Round 4 — BAM Day 2
29 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 4 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AUPALETI | RIAD | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | POLAND MIXED | 4JACKS | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | 4FUN | INDIA SENIORS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SANTOSHA | CHINA SENIOR | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CANADA MIXED | PORTO | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | DRINTEAM | KUWAIT | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | GILLIS | PORTUCOLE | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | COME TO HK CHINA | ALICE | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | SWEDEN SENIOR | GERMANY MIXED | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | LAWRENZO | AUSTRIA | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | POLAND WOMEN | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | USA E GETTA | ULI | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | PARTYPACK | FRANCE SENIORS | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | PIERCE | FRANCE WOMEN | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | INDIA OPEN | OUJDA1 | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | MO ROCCO | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | EL GHRARI | NZ OPEN | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | BRENO | INDIA MIXED | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | MEXICO | REASON | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | MADRID | RABONO CALAMIS | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | POWERSHARK | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | NZ MIXED | GEMIGNANI | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | POLAND OPEN | NO COKE | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | TEAM BLACK | MASARAHLOU | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | UAE MIXED | NORWAY SENIOR | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | BV WALDSOLMS | CAMELS | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | FINLAND | THE DARK KNIGHT | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | VINCIGUERRA | INDIA WOMEN | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | USA WOMEN | DINKIN | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 4↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 4 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R4 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VINCIGUERRA | 78.00 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 2 | POLAND OPEN | 73.00 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 3 | GERMANY MIXED | 71.00 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 4 | USA E GETTA | 70.80 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 5 | NORWAY SENIOR | 70.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 6 | SWEDEN SENIOR | 68.60 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 7 | BV WALDSOLMS | 67.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 7 | FRANCE WOMEN | 67.00 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 9 | EL GHRARI | 65.20 | 5.00 | 4 |
| 10 | SANTOSHA | 64.01 | 5.00 | 4 |
| 11 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | 63.20 | 5.00 | 4 |
| 12 | LAWRENZO | 63.01 | 6.00 | 4 |
| 13 | NZ OPEN | 63.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 14 | PORTUCOLE | 62.01 | 5.00 | 4 |
| 14 | TEAM BLACK | 62.01 | 6.00 | 4 |
| 16 | GEMIGNANI | 62.00 | 5.00 | 4 |
| 17 | ALICE | 61.50 | 6.00 | 4 |
| 18 | DRINTEAM | 61.00 | 6.00 | 4 |
| 19 | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 60.20 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 20 | INDIA OPEN | 60.01 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 21 | POLAND MIXED | 60.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 22 | INDIA MIXED | 59.01 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 23 | UAE MIXED | 59.00 | 5.00 | 4 |
| 24 | MASARAHLOU | 58.20 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 25 | FRANCE SENIORS | 58.01 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 26 | POLAND WOMEN | 58.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 26 | THE DARK KNIGHT | 58.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 28 | AUPALETI | 57.01 | 5.00 | 4 |
| 28 | DINKIN | 57.01 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 28 | POWERSHARK | 57.01 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 28 | RABONO CALAMIS | 57.01 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 28 | REASON | 57.01 | 5.00 | 4 |
| 33 | 4FUN | 57.00 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 34 | FINLAND | 56.01 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 34 | NO COKE | 56.01 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 36 | INDIA SENIORS | 56.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 37 | BRENO | 55.01 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 37 | CAMELS | 55.01 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 37 | PARTYPACK | 55.01 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 40 | USA WOMEN | 55.00 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 41 | GILLIS | 54.01 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 42 | 4JACKS | 54.00 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 42 | NZ MIXED | 54.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 44 | MADRID | 53.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 45 | CHINA SENIOR | 52.01 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 46 | AUSTRIA | 51.01 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 47 | CANADA MIXED | 51.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 47 | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 51.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 47 | ULI | 51.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 50 | PORTO | 50.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 51 | MO ROCCO | 49.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 52 | INDIA WOMEN | 44.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 53 | PIERCE | 43.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 54 | COME TO HK CHINA | 42.20 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 55 | KUWAIT | 39.80 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 56 | MEXICO | 39.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 57 | OUJDA1 | 37.80 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 58 | RIAD | 37.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 4 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R4 | BAM% |
|---|
AUPALETI vs RIAD 5 : 1 VP (match 115228) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUPALETI | RIAD | |
| 4♥x | W | ♠A | -3 | 800 | 99% | 2NT | E | ♠Q | = | 120 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2♦ | S | ♥10 | -2 | 200 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 64% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-2.0 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥x | W | -3 | 800 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | E | = | 120 | 86% | ||||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | S | -2 | 200 | 100% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND MIXED vs 4JACKS 2 : 4 VP (match 115229) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND MIXED | 4JACKS | |
| 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 3NT | E | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 52% | 1♥ | S | ♥10 | -1 | 100 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 3♠ | N | ♥A | = | 140 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 1♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
