Knockout event — places follow from the bracket: shared places (e.g. 5-8) are teams eliminated in the same phase; an unplayed decider leaves the place shared. Click a team for its players below.

Final placement
Place	Team
1	SWEDEN
2	USA 1
3	NORWAY
4	FRANCE
5-8	NETHERLANDS
5-8	CHINA
5-8	CHINA HONG KONG
5-8	POLAND

Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.

Rounds included so far (3 of 3): R1 R2 R3. Columns QF·1… = each player's Butler total in that stanza (each knockout phase is played in segments); they sum to Total.

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	USA 1	30	21	protocol →
	Open NSS.Chen – Q.Wang -0.2 / 14 bdClosed EWK.Jin – C.Zhu +8.4 / 14 bd
1	USA 1	48	47	protocol →
	Open NSS.Gu – B.Miao +4.2 / 14 bdClosed EWK.Jin – C.Zhu -6.0 / 14 bd
1	USA 1	13	45	protocol →
	Open NSS.Chen – Q.Wang -3.7 / 14 bdClosed EWS.Gu – B.Miao -31.3 / 14 bd
1	USA 1	26	28	protocol →
	Open NSK.Jin – C.Zhu +6.2 / 14 bdClosed EWS.Chen – Q.Wang -4.5 / 14 bd
Total IMP	117

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	NORWAY	29	50	protocol →
	Open EWL.Lee – J.Tsang -13.1 / 14 bdClosed NSF.Chan – M.Ng -7.9 / 14 bd
1	NORWAY	22	45	protocol →
	Open EWM.Ng – F.Chan -34.9 / 14 bdClosed NSS.Tseng – V.Wan +16.1 / 14 bd
1	NORWAY	22	41	protocol →
	Open EWV.Wan – S.Tseng -13.1 / 14 bdClosed NSJ.Tsang – L.Lee -8.6 / 14 bd
1	NORWAY	34	33	protocol →
	Open EWM.Ng – F.Chan -16.5 / 14 bdClosed NSJ.Tsang – L.Lee +11.6 / 14 bd
Total IMP	107

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	POLAND	60	25	protocol →
	Open EWC.Deheeger – A.Boulin +48.4 / 14 bdClosed NSB.Marie – T.Vincenot -11.0 / 14 bd
1	POLAND	18	29	protocol →
	Open EWC.Deheeger – A.Boulin -8.5 / 14 bdClosed NSM.Fourre – F.Beugin -4.1 / 14 bd
1	POLAND	36	23	protocol →
	Open EWC.Deheeger – A.Boulin +25.3 / 14 bdClosed NSB.Marie – T.Vincenot -10.8 / 14 bd
1	POLAND	8	37	protocol →
	Open EWF.Beugin – M.Fourre -0.5 / 14 bdClosed NSC.Deheeger – A.Boulin -28.4 / 14 bd
2	USA 1	38	31	protocol →
	Open NSB.Marie – T.Vincenot -9.7 / 14 bdClosed EWC.Deheeger – A.Boulin +15.8 / 14 bd
2	USA 1	23	38	protocol →
	Open NSM.Fourre – F.Beugin -4.0 / 14 bdClosed EWC.Deheeger – A.Boulin -14.6 / 14 bd
2	USA 1	15	21	protocol →
	Open NSB.Marie – T.Vincenot +1.7 / 14 bdClosed EWC.Deheeger – A.Boulin -7.0 / 14 bd
2	USA 1	34	36	protocol →
	Open NSB.Marie – T.Vincenot -1.8 / 14 bdClosed EWC.Deheeger – A.Boulin -3.9 / 14 bd
3	NORWAY	23	29	protocol →
	Open EWF.Beugin – M.Fourre +15.0 / 14 bdClosed NSB.Marie – T.Vincenot -20.4 / 14 bd
3	NORWAY	24	31	protocol →
	Open EWC.Deheeger – A.Boulin +13.8 / 14 bdClosed NSM.Fourre – F.Beugin -25.2 / 14 bd
3	NORWAY	19	44	protocol →
	Open EWC.Deheeger – A.Boulin -34.7 / 14 bdClosed NSB.Marie – T.Vincenot +1.2 / 14 bd
3	NORWAY	12	46	protocol →
	Open EWF.Beugin – M.Fourre -25.4 / 14 bdClosed NSA.Boulin – C.Deheeger -21.7 / 14 bd
3	NORWAY	0	0	protocol →
	Open EWC.Deheeger – A.Boulin no board scoredClosed NSB.Marie – T.Vincenot no board scored(line-up assumed from the round before)
3	NORWAY	0	0	protocol →
	Open EWC.Deheeger – A.Boulin no board scoredClosed NSB.Marie – T.Vincenot no board scored(line-up assumed from the round before)
Total IMP	310

