Round 10 — BAM Day 2
29 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 10 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GILLIS | RIAD | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | COME TO HK CHINA | DRINTEAM | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | SWEDEN SENIOR | CANADA MIXED | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | LAWRENZO | SANTOSHA | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | 4FUN | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | USA E GETTA | POLAND MIXED | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | PARTYPACK | AUPALETI | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | PIERCE | 4JACKS | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | FRANCE WOMEN | INDIA SENIORS | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | FRANCE SENIORS | CHINA SENIOR | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | ULI | PORTO | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | POLAND WOMEN | KUWAIT | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | AUSTRIA | PORTUCOLE | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | GERMANY MIXED | ALICE | 2 | 4 | 2.20 | 4.20 | protocol → |
| 15 | POWERSHARK | OUJDA1 | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | NZ MIXED | MADRID | 2 | 4 | 2.20 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | POLAND OPEN | MEXICO | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | TEAM BLACK | BRENO | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | UAE MIXED | EL GHRARI | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | BV WALDSOLMS | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | FINLAND | INDIA OPEN | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | VINCIGUERRA | MO ROCCO | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | USA WOMEN | NZ OPEN | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | DINKIN | INDIA MIXED | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | INDIA WOMEN | REASON | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | THE DARK KNIGHT | RABONO CALAMIS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | CAMELS | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | NORWAY SENIOR | GEMIGNANI | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | MASARAHLOU | NO COKE | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 10↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 10 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R10 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | POLAND OPEN | 98.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 2 | SWEDEN SENIOR | 96.60 | 6.00 | 10 |
| 3 | VINCIGUERRA | 95.00 | 5.00 | 10 |
| 4 | GEMIGNANI | 91.00 | 5.00 | 10 |
| 5 | USA E GETTA | 90.80 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 6 | GERMANY MIXED | 90.20 | 2.20 | 10 |
| 7 | BV WALDSOLMS | 88.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 8 | POLAND MIXED | 86.00 | 5.00 | 10 |
| 9 | FRANCE WOMEN | 85.00 | 5.00 | 10 |
| 10 | NORWAY SENIOR | 84.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 11 | EL GHRARI | 83.20 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 12 | FRANCE SENIORS | 83.01 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 12 | GILLIS | 83.01 | 5.00 | 10 |
| 12 | NO COKE | 83.01 | 5.00 | 10 |
| 15 | ALICE | 81.70 | 4.20 | 10 |
| 16 | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 80.20 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 17 | AUPALETI | 80.01 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 17 | INDIA MIXED | 80.01 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 17 | REASON | 80.01 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 20 | POLAND WOMEN | 80.00 | 6.00 | 10 |
| 21 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | 79.20 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 22 | PORTUCOLE | 79.01 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 22 | TEAM BLACK | 79.01 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 24 | POWERSHARK | 78.01 | 6.00 | 10 |
| 24 | RABONO CALAMIS | 78.01 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 24 | SANTOSHA | 78.01 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 27 | INDIA OPEN | 77.01 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 28 | DRINTEAM | 77.00 | 5.00 | 10 |
| 28 | NZ OPEN | 77.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 30 | FINLAND | 76.01 | 6.00 | 10 |
| 31 | THE DARK KNIGHT | 76.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 31 | UAE MIXED | 76.00 | 5.00 | 10 |
| 33 | BRENO | 75.51 | 5.00 | 10 |
| 34 | CAMELS | 75.01 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 34 | LAWRENZO | 75.01 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 36 | CHINA SENIOR | 74.01 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 36 | PARTYPACK | 74.01 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 38 | INDIA SENIORS | 73.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 39 | AUSTRIA | 72.01 | 5.00 | 10 |
| 40 | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 72.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 41 | MASARAHLOU | 71.20 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 42 | 4JACKS | 71.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 43 | NZ MIXED | 70.20 | 2.20 | 10 |
| 44 | MADRID | 70.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 45 | DINKIN | 69.01 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 46 | ULI | 69.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 47 | 4FUN | 68.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 47 | USA WOMEN | 68.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 49 | CANADA MIXED | 60.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 49 | MO ROCCO | 60.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 51 | COME TO HK CHINA | 58.20 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 52 | PORTO | 58.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 53 | INDIA WOMEN | 56.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 53 | RIAD | 56.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 55 | MEXICO | 55.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 55 | PIERCE | 55.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 57 | KUWAIT | 49.80 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 58 | OUJDA1 | 44.80 | 0.00 | 10 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 10 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R10 | BAM% |
