Round 6 — BAM Day 2
29 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 6 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4FUN | RIAD | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | SANTOSHA | POLAND MIXED | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CANADA MIXED | AUPALETI | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | DRINTEAM | 4JACKS | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | GILLIS | INDIA SENIORS | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | COME TO HK CHINA | CHINA SENIOR | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | SWEDEN SENIOR | PORTO | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | LAWRENZO | KUWAIT | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | PORTUCOLE | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | USA E GETTA | ALICE | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | PARTYPACK | GERMANY MIXED | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | PIERCE | AUSTRIA | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | FRANCE WOMEN | POLAND WOMEN | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | FRANCE SENIORS | ULI | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | EL GHRARI | OUJDA1 | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | BRENO | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | MEXICO | INDIA OPEN | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | MADRID | MO ROCCO | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | POWERSHARK | NZ OPEN | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | NZ MIXED | INDIA MIXED | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | POLAND OPEN | REASON | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | TEAM BLACK | RABONO CALAMIS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | UAE MIXED | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | BV WALDSOLMS | GEMIGNANI | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | FINLAND | NO COKE | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | VINCIGUERRA | MASARAHLOU | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | USA WOMEN | NORWAY SENIOR | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | DINKIN | CAMELS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | INDIA WOMEN | THE DARK KNIGHT | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 6↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 6 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R6 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | POLAND OPEN | 85.00 | 6.00 | 6 |
| 2 | VINCIGUERRA | 84.00 | 6.00 | 6 |
| 3 | SWEDEN SENIOR | 79.60 | 6.00 | 6 |
| 4 | GERMANY MIXED | 77.00 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 5 | USA E GETTA | 75.80 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 6 | BV WALDSOLMS | 74.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 6 | NORWAY SENIOR | 74.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 8 | EL GHRARI | 73.20 | 5.00 | 6 |
| 9 | FRANCE WOMEN | 72.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 10 | GEMIGNANI | 70.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 10 | NZ OPEN | 70.00 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 10 | POLAND MIXED | 70.00 | 6.00 | 6 |
| 13 | ALICE | 69.50 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 14 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | 68.20 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 15 | THE DARK KNIGHT | 68.00 | 6.00 | 6 |
| 16 | NO COKE | 67.01 | 5.00 | 6 |
| 16 | TEAM BLACK | 67.01 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 18 | AUPALETI | 66.01 | 5.00 | 6 |
| 18 | INDIA OPEN | 66.01 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 18 | SANTOSHA | 66.01 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 21 | DINKIN | 65.01 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 21 | GILLIS | 65.01 | 5.00 | 6 |
| 21 | INDIA MIXED | 65.01 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 21 | LAWRENZO | 65.01 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 21 | PORTUCOLE | 65.01 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 21 | RABONO CALAMIS | 65.01 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 27 | POLAND WOMEN | 65.00 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 28 | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 64.20 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 29 | DRINTEAM | 64.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 30 | CAMELS | 63.01 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 30 | FRANCE SENIORS | 63.01 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 30 | PARTYPACK | 63.01 | 5.00 | 6 |
| 30 | REASON | 63.01 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 34 | INDIA SENIORS | 63.00 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 35 | BRENO | 62.01 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 36 | 4FUN | 62.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 36 | 4JACKS | 62.00 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 38 | FINLAND | 61.01 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 39 | UAE MIXED | 61.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 39 | USA WOMEN | 61.00 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 41 | MASARAHLOU | 60.20 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 42 | AUSTRIA | 60.01 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 42 | CHINA SENIOR | 60.01 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 44 | ULI | 60.00 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 45 | POWERSHARK | 59.01 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 46 | MADRID | 59.00 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 46 | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 59.00 | 5.00 | 6 |
| 48 | NZ MIXED | 58.00 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 49 | CANADA MIXED | 52.00 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 50 | MO ROCCO | 51.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 51 | COME TO HK CHINA | 50.20 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 52 | PORTO | 50.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 53 | INDIA WOMEN | 46.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 53 | PIERCE | 46.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 55 | MEXICO | 45.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 56 | KUWAIT | 44.80 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 57 | RIAD | 42.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 58 | OUJDA1 | 41.80 | 1.00 | 6 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 6 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R6 | BAM% |
