Round 20 — BAM Teams
20 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 20 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | XINJIANGYILI | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | YUNNAN | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CCSA | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | THAILAND Mixed | SCOTLAND BLUE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | AUSTRALIA OPEN | INDONESIA Open | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | HUAXINHUANBAO | NEWB | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | HUANG YU | MIX DENMARK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | PIONEERS | WARHORSE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PD HEART | BBC THAILAND | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | JELLY BELLY | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | WUHAN | TO WIN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | UICC WUHAN | HIMOTOR | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | MONA | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | HUBEI FUXING | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | ENSEMBLE | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | USA SR 1 | KBA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | POLAND Women | INDIA TSANGPO | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | LATVIA | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 20↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 20 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R20 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | 54.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 2 | PIONEERS | 53.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 3 | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | 50.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 3 | LATVIA | 50.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 5 | AUSTRALIA OPEN | 48.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 6 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 47.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 6 | INDONESIA Open | 47.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 6 | UICC WUHAN | 47.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 9 | WUHAN | 46.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 10 | KBA | 44.40 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 11 | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 44.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 11 | WARHORSE | 44.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 11 | YUNNAN | 44.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 14 | BBC THAILAND | 43.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 14 | USA SR 1 | 43.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 16 | HIMOTOR | 42.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 16 | JELLY BELLY | 42.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 18 | MIX DENMARK | 40.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 18 | MONA | 40.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 18 | SCOTLAND BLUE | 40.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 21 | CCSA | 39.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 21 | TO WIN | 39.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 21 | XINJIANGYILI | 39.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 24 | POLAND Women | 37.00 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 24 | THAILAND Mixed | 37.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 24 | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | 37.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 27 | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 36.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 27 | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 36.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 27 | INDIA TSANGPO | 36.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 27 | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 36.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 31 | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 35.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 31 | HUANG YU | 35.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 33 | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 34.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 34 | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 33.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 35 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | 32.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 36 | HUBEI FUXING | 31.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 37 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | 30.60 | 3.00 | 20 |
| 38 | NEWB | 30.00 | 1.00 | 20 |
| 38 | PD HEART | 30.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
| 40 | ENSEMBLE | 29.00 | 2.00 | 20 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 20 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R20 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANYA BRIDGE FATE vs XINJIANGYILI 1 : 3 VP (match 88703) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | XINJIANGYILI | |
| 7 | 4♠x | S | ♣A | -2 | 500 | 90% | 4♥ | N | ♣4 | -2 | 200 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♠ | N | ♠6 | -3 | 150 | 83% | 3♣ | W | ♣5 | +2 | 150 | 83% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠x | S | -2 | 500 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 73% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠ | N | -3 | 150 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♣ | W | +2 | 150 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YUNNAN vs WUHAN ENGINEERING 3 : 1 VP (match 88704) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YUNNAN | WUHAN ENGINEERING | |
| 7 | 3♣ | W | ♥A | = | 110 | 59% | 4♥x | S | ♣A | -2 | 500 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | ♦6 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 3♦ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | S | -2 | 500 | 90% | ||||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CCSA vs BEIJINGXUGUANG 2 : 2 VP (match 88705) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CCSA | BEIJINGXUGUANG | |
| 7 | 3♣ | W | ♥A | = | 110 | 59% | 3♠ | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 3♦ | E | ♠5 | +2 | 150 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 51% | ||||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | +2 | 150 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THAILAND Mixed vs SCOTLAND BLUE 2 : 2 VP (match 88706) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THAILAND Mixed | SCOTLAND BLUE | |
| 7 | 3♦ | S | ♣A | -2 | 200 | 73% | 2♠ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | ♣5 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 3NT | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♦ | S | -2 | 200 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 65% | ||||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUSTRALIA OPEN vs INDONESIA Open 2 : 2 VP (match 88707) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUSTRALIA OPEN | INDONESIA Open | |
| 7 | 3♥ | N | ♣7 | -1 | 100 | 51% | 2♠ | N | ♦10 | +1 | 140 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | ♠4 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 3♠x | N | ♠6 | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 81% | ||||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUAXINHUANBAO vs NEWB 3 : 1 VP (match 88708) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUAXINHUANBAO | NEWB | |
