Round 9 — BAM Day 2
29 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 9 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DRINTEAM | RIAD | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | GILLIS | CANADA MIXED | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | COME TO HK CHINA | SANTOSHA | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SWEDEN SENIOR | 4FUN | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | LAWRENZO | POLAND MIXED | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | AUPALETI | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | USA E GETTA | 4JACKS | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | PARTYPACK | INDIA SENIORS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | PIERCE | CHINA SENIOR | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | FRANCE WOMEN | PORTO | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | FRANCE SENIORS | KUWAIT | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | ULI | PORTUCOLE | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | POLAND WOMEN | ALICE | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | AUSTRIA | GERMANY MIXED | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | MADRID | OUJDA1 | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | POWERSHARK | MEXICO | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | NZ MIXED | BRENO | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | -0.50 | protocol → |
| 18 | POLAND OPEN | EL GHRARI | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | TEAM BLACK | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | UAE MIXED | INDIA OPEN | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | BV WALDSOLMS | MO ROCCO | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | FINLAND | NZ OPEN | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | VINCIGUERRA | INDIA MIXED | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | USA WOMEN | REASON | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | DINKIN | RABONO CALAMIS | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | INDIA WOMEN | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | THE DARK KNIGHT | GEMIGNANI | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | CAMELS | NO COKE | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | NORWAY SENIOR | MASARAHLOU | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 9↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 9 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R9 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | POLAND OPEN | 94.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 2 | SWEDEN SENIOR | 90.60 | 6.00 | 9 |
| 3 | VINCIGUERRA | 90.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 4 | USA E GETTA | 89.80 | 6.00 | 9 |
| 5 | GERMANY MIXED | 88.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 6 | BV WALDSOLMS | 86.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 6 | GEMIGNANI | 86.00 | 6.00 | 9 |
| 8 | NORWAY SENIOR | 83.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 9 | EL GHRARI | 82.20 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 10 | POLAND MIXED | 81.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 11 | FRANCE WOMEN | 80.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 12 | FRANCE SENIORS | 79.01 | 5.00 | 9 |
| 13 | GILLIS | 78.01 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 13 | NO COKE | 78.01 | 5.00 | 9 |
| 13 | PORTUCOLE | 78.01 | 5.00 | 9 |
| 13 | TEAM BLACK | 78.01 | 5.00 | 9 |
| 17 | ALICE | 77.50 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 18 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | 77.20 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 19 | INDIA OPEN | 77.01 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 20 | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 76.20 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 21 | AUPALETI | 76.01 | 5.00 | 9 |
| 21 | INDIA MIXED | 76.01 | 5.00 | 9 |
| 21 | RABONO CALAMIS | 76.01 | 6.00 | 9 |
| 21 | REASON | 76.01 | 6.00 | 9 |
| 25 | NZ OPEN | 75.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 26 | SANTOSHA | 74.01 | 5.00 | 9 |
| 27 | POLAND WOMEN | 74.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 28 | CAMELS | 73.01 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 28 | LAWRENZO | 73.01 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 30 | CHINA SENIOR | 72.01 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 30 | PARTYPACK | 72.01 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 30 | POWERSHARK | 72.01 | 6.00 | 9 |
| 33 | DRINTEAM | 72.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 33 | INDIA SENIORS | 72.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 33 | THE DARK KNIGHT | 72.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 36 | UAE MIXED | 71.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 37 | BRENO | 70.51 | -0.50 | 9 |
| 38 | MASARAHLOU | 70.20 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 39 | FINLAND | 70.01 | 6.00 | 9 |
| 40 | 4JACKS | 68.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 40 | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 68.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 40 | NZ MIXED | 68.00 | 6.00 | 9 |
| 43 | AUSTRIA | 67.01 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 43 | DINKIN | 67.01 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 45 | MADRID | 67.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 46 | ULI | 65.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 47 | 4FUN | 64.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 47 | USA WOMEN | 64.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 49 | CANADA MIXED | 60.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 50 | MO ROCCO | 59.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 51 | COME TO HK CHINA | 57.20 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 52 | PORTO | 56.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 53 | RIAD | 55.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 54 | INDIA WOMEN | 54.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 55 | MEXICO | 53.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 56 | PIERCE | 52.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 57 | KUWAIT | 49.80 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 58 | OUJDA1 | 44.80 | 3.00 | 9 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 9 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R9 | BAM% |
|---|
DRINTEAM vs RIAD 3 : 3 VP (match 115298) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRINTEAM | RIAD | |
