Round 14 — U26 BAM Qualification
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 14 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | CS21MSCHOOL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | 50 50 | CONGO | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ HU | ITALIA 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GREISNOR | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA RDFZ | AUSTRIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MAN EATING COBRAS | INDIA-B U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND KIDS | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDIA U16 | INDIA U21 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA-A U26 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | DABROWKA | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SERBIA | SERBALICIOUS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CROATIA U16 | SXNEBULA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHILE | SXSPARK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | URUGUAY | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DABROWKA PO | BELGIUM | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | GERMANY | HONG KONG | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 14↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 14 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R14 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-A U26 | 39.80 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 2 | INDIA-B U26 | 38.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ | 37.40 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 4 | GREISNOR | 36.60 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 5 | AUSTRIA | 36.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 5 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 36.00 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 7 | ISRAEL | 35.80 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 8 | ITALIA 2 | 34.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 9 | SXNEBULA | 33.20 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 10 | SERBALICIOUS | 32.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 11 | 50 50 | 31.00 | 2.40 | 14 |
| 12 | GERMANY | 30.40 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 13 | CHILE | 29.80 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 14 | PRISM FALCONS | 29.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 15 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 28.40 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 16 | HONG KONG | 28.20 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 17 | DABROWKA | 28.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 17 | URUGUAY | 28.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 19 | POLAND KIDS | 27.80 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 19 | SERBIA | 27.80 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 21 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 27.40 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 22 | INDIA U16 | 26.80 | 1.00 | 14 |
| 23 | INDIA U21 | 26.00 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 24 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 25.80 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 25 | SXSPARK | 25.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 26 | DABROWKA PO | 21.80 | 2.40 | 14 |
| 27 | CROATIA U16 | 20.80 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 28 | CS21MSCHOOL | 19.00 | 4.00 | 14 |
| 28 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 19.00 | 2.00 | 14 |
| 30 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 18.80 | 3.00 | 14 |
| 31 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 16.40 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 32 | CAPRISUN | 14.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 33 | CONGO | 5.60 | 0.00 | 14 |
| 34 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 14 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 14 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R14 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs CS21MSCHOOL 0 : 4 VP (match 83413) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | CS21MSCHOOL | |
| 5♣ | W | ♠A | = | 400 | 68% | 5♣ | W | ♥5 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 1♠ | S | ♣A | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1N | E | ♠A | +2 | 150 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 1♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs CONGO 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83414) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | CONGO | |
| Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 59% | Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 89% | Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 59% | |||||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 89% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HU vs ITALIA 2 0 : 4 VP (match 83415) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HU | ITALIA 2 | |
| 6♣ | E | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 6♣ | W | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 2♣x | W | ♠J | = | 180 | 74% | 1N | E | ♠3 | +2 | 150 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | E | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | -2 | 100 | 92% | ||||
| 2♣x | W | = | 180 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GREISNOR vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 3 : 1 VP (match 83416) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GREISNOR | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 5♣ | W | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 65% | 6♣ | W | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | W | ♥5 | +1 | 120 | 56% | 1N | E | ♠A | +2 | 150 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6♣ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 1N | W | +1 | 120 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs AUSTRIA 2 : 2 VP (match 83417) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | AUSTRIA | |
