Skip to content

🌐 All championships 🏠 Categories 🔍 Players ▲ Top

Tables

← Cumulative standings Round 1 results & standings results standings Round 1 board records

Match protocols

1. BEIJING TRINERGY – INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 2. MINA – BRIDGE OF KING F1 3. PANDORA – MIKLAGARD 4. BOHNSACK – SJODAL 5. NI LLIV – ZEN 6. BADGER – MOSTINGAN 7. CAYNE – LEGEANKA 8. GOLD – OPTIMISTS 9. MELWOOD – TUPPEN 10. BERGEN AK – THE PATRIOTS 11. CHINA GEELY AUTO – WARD PLATT 12. ROSENTHAL – VIDIGAL 13. VI E KLAR – PUNCH 14. YABBIES – MALUISH 15. MELBOURNE 1 – HOFFEMAN 16. ANITAS SANS – TOGRAM 17. TEAM ATLANTIC – PASSO DOUBLE 18. KIBE – GAMMA GRAFISK 19. TOMFOOLERY – WITO 20. ALZADA – SILVERFOX 21. SANBORN – DARLING 22. MAHAFFEY – TAKK 23. MIXED – KURTS ANGELS 24. ROSSARD – BYE 25. MARIE – TRONDERMIX 26. GRAIZER – NONSTOP 27. SOLHEIM – LES MISERABLES

Rounds

Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8 Round 9 Round 10 Round 11 Round 12 Round 13 Round 14 Round 15 Round 16 Round 17 Round 18 Round 19 Round 20 Round 21 Round 22 Round 23 Round 24 Round 25

Round 1 — M-OPEN BAM

27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records

Round 1 results↑ top

Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.

Table	Home team	Visiting team	BAM (home)	BAM (visit)	VP (home)	VP (visit)
1	BEIJING TRINERGY	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
2	MINA	BRIDGE OF KING F1	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
3	PANDORA	MIKLAGARD	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
4	BOHNSACK	SJODAL	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
5	NI LLIV	ZEN	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
6	BADGER	MOSTINGAN	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
7	CAYNE	LEGEANKA	3	1	2.80	1.20	protocol →
8	GOLD	OPTIMISTS	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
9	MELWOOD	TUPPEN	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
10	BERGEN AK	THE PATRIOTS	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
11	CHINA GEELY AUTO	WARD PLATT	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
12	ROSENTHAL	VIDIGAL	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
13	VI E KLAR	PUNCH	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
14	YABBIES	MALUISH	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
15	MELBOURNE 1	HOFFEMAN	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
16	ANITAS SANS	TOGRAM	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
17	TEAM ATLANTIC	PASSO DOUBLE	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
18	KIBE	GAMMA GRAFISK	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
19	TOMFOOLERY	WITO	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
20	ALZADA	SILVERFOX	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
21	SANBORN	DARLING	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
22	MAHAFFEY	TAKK	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
23	MIXED	KURTS ANGELS	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
24	ROSSARD	BYE	2	2	2.40	0.00	protocol →
25	MARIE	TRONDERMIX	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
26	GRAIZER	NONSTOP	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
27	SOLHEIM	LES MISERABLES	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →

Standings after round 1↑ top

Cumulative board-a-match points through round 1 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players

