Round 12 — BAM Day 2
29 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 12 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SWEDEN SENIOR | RIAD | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | LAWRENZO | COME TO HK CHINA | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | GILLIS | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | USA E GETTA | DRINTEAM | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PARTYPACK | CANADA MIXED | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | PIERCE | SANTOSHA | 6 | 0 | 5.80 | 0.20 | protocol → |
| 7 | FRANCE WOMEN | 4FUN | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | FRANCE SENIORS | POLAND MIXED | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | ULI | AUPALETI | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | POLAND WOMEN | 4JACKS | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | AUSTRIA | INDIA SENIORS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | GERMANY MIXED | CHINA SENIOR | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | ALICE | PORTO | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | PORTUCOLE | KUWAIT | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | POLAND OPEN | OUJDA1 | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | TEAM BLACK | NZ MIXED | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | UAE MIXED | POWERSHARK | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | BV WALDSOLMS | MADRID | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | FINLAND | MEXICO | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | VINCIGUERRA | BRENO | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | USA WOMEN | EL GHRARI | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | DINKIN | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | INDIA WOMEN | INDIA OPEN | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | THE DARK KNIGHT | MO ROCCO | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CAMELS | NZ OPEN | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | NORWAY SENIOR | INDIA MIXED | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | MASARAHLOU | REASON | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | NO COKE | RABONO CALAMIS | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | GEMIGNANI | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 12↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 12 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R12 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | POLAND OPEN | 108.00 | 6.00 | 12 |
| 2 | SWEDEN SENIOR | 106.60 | 6.00 | 12 |
| 3 | VINCIGUERRA | 104.00 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 4 | GERMANY MIXED | 97.20 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 5 | GEMIGNANI | 97.00 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 6 | USA E GETTA | 95.80 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 7 | FRANCE SENIORS | 94.01 | 5.00 | 12 |
| 8 | BV WALDSOLMS | 94.00 | 5.00 | 12 |
| 8 | NORWAY SENIOR | 94.00 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 10 | NO COKE | 93.01 | 6.00 | 12 |
| 11 | FRANCE WOMEN | 92.00 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 12 | GILLIS | 91.01 | 6.00 | 12 |
| 13 | POLAND WOMEN | 91.00 | 6.00 | 12 |
| 14 | ALICE | 90.70 | 5.00 | 12 |
| 15 | POLAND MIXED | 89.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 16 | INDIA MIXED | 88.01 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 16 | REASON | 88.01 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 18 | EL GHRARI | 87.20 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 19 | INDIA OPEN | 87.01 | 5.00 | 12 |
| 20 | NZ OPEN | 87.00 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 21 | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 86.20 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 22 | PORTUCOLE | 86.01 | 5.00 | 12 |
| 23 | DRINTEAM | 86.00 | 5.00 | 12 |
| 23 | UAE MIXED | 86.00 | 6.00 | 12 |
| 25 | AUPALETI | 85.01 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 26 | BRENO | 83.51 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 27 | FINLAND | 82.01 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 27 | TEAM BLACK | 82.01 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 29 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | 81.20 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 30 | DINKIN | 81.01 | 6.00 | 12 |
| 30 | PARTYPACK | 81.01 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 32 | SANTOSHA | 80.21 | 0.20 | 12 |
| 33 | POWERSHARK | 80.01 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 34 | CAMELS | 79.01 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 34 | CHINA SENIOR | 79.01 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 36 | THE DARK KNIGHT | 79.00 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 37 | AUSTRIA | 78.01 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 37 | RABONO CALAMIS | 78.01 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 39 | LAWRENZO | 77.01 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 40 | INDIA SENIORS | 77.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 40 | ULI | 77.00 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 42 | NZ MIXED | 76.20 | 5.00 | 12 |
