Knockout event — places follow from the bracket: shared places (e.g. 5-8) are teams eliminated in the same phase; an unplayed decider leaves the place shared. Click a team for its players below.

Final placement
Place	Team
1	MILNER
2	STERNBERG
3-4	LEWIS
3-4	HACKETT
5-8	IMAX
5-8	INDONESIA
5-8	LYNCH
5-8	MARKOWICZ

Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.

Rounds included so far (3 of 3): R1 R2 R3. Columns QF·1… = each player's Butler total in that stanza (each knockout phase is played in segments); they sum to Total.

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	MARKOWICZ	41	46	protocol →
	Open NSP.Hackett – J.Sansom +0.1 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Holland – C.Mari -0.2 / 14 bd
1	MARKOWICZ	31	14	protocol →
	Open NSJ.Holland – C.Mari +29.2 / 14 bdClosed EWP.Hackett – J.Sansom -10.5 / 14 bd
1	MARKOWICZ	60	4	protocol →
	Open NSJ.Holland – C.Mari +32.0 / 14 bdClosed EWP.Hackett – J.Sansom +34.9 / 14 bd
1	MARKOWICZ	60	14	protocol →
	Open NSP.Hackett – J.Sansom +3.6 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Holland – C.Mari +42.5 / 14 bd
2	STERNBERG	13	28	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Holland – C.Mari +4.7 / 14 bdClosed NSP.Hackett – J.Sansom -29.1 / 14 bd
2	STERNBERG	23	5	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Sansom – P.Hackett +7.6 / 14 bdClosed NSJ.Holland – C.Mari +18.8 / 14 bd
2	STERNBERG	27	36	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Holland – C.Mari -13.8 / 14 bdClosed NSP.Hackett – J.Sansom +1.6 / 14 bd
2	STERNBERG	15	58	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Holland – C.Mari -14.7 / 14 bdClosed NSP.Hackett – J.Sansom -43.2 / 14 bd
Total IMP	270

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	MILNER	32	37	protocol →
	Open EWS.Morimura – T.Imakura +16.9 / 14 bdClosed NSH.Abe – T.Yoshida -19.9 / 14 bd
1	MILNER	19	33	protocol →
	Open EWT.Yoshida – H.Abe -4.5 / 14 bdClosed NST.Imakura – S.Morimura -10.5 / 14 bd
1	MILNER	9	47	protocol →
	Open EWT.Yoshida – H.Abe -20.9 / 14 bdClosed NST.Imakura – S.Morimura -23.7 / 14 bd
1	MILNER	28	19	protocol →
	Open EWT.Yoshida – H.Abe +1.2 / 14 bdClosed NST.Imakura – S.Morimura +7.7 / 14 bd
Total IMP	88

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	LEWIS	10	45	protocol →
	Open EWM.Sawiruddin – M.Hartono +0.1 / 14 bdClosed NSH.Lasut – E.Manoppo -33.6 / 14 bd
1	LEWIS	44	49	protocol →
	Open EWM.Sawiruddin – B.Polii +2.5 / 14 bdClosed NSH.Lasut – E.Manoppo -6.4 / 14 bd
1	LEWIS	26	23	protocol →
	Open EWM.Sawiruddin – B.Polii -8.1 / 14 bdClosed NSH.Lasut – E.Manoppo +16.2 / 14 bd
1	LEWIS	35	53	protocol →
	Open EWM.Sawiruddin – B.Polii -34.3 / 14 bdClosed NSH.Lasut – E.Manoppo +15.4 / 14 bd
Total IMP	115

