Round 8 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 8 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | AUSTRIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | MAN EATING COBRAS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | EYE OF THE TIGER | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | CHINA RDFZ HU | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | SHSLLS1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | SERBIA U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | ITALIA U26 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | CHILE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | ITALIA 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | BELGIUM | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | POLAND KIDS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | HONG KONG | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | ITALIA U26W | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | BYE | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | SXNEBULA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | GREISNOR | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | ITALIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | INDIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | HAPPY BRIDGE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | SXTULIP | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | INDIA-A U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 8↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 8 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R8 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GREISNOR | 60.60 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ | 59.80 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 3 | INDIA-A U26 | 58.80 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 4 | ITALIA U21 | 58.20 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 4 | SXNEBULA | 58.20 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 6 | ITALIA U26 | 57.20 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | 56.60 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | 56.40 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 9 | ISRAEL | 56.20 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 10 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 54.40 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 11 | AUSTRIA | 54.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 12 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 53.80 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 13 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 52.20 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 14 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 51.20 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 15 | SERBIA U21 | 50.80 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 16 | SXSTARLORD | 50.60 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 17 | ITALIA U26W | 50.20 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 17 | SXDAISY | 50.20 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 19 | JAPAN U21 | 49.20 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 19 | SHSLLS1 | 49.20 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 21 | INDIA-B U26 | 49.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 22 | CROATIA | 48.20 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 23 | GERMANY | 47.80 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 24 | CHILE U26W | 47.20 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 24 | SXTULIP | 47.20 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 26 | POLAND KIDS | 46.80 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 27 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 46.20 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 28 | INDIA U21 | 46.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 29 | 50 50 | 45.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 30 | CHILE | 44.80 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 30 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 44.80 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 32 | DABROWKA | 43.80 | 2.40 | 8 |
| 33 | ITALIA 2 | 43.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 33 | SERBIA U26W | 43.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 35 | ZHIHAOLE | 41.60 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 36 | INDIA U16 | 41.20 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 37 | DABROWKA PO | 40.80 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 38 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 39.40 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 39 | URUGUAY | 39.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 40 | PRISM FALCONS | 38.40 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 40 | SXSPARK | 38.40 | 2.40 | 8 |
| 42 | HONG KONG | 37.20 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 43 | CROATIA U16 | 31.80 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 44 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 31.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 45 | CS21MSCHOOL | 27.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 46 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 26.40 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 47 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 24.80 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 48 | CAPRISUN | 18.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 8 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R8 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 3 : 1 VP (match 84311) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 3♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 74% | 3♠ | W | ♦7 | +1 | 170 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♠x | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 56% | 3N | W | ♠K | = | 600 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 74% | ||||
| 3♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs AUSTRIA 2 : 2 VP (match 84312) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | AUSTRIA | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 3♠x | W | ♣J | +1 | 630 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 72% | 3Nx | W | ♠K | -2 | 500 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | W | +1 | 630 | 100% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3Nx | W | -2 | 500 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs MAN EATING COBRAS 4 : 0 VP (match 84313) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 4♠ | W | ♣J | = | 420 | 61% | 5♦x | N | ♠T | -2 | 500 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 72% | 4♠x | N | ♣K | -2 | 300 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 5♦x | N | -2 | 500 | 94% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs EYE OF THE TIGER 4 : 0 VP (match 84314) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 4♠ | W | ♣J | = | 420 | 61% | 5♦x | N | ♠2 | -2 | 500 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 72% | 3♠x | N | ♣A | -2 | 300 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 5♦x | N | -2 | 500 | 94% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs CHINA RDFZ HU 0 : 4 VP (match 84315) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| 3♠ | W | ♣J | +2 | 200 | 59% | 4♦ | N | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | N | ♣A | -2 | 300 | 72% | 4♠ | N | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | W | +2 | 200 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 83% | ||||
| 3♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -3 | 150 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs SHSLLS1 2 : 2 VP (match 84316) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | SHSLLS1 | |
| 2♠ | W | ♠4 | +2 | 170 | 74% | 2♠ | W | ♣J | +2 | 170 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | -3 | 150 | 56% | 2N | W | ♠K | +1 | 150 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 74% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -3 | 150 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2N | W | +1 | 150 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs SERBIA U21 4 : 0 VP (match 84317) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | SERBIA U21 | |