|---|
GILLIS vs RIAD 5 : 1 VP (match 115312) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GILLIS | RIAD | |
| 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2♠ | E | ♣10 | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | S | ♦3 | = | 90 | 83% | 1♠ | W | ♠9 | = | 80 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.8 | NS-0.3 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 82% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | W | = | 80 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.8 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
COME TO HK CHINA vs DRINTEAM 1 : 5 VP (match 115313) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | COME TO HK CHINA | DRINTEAM | |
| 2♠ | E | ♣10 | = | 110 | 65% | 3♦ | S | ♣K | = | 110 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥10 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | N | ♥4 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 3♠ | W | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.2 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | = | 110 | 71% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| 1NT | N | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWEDEN SENIOR vs CANADA MIXED 6 : 0 VP (match 115314) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWEDEN SENIOR | CANADA MIXED | |
| 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2♠ | E | ♦A | = | 110 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥5 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 1♠ | W | ♠2 | = | 80 | 54% | 2♠ | W | ♠2 | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.4 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 65% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 1♠ | W | = | 80 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LAWRENZO vs SANTOSHA 2 : 4 VP (match 115315) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LAWRENZO | SANTOSHA | |
| 3♠ | E | ♣10 | = | 140 | 82% | 2♠ | E | ♣10 | = | 110 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥5 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 3NT | E | ♥10 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠ | W | ♠3 | = | 110 | 80% | 2♠ | W | ♠2 | = | 110 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS-1.4 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 65% | ||||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIEDS NOIR AND CO vs 4FUN 2 : 4 VP (match 115316) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | 4FUN | |
| 2♠ | E | ♣10 | +2 | 170 | 94% | 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥4 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 1♠ | W | ♠3 | +1 | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA E GETTA vs POLAND MIXED 1 : 5 VP (match 115317) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA E GETTA | POLAND MIXED | |
| 2♠ | E | ♣10 | +1 | 140 | 82% | 3♠ | E | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥9 | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠ | W | ♠2 | = | 110 | 80% | 2♥ | E | ♠7 | -3 | 150 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+1.5 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PARTYPACK vs AUPALETI 2 : 4 VP (match 115318) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PARTYPACK | AUPALETI | |
| 3♠ | E | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 3♦ | S | ♠8 | = | 110 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥2 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 1♠ | W | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 1♥ | W | ♠2 | +1 | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | = | 110 | 71% | ||||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| 1♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 1♥ | W | +1 | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIERCE vs 4JACKS 3 : 3 VP (match 115319) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIERCE | 4JACKS | |
| 2♠ | E | ♥8 | +2 | 170 | 94% | 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥5 | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | E | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 1♠ | W | ♠2 | = | 80 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | W | = | 80 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE WOMEN vs INDIA SENIORS 5 : 1 VP (match 115320) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE WOMEN | INDIA SENIORS | |
| 3♦x | S | ♦J | = | 670 | 100% | 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥10 | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | W | ♠2 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2♠ | W | ♠2 | +1 | 140 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+2.2 | NS-0.4 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦x | S | = | 670 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+2.2 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs CHINA SENIOR 4 : 2 VP (match 115321) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | CHINA SENIOR | |
| 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2♠ | E | ♣10 | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥10 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 68% | 1NT | W | ♦5 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 82% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | -2 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ULI vs PORTO 4 : 2 VP (match 115322) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ULI | PORTO | |