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	INDONESIA	45	10	protocol →
	Open NSJ.Czyzowicz – D.Jacob -0.1 / 14 bdClosed EWM.Itabashi – R.Grabel +33.6 / 14 bd
1	INDONESIA	49	44	protocol →
	Open NSJ.Czyzowicz – D.Jacob -2.5 / 14 bdClosed EWP.Lewis – L.Lewis +6.4 / 14 bd
1	INDONESIA	23	26	protocol →
	Open NSM.Itabashi – R.Grabel +8.1 / 14 bdClosed EWL.Lewis – P.Lewis -16.2 / 14 bd
1	INDONESIA	53	35	protocol →
	Open NSJ.Czyzowicz – D.Jacob +34.3 / 14 bdClosed EWM.Itabashi – R.Grabel -15.4 / 14 bd
2	MILNER	26	19	protocol →
	Open EWL.Lewis – P.Lewis -17.3 / 14 bdClosed NSM.Itabashi – R.Grabel +16.4 / 14 bd
2	MILNER	2	50	protocol →
	Open EWD.Jacob – J.Czyzowicz -25.0 / 14 bdClosed NSL.Lewis – P.Lewis -35.9 / 14 bd
2	MILNER	26	15	protocol →
	Open EWR.Grabel – M.Itabashi +13.4 / 14 bdClosed NSJ.Czyzowicz – D.Jacob -1.8 / 14 bd
2	MILNER	42	29	protocol →
	Open EWR.Grabel – M.Itabashi -4.4 / 14 bdClosed NSJ.Czyzowicz – D.Jacob +24.3 / 14 bd
Total IMP	266

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	STERNBERG	29	39	protocol →
	Open EWM.Passell – C.Lynch -39.9 / 14 bdClosed NSM.Jacobus – E.Wold +29.9 / 14 bd
1	STERNBERG	30	35	protocol →
	Open EWL.Stansby – B.Bramley +8.7 / 14 bdClosed NSM.Passell – M.Jacobus -15.4 / 14 bd
1	STERNBERG	12	49	protocol →
	Open EWL.Stansby – B.Bramley -9.5 / 14 bdClosed NSM.Jacobus – E.Wold -27.5 / 14 bd
1	STERNBERG	36	23	protocol →
	Open EWM.Passell – E.Wold +14.9 / 14 bdClosed NSB.Bramley – L.Stansby -2.3 / 14 bd
Total IMP	107

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	HACKETT	46	41	protocol →
	Open EWS.Zeligman – J.Russyan -0.1 / 14 bdClosed NSJ.Klukowski – V.Markowicz +0.2 / 14 bd
1	HACKETT	14	31	protocol →
	Open EWS.Zeligman – V.Melman -29.2 / 14 bdClosed NSJ.Klukowski – J.Russyan +10.5 / 14 bd
1	HACKETT	4	60	protocol →
	Open EWS.Zeligman – J.Russyan -32.0 / 14 bdClosed NSV.Melman – V.Markowicz -34.9 / 14 bd
1	HACKETT	14	60	protocol →
	Open EWS.Zeligman – J.Russyan -3.6 / 14 bdClosed NSV.Melman – V.Markowicz -42.5 / 14 bd
Total IMP	78

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	IMAX	37	32	protocol →
	Open NSA.Kowalski – J.Romanski -16.9 / 14 bdClosed EWR.Milner – H.Lall +19.9 / 14 bd
1	IMAX	33	19	protocol →
	Open NSA.Kowalski – J.Romanski +4.5 / 14 bdClosed EWM.Bessis – P.Cronier +10.5 / 14 bd
1	IMAX	47	9	protocol →
	Open NSH.Lall – R.Milner +20.9 / 14 bdClosed EWM.Bessis – P.Cronier +23.7 / 14 bd
1	IMAX	19	28	protocol →
	Open NSA.Kowalski – J.Romanski -1.2 / 14 bdClosed EWM.Bessis – P.Cronier -7.7 / 14 bd
2	LEWIS	19	26	protocol →
	Open NSH.Lall – R.Milner +17.3 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Romanski – A.Kowalski -16.4 / 14 bd
2	LEWIS	50	2	protocol →
	Open NSA.Kowalski – J.Romanski +25.0 / 14 bdClosed EWM.Bessis – P.Cronier +35.9 / 14 bd
2	LEWIS	15	26	protocol →
	Open NSA.Kowalski – J.Romanski -13.4 / 14 bdClosed EWM.Bessis – P.Cronier +1.8 / 14 bd
2	LEWIS	29	42	protocol →
	Open NSP.Cronier – M.Bessis +4.4 / 14 bdClosed EWA.Kowalski – J.Romanski -24.3 / 14 bd
3	STERNBERG	27	11	protocol →
	Open NSA.Kowalski – J.Romanski +16.0 / 14 bdClosed EWR.Milner – H.Lall +16.0 / 14 bd
3	STERNBERG	31	19	protocol →
	Open NSP.Cronier – M.Bessis +12.0 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Romanski – A.Kowalski +12.0 / 14 bd
3	STERNBERG	10	33	protocol →
	Open NSH.Lall – R.Milner -23.0 / 14 bdClosed EWM.Bessis – P.Cronier -23.0 / 14 bd
3	STERNBERG	44	10	protocol →
	Open NSP.Cronier – M.Bessis +34.0 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Romanski – A.Kowalski +34.0 / 14 bd
Total IMP	361