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	SWEDEN	15	57	protocol →
	Open EWP.Coppens – B.Donkersloot -56.6 / 14 bdClosed NSM.Stougie – L.Stougie +6.4 / 14 bd
1	SWEDEN	15	36	protocol →
	Open EWT.Sprinkhuizen – L.Tijssen +21.6 / 14 bdClosed NSM.Stougie – L.Stougie -44.1 / 14 bd
1	SWEDEN	39	34	protocol →
	Open EWT.Sprinkhuizen – L.Tijssen -0.9 / 14 bdClosed NSB.Donkersloot – P.Coppens +3.2 / 14 bd
1	SWEDEN	43	15	protocol →
	Open EWL.Stougie – M.Stougie +19.9 / 14 bdClosed NSL.Tijssen – T.Sprinkhuizen +9.4 / 14 bd
Total IMP	112

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	CHINA HONG KONG	50	29	protocol →
	Open NSC.Bakke – E.Flaatt +13.1 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Saether – M.Scheie +7.9 / 14 bd
1	CHINA HONG KONG	45	22	protocol →
	Open NSC.Bakke – E.Flaatt +34.9 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Saether – M.Scheie -16.1 / 14 bd
1	CHINA HONG KONG	41	22	protocol →
	Open NSM.Scheie – J.Saether +13.1 / 14 bdClosed EWE.Flaatt – C.Bakke +8.6 / 14 bd
1	CHINA HONG KONG	33	34	protocol →
	Open NSC.Bakke – E.Flaatt +16.5 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Saether – M.Scheie -11.6 / 14 bd
2	SWEDEN	9	37	protocol →
	Open EWE.Flaatt – C.Bakke -33.3 / 14 bdClosed NSM.Scheie – J.Saether -7.5 / 14 bd
2	SWEDEN	27	28	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Saether – M.Scheie +2.5 / 14 bdClosed NSC.Bakke – E.Flaatt -8.0 / 14 bd
2	SWEDEN	19	28	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Saether – M.Scheie -3.7 / 14 bdClosed NSC.Bakke – E.Flaatt -12.4 / 14 bd
2	SWEDEN	17	53	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Saether – M.Scheie -23.4 / 14 bdClosed NSC.Bakke – E.Flaatt -25.7 / 14 bd
3	FRANCE	29	23	protocol →
	Open NSC.Bakke – E.Flaatt -15.0 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Saether – M.Scheie +20.4 / 14 bd
3	FRANCE	31	24	protocol →
	Open NSM.Scheie – J.Saether -13.8 / 14 bdClosed EWE.Flaatt – C.Bakke +25.2 / 14 bd
3	FRANCE	44	19	protocol →
	Open NSC.Bakke – E.Flaatt +34.7 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Saether – M.Scheie -1.2 / 14 bd
3	FRANCE	46	12	protocol →
	Open NSC.Bakke – E.Flaatt +25.4 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Saether – M.Scheie +21.7 / 14 bd
3	FRANCE	0	0	protocol →
	Open NSC.Bakke – E.Flaatt no board scoredClosed EWJ.Saether – M.Scheie no board scored(line-up assumed from the round before)
3	FRANCE	0	0	protocol →
	Open NSC.Bakke – E.Flaatt no board scoredClosed EWJ.Saether – M.Scheie no board scored(line-up assumed from the round before)
Total IMP	391

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	FRANCE	25	60	protocol →
	Open NSP.Marcinowski – M.Sobczak -48.4 / 14 bdClosed EWB.Krawczyk – M.Krysa +11.0 / 14 bd
1	FRANCE	29	18	protocol →
	Open NSP.Marcinowski – M.Sobczak +8.5 / 14 bdClosed EWB.Krawczyk – M.Krysa +4.1 / 14 bd
1	FRANCE	23	36	protocol →
	Open NSP.Marcinowski – M.Sobczak -25.3 / 14 bdClosed EWB.Krawczyk – M.Krysa +10.8 / 14 bd
1	FRANCE	37	8	protocol →
	Open NSP.Marcinowski – M.Sobczak +0.5 / 14 bdClosed EWB.Krawczyk – M.Krysa +28.4 / 14 bd
Total IMP	114