| 43 | MASARAHLOU | 75.20 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 44 | MADRID | 75.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 45 | USA WOMEN | 73.00 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 46 | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 72.00 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 47 | 4JACKS | 71.00 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 48 | 4FUN | 70.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 49 | CANADA MIXED | 69.00 | 5.00 | 12 |
| 50 | COME TO HK CHINA | 66.20 | 6.00 | 12 |
| 51 | PIERCE | 64.80 | 5.80 | 12 |
| 52 | MO ROCCO | 63.00 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 52 | PORTO | 63.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 54 | MEXICO | 61.00 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 55 | RIAD | 60.00 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 56 | INDIA WOMEN | 57.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 57 | KUWAIT | 51.80 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 58 | OUJDA1 | 49.80 | 0.00 | 12 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 12 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R12 | BAM% |
|---|
SWEDEN SENIOR vs RIAD 6 : 0 VP (match 115340) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWEDEN SENIOR | RIAD | |
| 5♣ | E | ♥K | +1 | 620 | 94% | 3NT | W | ♥2 | +4 | 720 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠x | W | ♣10 | -2 | 500 | 97% | 6♣ | E | ♦A | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | N | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 82% | 3♠ | S | ♠Q | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-0.9 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | E | +1 | 620 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +4 | 720 | 70% | ||||
| 6♠x | W | -2 | 500 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | ||||
| 3♣ | N | -1 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | S | -3 | 300 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LAWRENZO vs COME TO HK CHINA 0 : 6 VP (match 115341) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LAWRENZO | COME TO HK CHINA | |
| 6♣ | E | ♠3 | = | 1370 | 53% | 3NT | W | ♦6 | +4 | 720 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 6♣ | E | ♦A | = | 1370 | 68% | 5♠ | W | ♥8 | +2 | 710 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | E | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 60% | 3NT | N | ♣K | = | 600 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +4 | 720 | 70% | ||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | W | +2 | 710 | 56% | ||||
| 3♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIEDS NOIR AND CO vs GILLIS 0 : 6 VP (match 115342) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | GILLIS | |
| 6NT | W | ♠K | = | 1440 | 84% | 6♣ | W | ♠K | = | 1370 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 6NT | W | ♥7 | +1 | 1470 | 97% | 6♣ | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 82% | 2♥x | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-2.2 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 53% | ||||
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1470 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 85% | ||||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 2♥x | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-2.2 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA E GETTA vs DRINTEAM 1 : 5 VP (match 115343) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA E GETTA | DRINTEAM | |
| 6♣ | E | ♥8 | = | 1370 | 53% | 6♣ | E | ♠5 | = | 1370 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 6♣ | E | ♦A | = | 1370 | 68% | 6♣ | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 62% | 3NT | N | ♣K | = | 600 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.4 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 53% | ||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 85% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PARTYPACK vs CANADA MIXED 1 : 5 VP (match 115344) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PARTYPACK | CANADA MIXED | |
| 6NT | W | ♠K | = | 1440 | 84% | 3NT | W | ♥2 | +4 | 720 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 6NT | W | ♦5 | = | 1440 | 90% | 6NT | W | ♦5 | = | 1440 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♣ | S | ♥9 | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2♠x | W | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-2.4 | NS-0.2 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +4 | 720 | 70% | ||||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 90% | ||||
| 5♣ | S | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | W | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-2.4 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIERCE vs SANTOSHA 5.8 : 0.2 VP (match 115345) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIERCE | SANTOSHA | |
| 4NT | W | ♠K | +2 | 690 | 85% | 3NT | W | ♦6 | +4 | 720 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 6♣ | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 85% | 5♦x | S | ♣A | -3 | 800 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | W | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 72% | 2♥x | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.8 | NS+0.6 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4NT | W | +2 | 690 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +4 | 720 | 70% | ||||
| 6♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 5♦x | S | -3 | 800 | 50% | ||||