| 6♦ | S | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 92% | 3NT | N | ♠10 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♥8 | = | 110 | 70% | 3♦ | W | ♥7 | = | 110 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2NT | S | ♣J | = | 120 | 96% | 2♠ | E | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| 2NT | S | = | 120 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GILLIS vs CANADA MIXED 4 : 2 VP (match 115299) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GILLIS | CANADA MIXED | |
| 3NT | S | ♣J | +3 | 690 | 97% | 5♦ | N | ♥A | +1 | 620 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2NT | E | ♥5 | +2 | 180 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♣6 | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2♥ | E | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +3 | 690 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | N | +1 | 620 | 86% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | E | +2 | 180 | 93% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
COME TO HK CHINA vs SANTOSHA 1 : 5 VP (match 115300) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | COME TO HK CHINA | SANTOSHA | |
| 3NT | S | ♣4 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | S | ♣4 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2NT | E | ♥5 | +2 | 180 | 93% | 4♦ | E | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | W | ♠A | = | 90 | 51% | 2♥ | E | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+1.3 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 2NT | E | +2 | 180 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 79% | ||||
| 2♦ | W | = | 90 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWEDEN SENIOR vs 4FUN 6 : 0 VP (match 115301) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWEDEN SENIOR | 4FUN | |
| 3NT | S | ♠2 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | S | ♣2 | +1 | 630 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | W | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2NT | E | ♥2 | +2 | 180 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | N | ♠5 | +1 | 120 | 96% | 2♥ | E | ♦8 | = | 110 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.8 | NS-1.7 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 75% | ||||
| 4♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | E | +2 | 180 | 93% | ||||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.8 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LAWRENZO vs POLAND MIXED 2 : 4 VP (match 115302) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LAWRENZO | POLAND MIXED | |
| 6♦ | N | ♠10 | = | 1370 | 100% | 3NT | S | ♦3 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♥8 | = | 110 | 70% | 1NT | N | ♣K | = | 90 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♥A | = | 110 | 69% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | N | = | 1370 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 88% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIEDS NOIR AND CO vs AUPALETI 1 : 5 VP (match 115303) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | AUPALETI | |
| 3NT | S | ♠2 | +1 | 630 | 75% | 3NT | S | ♣J | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 3♥ | S | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♦x | W | ♦5 | = | 180 | 89% | 1NT | N | ♦A | = | 90 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+1.2 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 2♦x | W | = | 180 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA E GETTA vs 4JACKS 6 : 0 VP (match 115304) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA E GETTA | 4JACKS | |
| 3NT | S | ♠2 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 630 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♦3 | = | 110 | 95% | 4♦ | E | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 2NT | S | ♣3 | = | 120 | 96% | 2♥ | E | ♥A | +2 | 170 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+2.1 | NS-0.6 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 75% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 79% | ||||
| 2NT | S | = | 120 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +2 | 170 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+2.1 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PARTYPACK vs INDIA SENIORS 4 : 2 VP (match 115305) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PARTYPACK | INDIA SENIORS | |
| 6♦ | N | ♣3 | -1 | 100 | 92% | 3NT | S | ♥Q | +1 | 630 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | W | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 79% | 3♠x | N | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | W | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2♥ | E | ♦8 | = | 110 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 75% | ||||
| 4♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 52% | ||||
| 1NT | W | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIERCE vs CHINA SENIOR 2 : 4 VP (match 115306) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIERCE | CHINA SENIOR | |
| 3NT | S | ♣4 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 5♦ | N | ♣6 | = | 600 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥5 | +3 | 180 | 93% | 3♦ | W | ♥8 | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | S | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 57% | 1NT | S | ♦6 | = | 90 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | N | = | 600 | 88% | ||||
| 1NT | E | +3 | 180 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| 1NT | S | -1 | 100 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE WOMEN vs PORTO 4 : 2 VP (match 115307) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE WOMEN | PORTO | |
| 3NT | S | ♠5 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | S | ♠2 | +1 | 630 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 61% | 3♦ | W | ♥3 | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♠6 | -5 | 500 | 99% | 2NT | S | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 57% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 75% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | -5 | 500 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | S | -1 | 100 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs KUWAIT 5 : 1 VP (match 115308) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | KUWAIT | |