| 2♠ | E | ♣10 | = | 110 | 65% | 4♠ | E | ♥7 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥5 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♣4 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 1♠ | W | ♠2 | +1 | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND WOMEN vs KUWAIT 6 : 0 VP (match 115323) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND WOMEN | KUWAIT | |
| 4♠x | E | ♣10 | -2 | 500 | 98% | 2♠ | E | ♣10 | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥9 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 1♠ | W | ♠2 | = | 80 | 54% | 1NT | S | ♥10 | -2 | 200 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-2.2 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | E | -2 | 500 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 82% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 1♠ | W | = | 80 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | -2 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUSTRIA vs PORTUCOLE 5 : 1 VP (match 115324) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUSTRIA | PORTUCOLE | |
| 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2♠ | E | ♣10 | = | 110 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥10 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 3NT | E | ♥10 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1♠ | W | ♠2 | = | 80 | 54% | 1♠ | W | ♠2 | +1 | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.4 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 65% | ||||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 1♠ | W | = | 80 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY MIXED vs ALICE 2.2 : 4.2 VP (match 115325) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY MIXED | ALICE | |
| 3♠ | E | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 55% | Adj. | N | — | 100 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| 3NT | E | ♥10 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | W | ♦5 | = | 90 | 62% | 1♠ | W | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Adj. | N | 100 | ||||||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POWERSHARK vs OUJDA1 6 : 0 VP (match 115531) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POWERSHARK | OUJDA1 | |
| 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2♠ | E | ♣10 | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥2 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥10 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 1NT | S | ♥10 | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-2.2 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 82% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | -3 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NZ MIXED vs MADRID 2.2 : 3 VP (match 115532) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NZ MIXED | MADRID | |
| Adj. | N | — | 100 | 3♠ | E | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| 3NT | E | ♥10 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 3NT | E | ♥10 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | E | ♣4 | = | 90 | 62% | 1♠ | W | ♣2 | = | 80 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| Adj. | N | 100 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | W | = | 80 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND OPEN vs MEXICO 4 : 2 VP (match 115533) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND OPEN | MEXICO | |
| 2♣ | W | ♦7 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1♠ | E | ♥8 | +1 | 110 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥5 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 3NT | E | ♥10 | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2♠ | W | ♠2 | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | E | +1 | 110 | 65% | ||||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM BLACK vs BRENO 1 : 5 VP (match 115534) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM BLACK | BRENO | |
| 3♠ | E | ♣10 | +2 | 200 | 96% | 2♠ | E | ♣10 | = | 110 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥10 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 3NT | E | ♥5 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | S | ♥10 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1NT | E | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS-0.5 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | +2 | 200 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 65% | ||||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 1NT | S | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UAE MIXED vs EL GHRARI 5 : 1 VP (match 115535) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UAE MIXED | EL GHRARI | |
| 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 4♠ | E | ♣10 | = | 620 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 1♠ | W | ♠3 | +1 | 110 | 80% | 2♥ | W | ♥A | = | 110 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-2.1 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 99% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BV WALDSOLMS vs MATILDAS PLUS 2 2 : 4 VP (match 115536) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BV WALDSOLMS | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | |
| 2♠ | E | ♣10 | +1 | 140 | 82% | 3♦ | S | ♠9 | +1 | 130 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥10 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 1♠ | W | ♠3 | = | 80 | 54% | 1NT | W | ♣10 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | +1 | 130 | 75% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 1♠ | W | = | 80 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | -2 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINLAND vs INDIA OPEN 6 : 0 VP (match 115537) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINLAND | INDIA OPEN | |