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	LYNCH	39	29	protocol →
	Open NSJ.Schermer – N.Chambers +39.9 / 14 bdClosed EWF.Hamilton – A.Fisher -29.9 / 14 bd
1	LYNCH	35	30	protocol →
	Open NSA.Fisher – F.Hamilton -8.7 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Schermer – N.Chambers +15.4 / 14 bd
1	LYNCH	49	12	protocol →
	Open NSA.Fisher – F.Hamilton +9.5 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Schermer – N.Chambers +27.5 / 14 bd
1	LYNCH	23	36	protocol →
	Open NSA.Fisher – F.Hamilton -14.9 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Schermer – N.Chambers +2.3 / 14 bd
2	HACKETT	28	13	protocol →
	Open NSB.Eisenberg – J.Sternberg -4.7 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Schermer – N.Chambers +29.1 / 14 bd
2	HACKETT	5	23	protocol →
	Open NSA.Fisher – F.Hamilton -7.6 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Schermer – N.Chambers -18.8 / 14 bd
2	HACKETT	36	27	protocol →
	Open NSJ.Schermer – N.Chambers +13.8 / 14 bdClosed EWF.Hamilton – A.Fisher -1.6 / 14 bd
2	HACKETT	58	15	protocol →
	Open NSF.Hamilton – A.Fisher +14.7 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Schermer – N.Chambers +43.2 / 14 bd
3	MILNER	11	27	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Schermer – N.Chambers -16.0 / 14 bdClosed NSF.Hamilton – A.Fisher -16.0 / 14 bd
3	MILNER	19	31	protocol →
	Open EWF.Hamilton – A.Fisher -12.0 / 14 bdClosed NSJ.Schermer – N.Chambers -12.0 / 14 bd
3	MILNER	33	10	protocol →
	Open EWF.Hamilton – A.Fisher +23.0 / 14 bdClosed NSJ.Schermer – N.Chambers +23.0 / 14 bd
3	MILNER	10	44	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Schermer – N.Chambers -34.0 / 14 bdClosed NSF.Hamilton – A.Fisher -34.0 / 14 bd
Total IMP	346