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	NETHERLANDS	57	15	protocol →
	Open NSI.Gronkvist – M.Rimstedt +56.6 / 14 bdClosed EWO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten -6.4 / 14 bd
1	NETHERLANDS	36	15	protocol →
	Open NSI.Gronkvist – M.Rimstedt -21.6 / 14 bdClosed EWO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten +44.1 / 14 bd
1	NETHERLANDS	34	39	protocol →
	Open NSI.Gronkvist – M.Rimstedt +0.9 / 14 bdClosed EWO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten -3.2 / 14 bd
1	NETHERLANDS	15	43	protocol →
	Open NSI.Gronkvist – M.Rimstedt -19.9 / 14 bdClosed EWO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten -9.4 / 14 bd
2	NORWAY	37	9	protocol →
	Open NSI.Gronkvist – M.Rimstedt +33.3 / 14 bdClosed EWO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten +7.5 / 14 bd
2	NORWAY	28	27	protocol →
	Open NSI.Gronkvist – M.Rimstedt -2.5 / 14 bdClosed EWO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten +8.0 / 14 bd
2	NORWAY	28	19	protocol →
	Open NSO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten +3.7 / 14 bdClosed EWM.Rimstedt – I.Gronkvist +12.4 / 14 bd
2	NORWAY	53	17	protocol →
	Open NSI.Gronkvist – M.Rimstedt +23.4 / 14 bdClosed EWO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten +25.7 / 14 bd
3	USA 1	34	38	protocol →
	Open NSI.Gronkvist – M.Rimstedt +9.6 / 14 bdClosed EWO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten -25.7 / 14 bd
3	USA 1	50	22	protocol →
	Open NSI.Gronkvist – M.Rimstedt +35.0 / 14 bdClosed EWO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten -3.7 / 14 bd
3	USA 1	22	65	protocol →
	Open NSI.Gronkvist – M.Rimstedt -45.7 / 14 bdClosed EWO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten -9.5 / 14 bd
3	USA 1	43	10	protocol →
	Open NSO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten +19.0 / 14 bdClosed EWM.Rimstedt – I.Gronkvist +22.7 / 14 bd
3	USA 1	42	8	protocol →
	Open NSO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten +34.0 / 14 bdClosed EWM.Rimstedt – I.Gronkvist +34.0 / 14 bd
3	USA 1	42	42	protocol →
	Open NSO.Rimstedt – J.Safsten +0.0 / 14 bdClosed EWM.Rimstedt – I.Gronkvist +0.0 / 14 bd
Total IMP	521

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	CHINA	21	30	protocol →
	Open EWK.Rosenberg – B.Kristensen +0.2 / 14 bdClosed NSC.Huber – O.Kriegel -8.4 / 14 bd
1	CHINA	47	48	protocol →
	Open EWC.Huber – O.Kriegel -4.2 / 14 bdClosed NSK.Rosenberg – B.Kristensen +6.0 / 14 bd
1	CHINA	45	13	protocol →
	Open EWC.Huber – O.Kriegel +3.7 / 14 bdClosed NSB.Kristensen – K.Rosenberg +31.3 / 14 bd
1	CHINA	28	26	protocol →
	Open EWC.Huber – O.Kriegel -6.2 / 14 bdClosed NSB.Kristensen – K.Rosenberg +4.5 / 14 bd
2	FRANCE	31	38	protocol →
	Open EWB.Kristensen – K.Rosenberg +9.7 / 14 bdClosed NSC.Huber – O.Kriegel -15.8 / 14 bd
2	FRANCE	38	23	protocol →
	Open EWC.Huber – O.Kriegel +4.0 / 14 bdClosed NSB.Kristensen – K.Rosenberg +14.6 / 14 bd
2	FRANCE	21	15	protocol →
	Open EWK.Rosenberg – B.Kristensen -1.7 / 14 bdClosed NSC.Huber – O.Kriegel +7.0 / 14 bd
2	FRANCE	36	34	protocol →
	Open EWK.Rosenberg – B.Kristensen +1.8 / 14 bdClosed NSC.Huber – O.Kriegel +3.9 / 14 bd
3	SWEDEN	38	34	protocol →
	Open EWC.Huber – O.Kriegel -9.6 / 14 bdClosed NSB.Kristensen – K.Rosenberg +25.7 / 14 bd
3	SWEDEN	22	50	protocol →
	Open EWK.Rosenberg – B.Kristensen -35.0 / 14 bdClosed NSC.Huber – O.Kriegel +3.7 / 14 bd
3	SWEDEN	65	22	protocol →
	Open EWK.Rosenberg – B.Kristensen +45.7 / 14 bdClosed NSC.Huber – O.Kriegel +9.5 / 14 bd
3	SWEDEN	10	43	protocol →
	Open EWK.Rosenberg – B.Kristensen -19.0 / 14 bdClosed NSC.Huber – O.Kriegel -22.7 / 14 bd
3	SWEDEN	8	42	protocol →
	Open EWK.Rosenberg – B.Kristensen -34.0 / 14 bdClosed NSC.Huber – O.Kriegel -34.0 / 14 bd
3	SWEDEN	42	42	protocol →
	Open EWC.Huber – O.Kriegel +0.0 / 14 bdClosed NSK.Rosenberg – B.Kristensen +0.0 / 14 bd
Total IMP	452