| 3NT | S | ♠2 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | S | ♣4 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | S | ♦4 | = | 110 | 95% | 1NT | E | ♥5 | +3 | 180 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | S | ♣10 | +2 | 150 | 100% | 2♥ | E | ♦8 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+2.2 | NS-0.2 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | +3 | 180 | 93% | ||||
| 1NT | S | +2 | 150 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+2.2 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ULI vs PORTUCOLE 1 : 5 VP (match 115309) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ULI | PORTUCOLE | |
| 3NT | N | ♣6 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | S | ♣4 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♦ | W | ♥7 | = | 110 | 70% | 2NT | W | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♣5 | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2♠ | E | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+1.7 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | W | -1 | 50 | 79% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND WOMEN vs ALICE 3 : 3 VP (match 115310) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND WOMEN | ALICE | |
| 3NT | S | ♠2 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | S | ♣4 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♦ | W | ♥7 | = | 110 | 70% | 1NT | N | ♣Q | +1 | 120 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♥A | = | 110 | 69% | 2♥ | E | ♦8 | +1 | 140 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.6 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 100% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUSTRIA vs GERMANY MIXED 3 : 3 VP (match 115311) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUSTRIA | GERMANY MIXED | |
| 3NT | S | ♠5 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | N | ♠9 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♥ | S | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 4♦ | W | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | S | ♦6 | = | 90 | 84% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+1.0 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 79% | ||||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 84% | 2 | |||
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MADRID vs OUJDA1 3 : 3 VP (match 115516) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MADRID | OUJDA1 | |
| 3NT | S | ♣J | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | S | ♠2 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2NT | E | ♥5 | +2 | 180 | 93% | 2♥ | S | ♦3 | = | 110 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2♣ | S | ♠6 | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.3 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 2NT | E | +2 | 180 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 95% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | S | -2 | 200 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POWERSHARK vs MEXICO 6 : 0 VP (match 115517) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POWERSHARK | MEXICO | |
| 3NT | S | ♣J | +2 | 660 | 65% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♥3 | = | 110 | 70% | 3NT | E | ♥5 | +1 | 430 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2♣x | S | ♠6 | -2 | 500 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-2.9 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -3 | 300 | 97% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 100% | ||||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 2♣x | S | -2 | 500 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NZ MIXED vs BRENO 6 : -0.5 VP (match 115518) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NZ MIXED | BRENO | |
| 3NT | S | ♠5 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 6♣ | S | ♦9 | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 3♦ | W | ♥8 | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2♥ | E | ♥A | = | 110 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-1.7 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | S | -3 | 300 | 97% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND OPEN vs EL GHRARI 2 : 4 VP (match 115519) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND OPEN | EL GHRARI | |
| 3NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 630 | 75% | 3NT | S | ♣4 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 61% | 3♣ | E | ♠K | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | S | ♦2 | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2♥ | W | ♥2 | = | 110 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| 1NT | S | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM BLACK vs MATILDAS PLUS 2 5 : 1 VP (match 115520) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM BLACK | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | |
| 3NT | S | ♠2 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | N | ♠10 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | N | ♣Q | = | 90 | 88% | 3♦ | W | ♥8 | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦8 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2NT | S | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 57% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-0.2 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | S | -1 | 100 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UAE MIXED vs INDIA OPEN 3 : 3 VP (match 115521) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UAE MIXED | INDIA OPEN | |
| 6♣ | N | ♣3 | -5 | 500 | 100% | 3NT | N | ♣6 | +1 | 630 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♦2 | = | 110 | 70% | 3♦ | W | ♥3 | = | 110 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2NT | W | ♣7 | = | 120 | 78% | 1NTx | W | ♠A | = | 180 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-2.0 | NS-1.7 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | N | -5 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 75% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| 2NT | W | = | 120 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 1NTx | W | = | 180 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-2.0 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BV WALDSOLMS vs MO ROCCO 4 : 2 VP (match 115522) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BV WALDSOLMS | MO ROCCO | |
| 3NT | N | ♠3 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | S | ♠2 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♦ | W | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 79% | 3♦ | W | ♥3 | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦10 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2♦ | W | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+0.3 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 4♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINLAND vs NZ OPEN 6 : 0 VP (match 115523) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINLAND | NZ OPEN | |