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	Total	Avg/bd	Qual.	QF·1	QF·2	QF·3	QF·4	SF·1	SF·2	SF·3	SF·4	F·1	F·2	F·3	F·4
1	J.Holland	HACKETT	112	+98.5	+0.88	+58.0	-0.2	+29.2	+32.0	+42.5	+4.7	+18.8	-13.8	-14.7	·	·	·	·
1	C.Mari	HACKETT	112	+98.5	+0.88	+58.0	-0.2	+29.2	+32.0	+42.5	+4.7	+18.8	-13.8	-14.7	·	·	·	·
3	H.Lall	MILNER	70	+51.1	+0.73	+51.9	+19.9	+20.9	·	·	+17.3	·	·	·	+16.0	-23.0	·	·
3	R.Milner	MILNER	70	+51.1	+0.73	+51.9	+19.9	+20.9	·	·	+17.3	·	·	·	+16.0	-23.0	·	·
5	M.Bessis	MILNER	126	+91.6	+0.73	+87.8	+10.5	+23.7	-7.7	·	+35.9	+1.8	+4.4	·	+12.0	-23.0	+34.0	·
5	P.Cronier	MILNER	126	+91.6	+0.73	+87.8	+10.5	+23.7	-7.7	·	+35.9	+1.8	+4.4	·	+12.0	-23.0	+34.0	·
7	N.Chambers	STERNBERG	168	+113.4	+0.68	+101.1	+39.9	+15.4	+27.5	+2.3	+29.1	-18.8	+13.8	+43.2	-16.0	-12.0	+23.0	-34.0
7	J.Schermer	STERNBERG	168	+113.4	+0.68	+101.1	+39.9	+15.4	+27.5	+2.3	+29.1	-18.8	+13.8	+43.2	-16.0	-12.0	+23.0	-34.0
9	R.Grabel	LEWIS	84	+51.7	+0.62	+50.9	+33.6	+8.1	-15.4	·	+16.4	+13.4	-4.4	·	·	·	·	·
9	M.Itabashi	LEWIS	84	+51.7	+0.62	+50.9	+33.6	+8.1	-15.4	·	+16.4	+13.4	-4.4	·	·	·	·	·
11	E.Wold	LYNCH	42	+17.3	+0.41	+66.9	+29.9	-27.5	+14.9	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
12	J.Klukowski	MARKOWICZ	28	+10.7	+0.38	+22.4	+0.2	+10.5	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
13	J.Czyzowicz	LEWIS	84	+29.2	+0.35	+67.0	-0.1	-2.5	+34.3	·	-25.0	-1.8	+24.3	·	·	·	·	·
13	D.Jacob	LEWIS	84	+29.2	+0.35	+67.0	-0.1	-2.5	+34.3	·	-25.0	-1.8	+24.3	·	·	·	·	·
15	A.Kowalski	MILNER	140	+19.3	+0.14	+144.0	-16.9	+4.5	-1.2	·	-16.4	+25.0	-13.4	-24.3	+16.0	+12.0	+34.0	·
15	J.Romanski	MILNER	140	+19.3	+0.14	+144.0	-16.9	+4.5	-1.2	·	-16.4	+25.0	-13.4	-24.3	+16.0	+12.0	+34.0	·
17	M.Hartono	INDONESIA	14	+0.1	+0.01	+49.4	+0.1	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
18	B.Bramley	LYNCH	42	-3.1	-0.07	+71.4	+8.7	-9.5	-2.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
18	L.Stansby	LYNCH	42	-3.1	-0.07	+71.4	+8.7	-9.5	-2.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
20	H.Lasut	INDONESIA	56	-8.4	-0.15	+137.1	-33.6	-6.4	+16.2	+15.4	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
20	E.Manoppo	INDONESIA	56	-8.4	-0.15	+137.1	-33.6	-6.4	+16.2	+15.4	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
22	T.Imakura	IMAX	56	-9.6	-0.17	-17.8	+16.9	-10.5	-23.7	+7.7	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
22	S.Morimura	IMAX	56	-9.6	-0.17	-17.8	+16.9	-10.5	-23.7	+7.7	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
24	M.Jacobus	LYNCH	42	-13.0	-0.31	+78.8	+29.9	-15.4	-27.5	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
25	P.Hackett	HACKETT	112	-35.0	-0.31	+99.7	+0.1	-10.5	+34.9	+3.6	-29.1	+7.6	+1.6	-43.2	·	·	·	·
25	J.Sansom	HACKETT	112	-35.0	-0.31	+99.7	+0.1	-10.5	+34.9	+3.6	-29.1	+7.6	+1.6	-43.2	·	·	·	·
27	B.Eisenberg	STERNBERG	14	-4.7	-0.34	+28.1	·	·	·	·	-4.7	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
27	J.Sternberg	STERNBERG	14	-4.7	-0.34	+31.1	·	·	·	·	-4.7	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
29	J.Russyan	MARKOWICZ	56	-25.2	-0.45	+26.5	-0.1	+10.5	-32.0	-3.6	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
30	A.Fisher	STERNBERG	154	-77.5	-0.50	+26.0	-29.9	-8.7	+9.5	-14.9	-7.6	-1.6	+14.7	·	-16.0	-12.0	+23.0	-34.0
30	F.Hamilton	STERNBERG	154	-77.5	-0.50	+29.0	-29.9	-8.7	+9.5	-14.9	-7.6	-1.6	+14.7	·	-16.0	-12.0	+23.0	-34.0
32	M.Sawiruddin	INDONESIA	56	-39.8	-0.71	+78.3	+0.1	+2.5	-8.1	-34.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
33	H.Abe	IMAX	56	-44.1	-0.79	+116.6	-19.9	-4.5	-20.9	+1.2	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
33	T.Yoshida	IMAX	56	-44.1	-0.79	+116.6	-19.9	-4.5	-20.9	+1.2	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
35	B.Polii	INDONESIA	42	-39.9	-0.95	+9.4	+2.5	-8.1	-34.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
36	M.Passell	LYNCH	42	-40.4	-0.96	+25.9	-39.9	-15.4	+14.9	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
37	L.Lewis	LEWIS	56	-63.0	-1.12	-19.9	+6.4	-16.2	·	·	-17.3	-35.9	·	·	·	·	·	·
37	P.Lewis	LEWIS	56	-63.0	-1.12	-19.9	+6.4	-16.2	·	·	-17.3	-35.9	·	·	·	·	·	·
39	S.Zeligman	MARKOWICZ	56	-64.9	-1.16	+117.4	-0.1	-29.2	-32.0	-3.6	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
40	V.Markowicz	MARKOWICZ	42	-77.2	-1.84	-4.6	+0.2	-34.9	-42.5	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
41	V.Melman	MARKOWICZ	42	-106.6	-2.54	+77.7	-29.2	-34.9	-42.5	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
42	C.Lynch	LYNCH	14	-39.9	-2.85	+12.6	-39.9	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