| 3♠ | E | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2♠ | E | ♣10 | = | 110 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥2 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥2 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♣4 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 1♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-1.4 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 65% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VINCIGUERRA vs MO ROCCO 5 : 1 VP (match 115538) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VINCIGUERRA | MO ROCCO | |
| 3♠ | E | ♣10 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | E | ♥10 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥10 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 1♠ | W | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 1♠ | W | ♥A | +3 | 170 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-0.8 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| 1♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | W | +3 | 170 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA WOMEN vs NZ OPEN 4 : 2 VP (match 115539) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA WOMEN | NZ OPEN | |
| 2♠ | W | ♥6 | +1 | 140 | 82% | 3♠ | E | ♣10 | = | 140 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | E | ♥9 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥5 | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | W | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 1♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 82% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| 1NT | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DINKIN vs INDIA MIXED 2 : 4 VP (match 115540) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DINKIN | INDIA MIXED | |
| 3♠ | E | ♣10 | = | 140 | 82% | 3♦ | S | ♦J | = | 110 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 4♠ | E | ♦6 | +2 | 480 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♣4 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2♥x | E | ♣6 | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | = | 110 | 71% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 480 | 100% | ||||
| 1NT | E | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 2♥x | E | -2 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA WOMEN vs REASON 2 : 4 VP (match 115541) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA WOMEN | REASON | |
| 4♠ | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 55% | 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 4NT | E | ♥4 | = | 430 | 78% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 1♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| 4NT | E | = | 430 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THE DARK KNIGHT vs RABONO CALAMIS 4 : 2 VP (match 115542) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THE DARK KNIGHT | RABONO CALAMIS | |
| 3♥ | W | ♦5 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2♠ | E | ♣10 | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1♠ | W | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 1NT | E | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS+0.1 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 82% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| 1♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAMELS vs CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED 2 : 4 VP (match 115543) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAMELS | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | |
| 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 3♠ | E | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | W | ♠9 | +1 | 120 | 93% | 1NT | S | ♥10 | = | 90 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NORWAY SENIOR vs GEMIGNANI 1 : 5 VP (match 115544) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NORWAY SENIOR | GEMIGNANI | |
| 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | E | ♥2 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 6♦ | E | ♥10 | -2 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | W | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 68% | 1NT | N | ♥3 | +2 | 150 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+2.7 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | E | -2 | 100 | 100% | ||||
| 1NT | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | N | +2 | 150 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MASARAHLOU vs NO COKE 1 : 5 VP (match 115545) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MASARAHLOU | NO COKE | |
| 4♠ | E | ♣10 | = | 620 | 99% | 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♥5 | = | 400 | 71% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1♠ | W | ♠3 | = | 80 | 54% | 1NT | E | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.5 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 71% | ||||
| 1♠ | W | = | 80 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
Board 13board records → · view →
| ♠ Q3 ♥ 62 ♦ T765 ♣ AJ942 | ||
| ♠ K98 ♥ AJ93 ♦ J ♣ KQ853 | 13 Dlr N Both | ♠ JT642 ♥ KQ4 ♦ K93 ♣ 76 |
| ♠ A75 ♥ T875 ♦ AQ842 ♣ T |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 6 |
| S | 6 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 6 |
| E | 7 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| W | 7 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
Minimax (par): NS -140: 3♠E= 3♠W=
Board 14board records → · view →
| ♠ J84 ♥ AJ63 ♦ T3 ♣ J752 | ||
| ♠ K532 ♥ 87 ♦ AKQ97 ♣ 83 | 14 Dlr E None | ♠ QT7 ♥ KQ ♦ J842 ♣ AKQT |
| ♠ A96 ♥ T9542 ♦ 65 ♣ 964 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 |
| S | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 |
| E | 10 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 11 |
| W | 10 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 11 |
Minimax (par): NS -450: 4♠E+1 4♠W+1
Board 15board records → · view →
| ♠ 932 ♥ AK6 ♦ A975 ♣ KT2 | ||
| ♠ AJ54 ♥ T2 ♦ KJ832 ♣ A8 | 15 Dlr S N-S | ♠ KT8 ♥ Q8543 ♦ 4 ♣ J753 |
| ♠ Q76 ♥ J97 ♦ QT6 ♣ Q964 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| S | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| E | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| W | 6 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
Minimax (par): NS -110: 1♥♠E+1 1♥♠W+1