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	Total	Avg/bd	Qual.	QF·1	QF·2	QF·3	QF·4	SF·1	SF·2	SF·3	SF·4	F·1	F·2	F·3	F·4	F·5	F·6
1	B.Krawczyk	🇵🇱 POLAND	56	+54.3	+0.97	+99.0	+11.0	+4.1	+10.8	+28.4	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
1	M.Krysa	🇵🇱 POLAND	56	+54.3	+0.97	+99.0	+11.0	+4.1	+10.8	+28.4	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
3	T.Sprinkhuizen	🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS	42	+30.1	+0.72	+26.6	+21.6	-0.9	+9.4	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
3	L.Tijssen	🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS	42	+30.1	+0.72	+26.6	+21.6	-0.9	+9.4	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
5	I.Gronkvist	🇸🇪 SWEDEN	196	+138.2	+0.71	+134.5	+56.6	-21.6	+0.9	-19.9	+33.3	-2.5	+12.4	+23.4	+9.6	+35.0	-45.7	+22.7	+34.0	+0.0
5	M.Rimstedt	🇸🇪 SWEDEN	196	+138.2	+0.71	+134.5	+56.6	-21.6	+0.9	-19.9	+33.3	-2.5	+12.4	+23.4	+9.6	+35.0	-45.7	+22.7	+34.0	+0.0
7	O.Rimstedt	🇸🇪 SWEDEN	196	+84.1	+0.43	+265.8	-6.4	+44.1	-3.2	-9.4	+7.5	+8.0	+3.7	+25.7	-25.7	-3.7	-9.5	+19.0	+34.0	+0.0
7	J.Safsten	🇸🇪 SWEDEN	196	+84.1	+0.43	+265.8	-6.4	+44.1	-3.2	-9.4	+7.5	+8.0	+3.7	+25.7	-25.7	-3.7	-9.5	+19.0	+34.0	+0.0
9	C.Bakke	🇳🇴 NORWAY	168	+64.0	+0.38	+152.1	+13.1	+34.9	+8.6	+16.5	-33.3	-8.0	-12.4	-25.7	-15.0	+25.2	+34.7	+25.4	·	·
9	E.Flaatt	🇳🇴 NORWAY	168	+64.0	+0.38	+152.1	+13.1	+34.9	+8.6	+16.5	-33.3	-8.0	-12.4	-25.7	-15.0	+25.2	+34.7	+25.4	·	·
11	B.Kristensen	🇺🇸 USA 1	196	+49.8	+0.25	+111.9	+0.2	+6.0	+31.3	+4.5	+9.7	+14.6	-1.7	+1.8	+25.7	-35.0	+45.7	-19.0	-34.0	+0.0
11	K.Rosenberg	🇺🇸 USA 1	196	+49.8	+0.25	+154.1	+0.2	+6.0	+31.3	+4.5	+9.7	+14.6	-1.7	+1.8	+25.7	-35.0	+45.7	-19.0	-34.0	+0.0
13	K.Jin	🇨🇳 CHINA	42	+8.6	+0.20	+156.2	+8.4	-6.0	+6.2	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
13	C.Zhu	🇨🇳 CHINA	42	+8.6	+0.20	+156.2	+8.4	-6.0	+6.2	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
15	S.Tseng	🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG	28	+3.0	+0.11	+38.0	+16.1	-13.1	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
15	V.Wan	🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG	28	+3.0	+0.11	+38.0	+16.1	-13.1	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
17	J.Saether	🇳🇴 NORWAY	168	-11.7	-0.07	+98.6	+7.9	-16.1	+13.1	-11.6	-7.5	+2.5	-3.7	-23.4	+20.4	-13.8	-1.2	+21.7	·	·
17	M.Scheie	🇳🇴 NORWAY	168	-11.7	-0.07	+98.6	+7.9	-16.1	+13.1	-11.6	-7.5	+2.5	-3.7	-23.4	+20.4	-13.8	-1.2	+21.7	·	·
19	A.Boulin	🇫🇷 FRANCE	154	-15.5	-0.10	+34.6	+48.4	-8.5	+25.3	-28.4	+15.8	-14.6	-7.0	-3.9	+13.8	-34.7	-21.7	·	·	·