| 3♠x | W | -2 | 300 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 2♥x | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.8 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE WOMEN vs 4FUN 4 : 2 VP (match 115346) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE WOMEN | 4FUN | |
| 6♣ | E | ♥8 | = | 1370 | 53% | 6NT | W | ♥5 | = | 1440 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 6♣ | E | ♦A | = | 1370 | 68% | 6♣ | E | ♥9 | +1 | 1390 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 62% | 3NT | N | ♣Q | = | 600 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | ||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | +1 | 1390 | 82% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs POLAND MIXED 5 : 1 VP (match 115347) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | POLAND MIXED | |
| 6NT | W | ♣8 | = | 1440 | 84% | 6NT | W | ♥5 | = | 1440 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | W | ♦5 | +3 | 690 | 60% | 6♣ | E | ♥10 | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | E | ♦K | -2 | 100 | 60% | 2♥ | W | ♣9 | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.3 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | ||||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | ||||
| 3♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ULI vs AUPALETI 4 : 2 VP (match 115348) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ULI | AUPALETI | |
| 3NT | W | ♥4 | +3 | 690 | 85% | 6NT | W | ♠K | = | 1440 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 6♣ | E | ♦A | = | 1370 | 68% | 4♥x | S | ♣A | -2 | 500 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | E | ♦A | -2 | 100 | 60% | 2♠ | N | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | ||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | S | -2 | 500 | 77% | ||||
| 3♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND WOMEN vs 4JACKS 6 : 0 VP (match 115349) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND WOMEN | 4JACKS | |
| 6♣ | E | ♠2 | = | 1370 | 53% | 6NT | W | ♣9 | = | 1440 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦x | S | ♣A | -3 | 800 | 50% | 6♣ | W | ♥4 | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♣K | = | 600 | 86% | 5♦x | S | ♠3 | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-2.1 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | ||||
| 5♦x | S | -3 | 800 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 68% | ||||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 5♦x | S | -3 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUSTRIA vs INDIA SENIORS 4 : 2 VP (match 115350) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUSTRIA | INDIA SENIORS | |
| 6♣ | E | ♥8 | = | 1370 | 53% | 3NT | W | ♦6 | +4 | 720 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠ | W | ♣10 | -2 | 200 | 92% | 5♠ | E | ♦A | +1 | 680 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥x | W | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2♥ | E | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.4 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +4 | 720 | 70% | ||||
| 6♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | E | +1 | 680 | 63% | ||||
| 2♥x | W | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY MIXED vs CHINA SENIOR 2 : 4 VP (match 115351) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY MIXED | CHINA SENIOR | |
| 6NT | W | ♠K | = | 1440 | 84% | 3NT | W | ♥2 | +3 | 690 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♦A | +1 | 650 | 68% | 5♦x | S | ♠7 | -3 | 800 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥x | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 60% | 3NT | N | ♥J | = | 600 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+1.4 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 85% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 5♦x | S | -3 | 800 | 50% | ||||
| 2♥x | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALICE vs PORTO 5 : 1 VP (match 115352) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALICE | PORTO | |
| 3NT | W | ♦6 | +4 | 720 | 70% | 3NT | W | ♦6 | +4 | 720 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 6♦x | S | ♣A | -4 | 1100 | 54% | 6♣ | E | ♦A | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♣Q | = | 600 | 86% | 2♥x | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.2 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | +4 | 720 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | W | +4 | 720 | 70% | ||||
| 6♦x | S | -4 | 1100 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | ||||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2♥x | W | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PORTUCOLE vs KUWAIT 5 : 1 VP (match 115353) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PORTUCOLE | KUWAIT | |
| 7NT | W | ♠K | -2 | 200 | 100% | 6♣ | W | ♠K | = | 1370 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 5♠ | E | ♦A | = | 650 | 68% | 6NT | W | ♦5 | = | 1440 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♥J | = | 600 | 86% | 3NT | N | ♣K | = | 600 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+2.1 | NS-0.1 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7NT | W | -2 | 200 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 53% | ||||
| 5♠ | E | = | 650 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 90% | ||||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+2.1 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND OPEN vs OUJDA1 6 : 0 VP (match 115561) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND OPEN | OUJDA1 | |