4FUN vs INDIA SENIORS 4 : 2 VP (match 115230) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 4FUN | INDIA SENIORS | |
| 3♠ | S | ♣A | +1 | 170 | 67% | 2♠ | S | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♣x | W | ♦A | -2 | 300 | 89% | 5♣x | W | ♦A | -2 | 300 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+1.0 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | S | +1 | 170 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 63% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SANTOSHA vs CHINA SENIOR 5 : 1 VP (match 115231) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SANTOSHA | CHINA SENIOR | |
| 3NT | E | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 69% | 3♠ | S | ♣A | = | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♣x | W | ♦K | -2 | 300 | 89% | 3NT | E | ♠6 | -2 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.6 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 200 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 63% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CANADA MIXED vs PORTO 3 : 3 VP (match 115232) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CANADA MIXED | PORTO | |
| 3♦ | W | ♠A | -4 | 400 | 74% | 3♠x | S | ♣A | +1 | 630 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 1NT | E | ♥7 | +1 | 120 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 4♠ | N | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | W | -4 | 400 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | S | +1 | 630 | 94% | ||||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 90% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DRINTEAM vs KUWAIT 6 : 0 VP (match 115233) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRINTEAM | KUWAIT | |
| 4♥ | W | ♠A | -2 | 200 | 69% | 4♣ | E | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♦3 | +1 | 120 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣x | W | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 89% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.0 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 90% | ||||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GILLIS vs PORTUCOLE 1 : 5 VP (match 115234) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GILLIS | PORTUCOLE | |
| 4♠x | S | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♠x | N | ♥K | = | 590 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥7 | +1 | 120 | 90% | 1NT | E | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | N | = | 590 | 85% | ||||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
COME TO HK CHINA vs ALICE 0 : 6 VP (match 115235) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | COME TO HK CHINA | ALICE | |
| 3NT | E | ♠Q | = | 600 | 94% | 4♥x | E | ♠Q | -2 | 500 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥4 | = | 90 | 52% | 2♥ | S | ♠2 | = | 110 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 64% | 5♣x | W | ♦A | -2 | 300 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+2.3 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | E | -2 | 500 | 76% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 98% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWEDEN SENIOR vs GERMANY MIXED 2 : 4 VP (match 115236) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWEDEN SENIOR | GERMANY MIXED | |
| 3NT | E | ♠Q | = | 600 | 94% | 4♠x | S | ♣A | = | 590 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | N | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 64% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | S | = | 590 | 85% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LAWRENZO vs AUSTRIA 6 : 0 VP (match 115237) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LAWRENZO | AUSTRIA | |
| 3♠x | S | ♣A | +1 | 630 | 94% | 4♠x | S | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 1NT | E | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣x | W | ♦K | -2 | 300 | 89% | 4♥ | E | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+2.4 | NS-0.1 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠x | S | +1 | 630 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+2.4 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIEDS NOIR AND CO vs POLAND WOMEN 5 : 1 VP (match 115238) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | POLAND WOMEN | |
| 4♣ | W | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♦3 | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♣x | W | ♦K | -2 | 300 | 89% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.6 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA E GETTA vs ULI 3 : 3 VP (match 115239) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA E GETTA | ULI | |
| 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | E | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 5♣x | W | ♦K | -2 | 300 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 90% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PARTYPACK vs FRANCE SENIORS 2 : 4 VP (match 115240) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PARTYPACK | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 4♠ | S | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 51% | 5♥ | E | ♠Q | -3 | 300 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | S | ♦2 | = | 90 | 78% | 1NT | E | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 64% | 4♣ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | E | -3 | 300 | 72% | ||||
| 2♦ | S | = | 90 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | W | -1 | 50 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIERCE vs FRANCE WOMEN 2 : 4 VP (match 115241) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIERCE | FRANCE WOMEN | |
| 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 3NT | E | ♠Q | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | N | ♥K | = | 90 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 92% | 4♠ | N | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 94% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 78% | ||||
| 4♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA OPEN vs OUJDA1 4 : 2 VP (match 115441) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA OPEN | OUJDA1 | |
| 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 3♥ | E | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♥7 | +1 | 120 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 5♥ | E | ♠7 | -2 | 100 | 69% | 5♦ | N | ♥K | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 90% | ||||
| 5♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | N | -2 | 100 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MATILDAS PLUS 2 vs MO ROCCO 3 : 3 VP (match 115442) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | MO ROCCO | |
| 3♠x | S | ♣A | = | 530 | 79% | 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♦3 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♦3 | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♦ | N | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 92% | 4♠ | N | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠x | S | = | 530 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 5♦ | N | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EL GHRARI vs NZ OPEN 5 : 1 VP (match 115443) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EL GHRARI | NZ OPEN | |