vs parfull table →

#	Player	vs par
1	J.Holland	+1.45
1	C.Mari	+1.45
3	M.Bessis	+1.14
3	P.Cronier	+1.14
5	R.Grabel	+1.11
5	M.Itabashi	+1.11
7	H.Lall	+0.71
7	R.Milner	+0.71
9	N.Chambers	+0.64
9	J.Schermer	+0.64
11	A.Fisher	-0.49
11	F.Hamilton	-0.49
1	J.Holland	+1.45
1	C.Mari	+1.45
3	M.Bessis	+1.14
3	P.Cronier	+1.14
5	R.Grabel	+1.11
5	M.Itabashi	+1.11
7	H.Lall	+0.71
7	R.Milner	+0.71
9	N.Chambers	+0.64
9	J.Schermer	+0.64
11	A.Fisher	-0.49
11	F.Hamilton	-0.49
13	P.Hackett	-0.87
13	J.Sansom	-0.87
15	A.Kowalski	-0.89
15	J.Romanski	-0.89
17	J.Czyzowicz	-0.96
17	D.Jacob	-0.96
19	J.Russyan	+1.41
20	M.Hartono	+1.29
21	M.Sawiruddin	+1.07
22	B.Polii	+1.00
23	S.Zeligman	+0.89
24	M.Passell	+0.86
25	E.Wold	+0.60
26	H.Abe	+0.14
26	T.Yoshida	+0.14
28	L.Lewis	-0.26
28	P.Lewis	-0.26
30	C.Lynch	-0.50
31	B.Eisenberg	-0.57
31	J.Sternberg	-0.57
33	M.Jacobus	-0.67
34	J.Klukowski	-0.75
35	B.Bramley	-0.79
35	L.Stansby	-0.79
37	T.Imakura	-0.84
37	S.Morimura	-0.84
39	H.Lasut	-1.23
39	E.Manoppo	-1.23
41	V.Markowicz	-3.02
42	V.Melman	-3.12

