Round 16 — BAM Teams
20 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 16 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JELLY BELLY | MIX DENMARK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | WUHAN | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | UICC WUHAN | WARHORSE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | MONA | BBC THAILAND | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | XINJIANGYILI | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | HUBEI FUXING | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | ENSEMBLE | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | USA SR 1 | SCOTLAND BLUE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | POLAND Women | INDONESIA Open | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | LATVIA | NEWB | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | THAILAND Mixed | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | AUSTRALIA OPEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | HUAXINHUANBAO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | HUANG YU | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | KBA | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | INDIA TSANGPO | PIONEERS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | CHINA HUOCHETOU | PD HEART | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CANADA CHINA UNITED | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | TO WIN | YUNNAN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | HIMOTOR | CCSA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 16↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 16 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R16 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | 47.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 2 | PIONEERS | 45.00 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 3 | INDONESIA Open | 42.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 3 | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | 42.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 5 | AUSTRALIA OPEN | 40.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 6 | LATVIA | 39.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 7 | HIMOTOR | 38.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 7 | WARHORSE | 38.00 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 9 | UICC WUHAN | 37.00 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 10 | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 36.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 10 | WUHAN | 36.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 12 | BBC THAILAND | 35.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 12 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 35.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 12 | KBA | 35.00 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 15 | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 34.00 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 16 | MIX DENMARK | 33.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 16 | USA SR 1 | 33.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 16 | YUNNAN | 33.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 19 | MONA | 32.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 19 | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | 32.00 | 3.00 | 16 |
| 21 | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 31.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 21 | POLAND Women | 31.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 21 | SCOTLAND BLUE | 31.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 21 | TO WIN | 31.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 25 | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 30.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 26 | CCSA | 29.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 26 | JELLY BELLY | 29.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 26 | THAILAND Mixed | 29.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 29 | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 28.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 29 | INDIA TSANGPO | 28.00 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 31 | XINJIANGYILI | 27.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 32 | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 26.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 33 | HUBEI FUXING | 25.00 | 1.00 | 16 |
| 34 | HUANG YU | 24.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 34 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | 24.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 34 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | 24.00 | 4.00 | 16 |
| 37 | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 23.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
| 37 | NEWB | 23.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 37 | PD HEART | 23.00 | 0.00 | 16 |
| 40 | ENSEMBLE | 22.00 | 2.00 | 16 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 16 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R16 | BAM% |
|---|
JELLY BELLY vs MIX DENMARK 2 : 2 VP (match 88583) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JELLY BELLY | MIX DENMARK | |
| 31 | 2♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 70% | 3NT | N | ♦2 | = | 600 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | = | 420 | 55% | 4♥ | S | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 99% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WUHAN vs JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB 2 : 2 VP (match 88584) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WUHAN | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | |
| 31 | 3NT | N | ♦2 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 3♠ | S | ♣7 | = | 140 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | = | 420 | 55% | 3NT | N | ♣3 | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 70% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UICC WUHAN vs WARHORSE 1 : 3 VP (match 88585) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UICC WUHAN | WARHORSE | |
| 31 | 2♠ | S | ♥J | = | 110 | 53% | 2♦x | W | ♠J | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3NT | N | ♦8 | +2 | 460 | 82% | 3NT | N | ♦8 | +2 | 460 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 2♦x | W | -2 | 300 | 92% | ||||
| 32 | 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MONA vs BBC THAILAND 4 : 0 VP (match 88586) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MONA | BBC THAILAND | |
| 31 | 2♠ | N | ♥A | = | 110 | 53% | 4♠ | S | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | ♠K | +1 | 450 | 69% | 3NT | N | ♣9 | +1 | 430 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM vs XINJIANGYILI 4 : 0 VP (match 88587) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | XINJIANGYILI | |