| 3NT | S | ♠5 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | N | ♣6 | +1 | 630 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | N | ♣K | = | 90 | 88% | 3♦ | W | ♥3 | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 70% | 1NT | W | ♥2 | = | 90 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-0.9 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 75% | ||||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VINCIGUERRA vs INDIA MIXED 1 : 5 VP (match 115524) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VINCIGUERRA | INDIA MIXED | |
| 3NT | S | ♠2 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | N | ♠3 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♠ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2♥ | S | ♠J | = | 110 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♥A | = | 110 | 69% | 2NT | W | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+2.0 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 95% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | W | -2 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA WOMEN vs REASON 0 : 6 VP (match 115525) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA WOMEN | REASON | |
| 3NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 630 | 75% | 3NT | S | ♣4 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♥3 | = | 110 | 70% | 3♥ | S | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | S | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 57% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 1NT | S | -1 | 100 | 57% | 2 | |||
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DINKIN vs RABONO CALAMIS 0 : 6 VP (match 115526) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DINKIN | RABONO CALAMIS | |
| 3NT | S | ♣4 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 3NT | N | ♣6 | +3 | 690 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♥3 | = | 110 | 70% | 3♠ | N | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | W | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2♠ | E | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+1.9 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | +3 | 690 | 97% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 2♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA WOMEN vs CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED 2 : 4 VP (match 115527) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA WOMEN | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | |
| 3NT | S | ♠2 | +1 | 630 | 75% | 3NT | S | ♣4 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2♥ | S | ♦6 | = | 110 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♥A | = | 110 | 69% | 2♠ | S | ♦7 | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 95% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THE DARK KNIGHT vs GEMIGNANI 0 : 6 VP (match 115528) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THE DARK KNIGHT | GEMIGNANI | |
| 6♦ | S | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 92% | 3NT | S | ♠2 | +1 | 630 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥5 | +3 | 180 | 93% | 3♦ | W | ♥7 | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | W | ♥2 | +1 | 120 | 78% | 2NT | S | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 57% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-2.3 | NS-1.0 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 75% | ||||
| 1NT | E | +3 | 180 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | S | -1 | 100 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-2.3 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAMELS vs NO COKE 1 : 5 VP (match 115529) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAMELS | NO COKE | |
| 3NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 630 | 75% | 3NT | S | ♠2 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | N | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 61% | 3♠ | N | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2NT | S | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 57% | 1NT | N | ♦A | +1 | 120 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+1.4 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 1NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 2NT | S | -1 | 100 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NORWAY SENIOR vs MASARAHLOU 4 : 2 VP (match 115530) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NORWAY SENIOR | MASARAHLOU | |
| 6♦ | N | ♠10 | -1 | 100 | 92% | 3NT | S | ♣2 | +3 | 690 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥x | S | ♠J | -1 | 100 | 52% | 3♦ | W | ♥7 | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | W | ♠A | = | 90 | 51% | 2♥ | N | ♦A | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +3 | 690 | 97% | ||||
| 3♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| 2♦ | W | = | 90 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | -3 | 300 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
Board 10board records → · view →
| ♠ 4 ♥ K9 ♦ KQT852 ♣ A985 | ||
| ♠ J752 ♥ Q3 ♦ 93 ♣ JT742 | 10 Dlr E Both | ♠ KT93 ♥ AJT5 ♦ J74 ♣ 63 |
| ♠ AQ86 ♥ 87642 ♦ A6 ♣ KQ |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 11 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 9 |
| S | 10 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 8 |
| E | 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| W | 2 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
Minimax (par): NS +660: 3NTN+2
Board 11board records → · view →
| ♠ AT63 ♥ 873 ♦ T2 ♣ 9642 | ||
| ♠ J9 ♥ QT9 ♦ Q9643 ♣ A83 | 11 Dlr S None | ♠ 874 ♥ K4 ♦ AJ75 ♣ KQJ5 |
| ♠ KQ52 ♥ AJ652 ♦ K8 ♣ T7 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 4 |
| S | 6 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 4 |
| E | 7 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 9 |
| W | 7 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 9 |
Minimax (par): NS -100: 3♥♠Nx-1 3♥♠Sx-1
Board 12board records → · view →
| ♠ AK8 ♥ K982 ♦ J54 ♣ 972 | ||
| ♠ 6 ♥ J73 ♦ K9762 ♣ AJT3 | 12 Dlr W N-S | ♠ J9752 ♥ QT54 ♦ A3 ♣ Q4 |
| ♠ QT43 ♥ A6 ♦ QT8 ♣ K865 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| S | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| E | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| W | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Minimax (par): NS -80: 1♥E= 1♥W=