Round 22 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 22 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | POLAND KIDS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | CAPRISUN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | HONG KONG | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | ITALIA U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | SXNEBULA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | GREISNOR | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | ITALIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | INDIA U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | HAPPY BRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | SXTULIP | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | INDIA-A U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | AUSTRIA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | MAN EATING COBRAS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | EYE OF THE TIGER | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | SHSLLS1 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | SERBIA U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | ITALIA U26 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | CHILE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | ITALIA 2 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | BELGIUM | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 22↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 22 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R22 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA U21 | 98.20 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 2 | GREISNOR | 97.60 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 3 | ITALIA U26 | 96.60 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 4 | ISRAEL | 94.60 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 5 | SXNEBULA | 93.20 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 6 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 91.80 | 2.40 | 22 |
| 7 | AUSTRIA | 91.00 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 8 | JAPAN U26 | 89.60 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 9 | SERBALICIOUS | 89.40 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 10 | INDIA-A U26 | 87.80 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 11 | CHINA RDFZ | 84.20 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 12 | SXDAISY | 83.40 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 13 | CROATIA | 83.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 13 | SXSTARLORD | 83.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 15 | GERMANY | 81.80 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 16 | JAPAN U21 | 81.40 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 17 | SERBIA U21 | 80.20 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 18 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 80.00 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 19 | ITALIA U26W | 79.60 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 20 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 79.20 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 21 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 77.80 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 22 | SHSLLS1 | 76.60 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 23 | CHILE U26W | 76.40 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 23 | INDIA-B U26 | 76.40 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 25 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 76.20 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 26 | DABROWKA | 75.80 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 27 | POLAND KIDS | 75.20 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 27 | SXTULIP | 75.20 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 29 | CHILE | 74.20 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 30 | DABROWKA PO | 72.20 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 31 | HONG KONG | 71.60 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 32 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 70.80 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 33 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 70.40 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 34 | INDIA U21 | 70.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 35 | ITALIA 2 | 69.40 | 3.00 | 22 |
| 36 | SXSPARK | 67.20 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 37 | PRISM FALCONS | 61.80 | 2.40 | 22 |
| 38 | SERBIA U26W | 60.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 39 | ZHIHAOLE | 58.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 40 | INDIA U16 | 57.60 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 41 | URUGUAY | 54.80 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 42 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 52.00 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 43 | 50 50 | 50.80 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 44 | CROATIA U16 | 48.60 | 2.40 | 22 |
| 45 | CAPRISUN | 42.40 | 4.00 | 22 |
| 46 | CS21MSCHOOL | 40.40 | 1.00 | 22 |
| 47 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 36.40 | 2.00 | 22 |
| 48 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 36.20 | 0.00 | 22 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 22 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 22 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R22 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs POLAND KIDS 2 : 2 VP (match 84661) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | POLAND KIDS | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | = | 420 | 58% | 3N | N | ♠2 | +1 | 430 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥2 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 3N | E | ♥8 | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +1 | 430 | 72% | ||||
| 3N | E | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs CAPRISUN 0 : 4 VP (match 84662) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | CAPRISUN | |
| 3N | S | ♠9 | -3 | 150 | 99% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♦A | = | 110 | 50% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -3 | 150 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs HONG KONG 0 : 4 VP (match 84663) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | HONG KONG | |
| 3N | N | ♣6 | = | 400 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | = | 420 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥8 | +1 | 630 | 94% | 3N | E | ♥2 | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | = | 400 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 58% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs ITALIA U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 84664) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | ITALIA U26W | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 87% | 3N | N | ♠4 | = | 400 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥8 | +1 | 630 | 94% | 3N | E | ♥8 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | = | 400 | 61% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -2 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84665)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | BYE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 2 : 2 VP (match 84666) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 87% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | E | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♠ | E | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 87% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs SXNEBULA 1 : 3 VP (match 84667) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | SXNEBULA | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 83% | 4♥ | S | ♦7 | +2 | 480 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♠ | E | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+1.