| 31 | 1NTx | W | ♠J | -2 | 300 | 92% | 3♠ | S | ♥J | = | 140 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3NT | N | ♠4 | +3 | 490 | 95% | 2NT | N | ♦3 | +3 | 210 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 1NTx | W | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 70% | ||||
| 32 | 3NT | N | +3 | 490 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | +3 | 210 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI FUXING vs WUHAN ENGINEERING 1 : 3 VP (match 88588) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI FUXING | WUHAN ENGINEERING | |
| 31 | 3NT | N | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 64% | 1♠ | S | ♥J | +2 | 140 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 4♥ | S | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 1♠ | S | +2 | 140 | 70% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ENSEMBLE vs BEIJINGXUGUANG 2 : 2 VP (match 88589) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ENSEMBLE | BEIJINGXUGUANG | |
| 31 | 3♠ | S | ♥J | -2 | 200 | 86% | 3♠ | S | ♥J | +1 | 170 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | = | 420 | 55% | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | +1 | 170 | 85% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA SR 1 vs SCOTLAND BLUE 2 : 2 VP (match 88590) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA SR 1 | SCOTLAND BLUE | |
| 31 | 1♠ | S | ♥J | +3 | 170 | 85% | 2♠ | S | ♣5 | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | ♠6 | = | 420 | 55% | 5♣x | E | ♥A | -5 | 1400 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 1♠ | S | +3 | 170 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | E | -5 | 1400 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND Women vs INDONESIA Open 2 : 2 VP (match 88591) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND Women | INDONESIA Open | |
| 31 | 4♠ | S | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 86% | 4♠ | S | ♣7 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | ♦8 | +1 | 450 | 69% | 4♥ | N | ♦4 | +1 | 450 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs NEWB 4 : 0 VP (match 88592) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | NEWB | |
| 31 | 3♠ | S | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 85% | 4♠ | S | ♥J | -3 | 300 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | ♠K | +2 | 480 | 92% | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS-1.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♠ | S | +1 | 170 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -3 | 300 | 99% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | +2 | 480 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD vs THAILAND Mixed 0 : 4 VP (match 88663) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | THAILAND Mixed | |
| 31 | 3NTx | N | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 86% | 4♠ | S | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3NT | N | ♠K | = | 400 | 68% | 3NT | N | ♥Q | +1 | 430 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NTx | N | -1 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 32 | 3NT | N | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GUIZHOU ZHENGYE vs AUSTRALIA OPEN 2 : 2 VP (match 88664) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | AUSTRALIA OPEN | |
| 31 | 3♠ | S | ♥J | -2 | 200 | 86% | 3♠ | S | ♥J | = | 140 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3NT | N | ♠K | +2 | 460 | 82% | 3♥ | S | ♠6 | +1 | 170 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 70% | ||||
| 32 | 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BANGKOK MIND SPORT vs HUAXINHUANBAO 2 : 2 VP (match 88665) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | HUAXINHUANBAO | |
| 31 | 3NT | N | ♥6 | = | 600 | 99% | 3NT | N | ♥4 | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | = | 420 | 55% | 3NT | N | ♠K | +2 | 460 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED vs HUANG YU 4 : 0 VP (match 88666) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | HUANG YU | |
| 31 | 3♠ | S | ♥J | = | 140 | 70% | 4♠ | S | ♣7 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3NT | N | ♦8 | +2 | 460 | 82% | 3NT | N | ♥Q | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| 32 | 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 400 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KBA vs ZHEJIANG JINJIANG 1 : 3 VP (match 88667) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KBA | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | |
| 31 | 3NT | N | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 64% | 3NT | N | ♦2 | -1 | 100 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 3NT | N | ♦8 | +1 | 430 | 59% | 3NTx | N | ♣3 | +2 | 750 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 32 | 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 3NTx | N | +2 | 750 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA TSANGPO vs PIONEERS 1 : 3 VP (match 88668) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA TSANGPO | PIONEERS | |
| 31 | 3NT | N | ♥4 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2♠ | S | ♥J | +1 | 140 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | N | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 70% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA HUOCHETOU vs PD HEART 4 : 0 VP (match 88669) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA HUOCHETOU | PD HEART | |
| 31 | 2♠ | N | ♠2 | +1 | 140 | 70% | 3♠ | S | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3NT | N | ♠8 | +2 | 460 | 82% | 3NT | N | ♥Q | +1 | 430 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 70% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 32 | 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CANADA CHINA UNITED vs TIANYA BRIDGE FATE 0 : 4 VP (match 88670) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CANADA CHINA UNITED | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | |
| 31 | 3NT | N | ♦2 | -3 | 300 | 99% | 4♠ | S | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 3NT | N | ♠7 | +1 | 430 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | N | -3 | 300 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TO WIN vs YUNNAN 2 : 2 VP (match 88671) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TO WIN | YUNNAN | |
| 31 | 2NT | N | ♦2 | = | 120 | 59% | 2♦x | W | ♠J | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3NT | N | ♠7 | +2 | 460 | 82% | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 2NT | N | = | 120 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 2♦x | W | -2 | 300 | 92% | ||||
| 32 | 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HIMOTOR vs CCSA 0 : 4 VP (match 88672) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HIMOTOR | CCSA | |
| 31 | 3NT | S | ♥4 | -1 | 100 | 64% | 1♠ | S | ♥J | +1 | 110 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3NT | N | ♣3 | = | 400 | 68% | 4♥ | S | ♠5 | = | 420 | 55% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | S | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 1♠ | S | +1 | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 32 | 3NT | N | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|