|---|
4FUN vs RIAD 3 : 3 VP (match 115256) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 4FUN | RIAD | |
| 3NT | W | ♥J | = | 400 | 86% | 3NT | W | ♥J | +2 | 460 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | S | ♣7 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠ | N | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3♣ | E | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | = | 400 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 460 | 97% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SANTOSHA vs POLAND MIXED 0 : 6 VP (match 115257) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SANTOSHA | POLAND MIXED | |
| 3NT | W | ♠J | +1 | 430 | 92% | 3♣ | W | ♠J | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣9 | = | 600 | 94% | 3NT | S | ♦10 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥x | S | ♣3 | -2 | 300 | 99% | 3NT | W | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-2.7 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 58% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | ||||
| 2♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-2.7 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CANADA MIXED vs AUPALETI 1 : 5 VP (match 115258) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CANADA MIXED | AUPALETI | |
| 3♣ | W | ♥2 | +2 | 150 | 70% | 1NT | W | ♥J | +2 | 150 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | S | ♣9 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | E | ♦Q | = | 110 | 88% | 3♥ | E | ♦Q | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | +2 | 150 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 70% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | ||||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -2 | 200 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DRINTEAM vs 4JACKS 2 : 4 VP (match 115259) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRINTEAM | 4JACKS | |
| 3♦ | S | ♣2 | -2 | 100 | 73% | 2♥ | N | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣7 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3NT | S | ♣7 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2♦ | N | ♣A | = | 90 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | S | -2 | 100 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 82% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 3♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | N | = | 90 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GILLIS vs INDIA SENIORS 5 : 1 VP (match 115260) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GILLIS | INDIA SENIORS | |
| 3♣ | W | ♠J | = | 110 | 58% | 3♣ | W | ♠J | = | 110 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♦10 | +3 | 690 | 98% | 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3♣ | E | ♦Q | = | 110 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.8 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 58% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +3 | 690 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 3♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
COME TO HK CHINA vs CHINA SENIOR 3 : 3 VP (match 115261) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | COME TO HK CHINA | CHINA SENIOR | |
| 3♣ | W | ♠J | = | 110 | 58% | 3NT | E | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | N | ♠3 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | S | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♦ | N | ♣A | = | 90 | 61% | 3♦ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.4 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | ||||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 2♦ | N | = | 90 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWEDEN SENIOR vs PORTO 6 : 0 VP (match 115262) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWEDEN SENIOR | PORTO | |
| 2♦ | N | ♣7 | -2 | 100 | 73% | 3♣ | W | ♥10 | +1 | 130 | 57% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣7 | +3 | 690 | 98% | 3NT | S | ♣8 | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | N | ♣A | = | 90 | 61% | 3♦ | N | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-1.9 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | N | -2 | 100 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 57% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +3 | 690 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | = | 600 | 94% | ||||
| 2♦ | N | = | 90 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | -3 | 150 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LAWRENZO vs KUWAIT 2 : 4 VP (match 115263) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LAWRENZO | KUWAIT | |
| 3♣x | W | ♠J | = | 470 | 98% | 2NT | E | ♥9 | +1 | 150 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣7 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 1NT | N | ♠2 | +4 | 210 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2♦ | N | ♣A | = | 90 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣x | W | = | 470 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | E | +1 | 150 | 70% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | N | +4 | 210 | 98% | ||||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | N | = | 90 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIEDS NOIR AND CO vs PORTUCOLE 4 : 2 VP (match 115264) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | PORTUCOLE | |
| 1NT | E | ♥9 | +2 | 150 | 70% | 2NTx | N | ♠Q | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣8 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | S | ♣7 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | E | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2♠ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | E | +2 | 150 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 2NTx | N | -4 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | ||||
| 3♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA E GETTA vs ALICE 4 : 2 VP (match 115265) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA E GETTA | ALICE | |
| 3♣ | W | ♠J | = | 110 | 58% | 3NT | E | ♥9 | = | 400 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♦10 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3NT | N | ♣6 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♣J | = | 110 | 88% | 2♠ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 86% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PARTYPACK vs GERMANY MIXED 5 : 1 VP (match 115266) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PARTYPACK | GERMANY MIXED | |