| 3♠ | W | ♠4 | +2 | 200 | 59% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♣A | = | 140 | 91% | 3N | S | ♣5 | -5 | 250 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | W | +2 | 200 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 61% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -5 | 250 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs ITALIA U26 3 : 1 VP (match 84318) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | ITALIA U26 | |
| 4♦ | S | ♠3 | = | 130 | 92% | 4♠ | W | ♠4 | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | N | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 86% | 4♠x | N | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-1.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♦ | S | = | 130 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 82% | ||||
| 4♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs CHILE 2 : 2 VP (match 84319) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | CHILE | |
| 4♠ | W | ♣J | = | 420 | 61% | 5♥ | E | ♦Q | = | 450 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | N | ♣A | = | 110 | 89% | 3♠x | N | ♣A | = | 530 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | E | = | 450 | 82% | ||||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | N | = | 530 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs ITALIA 2 0 : 4 VP (match 84320) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | ITALIA 2 | |
| 4♠ | W | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 4♠ | W | ♥3 | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠K | = | 600 | 96% | 3♣ | E | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 61% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84321) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | BELGIUM | |
| 3♠ | W | ♣J | +2 | 200 | 59% | 4♦x | S | ♠5 | = | 710 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣ | W | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 84% | 4♠x | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | W | +2 | 200 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 4♦x | S | = | 710 | 100% | ||||
| 5♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs POLAND KIDS 2 : 2 VP (match 84322) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | POLAND KIDS | |
| 4♠ | W | ♣2 | = | 420 | 61% | 4♠ | W | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣x | E | ♠6 | +1 | 870 | 100% | 4♠x | N | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 82% | ||||
| 3♣x | E | +1 | 870 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 84323) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | CAPRISUN | |
| 3♦ | S | ♠5 | +1 | 130 | 92% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 56% | 3♠x | N | ♣A | -2 | 300 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | S | +1 | 130 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 61% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs HONG KONG 3 : 1 VP (match 84324) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | HONG KONG | |
| 2♠ | W | ♠4 | +3 | 200 | 59% | 3♠ | W | ♥3 | +2 | 200 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♠ | N | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 72% | 3♠ | N | ♣K | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | +3 | 200 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | W | +2 | 200 | 59% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs ITALIA U26W 0 : 4 VP (match 84325) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | ITALIA U26W | |
| 4♠ | W | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 3♠ | W | ♣J | +2 | 200 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣5 | -5 | 250 | 63% | 4♥ | W | ♠K | -3 | 300 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | +2 | 200 | 59% | ||||
| 3N | S | -5 | 250 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -3 | 300 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs BYE 0 : 0 VP (match 84326)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | BYE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84327)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs SXNEBULA 0 : 4 VP (match 84328) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | SXNEBULA | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 82% | 4♦ | N | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | N | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 86% | 4♠x | N | ♣A | -2 | 300 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 83% | ||||
| 4♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs GREISNOR 0 : 4 VP (match 84329) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | GREISNOR | |
| 4♠ | W | ♣J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 3♠ | E | ♦K | +1 | 170 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | N | ♣K | -3 | 500 | 86% | 3♠x | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | +1 | 170 | 74% | ||||
| 4♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 84330) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 3♠ | W | ♠4 | +2 | 200 | 59% | 2♠ | W | ♠4 | +2 | 170 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 84% | 4♠x | N | ♣K | -3 | 500 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | W | +2 | 200 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 74% | ||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs ITALIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 84331) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | ITALIA U21 | |
| 5♦ | N | ♠2 | -2 | 200 | 59% | 3♦ | N | ♣K | = | 110 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠K | = | 600 | 96% | 3♠ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | N | -2 | 200 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | = | 110 | 87% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs INDIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 84332) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | INDIA U21 | |
| 4♠ | W | ♣J | = | 420 | 61% | 3♦ | S | ♠3 | +1 | 130 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 56% | 3♠ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | +1 | 130 | 92% | ||||
| 3♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs HAPPY BRIDGE 4 : 0 VP (match 84333) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 3♦ | S | ♠J | +1 | 130 | 92% | 4♠x | W | ♣J | = | 590 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 72% | 4♠x | N | ♣A | -2 | 300 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | S | +1 | 130 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | W | = | 590 | 98% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs SXTULIP 0 : 4 VP (match 84334) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | SXTULIP | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥3 | +1 | 450 | 82% | 4♠ | W | ♦T | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | -4 | 200 | 60% | 3♠x | N | ♣K | = | 530 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 61% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -4 | 200 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | N | = | 530 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs INDIA-A U26 2 : 2 VP (match 84335) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 4♠ | W | ♠4 | +1 | 450 | 82% | 3♦ | S | ♠5 | +2 | 150 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 72% | 4♠ | N | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | +2 | 150 | 98% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ A74 ♥ Q43 ♦ AT873 ♣ J2 | ||
| ♠ KJ953 ♥ A62 ♦ – ♣ AQT97 | 15 Dlr S N-S | ♠ T62 ♥ JT875 ♦ J65 ♣ K4 |
| ♠ Q8 ♥ K9 ♦ KQ942 ♣ 8653 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 3 |
| S | 6 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 3 |
| E | 6 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 9 |
| W | 6 | 10 | 10 | 4 | 9 |
| ♠ KQJ9872 ♥ J ♦ KQ7 ♣ 96 | ||
| ♠ AT53 ♥ QT73 ♦ A92 ♣ 54 | 16 Dlr W E-W | ♠ 4 ♥ A52 ♦ J54 ♣ AKT832 |
| ♠ 6 ♥ K9864 ♦ T863 ♣ QJ7 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| S | 3 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| E | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 9 |
| W | 9 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 10 |