Opening leadsfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	A.Kowalski	100.0%
2	D.Jacob	92.3%
3	F.Hamilton	90.6%
4	M.Bessis	89.3%
5	P.Hackett	84.2%
6	N.Chambers	82.0%
7	J.Sansom	81.0%
8	P.Cronier	79.3%
9	R.Grabel	77.8%
10	J.Schermer	76.9%
11	H.Lall	76.5%
12	M.Itabashi	72.2%
1	A.Kowalski	100.0%
2	D.Jacob	92.3%
3	F.Hamilton	90.6%
4	M.Bessis	89.3%
5	P.Hackett	84.2%
6	N.Chambers	82.0%
7	J.Sansom	81.0%
8	P.Cronier	79.3%
9	R.Grabel	77.8%
10	J.Schermer	76.9%
11	H.Lall	76.5%
12	M.Itabashi	72.2%
13	R.Milner	70.0%
14	C.Mari	68.4%
15	J.Romanski	66.7%
16	J.Holland	66.7%
17	J.Czyzowicz	64.7%
18	A.Fisher	60.7%
19	B.Eisenberg	100.0%
20	S.Morimura	91.7%
21	L.Stansby	90.9%
22	J.Sternberg	85.7%
23	T.Yoshida	83.3%
24	P.Lewis	81.8%
25	E.Manoppo	80.0%
26	J.Russyan	80.0%
26	M.Sawiruddin	80.0%
28	V.Melman	76.9%
29	M.Jacobus	75.0%
30	M.Passell	71.4%
30	V.Markowicz	71.4%
32	H.Abe	71.4%
33	T.Imakura	70.0%
34	S.Zeligman	69.2%
35	B.Polii	66.7%
35	L.Lewis	66.7%
37	E.Wold	66.7%
38	M.Hartono	66.7%
39	H.Lasut	53.3%
40	B.Bramley	42.9%
41	J.Klukowski	33.3%
42	C.Lynch	33.3%

Declarer playfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	N.Chambers	88.1%
2	J.Czyzowicz	87.5%
3	P.Cronier	87.5%
4	R.Milner	84.6%
5	P.Hackett	83.3%
6	M.Bessis	82.4%
7	C.Mari	82.1%
8	J.Schermer	77.3%
8	J.Romanski	77.3%
10	A.Kowalski	75.6%
11	H.Lall	75.0%
12	A.Fisher	73.7%
1	N.Chambers	88.1%
2	J.Czyzowicz	87.5%
3	P.Cronier	87.5%
4	R.Milner	84.6%
5	P.Hackett	83.3%
6	M.Bessis	82.4%
7	C.Mari	82.1%
8	J.Schermer	77.3%
8	J.Romanski	77.3%
10	A.Kowalski	75.6%
11	H.Lall	75.0%
12	A.Fisher	73.7%
13	J.Sansom	73.7%
14	M.Itabashi	70.6%
15	D.Jacob	70.0%
16	F.Hamilton	69.2%
17	J.Holland	66.7%
18	R.Grabel	64.7%
19	E.Wold	100.0%
19	J.Klukowski	100.0%
19	J.Sternberg	100.0%
19	C.Lynch	100.0%
23	J.Russyan	94.4%
24	M.Sawiruddin	94.1%
25	H.Abe	87.5%
26	P.Lewis	85.7%
27	M.Hartono	80.0%
28	S.Zeligman	80.0%
29	L.Stansby	80.0%
30	T.Imakura	78.9%
31	B.Bramley	76.9%
32	B.Eisenberg	75.0%
33	H.Lasut	72.7%
34	E.Manoppo	71.4%
35	M.Passell	70.6%
36	V.Melman	66.7%
37	V.Markowicz	66.7%
38	S.Morimura	66.7%
39	M.Jacobus	61.5%
40	T.Yoshida	60.0%
41	L.Lewis	57.1%
42	B.Polii	55.6%