| 3♣ | W | ♦2 | = | 110 | 58% | 1NT | W | ♠J | +2 | 150 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | S | ♣7 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♦x | N | ♣Q | = | 180 | 88% | 2♥ | W | ♣J | +1 | 140 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.5 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 70% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 2♦x | N | = | 180 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIERCE vs AUSTRIA 2 : 4 VP (match 115267) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIERCE | AUSTRIA | |
| 3NT | W | ♠J | +1 | 430 | 92% | 2♠ | S | ♦9 | = | 110 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♦10 | +3 | 690 | 98% | 3NT | S | ♣7 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | E | ♦Q | = | 110 | 88% | 3♦x | N | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 97% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +3 | 690 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | ||||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | N | -1 | 100 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE WOMEN vs POLAND WOMEN 2 : 4 VP (match 115268) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE WOMEN | POLAND WOMEN | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦6 | -2 | 100 | 73% | 3♦x | S | ♦6 | = | 470 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣7 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | S | ♦10 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | N | ♣A | = | 90 | 61% | 3♦x | N | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | S | = | 470 | 99% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | ||||
| 2♦ | N | = | 90 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | N | -1 | 100 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs ULI 2 : 4 VP (match 115269) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | ULI | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦9 | -3 | 150 | 70% | 3♣ | W | ♠J | +1 | 130 | 57% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣9 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | N | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 75% | 2♦ | N | ♣A | = | 90 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -3 | 150 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 57% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 1NT | N | -2 | 100 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | N | = | 90 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EL GHRARI vs OUJDA1 5 : 1 VP (match 115471) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EL GHRARI | OUJDA1 | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦9 | -2 | 100 | 73% | 3♣ | W | ♠J | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣8 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | S | ♣8 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♦ | W | ♣J | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2♦x | N | ♣A | = | 180 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+0.7 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 58% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 2♦ | W | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2♦x | N | = | 180 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs MATILDAS PLUS 2 1 : 5 VP (match 115472) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | |
| 3♣ | W | ♠J | +1 | 130 | 57% | 3♦ | N | ♣8 | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♥2 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♣ | E | ♦Q | = | 110 | 88% | 2♦ | N | ♣A | = | 90 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 82% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | N | = | 90 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MEXICO vs INDIA OPEN 3 : 3 VP (match 115473) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MEXICO | INDIA OPEN | |
| 3NT | W | ♥J | +1 | 430 | 92% | 3♦x | S | ♣5 | -2 | 300 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣8 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♦x | N | ♣Q | = | 180 | 88% | 2♠ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | S | -2 | 300 | 82% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 2♦x | N | = | 180 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MADRID vs MO ROCCO 4 : 2 VP (match 115474) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MADRID | MO ROCCO | |
| 3NT | E | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 3NT | W | ♥J | +1 | 430 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣7 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3NT | S | ♣7 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | E | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2♦x | N | ♣A | = | 180 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.9 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 430 | 92% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 3♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 2♦x | N | = | 180 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.9 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POWERSHARK vs NZ OPEN 2 : 4 VP (match 115475) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POWERSHARK | NZ OPEN | |
| 3♣ | W | ♠J | = | 110 | 58% | 3♣ | E | ♥9 | = | 110 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | S | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | W | ♦5 | = | 90 | 66% | 2♦x | N | ♣A | = | 180 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 58% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 2♦x | N | = | 180 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NZ MIXED vs INDIA MIXED 4 : 2 VP (match 115476) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NZ MIXED | INDIA MIXED | |
| 2♦ | S | ♣5 | = | 90 | 91% | 3♦ | N | ♣7 | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣7 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦x | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 75% | 2♦ | N | ♣A | = | 90 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.6 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | S | = | 90 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 82% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 3♦x | N | -1 | 100 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | N | = | 90 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND OPEN vs REASON 6 : 0 VP (match 115477) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND OPEN | REASON | |
| 3♦ | S | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 82% | 1NT | W | ♠J | +2 | 150 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣9 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥x | E | ♠7 | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2♦x | N | ♣A | = | 180 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+2.3 | NS+0.1 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 70% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 4♥x | E | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2♦x | N | = | 180 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+2.3 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM BLACK vs RABONO CALAMIS 4 : 2 VP (match 115478) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM BLACK | RABONO CALAMIS | |