| 3NT | W | ♥5 | +4 | 720 | 70% | 6NT | W | ♠K | = | 1440 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 6♣ | E | ♥10 | -1 | 100 | 85% | 6♣ | E | ♦A | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♣Q | = | 600 | 86% | 3NT | N | ♣Q | -1 | 100 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.8 | NS-1.7 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | +4 | 720 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | ||||
| 6♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | ||||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.8 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM BLACK vs NZ MIXED 1 : 5 VP (match 115562) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM BLACK | NZ MIXED | |
| 6♣ | E | ♦2 | = | 1370 | 53% | 6♣ | W | ♠K | = | 1370 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 6NT | W | ♠Q | = | 1440 | 90% | 6♣ | E | ♥2 | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 62% | 3NT | N | ♥J | = | 600 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 53% | ||||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UAE MIXED vs POWERSHARK 6 : 0 VP (match 115563) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UAE MIXED | POWERSHARK | |
| 3NT | W | ♦6 | +4 | 720 | 70% | 6NT | W | ♠K | = | 1440 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣ | E | ♦A | +1 | 620 | 74% | 6♣ | E | ♦A | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠Q | = | 600 | 86% | 2♥ | E | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-1.8 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | +4 | 720 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | ||||
| 5♣ | E | +1 | 620 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 600 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BV WALDSOLMS vs MADRID 5 : 1 VP (match 115564) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BV WALDSOLMS | MADRID | |
| 6♣ | W | ♠K | = | 1370 | 53% | 6NT | W | ♥4 | = | 1440 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠x | W | ♦2 | -3 | 800 | 100% | 5♣ | E | ♥10 | +1 | 620 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2♥ | E | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.5 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | ||||
| 6♠x | W | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | E | +1 | 620 | 74% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINLAND vs MEXICO 2 : 4 VP (match 115565) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINLAND | MEXICO | |
| 6♣ | E | ♥J | = | 1370 | 53% | 3NT | W | ♥2 | +3 | 690 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 6♦x | S | ♣A | -6 | 1700 | 99% | 5♠ | W | ♦5 | +1 | 680 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 62% | 3NT | N | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 85% | ||||
| 6♦x | S | -6 | 1700 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | W | +1 | 680 | 63% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VINCIGUERRA vs BRENO 3 : 3 VP (match 115566) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VINCIGUERRA | BRENO | |
| 3NT | W | ♠Q | +3 | 690 | 85% | 3NT | W | ♦6 | +3 | 690 | 85% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♥x | S | ♦3 | -3 | 800 | 50% | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | +3 | 710 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | S | ♠Q | = | 110 | 70% | 3♥ | E | ♦A | -2 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+1.0 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 85% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 85% | ||||
| 5♥x | S | -3 | 800 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +3 | 710 | 56% | ||||
| 3♦ | S | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA WOMEN vs EL GHRARI 4 : 2 VP (match 115567) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA WOMEN | EL GHRARI | |
| 6♣ | W | ♠K | = | 1370 | 53% | 6♣ | W | ♣9 | +1 | 1390 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠x | W | ♣3 | -2 | 500 | 97% | 6♣ | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | S | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 82% | 3NT | N | ♣J | = | 600 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.1 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | +1 | 1390 | 68% | ||||
| 6♠x | W | -2 | 500 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 85% | ||||
| 3♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DINKIN vs MATILDAS PLUS 2 6 : 0 VP (match 115568) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DINKIN | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | |
| 3NT | W | ♣9 | +3 | 690 | 85% | 6NT | W | ♠K | = | 1440 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣ | E | ♦A | +1 | 620 | 74% | 6NT | W | ♦5 | = | 1440 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | E | ♦A | -2 | 100 | 60% | 3♥ | E | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-1.7 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | ||||
| 5♣ | E | +1 | 620 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 90% | ||||
| 3♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA WOMEN vs INDIA OPEN 1 : 5 VP (match 115569) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA WOMEN | INDIA OPEN | |
| 6NT | W | ♠K | = | 1440 | 84% | 6NT | W | ♠K | = | 1440 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 6♠ | E | ♦A | = | 1430 | 84% | 6♠ | W | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 62% | 3NT | N | ♥J | = | 600 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | ||||
