | TRONDERMIX | 12.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 9 | WITO | 12.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 15 | DARLING | 11.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 15 | KURTS ANGELS | 11.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 15 | MALUISH | 11.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 18 | BADGER | 10.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 18 | GAMMA GRAFISK | 10.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 18 | MELWOOD | 10.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 18 | MOSTINGAN | 10.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 18 | SANBORN | 10.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 18 | TAKK | 10.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 18 | TOMFOOLERY | 10.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 18 | VIDIGAL | 10.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 18 | YABBIES | 10.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 27 | CAYNE | 9.80 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 28 | ROSSARD | 9.40 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 28 | TOGRAM | 9.40 | 2.40 | 5 |
| 30 | ALZADA | 9.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 30 | BERGEN AK | 9.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 30 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 9.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 30 | LES MISERABLES | 9.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 30 | MIXED | 9.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 30 | NI LLIV | 9.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 30 | OPTIMISTS | 9.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 30 | PASSO DOUBLE | 9.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 30 | PUNCH | 9.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 30 | THE PATRIOTS | 9.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 30 | TUPPEN | 9.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 30 | VI E KLAR | 9.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 42 | MAHAFFEY | 8.40 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 42 | SILVERFOX | 8.40 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 44 | LEGEANKA | 8.20 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 45 | ANITAS SANS | 8.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 45 | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 8.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 45 | MELBOURNE 1 | 8.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 45 | ROSENTHAL | 8.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 49 | HOFFEMAN | 7.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 49 | MINA | 7.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 49 | ZEN | 7.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 52 | MARIE | 5.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 52 | PANDORA | 5.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 5 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R5 | BAM% |
|---|
ZEN vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 3 : 1 VP (match 23517) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZEN | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | |
| 9 | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 6NT | W | ♣K | +1 | 1470 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♦ | S | ♥A | +1 | 150 | 81% | 4♦ | S | ♥K | +1 | 150 | 81% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-1.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1470 | 80% | ||||
| 10 | 4♦ | S | +1 | 150 | 81% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♦ | S | +1 | 150 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MOSTINGAN vs BOHNSACK 2 : 2 VP (match 23518) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MOSTINGAN | BOHNSACK | |
| 9 | 4♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 650 | 74% | 6♠ | E | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3♥x | W | ♦K | -2 | 500 | 65% | 3NT | S | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| 10 | 3♥x | W | -2 | 500 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LEGEANKA vs PANDORA 2 : 2 VP (match 23519) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LEGEANKA | PANDORA | |
| 9 | 6♠ | E | ♥K | +1 | 1460 | 71% | 4♠ | E | ♦10 | +1 | 650 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♥x | W | ♦K | -3 | 800 | 100% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 6♠ | E | +1 | 1460 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 74% | ||||
| 10 | 4♥x | W | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
OPTIMISTS vs MINA 1 : 3 VP (match 23520) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | OPTIMISTS | MINA | |
| 9 | 6♠ | E | ♦4 | +1 | 1460 | 71% | 4♠ | E | ♦10 | +3 | 710 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 6♠ | E | +1 | 1460 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +3 | 710 | 54% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BEIJING TRINERGY vs TUPPEN 1 : 3 VP (match 23521) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BEIJING TRINERGY | TUPPEN | |
| 9 | 6♠ | E | ♣J | = | 1430 | 55% | 3NT | E | ♣J | +4 | 720 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 6♠ | E | = | 1430 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +4 | 720 | 51% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRIDGE OF KING F1 vs THE PATRIOTS 1 : 3 VP (match 23522) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | THE PATRIOTS | |
| 9 | 7NT | W | ♣2 | = | 2220 | 95% | 7♠ | E | ♦10 | = | 2210 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 68% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 7NT | W | = | 2220 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 7♠ | E | = | 2210 | 85% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIKLAGARD vs CHINA GEELY AUTO 1 : 3 VP (match 23523) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIKLAGARD | CHINA GEELY AUTO | |
| 9 | 4♠ | E | ♣J | = | 620 | 76% | 7♠ | E | ♣J | -4 | 400 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+1.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 7♠ | E | -4 | 400 | 98% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SJODAL vs VIDIGAL 4 : 0 VP (match 23524) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SJODAL | VIDIGAL | |
| 9 | 7♠ | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 86% | 4♠ | E | ♣J | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♦ | S | ♥K | +1 | 150 | 81% | 3NT | S | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 7♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | ||||
| 10 | 4♦ | S | +1 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NI LLIV vs PUNCH 1 : 3 VP (match 23525) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NI LLIV | PUNCH | |
| 9 | 7NT | E | ♣8 | = | 2220 | 95% | 4♠ | E | ♥6 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 7NT | E | = | 2220 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BADGER vs YABBIES 2 : 2 VP (match 23526) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BADGER | YABBIES | |
| 9 | 7NT | W | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 86% | 6♠ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 1460 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♦ | S | ♥K | +1 | 150 | 81% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 7NT | W | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | E | +1 | 1460 | 71% | ||||
| 10 | 4♦ | S | +1 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOFFEMAN vs CAYNE 3 : 1 VP (match 23527) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOFFEMAN | CAYNE | |