| 3NT | E | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 56% | 4♠x | S | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 1NT | E | ♥7 | +1 | 120 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 64% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-1.4 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 90% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs INDIA MIXED 2 : 4 VP (match 115444) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | INDIA MIXED | |
| 3NT | E | ♠Q | = | 600 | 94% | 4♠x | N | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| 1NTx | E | ♥7 | -1 | 200 | 100% | 1NT | N | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 5♣x | W | ♦K | -2 | 300 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 1NTx | E | -1 | 200 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | N | -1 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MEXICO vs REASON 1 : 5 VP (match 115445) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MEXICO | REASON | |
| 3♣ | E | ♠Q | = | 110 | 84% | 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | W | ♠4 | = | 110 | 97% | 3♠ | N | ♥A | = | 140 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MADRID vs RABONO CALAMIS 2 : 4 VP (match 115446) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MADRID | RABONO CALAMIS | |
| 4♠x | S | ♣A | = | 590 | 85% | 3♠x | S | ♣A | +1 | 630 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣x | W | ♦A | -2 | 300 | 89% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS+1.4 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | = | 590 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | S | +1 | 630 | 94% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POWERSHARK vs CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED 4 : 2 VP (match 115447) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POWERSHARK | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | |
| 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | E | ♦3 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣x | W | ♦A | -2 | 300 | 89% | 5♣x | W | ♦K | -2 | 300 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 90% | ||||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NZ MIXED vs GEMIGNANI 1 : 5 VP (match 115448) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NZ MIXED | GEMIGNANI | |
| 3NT | E | ♠Q | = | 600 | 94% | 6♣x | E | ♠Q | -3 | 800 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♦3 | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♠x | N | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 100% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | -3 | 150 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.9 | NS-0.0 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 6♣x | E | -3 | 800 | 99% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 5♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -3 | 150 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.9 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND OPEN vs NO COKE 4 : 2 VP (match 115449) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND OPEN | NO COKE | |
| 4♠x | S | ♣K | = | 590 | 85% | 3NT | E | ♠J | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♦3 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | = | 590 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 94% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM BLACK vs MASARAHLOU 6 : 0 VP (match 115450) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM BLACK | MASARAHLOU | |
| 3♠x | N | ♥K | +1 | 630 | 94% | 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♥7 | +2 | 150 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣ | W | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 69% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-1.6 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠x | N | +1 | 630 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | +2 | 150 | 98% | ||||
| 5♣ | W | -2 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UAE MIXED vs NORWAY SENIOR 5 : 1 VP (match 115451) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UAE MIXED | NORWAY SENIOR | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 3NT | E | ♠Q | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 1NT | E | ♦3 | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-1.2 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 94% | ||||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BV WALDSOLMS vs CAMELS 3 : 3 VP (match 115452) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BV WALDSOLMS | CAMELS | |
| 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | E | ♥4 | = | 90 | 52% | 1NT | E | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | S | ♥9 | -1 | 100 | 92% | 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-1.4 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | +1 | 120 | 90% | ||||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINLAND vs THE DARK KNIGHT 3 : 3 VP (match 115453) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINLAND | THE DARK KNIGHT | |
| 3NT | E | ♠Q | = | 600 | 94% | 4♥x | E | ♠Q | -2 | 500 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 1NT | E | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♣x | W | ♦A | -2 | 300 | 89% | 4♥x | E | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.7 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | E | -2 | 500 | 76% | ||||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VINCIGUERRA vs INDIA WOMEN 4 : 2 VP (match 115454) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VINCIGUERRA | INDIA WOMEN | |
| 4♠x | S | ♣A | = | 590 | 85% | 4♠ | S | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 1NT | E | ♥6 | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 3NT | E | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-0.1 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | = | 590 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA WOMEN vs DINKIN 4 : 2 VP (match 115455) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA WOMEN | DINKIN | |
| 4♠x | S | ♣K | = | 590 | 85% | 4♠x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 1NT | E | ♥5 | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 5♣x | W | ♦K | -2 | 300 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+0.4 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | = | 590 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
Board 25board records → · view →
| ♠ A8 ♥ AJ843 ♦ 7653 ♣ 98 | ||
| ♠ 97 ♥ 97652 ♦ 92 ♣ AKJ7 | 25 Dlr N E-W | ♠ K5 ♥ KQT ♦ AJT ♣ QT532 |
| ♠ QJT6432 ♥ – ♦ KQ84 ♣ 64 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 3 |
| S | 4 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 3 |
| E | 9 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 9 |
| W | 8 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 8 |
Minimax (par): NS -300: 4♦♠Nx-2 4♦♠Sx-2
Board 26board records → · view →
| ♠ AJ9 ♥ A32 ♦ QT7 ♣ KT76 | ||
| ♠ T852 ♥ T9 ♦ 9862 ♣ A84 | 26 Dlr E Both | ♠ Q74 ♥ KQJ8 ♦ AJ ♣ QJ52 |
| ♠ K63 ♥ 7654 ♦ K543 ♣ 93 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| S | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| E | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| W | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
Minimax (par): NS +90: 1NTN= 1NTS=
Board 27board records → · view →
| ♠ AJ432 ♥ 85 ♦ AKQ94 ♣ 5 | ||
| ♠ T5 ♥ 94 ♦ 75 ♣ AT98732 | 27 Dlr S None | ♠ K8 ♥ AKQT73 ♦ J6 ♣ J64 |
| ♠ Q976 ♥ J62 ♦ T832 ♣ KQ |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 2 |
| S | 6 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 2 |
| E | 7 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| W | 7 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
Minimax (par): NS +100: 4♣♥Ex-1 4♣♥Wx-1