Round 15 — BAM Day 2
29 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 15 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | USA E GETTA | RIAD | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | PARTYPACK | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | PIERCE | LAWRENZO | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | FRANCE WOMEN | SWEDEN SENIOR | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | FRANCE SENIORS | COME TO HK CHINA | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | ULI | GILLIS | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND WOMEN | DRINTEAM | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | AUSTRIA | CANADA MIXED | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | GERMANY MIXED | SANTOSHA | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | ALICE | 4FUN | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | PORTUCOLE | POLAND MIXED | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | KUWAIT | AUPALETI | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | PORTO | 4JACKS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | CHINA SENIOR | INDIA SENIORS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | BV WALDSOLMS | OUJDA1 | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | FINLAND | UAE MIXED | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | VINCIGUERRA | TEAM BLACK | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | USA WOMEN | POLAND OPEN | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | DINKIN | NZ MIXED | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | INDIA WOMEN | POWERSHARK | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | THE DARK KNIGHT | MADRID | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | CAMELS | MEXICO | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | NORWAY SENIOR | BRENO | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | MASARAHLOU | EL GHRARI | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | NO COKE | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | GEMIGNANI | INDIA OPEN | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | MO ROCCO | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | RABONO CALAMIS | NZ OPEN | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | REASON | INDIA MIXED | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 15↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 15 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R15 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | POLAND OPEN | 118.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 1 | VINCIGUERRA | 118.00 | 6.00 | 15 |
| 3 | SWEDEN SENIOR | 116.60 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 4 | NO COKE | 105.01 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 5 | NORWAY SENIOR | 105.00 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 6 | GEMIGNANI | 104.00 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 7 | USA E GETTA | 103.80 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 8 | GERMANY MIXED | 103.20 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 9 | REASON | 102.01 | 5.00 | 15 |
| 10 | BV WALDSOLMS | 101.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 10 | FRANCE WOMEN | 101.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 12 | ALICE | 100.70 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 13 | FRANCE SENIORS | 100.01 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 13 | PORTUCOLE | 100.01 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 15 | POLAND MIXED | 100.00 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 15 | POLAND WOMEN | 100.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 17 | GILLIS | 99.01 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 18 | EL GHRARI | 98.20 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 19 | DRINTEAM | 97.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 19 | NZ OPEN | 97.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 21 | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 95.20 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 22 | AUPALETI | 95.01 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 22 | INDIA MIXED | 95.01 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 22 | INDIA OPEN | 95.01 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 25 | UAE MIXED | 95.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 26 | BRENO | 94.51 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 27 | PARTYPACK | 93.01 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 28 | DINKIN | 92.01 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 29 | SANTOSHA | 90.21 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 30 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | 90.20 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 31 | POWERSHARK | 90.01 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 31 | TEAM BLACK | 90.01 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 33 | AUSTRIA | 88.01 | 5.00 | 15 |
| 33 | CHINA SENIOR | 88.01 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 35 | CAMELS | 87.01 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 35 | FINLAND | 87.01 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 37 | LAWRENZO | 85.01 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 38 | THE DARK KNIGHT | 85.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 38 | USA WOMEN | 85.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 40 | RABONO CALAMIS | 84.01 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 41 | MADRID | 84.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 42 | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 83.00 | 5.00 | 15 |
| 43 | INDIA SENIORS | 82.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 43 | ULI | 82.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 45 | MASARAHLOU | 81.20 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 45 | NZ MIXED | 81.20 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 47 | 4FUN | 81.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 48 | COME TO HK CHINA | 79.20 | 5.00 | 15 |
| 49 | CANADA MIXED | 76.00 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 50 | 4JACKS | 75.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 51 | PORTO | 73.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 52 | PIERCE | 72.80 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 53 | MEXICO | 69.00 | 6.00 | 15 |
| 53 | RIAD | 69.00 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 55 | MO ROCCO | 68.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 56 | INDIA WOMEN | 67.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 57 | KUWAIT | 61.80 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 58 | OUJDA1 | 59.80 | 4.00 | 15 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 15 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R15 | BAM% |
|---|
USA E GETTA vs RIAD 3 : 3 VP (match 115382) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA E GETTA | RIAD | |
| 3NT | W | ♦6 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 3NT | W | ♥2 | = | 400 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2♥ | S | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | = | 400 | 97% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 59% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PARTYPACK vs PIEDS NOIR AND CO 3 : 3 VP (match 115383) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PARTYPACK | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | |
| 1NT | W | ♦2 | +2 | 150 | 93% | 3NT | W | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♦K | +1 | 650 | 95% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3NT | S | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-1.4 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIERCE vs LAWRENZO 2 : 4 VP (match 115384) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIERCE | LAWRENZO | |
| 3NT | W | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 3NT | W | ♠J | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♦J | = | 620 | 85% | 3♥ | S | ♦K | = | 140 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3NT | S | ♠6 | +1 | 430 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE WOMEN vs SWEDEN SENIOR 2 : 4 VP (match 115385) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE WOMEN | SWEDEN SENIOR | |
| 1NT | W | ♦2 | = | 90 | 67% | 3NT | W | ♦6 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 59% | 4♥x | S | ♦A | = | 790 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | S | = | 790 | 99% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs COME TO HK CHINA 1 : 5 VP (match 115386) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | COME TO HK CHINA | |
| 2♠ | E | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 3NT | W | ♠J | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♥ | N | ♦J | +1 | 170 | 59% | 4♥ | N | ♠10 | = | 620 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3NT | S | ♦J | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+1.0 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 85% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ULI vs GILLIS 2 : 4 VP (match 115387) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ULI | GILLIS | |
| 2NT | W | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1NT | W | ♦6 | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2♥ | S | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3NT | S | ♠2 | +1 | 430 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 67% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 59% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND WOMEN vs DRINTEAM 2 : 4 VP (match 115388) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND WOMEN | DRINTEAM | |
| 1NT | W | ♦2 | = | 90 | 67% | 3NT | W | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | E | ♥3 | -2 | 200 | 75% | 2♥ | S | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| 3♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUSTRIA vs CANADA MIXED 5 : 1 VP (match 115389) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUSTRIA | CANADA MIXED | |
| 1NT | W | ♥4 | = | 90 | 67% | 3NT | W | ♣J | +1 | 430 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦K | +1 | 170 | 59% | 3♥ | S | ♦A | = | 140 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠10 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS-1.2 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 100% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY MIXED vs SANTOSHA 2 : 4 VP (match 115390) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY MIXED | SANTOSHA | |
| 2♠ | W | ♦6 | = | 110 | 79% | 3NT | W | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥x | N | ♦J | = | 730 | 97% | 2♥ | S | ♦A | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3NT | S | ♦J | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| 3♥x | N | = | 730 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 79% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALICE vs 4FUN 2 : 4 VP (match 115391) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALICE | 4FUN | |
| 3NT | W | ♦6 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 3NT | W | ♦6 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | N | ♦J | +2 | 170 | 59% | 3♥ | N | ♠10 | +1 | 170 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | N | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 86% | 4♠x | W | ♣K | -4 | 800 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.9 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | ||||
| 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 59% | ||||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | W | -4 | 800 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PORTUCOLE vs POLAND MIXED 3 : 3 VP (match 115392) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PORTUCOLE | POLAND MIXED | |
| 3NT | W | ♦6 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 3NT | W | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♠9 | -1 | 100 | 90% | 3♥ | S | ♦A | = | 140 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♦J | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.0 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KUWAIT vs AUPALETI 4 : 2 VP (match 115393) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KUWAIT | AUPALETI | |
| 1NT | W | ♦2 | = | 90 | 67% | 2♠ | E | ♥9 | +1 | 140 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 59% | 2♥ | S | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 90% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 59% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PORTO vs 4JACKS 4 : 2 VP (match 115394) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PORTO | 4JACKS | |
| 3♣ | E | ♦9 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 3NT | W | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | S | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 59% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | E | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA SENIOR vs INDIA SENIORS 4 : 2 VP (match 115395) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA SENIOR | INDIA SENIORS | |
| 3NT | W | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2♠ | E | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 85% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BV WALDSOLMS vs OUJDA1 2 : 4 VP (match 115606) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BV WALDSOLMS | OUJDA1 | |
| 2♠ | E | ♦3 | = | 110 | 79% | 1NT | W | ♦2 | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 59% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♥9 | -2 | 100 | 100% | 3NT | S | ♠2 | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 67% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINLAND vs UAE MIXED 2 : 4 VP (match 115607) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINLAND | UAE MIXED | |
| 3NT | W | ♣3 | = | 400 | 97% | 2♠ | W | ♦6 | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 90% | 4♥ | N | ♠10 | -1 | 100 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♠2 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠5 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS-1.2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | = | 400 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 79% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VINCIGUERRA vs TEAM BLACK 6 : 0 VP (match 115608) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VINCIGUERRA | TEAM BLACK | |