| 6♠ | E | = | 1430 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 85% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THE DARK KNIGHT vs MO ROCCO 3 : 3 VP (match 115570) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THE DARK KNIGHT | MO ROCCO | |
| 6♣ | W | ♥2 | = | 1370 | 53% | 6NT | W | ♠K | +1 | 1470 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 6♣ | E | ♥9 | = | 1370 | 68% | 5♠ | W | ♦5 | = | 650 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2♥ | E | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | +1 | 1470 | 100% | ||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | W | = | 650 | 68% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAMELS vs NZ OPEN 2 : 4 VP (match 115571) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAMELS | NZ OPEN | |
| 6NT | W | ♠K | = | 1440 | 84% | 3NT | W | ♠K | +3 | 690 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 5♠ | W | ♥7 | +2 | 710 | 56% | 6♣ | E | ♥10 | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3NTx | N | ♣K | -1 | 200 | 93% | 2♠ | W | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +3 | 690 | 85% | ||||
| 5♠ | W | +2 | 710 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | ||||
| 3NTx | N | -1 | 200 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NORWAY SENIOR vs INDIA MIXED 4 : 2 VP (match 115572) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NORWAY SENIOR | INDIA MIXED | |
| 7NT | W | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 97% | 6NT | W | ♠K | = | 1440 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 6♣ | E | ♦A | = | 1370 | 68% | 3♦x | S | ♠7 | -1 | 200 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♥J | = | 600 | 86% | 3♠ | S | ♦Q | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7NT | W | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | ||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | S | -1 | 200 | 79% | ||||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MASARAHLOU vs REASON 2 : 4 VP (match 115573) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MASARAHLOU | REASON | |
| 6♣ | W | ♠K | = | 1370 | 53% | 6♣ | W | ♣9 | = | 1370 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 6♦x | S | ♣A | -6 | 1700 | 99% | 6♠x | W | ♣10 | -2 | 500 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 82% | 3♦ | S | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 53% | ||||
| 6♦x | S | -6 | 1700 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 6♠x | W | -2 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NO COKE vs RABONO CALAMIS 6 : 0 VP (match 115574) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NO COKE | RABONO CALAMIS | |
| 7♣ | W | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 97% | 6♣ | W | ♠K | = | 1370 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 6♣ | E | ♦A | = | 1370 | 68% | 6NT | W | ♦5 | = | 1440 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♣K | +1 | 630 | 100% | 2♥ | E | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-1.1 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | = | 1370 | 53% | ||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 1370 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 90% | ||||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GEMIGNANI vs CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED 4 : 2 VP (match 115575) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GEMIGNANI | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | |
| 6NT | W | ♠K | = | 1440 | 84% | 5♣ | W | ♠K | +1 | 620 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 7NTx | E | ♦A | -1 | 200 | 92% | 5♠ | E | ♦A | +1 | 680 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♥J | = | 600 | 86% | 3NT | N | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6NT | W | = | 1440 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | W | +1 | 620 | 94% | ||||
| 7NTx | E | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | E | +1 | 680 | 63% | ||||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
Board 19board records → · view →
| ♠ KQ8 ♥ T542 ♦ KT76 ♣ 98 | ||
| ♠ AT76 ♥ AQ97 ♦ A43 ♣ Q5 | 19 Dlr S E-W | ♠ 94 ♥ 3 ♦ Q5 ♣ AKJ76432 |
| ♠ J532 ♥ KJ86 ♦ J982 ♣ T |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 |
| S | 1 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 1 |
| E | 12 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 12 |
| W | 12 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 12 |
Minimax (par): NS -1440: 6NTE= 6NTW=
Board 20board records → · view →
| ♠ Q932 ♥ 8754 ♦ 52 ♣ T93 | ||
| ♠ J874 ♥ AQJ ♦ KT3 ♣ A86 | 20 Dlr W Both | ♠ AKT6 ♥ 6 ♦ 4 ♣ KQJ7542 |
| ♠ 5 ♥ KT932 ♦ AQJ9876 ♣ – |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0 |
| S | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0 |
| E | 12 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
| W | 12 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 12 |
Minimax (par): NS -1440: 6NTE= 6NTW=
Board 21board records → · view →
| ♠ K98 ♥ AK43 ♦ 64 ♣ T962 | ||
| ♠ QJT763 ♥ 9 ♦ QJT ♣ A87 | 21 Dlr N N-S | ♠ – ♥ JT8652 ♦ 532 ♣ KQJ4 |
| ♠ A542 ♥ Q7 ♦ AK987 ♣ 53 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 7 |
| S | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| E | 5 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| W | 5 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
Minimax (par): NS +120: 2NTN= 2NTS=