Place	Team	Pts	R1	Pld
1	MIKLAGARD	4.00	4.00	1
1	NI LLIV	4.00	4.00	1
1	TEAM ATLANTIC	4.00	4.00	1
1	TRONDERMIX	4.00	4.00	1
5	BADGER	3.00	3.00	1
5	BEIJING TRINERGY	3.00	3.00	1
5	BRIDGE OF KING F1	3.00	3.00	1
5	GOLD	3.00	3.00	1
5	KURTS ANGELS	3.00	3.00	1
5	MELWOOD	3.00	3.00	1
5	SANBORN	3.00	3.00	1
5	SILVERFOX	3.00	3.00	1
5	THE PATRIOTS	3.00	3.00	1
5	VIDIGAL	3.00	3.00	1
5	WARD PLATT	3.00	3.00	1
5	WITO	3.00	3.00	1
17	CAYNE	2.80	2.80	1
18	ROSSARD	2.40	2.40	1
19	ANITAS SANS	2.00	2.00	1
19	BOHNSACK	2.00	2.00	1
19	GAMMA GRAFISK	2.00	2.00	1
19	GRAIZER	2.00	2.00	1
19	HOFFEMAN	2.00	2.00	1
19	KIBE	2.00	2.00	1
19	LES MISERABLES	2.00	2.00	1
19	MAHAFFEY	2.00	2.00	1
19	MALUISH	2.00	2.00	1
19	MELBOURNE 1	2.00	2.00	1
19	NONSTOP	2.00	2.00	1
19	PUNCH	2.00	2.00	1
19	SJODAL	2.00	2.00	1
19	SOLHEIM	2.00	2.00	1
19	TAKK	2.00	2.00	1
19	TOGRAM	2.00	2.00	1
19	VI E KLAR	2.00	2.00	1
19	YABBIES	2.00	2.00	1
37	LEGEANKA	1.20	1.20	1
38	ALZADA	1.00	1.00	1
38	BERGEN AK	1.00	1.00	1
38	CHINA GEELY AUTO	1.00	1.00	1
38	DARLING	1.00	1.00	1
38	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN	1.00	1.00	1
38	MINA	1.00	1.00	1
38	MIXED	1.00	1.00	1
38	MOSTINGAN	1.00	1.00	1
38	OPTIMISTS	1.00	1.00	1
38	ROSENTHAL	1.00	1.00	1
38	TOMFOOLERY	1.00	1.00	1
38	TUPPEN	1.00	1.00	1
50	MARIE	0.00	0.00	1
50	PANDORA	0.00	0.00	1
50	PASSO DOUBLE	0.00	0.00	1
50	ZEN	0.00	0.00	1

Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.

Round 1 board-a-match standings↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	R1	BAM%

BEIJING TRINERGY vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 3 : 1 VP (match 23409) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BEIJING TRINERGY	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN
1	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%	3NT	N	♦10	+1	430		55%	2
2	3NT	N	♦7	+2	660		70%	3NT	S	♦6	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.9							NS+0.3	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	2
1	3NT	N	+1	430		55%	2
2	3NT	N	+2	660		70%	1	1
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.9	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.3	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MINA vs BRIDGE OF KING F1 1 : 3 VP (match 23410) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MINA	BRIDGE OF KING F1
1	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%	1	1
2	3♣	N	♥J	+1	130		92%	3NT	N	♦7	+2	660		70%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.3							NS+0.9	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	1	1
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	1	1
2	3♣	N	+1	130		92%		2
2	3NT	N	+2	660		70%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.3	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.9	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

PANDORA vs MIKLAGARD 0 : 4 VP (match 23411) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	PANDORA	MIKLAGARD
1	3NT	N	♥2	=	400		68%	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%		2
2	3♣	N	♦2	+2	150		90%	3NT	N	♦7	+2	660		70%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-1.2							NS+0.9	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	=	400		68%		2
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%		2
2	3♣	N	+2	150		90%		2
2	3NT	N	+2	660		70%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-1.2	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.9	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BOHNSACK vs SJODAL 2 : 2 VP (match 23412) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BOHNSACK	SJODAL
1	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%	1	1
2	3NT	N	♦8	+2	660		70%	3NT	S	♦6	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.9							NS+0.9	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	1	1
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	1	1
2	3NT	N	+2	660		70%	1	1
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.9	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.9	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

NI LLIV vs ZEN 4 : 0 VP (match 23413) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	NI LLIV	ZEN
1	3NT	N	♦10	=	400		68%	1NT	N	♦10	+4	210		83%	2
2	3NT	N	♠9	+1	630		71%	4♥	N	♥J	-2		200	98%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.8							NS-1.6	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	=	400		68%	2
1	1NT	N	+4	210		83%	2
2	3NT	N	+1	630		71%	2
2	4♥	N	-2		200	98%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.8	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.6	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BADGER vs MOSTINGAN 3 : 1 VP (match 23414) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BADGER	MOSTINGAN
1	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%	2NT	N	♦10	+3	210		83%	2
2	3NT	S	♦J	+2	660		70%	3NT	S	♦3	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.9							NS-0.3	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	2
1	2NT	N	+3	210		83%	2
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%	1	1
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.9	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.3	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