19	C.Deheeger	🇫🇷 FRANCE	154	-15.5	-0.10	+34.6	+48.4	-8.5	+25.3	-28.4	+15.8	-14.6	-7.0	-3.9	+13.8	-34.7	-21.7	·	·	·
21	S.Chen	🇨🇳 CHINA	42	-8.4	-0.20	+44.0	-0.2	-3.7	-4.5	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
21	Q.Wang	🇨🇳 CHINA	42	-8.4	-0.20	+44.0	-0.2	-3.7	-4.5	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
23	L.Lee	🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG	42	-10.1	-0.24	+1.3	-13.1	-8.6	+11.6	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
23	J.Tsang	🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG	42	-10.1	-0.24	+1.3	-13.1	-8.6	+11.6	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
25	C.Huber	🇺🇸 USA 1	196	-69.1	-0.35	+25.0	-8.4	-4.2	+3.7	-6.2	-15.8	+4.0	+7.0	+3.9	-9.6	+3.7	+9.5	-22.7	-34.0	+0.0
25	O.Kriegel	🇺🇸 USA 1	196	-69.1	-0.35	+25.0	-8.4	-4.2	+3.7	-6.2	-15.8	+4.0	+7.0	+3.9	-9.6	+3.7	+9.5	-22.7	-34.0	+0.0
27	L.Stougie	🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS	42	-17.8	-0.42	+54.0	+6.4	-44.1	+19.9	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
27	M.Stougie	🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS	42	-17.8	-0.42	+54.0	+6.4	-44.1	+19.9	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
29	B.Marie	🇫🇷 FRANCE	98	-50.8	-0.52	+2.4	-11.0	-10.8	·	·	-9.7	+1.7	-1.8	·	-20.4	+1.2	·	·	·	·
29	T.Vincenot	🇫🇷 FRANCE	98	-50.8	-0.52	+2.4	-11.0	-10.8	·	·	-9.7	+1.7	-1.8	·	-20.4	+1.2	·	·	·	·
31	F.Beugin	🇫🇷 FRANCE	84	-44.2	-0.53	+90.4	-4.1	-0.5	·	·	-4.0	·	·	·	+15.0	-25.2	-25.4	·	·	·
31	M.Fourre	🇫🇷 FRANCE	84	-44.2	-0.53	+90.4	-4.1	-0.5	·	·	-4.0	·	·	·	+15.0	-25.2	-25.4	·	·	·
33	S.Gu	🇨🇳 CHINA	28	-27.1	-0.97	+120.2	+4.2	-31.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
33	B.Miao	🇨🇳 CHINA	28	-27.1	-0.97	+120.2	+4.2	-31.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
35	P.Marcinowski	🇵🇱 POLAND	56	-64.7	-1.16	+180.7	-48.4	+8.5	-25.3	+0.5	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
35	M.Sobczak	🇵🇱 POLAND	56	-64.7	-1.16	+180.7	-48.4	+8.5	-25.3	+0.5	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
37	F.Chan	🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG	42	-59.3	-1.41	+84.1	-7.9	-34.9	-16.5	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
37	M.Ng	🇭🇰 CHINA HONG KONG	42	-59.3	-1.41	+84.1	-7.9	-34.9	-16.5	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
39	P.Coppens	🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS	28	-53.4	-1.91	+37.6	-56.6	+3.2	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
39	B.Donkersloot	🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS	28	-53.4	-1.91	+37.6	-56.6	+3.2	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