Defencefull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	M.Bessis	66.7%
1	P.Cronier	66.7%
3	A.Fisher	65.0%
3	F.Hamilton	65.0%
5	H.Lall	64.9%
5	R.Milner	64.9%
7	N.Chambers	63.2%
7	J.Schermer	63.2%
9	A.Kowalski	58.3%
9	J.Romanski	58.3%
11	J.Holland	51.2%
11	C.Mari	51.2%
1	M.Bessis	66.7%
1	P.Cronier	66.7%
3	A.Fisher	65.0%
3	F.Hamilton	65.0%
5	H.Lall	64.9%
5	R.Milner	64.9%
7	N.Chambers	63.2%
7	J.Schermer	63.2%
9	A.Kowalski	58.3%
9	J.Romanski	58.3%
11	J.Holland	51.2%
11	C.Mari	51.2%
13	R.Grabel	44.4%
13	M.Itabashi	44.4%
15	J.Czyzowicz	43.3%
15	D.Jacob	43.3%
17	P.Hackett	40.0%
17	J.Sansom	40.0%
19	B.Eisenberg	75.0%
19	J.Sternberg	75.0%
21	B.Polii	47.4%
22	J.Russyan	45.8%
23	S.Zeligman	45.8%
24	L.Lewis	45.0%
24	P.Lewis	45.0%
26	B.Bramley	44.4%
26	L.Stansby	44.4%
28	M.Sawiruddin	44.0%
29	T.Imakura	40.9%
29	S.Morimura	40.9%
31	H.Lasut	36.7%
31	E.Manoppo	36.7%
33	M.Passell	35.0%
34	C.Lynch	33.3%
35	M.Hartono	33.3%
36	E.Wold	32.0%
37	H.Abe	26.9%
37	T.Yoshida	26.9%
39	J.Klukowski	26.7%
40	V.Melman	25.0%
41	V.Markowicz	24.0%
42	M.Jacobus	15.8%

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top

Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.

Board	Tables	Swing	Best for NS	Best for EW
Quarterfinal · Bd 13	8	25.7	6♦x +1540 LYNCH (+10.1)	5♠ +650 MARKOWICZ (+15.6)
Semifinal · Bd 43	4	25.7	7NT +2220 MILNER (+10.7)	3NT -720 STERNBERG (+15.0)
Semifinal · Bd 10	4	24.4	7♣ +100 LEWIS (+14.7)	6♣ +1370 HACKETT (+9.7)
Quarterfinal · Bd 10	8	24.3	6♦ +1370 MARKOWICZ (+14.7)	6♦ +300 LEWIS (+9.6)
Semifinal · Bd 46	4	21.0	6♣ +50 MILNER (+12.7)	6♦ +920 MILNER (+8.3)
Quarterfinal · Bd 35	8	20.9	5♥x +500 MILNER (+7.9)	4♥x +790 HACKETT (+13.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 15	8	20.8	4♣ -300 MARKOWICZ (+6.9)	5♣x +1400 STERNBERG (+13.9)
Quarterfinal · Bd 25	8	20.7	4♠x +690 MILNER (+5.6)	5♥ +650 INDONESIA (+15.1)
Semifinal · Bd 45	4	20.3	7♥ +1510 LEWIS (+13.3)	6♠x -500 LEWIS (+7.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 34	8	20.0	3♣ +110 STERNBERG (+5.7)	4♠x +1100 MILNER (+14.3)
Semifinal · Bd 30	4	19.6	4♥ +50 STERNBERG (+6.3)	4♥xx +880 LEWIS (+13.3)
Quarterfinal · Bd 39	8	19.4	4♠x +300 LEWIS (+8.0)	4♠x +590 STERNBERG (+11.4)
Quarterfinal · Bd 53	8	19.1	2♥x +200 IMAX (+7.0)	1♠xx +720 HACKETT (+12.1)
Semifinal · Bd 15	4	19.0	4♠ +620 MILNER (+8.0)	5♠ +200 HACKETT (+11.0)

Stages

Tables

Rounds

Sanya 2014 — Knockout

Knockout bracket↑ top

Tournament standings — final placement↑ top

HACKETT — results↑ top

IMAX — results↑ top

INDONESIA — results↑ top

LEWIS — results↑ top

LYNCH — results↑ top

MARKOWICZ — results↑ top

MILNER — results↑ top

STERNBERG — results↑ top

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top