| 9 | 4♠ | E | ♥K | +3 | 710 | 54% | 6♠ | E | ♣J | = | 1430 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 4♠ | E | +3 | 710 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | E | = | 1430 | 55% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOLD vs ANITAS SANS 3 : 1 VP (match 23528) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOLD | ANITAS SANS | |
| 9 | 7♠ | E | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 86% | 6♠ | E | ♠10 | +1 | 1460 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 7♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | E | +1 | 1460 | 71% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MELWOOD vs TEAM ATLANTIC 1 : 3 VP (match 23529) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MELWOOD | TEAM ATLANTIC | |
| 9 | 7♠ | E | ♠10 | -1 | 100 | 86% | 3♣xx | E | ♣J | -1 | 400 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3♦ | S | ♥K | +2 | 150 | 81% | 3♦ | S | ♥K | +2 | 150 | 81% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 7♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 3♣xx | E | -1 | 400 | 98% | ||||
| 10 | 3♦ | S | +2 | 150 | 81% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | S | +2 | 150 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAMMA GRAFISK vs BERGEN AK 2 : 2 VP (match 23530) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAMMA GRAFISK | BERGEN AK | |
| 9 | 7♠ | E | ♠10 | = | 2210 | 85% | 7NT | W | ♣K | = | 2220 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3♦ | S | ♥K | +2 | 150 | 81% | 5♦ | S | ♥5 | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 7♠ | E | = | 2210 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 7NT | W | = | 2220 | 95% | ||||
| 10 | 3♦ | S | +2 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WARD PLATT vs WITO 2 : 2 VP (match 23531) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WARD PLATT | WITO | |
| 9 | 4♠ | E | ♣J | +2 | 680 | 64% | 7♠ | E | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 4♦ | S | ♥K | +1 | 150 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 7♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | S | +1 | 150 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALZADA vs ROSENTHAL 1 : 3 VP (match 23532) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALZADA | ROSENTHAL | |
| 9 | 6♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 1460 | 71% | 7♠ | E | ♣J | -3 | 300 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+1.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 6♠ | E | +1 | 1460 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 7♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 94% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SANBORN vs VI E KLAR 3 : 1 VP (match 23533) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SANBORN | VI E KLAR | |
| 9 | 6♠ | E | ♠2 | = | 1430 | 55% | 6♠ | E | ♠10 | +1 | 1460 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 68% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 6♠ | E | = | 1430 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | E | +1 | 1460 | 71% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MALUISH vs TAKK 0 : 4 VP (match 23534) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MALUISH | TAKK | |
| 9 | 7NT | E | ♣2 | = | 2220 | 95% | 4♠ | E | ♣J | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3♦ | N | ♣2 | +2 | 150 | 81% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 7NT | E | = | 2220 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | ||||
| 10 | 3♦ | N | +2 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MELBOURNE 1 vs KURTS ANGELS 0 : 4 VP (match 23535) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MELBOURNE 1 | KURTS ANGELS | |
| 9 | 7NT | E | ♣J | = | 2220 | 95% | 6♠ | E | ♥10 | +1 | 1460 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♦ | S | ♥K | +1 | 150 | 81% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 7NT | E | = | 2220 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | E | +1 | 1460 | 71% | ||||
| 10 | 4♦ | S | +1 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs TOGRAM 0 : 2.4 VP (match 23536)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | TOGRAM | |
| 9 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| 10 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| 10 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARIE vs PASSO DOUBLE 2 : 2 VP (match 23537) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARIE | PASSO DOUBLE | |
| 9 | 5♠ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 680 | 64% | 2♥x | N | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 3♦ | S | ♥K | +2 | 150 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 5♠ | E | +1 | 680 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 2♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 78% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | S | +2 | 150 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIBE vs NONSTOP 2 : 2 VP (match 23538) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIBE | NONSTOP | |
| 9 | 4♠ | E | ♠10 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 7♠ | E | ♠10 | = | 2210 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3♦ | S | ♥K | +2 | 150 | 81% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 7♠ | E | = | 2210 | 85% | ||||
| 10 | 3♦ | S | +2 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TOMFOOLERY vs SOLHEIM 2 : 2 VP (match 23539) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TOMFOOLERY | SOLHEIM | |
| 9 | 6NT | W | ♣K | = | 1440 | 61% | 5♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 680 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 4♦ | S | ♥K | +1 | 150 | 81% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 5♠ | E | +1 | 680 | 64% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | S | +1 | 150 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILVERFOX vs LES MISERABLES 1 : 3 VP (match 23540) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILVERFOX | LES MISERABLES | |
| 9 | 7NT | E | ♣J | = | 2220 | 95% | 7♠ | E | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 7NT | E | = | 2220 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 7♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GRAIZER vs DARLING 2 : 2 VP (match 23541) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GRAIZER | DARLING | |
| 9 | 7♠ | E | ♥K | = | 2210 | 85% | 6♠ | E | ♣J | +1 | 1460 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 3NT | S | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 7♠ | E | = | 2210 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | E | +1 | 1460 | 71% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAHAFFEY vs TRONDERMIX 0 : 4 VP (match 23542) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAHAFFEY | TRONDERMIX | |
| 9 | 6♠ | E | ♣J | = | 1430 | 55% | 6♣ | E | ♦10 | -4 | 400 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 4♦ | S | ♥K | +1 | 150 | 81% | 3♥ | E | ♦K | -2 | 200 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 6♠ | E | = | 1430 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | E | -4 | 400 | 98% | ||||
| 10 | 4♦ | S | +1 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | E | -2 | 200 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ROSSARD vs MIXED 1 : 3 VP (match 23543) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ROSSARD | MIXED | |
| 9 | 6♠ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 1460 | 71% | 6♠ | E | ♥2 | = | 1430 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 6♠ | E | +1 | 1460 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | E | = | 1430 | 55% | ||||
| 10 | 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | S | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|