vs parfull table →

#	Player	vs par
1	🇸🇪 O.Rimstedt	+0.88
1	🇸🇪 J.Safsten	+0.88
3	🇺🇸 B.Kristensen	+0.31
3	🇺🇸 K.Rosenberg	+0.31
5	🇫🇷 A.Boulin	+0.30
5	🇫🇷 C.Deheeger	+0.30
7	🇳🇴 J.Saether	+0.25
7	🇳🇴 M.Scheie	+0.25
9	🇳🇴 C.Bakke	-0.08
9	🇳🇴 E.Flaatt	-0.08
11	🇺🇸 C.Huber	-0.14
11	🇺🇸 O.Kriegel	-0.14
1	🇸🇪 O.Rimstedt	+0.88
1	🇸🇪 J.Safsten	+0.88
3	🇺🇸 B.Kristensen	+0.31
3	🇺🇸 K.Rosenberg	+0.31
5	🇫🇷 A.Boulin	+0.30
5	🇫🇷 C.Deheeger	+0.30
7	🇳🇴 J.Saether	+0.25
7	🇳🇴 M.Scheie	+0.25
9	🇳🇴 C.Bakke	-0.08
9	🇳🇴 E.Flaatt	-0.08
11	🇺🇸 C.Huber	-0.14
11	🇺🇸 O.Kriegel	-0.14
13	🇫🇷 F.Beugin	-0.29
13	🇫🇷 M.Fourre	-0.29
15	🇸🇪 I.Gronkvist	-0.29
15	🇸🇪 M.Rimstedt	-0.29
17	🇫🇷 B.Marie	-0.72
17	🇫🇷 T.Vincenot	-0.72
19	🇨🇳 S.Chen	+2.10
19	🇨🇳 Q.Wang	+2.10
21	🇵🇱 B.Krawczyk	+1.18
21	🇵🇱 M.Krysa	+1.18
23	🇳🇱 L.Stougie	+1.12
23	🇳🇱 M.Stougie	+1.12
23	🇭🇰 F.Chan	+1.12
23	🇭🇰 M.Ng	+1.12
27	🇳🇱 T.Sprinkhuizen	-0.33
27	🇳🇱 L.Tijssen	-0.33
29	🇭🇰 S.Tseng	-0.71
29	🇭🇰 V.Wan	-0.71
31	🇨🇳 K.Jin	-1.36
31	🇨🇳 C.Zhu	-1.36
33	🇭🇰 L.Lee	-1.55
33	🇭🇰 J.Tsang	-1.55
35	🇨🇳 S.Gu	-1.68
35	🇨🇳 B.Miao	-1.68
37	🇵🇱 P.Marcinowski	-1.73
37	🇵🇱 M.Sobczak	-1.73
39	🇳🇱 P.Coppens	-2.71
39	🇳🇱 B.Donkersloot	-2.71

Opening leadsfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	🇫🇷 B.Marie	95.0%
2	🇸🇪 O.Rimstedt	91.1%
3	🇺🇸 B.Kristensen	90.9%
4	🇸🇪 J.Safsten	89.6%
5	🇸🇪 I.Gronkvist	89.2%
6	🇫🇷 C.Deheeger	88.6%
7	🇸🇪 M.Rimstedt	86.8%
8	🇫🇷 F.Beugin	86.7%
9	🇺🇸 K.Rosenberg	86.7%
10	🇳🇴 M.Scheie	86.7%
11	🇳🇴 C.Bakke	86.5%
12	🇫🇷 M.Fourre	85.0%
1	🇫🇷 B.Marie	95.0%
2	🇸🇪 O.Rimstedt	91.1%
3	🇺🇸 B.Kristensen	90.9%
4	🇸🇪 J.Safsten	89.6%
5	🇸🇪 I.Gronkvist	89.2%
6	🇫🇷 C.Deheeger	88.6%
7	🇸🇪 M.Rimstedt	86.8%
8	🇫🇷 F.Beugin	86.7%
9	🇺🇸 K.Rosenberg	86.7%
10	🇳🇴 M.Scheie	86.7%
11	🇳🇴 C.Bakke	86.5%
12	🇫🇷 M.Fourre	85.0%
13	🇺🇸 C.Huber	85.0%
14	🇳🇴 J.Saether	84.8%
15	🇫🇷 T.Vincenot	84.6%
16	🇫🇷 A.Boulin	80.6%
17	🇳🇴 E.Flaatt	80.0%
18	🇺🇸 O.Kriegel	74.6%
19	🇨🇳 B.Miao	100.0%
20	🇵🇱 M.Sobczak	92.3%
21	🇭🇰 M.Ng	91.7%
22	🇨🇳 Q.Wang	90.0%
23	🇨🇳 S.Chen	86.7%
24	🇭🇰 L.Lee	85.7%
25	🇳🇱 L.Stougie	83.3%
25	🇵🇱 P.Marcinowski	83.3%
27	🇭🇰 J.Tsang	81.8%
28	🇳🇱 T.Sprinkhuizen	80.0%
29	🇳🇱 M.Stougie	78.6%
30	🇳🇱 L.Tijssen	77.8%
31	🇨🇳 K.Jin	77.8%
32	🇵🇱 B.Krawczyk	76.5%
33	🇭🇰 S.Tseng	75.0%
34	🇭🇰 V.Wan	71.4%
35	🇨🇳 C.Zhu	66.7%
35	🇨🇳 S.Gu	66.7%
35	🇳🇱 B.Donkersloot	66.7%
38	🇭🇰 F.Chan	66.7%
39	🇳🇱 P.Coppens	62.5%
40	🇵🇱 M.Krysa	58.3%