| 3NT | W | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 3NT | W | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥x | N | ♥2 | = | 790 | 99% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♦J | +2 | 460 | 96% | 3NT | S | ♠Q | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+2.6 | NS+0.1 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| 4♥x | N | = | 790 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 85% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 460 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+2.6 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA WOMEN vs POLAND OPEN 4 : 2 VP (match 115609) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA WOMEN | POLAND OPEN | |
| 3NT | W | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 1NT | W | ♦2 | +1 | 120 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 59% | 3♥ | N | ♥2 | +1 | 170 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 85% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 59% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DINKIN vs NZ MIXED 4 : 2 VP (match 115610) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DINKIN | NZ MIXED | |
| 3NT | W | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2♠ | E | ♥9 | +1 | 140 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 90% | 4♥ | N | ♦J | = | 620 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♥9 | +2 | 460 | 96% | 3NT | S | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 90% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 85% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 460 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA WOMEN vs POWERSHARK 4 : 2 VP (match 115611) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA WOMEN | POWERSHARK | |
| 3NT | W | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 3NT | W | ♣3 | = | 400 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 68% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | W | ♣A | -4 | 800 | 99% | 3NT | S | ♦J | +1 | 430 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS+0.6 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | = | 400 | 97% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 85% | ||||
| 3♠x | W | -4 | 800 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THE DARK KNIGHT vs MADRID 2 : 4 VP (match 115612) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THE DARK KNIGHT | MADRID | |
| 1NT | W | ♦2 | = | 90 | 67% | 3NT | W | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 85% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 85% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+1.6 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 85% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 85% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAMELS vs MEXICO 0 : 6 VP (match 115613) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAMELS | MEXICO | |
| 1NT | W | ♦2 | = | 90 | 67% | 3NT | W | ♠J | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | N | ♦J | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2♥ | S | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 59% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NORWAY SENIOR vs BRENO 3 : 3 VP (match 115614) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NORWAY SENIOR | BRENO | |
| 1NT | W | ♦2 | = | 90 | 67% | 3NT | W | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 68% | 4♥ | N | ♠10 | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠2 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠5 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MASARAHLOU vs EL GHRARI 2 : 4 VP (match 115615) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MASARAHLOU | EL GHRARI | |
| 1NT | W | ♥2 | = | 90 | 67% | 3NT | W | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2♥ | S | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NO COKE vs MATILDAS PLUS 2 1 : 5 VP (match 115616) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NO COKE | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | |
| 2NT | W | ♦2 | = | 120 | 85% | 3NT | W | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♦K | +2 | 170 | 59% | 2♥ | S | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 86% | 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2NT | W | = | 120 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 59% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GEMIGNANI vs INDIA OPEN 3 : 3 VP (match 115617) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GEMIGNANI | INDIA OPEN | |
| 1NT | W | ♥2 | +1 | 120 | 85% | 1NT | W | ♦2 | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 85% | 2♥ | S | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠2 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 67% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED vs MO ROCCO 2 : 4 VP (match 115618) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | MO ROCCO | |
| 3NT | W | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 3NT | W | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | S | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 90% | 3♥ | S | ♦A | = | 140 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RABONO CALAMIS vs NZ OPEN 4 : 2 VP (match 115619) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RABONO CALAMIS | NZ OPEN | |
| 3NT | W | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 3NT | W | ♥4 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♥ | S | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 59% | 3♥ | N | ♦J | = | 140 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠2 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♦J | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 100 | 87% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 68% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
REASON vs INDIA MIXED 5 : 1 VP (match 115620) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | REASON | INDIA MIXED | |
| 3NT | E | ♦3 | -2 | 100 | 87% | 1NT | W | ♥2 | +1 | 120 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 85% | 2♥ | S | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠6 | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-0.4 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 85% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 59% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
Board 28board records → · view →
| ♠ J8 ♥ A742 ♦ Q762 ♣ J93 | ||
| ♠ 94 ♥ QJT8 ♦ AT4 ♣ A862 | 28 Dlr W N-S | ♠ AQ652 ♥ K65 ♦ 85 ♣ KT5 |
| ♠ KT73 ♥ 93 ♦ KJ93 ♣ Q74 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| S | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| E | 7 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 |
| W | 7 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 8 |
Minimax (par): NS -110: 1♥♠E+1 1♥♠W+1
Board 29board records → · view →
| ♠ K6 ♥ KQT4 ♦ T9 ♣ KQ873 | ||
| ♠ AJ5 ♥ J9 ♦ AK762 ♣ 942 | 29 Dlr N Both | ♠ T974 ♥ 52 ♦ J3 ♣ AJT65 |
| ♠ Q832 ♥ A8763 ♦ Q854 ♣ – |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 6 |
| S | 7 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 6 |
| E | 6 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| W | 6 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
Minimax (par): NS +620: 4♥N= 4♥S=
Board 30board records → · view →
| ♠ J4 ♥ 6532 ♦ A82 ♣ AKT3 | ||
| ♠ QT8652 ♥ 9 ♦ JT6 ♣ 752 | 30 Dlr E None | ♠ A3 ♥ QJT84 ♦ 9753 ♣ Q4 |
| ♠ K97 ♥ AK7 ♦ KQ4 ♣ J986 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 10 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 11 |
| S | 10 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 11 |
| E | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| W | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
Minimax (par): NS +430: 3NTN+1 3NTS+1