| 5♥ | W | ♠A | -3 | 150 | 100% | 6♣ | W | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 2♣ | W | ♠J | = | 90 | 83% | 1N | N | ♥2 | = | 90 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♥ | W | -3 | 150 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 2♣ | W | = | 90 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | = | 90 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs INDIA-B U26 0 : 4 VP (match 83418) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 5♣ | W | ♥5 | +1 | 420 | 76% | 6♦ | W | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | E | ♠6 | +2 | 150 | 59% | 1N | N | ♦8 | = | 90 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | +1 | 420 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | = | 90 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs PRISM FALCONS 0 : 4 VP (match 83419) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | PRISM FALCONS | |
| 3N | W | ♥7 | +1 | 430 | 83% | 5♦ | W | ♣K | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | W | ♦2 | +2 | 150 | 59% | 1N | N | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | W | = | 400 | 68% | ||||
| 1N | W | +2 | 150 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs INDIA U21 1 : 3 VP (match 83420) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | INDIA U21 | |
| 6♦ | W | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 5♦ | W | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♣ | S | ♥8 | -3 | 300 | 97% | 1N | N | ♦3 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 3♣ | S | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | -2 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-A U26 vs HAPPY BRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 83421) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-A U26 | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 5♣ | W | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 6♣ | E | ♥2 | = | 920 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | N | ♥2 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1N | E | ♠6 | +3 | 180 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 95% | ||||
| 1N | N | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +3 | 180 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 83422) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | CAPRISUN | |
| 5♦ | W | ♥5 | +1 | 420 | 76% | 6♦ | W | ♥5 | = | 920 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | N | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 1N | W | ♠J | +2 | 150 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | W | +1 | 420 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | W | = | 920 | 95% | ||||
| 1N | N | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | +2 | 150 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA vs SERBALICIOUS 2 : 2 VP (match 83423) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA | SERBALICIOUS | |
| 3N | W | ♠A | +2 | 460 | 88% | 4♥x | S | ♥A | -4 | 800 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 2N | E | ♠6 | +1 | 150 | 59% | 1N | S | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | S | -4 | 800 | 91% | ||||
| 2N | E | +1 | 150 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 1N | S | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs SXNEBULA 2 : 2 VP (match 83424) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | SXNEBULA | |
| 6♦ | W | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 3N | W | ♥5 | +1 | 430 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | E | ♠A | +1 | 120 | 56% | 1N | N | ♥2 | +1 | 120 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 83% | ||||
| 1N | E | +1 | 120 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | +1 | 120 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs SXSPARK 0 : 4 VP (match 83425) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | SXSPARK | |
| 6N | W | ♦3 | = | 990 | 100% | 6♣ | W | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | N | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2♠ | S | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | W | = | 990 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | -2 | 100 | 92% | ||||
| 1N | N | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs URUGUAY 4 : 0 VP (match 83426) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | URUGUAY | |
| 2N | W | ♥5 | +2 | 180 | 64% | 5♣ | E | ♥T | +1 | 420 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | N | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 1N | W | ♥5 | +2 | 150 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | W | +2 | 180 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | E | +1 | 420 | 76% | ||||
| 1N | N | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | +2 | 150 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83427) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | BELGIUM | |
| 6♣ | W | ♦4 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 6♦ | W | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1♠ | S | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 1♠ | S | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6♦ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 1♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 1 : 3 VP (match 83428) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 5♣ | W | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 65% | 6♣ | W | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | N | ♦3 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2N | N | ♥2 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | -2 | 100 | 92% | ||||
| 1N | N | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2N | N | -2 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs HONG KONG 2 : 2 VP (match 83429) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | HONG KONG | |
| 6N | W | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 65% | 6♦ | W | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | E | ♠6 | = | 90 | 83% | 3N | E | ♠3 | = | 400 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | W | -2 | 100 | 92% | ||||
| 1N | E | = | 90 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ A843 ♥ J765 ♦ J43 ♣ K3 | ||
| ♠ QJT2 ♥ AKQ9 ♦ T6 ♣ QJT | 27 Dlr S None | ♠ 7 ♥ – ♦ AQ9872 ♣ A96542 |
| ♠ K965 ♥ T8432 ♦ K5 ♣ 87 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 2 |
| S | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
| E | 10 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 11 |
| W | 9 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 11 |
| ♠ J ♥ Q975 ♦ A942 ♣ T763 | ||
| ♠ 9542 ♥ 86 ♦ KJ6 ♣ AQJ2 | 28 Dlr W N-S | ♠ QT7 ♥ AT42 ♦ T873 ♣ K9 |
| ♠ AK863 ♥ KJ3 ♦ Q5 ♣ 854 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| S | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| E | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| W | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 7 |