Declarer playfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	🇫🇷 B.Marie	95.0%
2	🇺🇸 B.Kristensen	84.4%
3	🇺🇸 K.Rosenberg	83.7%
4	🇳🇴 C.Bakke	81.0%
5	🇸🇪 I.Gronkvist	78.0%
6	🇳🇴 E.Flaatt	77.5%
7	🇸🇪 O.Rimstedt	76.2%
8	🇫🇷 M.Fourre	76.0%
9	🇫🇷 C.Deheeger	75.7%
10	🇸🇪 M.Rimstedt	75.0%
11	🇳🇴 M.Scheie	74.4%
12	🇸🇪 J.Safsten	73.3%
1	🇫🇷 B.Marie	95.0%
2	🇺🇸 B.Kristensen	84.4%
3	🇺🇸 K.Rosenberg	83.7%
4	🇳🇴 C.Bakke	81.0%
5	🇸🇪 I.Gronkvist	78.0%
6	🇳🇴 E.Flaatt	77.5%
7	🇸🇪 O.Rimstedt	76.2%
8	🇫🇷 M.Fourre	76.0%
9	🇫🇷 C.Deheeger	75.7%
10	🇸🇪 M.Rimstedt	75.0%
11	🇳🇴 M.Scheie	74.4%
12	🇸🇪 J.Safsten	73.3%
13	🇫🇷 F.Beugin	66.7%
14	🇫🇷 A.Boulin	65.9%
15	🇺🇸 C.Huber	64.7%
16	🇳🇴 J.Saether	60.6%
17	🇫🇷 T.Vincenot	57.7%
18	🇺🇸 O.Kriegel	56.7%
19	🇳🇱 T.Sprinkhuizen	100.0%
20	🇭🇰 J.Tsang	88.9%
21	🇨🇳 C.Zhu	84.6%
22	🇨🇳 S.Chen	83.3%
23	🇭🇰 S.Tseng	81.8%
24	🇳🇱 L.Tijssen	73.3%
25	🇵🇱 B.Krawczyk	72.7%
26	🇨🇳 B.Miao	72.7%
27	🇨🇳 S.Gu	71.4%
28	🇵🇱 M.Sobczak	70.6%
29	🇭🇰 M.Ng	66.7%
30	🇭🇰 F.Chan	66.7%
30	🇳🇱 B.Donkersloot	66.7%
32	🇳🇱 M.Stougie	64.3%
32	🇵🇱 P.Marcinowski	64.3%
34	🇵🇱 M.Krysa	64.3%
35	🇳🇱 P.Coppens	62.5%
36	🇳🇱 L.Stougie	57.1%
37	🇨🇳 K.Jin	50.0%
37	🇭🇰 V.Wan	50.0%
37	🇨🇳 Q.Wang	50.0%
40	🇭🇰 L.Lee	46.7%