| 3♦x | S | ♦6 | = | 470 | 99% | 1NT | W | ♠J | +2 | 150 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♦10 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | S | ♣7 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦x | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 75% | 3♣ | E | ♦Q | = | 110 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦x | S | = | 470 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | +2 | 150 | 70% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | ||||
| 3♦x | N | -1 | 100 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UAE MIXED vs CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED 2 : 4 VP (match 115479) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UAE MIXED | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | |
| 3♣ | W | ♦3 | +1 | 130 | 57% | 3♣ | W | ♠J | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣9 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3NT | S | ♣7 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | W | ♦10 | = | 90 | 66% | 3♥ | E | ♠3 | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 58% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -3 | 300 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BV WALDSOLMS vs GEMIGNANI 3 : 3 VP (match 115480) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BV WALDSOLMS | GEMIGNANI | |
| 3NT | E | ♥8 | -2 | 100 | 94% | 3♣ | W | ♠J | +1 | 130 | 57% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♦ | N | ♣A | = | 90 | 61% | 3♣ | E | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 57% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 2♦ | N | = | 90 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINLAND vs NO COKE 1 : 5 VP (match 115481) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINLAND | NO COKE | |
| 3NT | E | ♥9 | = | 400 | 86% | 3♣ | W | ♥2 | +2 | 150 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | N | ♠3 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠ | N | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 75% | 2♦x | N | ♣A | = | 180 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | +2 | 150 | 70% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 2♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 2♦x | N | = | 180 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VINCIGUERRA vs MASARAHLOU 6 : 0 VP (match 115482) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VINCIGUERRA | MASARAHLOU | |
| 3♦ | S | ♦9 | -2 | 100 | 73% | 1NT | W | ♥J | +4 | 210 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣7 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 3NT | S | ♣7 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦x | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 75% | 3♠x | S | ♣2 | -2 | 300 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-1.8 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | S | -2 | 100 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | +4 | 210 | 81% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 3♦x | N | -1 | 100 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | S | -2 | 300 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA WOMEN vs NORWAY SENIOR 4 : 2 VP (match 115483) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA WOMEN | NORWAY SENIOR | |
| 3NT | E | ♦4 | -2 | 100 | 94% | 3♣ | W | ♠J | +1 | 130 | 57% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 3NT | S | ♦10 | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦x | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 75% | 2♦ | N | ♣A | = | 90 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 57% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | = | 600 | 94% | ||||
| 3♦x | N | -1 | 100 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | N | = | 90 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DINKIN vs CAMELS 4 : 2 VP (match 115484) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DINKIN | CAMELS | |
| 3♦ | S | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 82% | 1NT | W | ♥J | +3 | 180 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♥2 | +2 | 660 | 82% | 6♦ | S | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3NT | E | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | +3 | 180 | 79% | ||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 100% | ||||
| 3♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA WOMEN vs THE DARK KNIGHT 0 : 6 VP (match 115485) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA WOMEN | THE DARK KNIGHT | |
| 3♣ | W | ♠J | = | 110 | 58% | 2♦ | S | ♦9 | -2 | 100 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♥2 | = | 600 | 94% | 3NT | S | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | E | ♦Q | = | 110 | 88% | 2♦ | N | ♣A | = | 90 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | S | -2 | 100 | 73% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 61% | ||||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | N | = | 90 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
Board 1board records → · view →
| ♠ J2 ♥ KJT72 ♦ K32 ♣ AT3 | ||
| ♠ AT3 ♥ Q64 ♦ 96 ♣ KJ952 | 1 Dlr N None | ♠ Q84 ♥ A53 ♦ AQ8 ♣ Q874 |
| ♠ K9765 ♥ 98 ♦ JT754 ♣ 6 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 3 |
| S | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 3 |
| E | 9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
| W | 9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 10 |
Minimax (par): NS -300: 4♦Nx-2 4♦Sx-2
Board 2board records → · view →
| ♠ AJT5 ♥ 853 ♦ J54 ♣ AK5 | ||
| ♠ Q96 ♥ Q42 ♦ T97 ♣ J987 | 2 Dlr E N-S | ♠ K732 ♥ K97 ♦ Q63 ♣ 642 |
| ♠ 84 ♥ AJT6 ♦ AK82 ♣ QT3 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 |
| S | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9 |
| E | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| W | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Minimax (par): NS +630: 3NTN+1 3NTS+1
Board 3board records → · view →
| ♠ A5 ♥ AJ2 ♦ KT9652 ♣ JT | ||
| ♠ KJ ♥ 853 ♦ AJ874 ♣ 532 | 3 Dlr S E-W | ♠ Q982 ♥ T976 ♦ – ♣ AKQ97 |
| ♠ T7643 ♥ KQ4 ♦ Q3 ♣ 864 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 4 |
| S | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 4 |
| E | 7 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 9 |
| W | 7 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 9 |
Minimax (par): NS -100: 3♦Nx-1 3♦Sx-1