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 98% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs GREISNOR 3 : 1 VP (match 84668) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | GREISNOR | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | = | 420 | 58% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦3 | = | 600 | 68% | 3N | W | ♦A | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 1 : 3 VP (match 84669) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 4♥ | S | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 3N | N | ♠4 | = | 400 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦3 | = | 600 | 68% | 3N | E | ♥2 | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | = | 400 | 61% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs ITALIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 84670) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | ITALIA U21 | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 83% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥2 | +1 | 630 | 94% | 4♠ | E | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 87% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs INDIA U21 4 : 0 VP (match 84671) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | INDIA U21 | |
| 3N | N | ♦2 | +3 | 490 | 100% | 3N | N | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥8 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 3N | E | ♥8 | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.8 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | +3 | 490 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 3N | E | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs HAPPY BRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 84672) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | = | 420 | 58% | 2♥ | S | ♣J | +1 | 140 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥8 | +1 | 630 | 94% | 3N | E | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 71% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs SXTULIP 0 : 4 VP (match 84673) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | SXTULIP | |
| 3N | S | ♦4 | +1 | 430 | 72% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥7 | = | 620 | 84% | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 87% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs INDIA-A U26 2 : 2 VP (match 84674) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 4♥ | S | ♠8 | = | 420 | 58% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥8 | = | 620 | 84% | 3N | E | ♥2 | +1 | 630 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 87% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 2 : 2 VP (match 84675) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 83% | 3N | S | ♠7 | +1 | 430 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♦A | = | 110 | 50% | 3N | W | ♥3 | +1 | 630 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 72% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs AUSTRIA 1 : 3 VP (match 84676) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | AUSTRIA | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | = | 420 | 58% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥2 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 91% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 87% | ||||
| 3N | E | -2 | 200 | 91% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs MAN EATING COBRAS 4 : 0 VP (match 84677) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 4♥ | S | ♠7 | +1 | 450 | 87% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥2 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 3N | E | ♥8 | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 3N | E | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs EYE OF THE TIGER 0 : 4 VP (match 84678) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 3N | N | ♠4 | = | 400 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | = | 420 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♠ | E | ♥8 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | = | 400 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 58% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs CHINA RDFZ HU 0 : 2.4 VP (match 84679)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs SHSLLS1 1 : 3 VP (match 84680) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | SHSLLS1 | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 83% | 3N | N | ♠2 | = | 400 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | = | 400 | 61% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs SERBIA U21 4 : 0 VP (match 84681) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | SERBIA U21 | |
| 3N | N | ♠4 | = | 400 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♠9 | -2 | 100 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥2 | = | 600 | 68% | 4♠ | E | ♣8 | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | = | 400 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -2 | 100 | 96% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs ITALIA U26 3 : 1 VP (match 84682) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | ITALIA U26 | |
| 3N | N | ♠4 | = | 400 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥2 | = | 600 | 68% | 3N | E | ♥7 | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | = | 400 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 83% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs CHILE 2 : 2 VP (match 84683) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | CHILE | |
| 3N | N | ♠4 | = | 400 | 61% | 3N | N | ♠4 | -3 | 150 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♣8 | = | 600 | 68% | 2♥x | S | ♥A | -2 | 500 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | = | 400 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -3 | 150 | 99% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2♥x | S | -2 | 500 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs ITALIA 2 1 : 3 VP (match 84684) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | ITALIA 2 | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | = | 420 | 58% | 3N | N | ♠4 | +1 | 430 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +1 | 430 | 72% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84685) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | BELGIUM | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦4 | = | 420 | 58% | 4♥ | S | ♠7 | +1 | 450 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 91% | 4♠ | W | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 87% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ KQ5 ♥ 97 ♦ A5 ♣ K87543 | ||
| ♠ J987 ♥ A84 ♦ KT74 ♣ JT | 19 Dlr S E-W | ♠ T432 ♥ 62 ♦ J62 ♣ AQ96 |
| ♠ A6 ♥ KQJT53 ♦ Q983 ♣ 2 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 7 |
| S | 8 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 7 |
| E | 4 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| W | 4 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| ♠ T7 ♥ Q953 ♦ AK86 ♣ 962 | ||
| ♠ J9852 ♥ A4 ♦ 54 ♣ KQ43 | 20 Dlr W Both | ♠ K63 ♥ KJ6 ♦ QJ97 ♣ AJ7 |
| ♠ AQ4 ♥ T872 ♦ T32 ♣ T85 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| S | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 |
| E | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| W | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 |