Defencefull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	🇺🇸 B.Kristensen	91.0%
1	🇺🇸 K.Rosenberg	91.0%
3	🇳🇴 C.Bakke	90.2%
3	🇳🇴 E.Flaatt	90.2%
5	🇸🇪 O.Rimstedt	89.3%
5	🇸🇪 J.Safsten	89.3%
7	🇫🇷 A.Boulin	87.9%
7	🇫🇷 C.Deheeger	87.9%
9	🇸🇪 I.Gronkvist	86.7%
9	🇸🇪 M.Rimstedt	86.7%
11	🇳🇴 J.Saether	82.4%
11	🇳🇴 M.Scheie	82.4%
1	🇺🇸 B.Kristensen	91.0%
1	🇺🇸 K.Rosenberg	91.0%
3	🇳🇴 C.Bakke	90.2%
3	🇳🇴 E.Flaatt	90.2%
5	🇸🇪 O.Rimstedt	89.3%
5	🇸🇪 J.Safsten	89.3%
7	🇫🇷 A.Boulin	87.9%
7	🇫🇷 C.Deheeger	87.9%
9	🇸🇪 I.Gronkvist	86.7%
9	🇸🇪 M.Rimstedt	86.7%
11	🇳🇴 J.Saether	82.4%
11	🇳🇴 M.Scheie	82.4%
13	🇺🇸 C.Huber	81.8%
13	🇺🇸 O.Kriegel	81.8%
15	🇫🇷 F.Beugin	80.0%
15	🇫🇷 M.Fourre	80.0%
17	🇫🇷 B.Marie	71.7%
17	🇫🇷 T.Vincenot	71.7%
19	🇨🇳 S.Gu	100.0%
19	🇨🇳 B.Miao	100.0%
21	🇳🇱 T.Sprinkhuizen	89.5%
21	🇳🇱 L.Tijssen	89.5%
23	🇭🇰 F.Chan	87.5%
23	🇭🇰 M.Ng	87.5%
25	🇨🇳 K.Jin	86.7%
25	🇨🇳 C.Zhu	86.7%
27	🇵🇱 P.Marcinowski	84.0%
27	🇵🇱 M.Sobczak	84.0%
29	🇨🇳 S.Chen	84.0%
29	🇨🇳 Q.Wang	84.0%
31	🇵🇱 B.Krawczyk	82.8%
31	🇵🇱 M.Krysa	82.8%
33	🇳🇱 L.Stougie	80.0%
33	🇳🇱 M.Stougie	80.0%
35	🇭🇰 L.Lee	77.8%
35	🇭🇰 J.Tsang	77.8%
37	🇭🇰 S.Tseng	72.7%
37	🇭🇰 V.Wan	72.7%
39	🇳🇱 P.Coppens	71.4%
39	🇳🇱 B.Donkersloot	71.4%

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top

Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.

Board	Tables	Swing	Best for NS	Best for EW
Semifinal · Bd 23	4	28.6	7♥ +2210 🇺🇸 USA 1 (+14.3)	5♥ -710 🇳🇴 NORWAY (+14.3)
Final · Bd 22	4	25.7	6♥x +200 🇸🇪 SWEDEN (+16.0)	6♠ +1430 🇫🇷 FRANCE (+9.7)
Final · Bd 7	4	24.3	3♦x +500 🇺🇸 USA 1 (+11.3)	2♠x +670 🇺🇸 USA 1 (+13.0)
Final · Bd 6	4	24.0	6♠ +980 🇸🇪 SWEDEN (+12.0)	6♠ +50 🇫🇷 FRANCE (+12.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 2	8	23.2	6♣ +1370 🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS (+13.9)	4♥ -50 🇨🇳 CHINA (+9.3)
Quarterfinal · Bd 39	8	22.7	6♥x +500 🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS (+10.7)	4♥x +590 🇫🇷 FRANCE (+12.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 1	8	22.4	6♥ +50 🇳🇴 NORWAY (+10.7)	6♥ +980 🇵🇱 POLAND (+11.7)
Quarterfinal · Bd 47	8	21.9	6♥ +980 🇳🇱 NETHERLANDS (+10.0)	6♥ +50 🇵🇱 POLAND (+11.9)
Final · Bd 10	4	21.4	2♠x +800 🇺🇸 USA 1 (+12.7)	3♦ +100 🇺🇸 USA 1 (+8.7)
Semifinal · Bd 52	4	21.3	4♠ +420 🇳🇴 NORWAY (+9.0)	5♥x +500 🇫🇷 FRANCE (+12.3)
Semifinal · Bd 38	4	21.0	4♠ +100 🇸🇪 SWEDEN (+8.7)	4♠x +790 🇸🇪 SWEDEN (+12.3)
Quarterfinal · Bd 11	8	20.9	3♠x +530 🇸🇪 SWEDEN (+8.0)	4♣x +500 🇫🇷 FRANCE (+12.9)
Quarterfinal · Bd 52	8	20.8	5♦x +800 🇳🇴 NORWAY (+12.9)	4♥x +300 🇨🇳 CHINA (+7.9)
Semifinal · Bd 56	4	20.7	3♥x +800 🇸🇪 SWEDEN (+12.7)	2♠ +110 🇸🇪 SWEDEN (+8.0)

Stages

Tables

Rounds

Istanbul 2014 — Knockout

Knockout bracket↑ top

Tournament standings — final placement↑ top

CHINA — results↑ top

CHINA HONG KONG — results↑ top

FRANCE — results↑ top

NETHERLANDS — results↑ top

NORWAY — results↑ top

POLAND — results↑ top

SWEDEN — results↑ top

USA 1 — results↑ top

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top