| 7 | 3♠ | S | ♣K | = | 140 | 81% | 4♠ | S | ♥3 | -2 | 200 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 3♦ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 73% | ||||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUANG YU vs MIX DENMARK 2 : 2 VP (match 88709) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUANG YU | MIX DENMARK | |
| 7 | 2♠ | S | ♥3 | = | 110 | 65% | 3♣x | W | ♠10 | = | 670 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | ♦3 | +3 | 170 | 94% | 1NT | S | ♣4 | -3 | 150 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 3♣x | W | = | 670 | 99% | ||||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | +3 | 170 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | -3 | 150 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHEJIANG JINJIANG vs JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB 2 : 2 VP (match 88710) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | |
| 7 | 2♦x | S | ♣A | = | 180 | 92% | 4♥x | N | ♣6 | -2 | 500 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♠ | N | ♣K | -3 | 150 | 83% | 3♣ | W | ♥K | +1 | 130 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2♦x | S | = | 180 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | N | -2 | 500 | 90% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | N | -3 | 150 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIONEERS vs WARHORSE 1 : 3 VP (match 88711) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIONEERS | WARHORSE | |
| 7 | 3♣x | E | ♣3 | = | 670 | 99% | 2♠ | S | ♣K | = | 110 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | ♣2 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 3♣ | W | ♣5 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣x | E | = | 670 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 65% | ||||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PD HEART vs BBC THAILAND 2 : 2 VP (match 88712) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PD HEART | BBC THAILAND | |
| 7 | 3NT | S | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 51% | 3♠ | N | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 3♦ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | S | -1 | 100 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 51% | ||||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JELLY BELLY vs CANADA CHINA UNITED 2 : 2 VP (match 88783) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JELLY BELLY | CANADA CHINA UNITED | |
| 7 | 3NT | N | ♥Q | = | 600 | 97% | 4♥x | S | ♣K | -2 | 500 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 5♦ | E | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | S | -2 | 500 | 90% | ||||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WUHAN vs TO WIN 3 : 1 VP (match 88784) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WUHAN | TO WIN | |
| 7 | 2♥ | S | ♣7 | +1 | 140 | 81% | 2♠ | N | ♦10 | = | 110 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | ♠A | +1 | 130 | 56% | 3♦ | E | ♠4 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 81% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 65% | ||||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UICC WUHAN vs HIMOTOR 2 : 2 VP (match 88785) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UICC WUHAN | HIMOTOR | |
| 7 | 4♥x | N | ♦10 | -2 | 500 | 90% | 4♥x | N | ♦10 | -1 | 200 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♠ | N | ♠4 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 3♣ | W | ♠A | +1 | 130 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥x | N | -2 | 500 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 73% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MONA vs DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD 3 : 1 VP (match 88786) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MONA | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | |
| 7 | 2♥ | N | ♦8 | = | 110 | 65% | 4♠ | S | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♠ | N | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 95% | 1♠ | N | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 95% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 73% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 95% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM vs GUIZHOU ZHENGYE 3 : 1 VP (match 88787) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | |
| 7 | 2♠ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 65% | 4♥ | N | ♣6 | -2 | 200 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | ♣6 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 3♦ | E | ♠3 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 65% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 73% | ||||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI FUXING vs BANGKOK MIND SPORT 2 : 2 VP (match 88788) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI FUXING | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | |
| 7 | 3♦ | N | ♣3 | -2 | 200 | 73% | 3♠ | S | ♣A | = | 140 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♠ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 95% | 3♠ | N | ♣K | -3 | 150 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♦ | N | -2 | 200 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 81% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | -3 | 150 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ENSEMBLE vs ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED 2 : 2 VP (match 88789) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ENSEMBLE | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | |
| 7 | 3♥ | N | ♦10 | -1 | 100 | 51% | 5♣x | W | ♥A | -2 | 500 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♦ | E | ♠5 | = | 130 | 56% | 3♣ | W | ♦3 | +3 | 170 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | W | -2 | 500 | 95% | ||||
| 8 | 4♦ | E | = | 130 | 56% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | W | +3 | 170 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA SR 1 vs KBA 1 : 3 VP (match 88790) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA SR 1 | KBA | |
| 7 | 3♣ | E | ♠10 | = | 110 | 59% | 2♠ | S | ♣K | +2 | 170 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | ♣2 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 3♦ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +2 | 170 | 90% | ||||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND Women vs INDIA TSANGPO 3 : 1 VP (match 88791) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND Women | INDIA TSANGPO | |
| 7 | 3♥x | N | ♦10 | = | 730 | 100% | 4♠ | S | ♥3 | -2 | 200 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | ♣5 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 3♦ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3♥x | N | = | 730 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 73% | ||||
| 8 | 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs CHINA HUOCHETOU 2 : 2 VP (match 88792) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | CHINA HUOCHETOU | |
| 7 | 2♠ | S | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 81% | 3♥ | N | ♣7 | = | 140 | 81% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 130 | 56% | 3♦ | E | ♠K | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 81% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 81% | ||||
| 8 | 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|