CAYNE vs LEGEANKA 2.8 : 1.2 VP (match 23415) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	CAYNE	LEGEANKA
1	3NT	N	♦6	+2	460		76%	2NT	N	♦6	+3	210		83%	2
2	Adj.	N	—		660			3NT	S	♦6	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.5							NS-0.3	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	2
1	2NT	N	+3	210		83%	2
2	Adj.	N		660			1	1
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.5	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.3	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

GOLD vs OPTIMISTS 3 : 1 VP (match 23416) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	GOLD	OPTIMISTS
1	3NT	N	♦6	+2	460		76%	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%	1	1
2	3NT	N	♦8	+2	660		70%	4♥	S	♣A	-2		200	98%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.9							NS-0.4	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	1	1
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	1	1
2	3NT	N	+2	660		70%	2
2	4♥	S	-2		200	98%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.9	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.4	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MELWOOD vs TUPPEN 3 : 1 VP (match 23417) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MELWOOD	TUPPEN
1	3NT	N	♦2	+2	460		76%	3NT	N	♦10	-1		50	100%	2
2	3NT	N	♠3	+2	660		70%	3NT	N	♠8	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.9							NS-0.6	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	2
1	3NT	N	-1		50	100%	2
2	3NT	N	+2	660		70%	1	1
2	3NT	N	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.9	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.6	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BERGEN AK vs THE PATRIOTS 1 : 3 VP (match 23418) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BERGEN AK	THE PATRIOTS
1	3NT	N	♣Q	+2	460		76%	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%	1	1
2	3NT	N	♠3	+1	630		71%	3NT	S	♦6	+2	660		70%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.1							NS+0.9	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	1	1
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	1	1
2	3NT	N	+1	630		71%		2
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.1	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.9	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

CHINA GEELY AUTO vs WARD PLATT 1 : 3 VP (match 23419) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	CHINA GEELY AUTO	WARD PLATT
1	3NT	N	♦8	=	400		68%	3NT	N	♦9	=	400		68%	1	1
2	5♣	N	♥J	-1		100	94%	3NT	N	♠4	+1	630		71%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-1.2							NS-0.8	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	=	400		68%	1	1
1	3NT	N	=	400		68%	1	1
2	5♣	N	-1		100	94%		2
2	3NT	N	+1	630		71%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-1.2	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.8	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

ROSENTHAL vs VIDIGAL 1 : 3 VP (match 23420) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	ROSENTHAL	VIDIGAL
1	1NT	N	♦10	+4	210		83%	3NT	N	♦10	+1	430		55%		2
2	3NT	S	♦3	+2	660		70%	3NT	S	♦3	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.3							NS+0.3	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	1NT	N	+4	210		83%		2
1	3NT	N	+1	430		55%		2
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%	1	1
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.3	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.3	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

VI E KLAR vs PUNCH 2 : 2 VP (match 23421) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	VI E KLAR	PUNCH
1	2NT	N	♦10	+3	210		83%	2NT	N	♦10	=	120		98%	2
2	3NT	S	♦3	+2	660		70%	3NT	N	♦8	+3	690		100%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.3							NS+0.0	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	2NT	N	+3	210		83%	2
1	2NT	N	=	120		98%	2
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%		2
2	3NT	N	+3	690		100%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.3	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.0	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

YABBIES vs MALUISH 2 : 2 VP (match 23422) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	YABBIES	MALUISH
1	3NT	N	♦5	+2	460		76%	3NT	N	♦10	+1	430		55%	2
2	3NT	S	♠6	+1	630		71%	3NT	S	♠8	+2	660		70%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.1							NS+0.3	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	2
1	3NT	N	+1	430		55%	2
2	3NT	S	+1	630		71%		2
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.1	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.3	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MELBOURNE 1 vs HOFFEMAN 2 : 2 VP (match 23423) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MELBOURNE 1	HOFFEMAN
1	3NT	N	♦8	+1	430		55%	3NT	N	♦10	+1	430		55%	1	1
2	3NT	S	♦6	+2	660		70%	3NT	N	♠2	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.3							NS+0.3	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+1	430		55%	1	1
1	3NT	N	+1	430		55%	1	1
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%	1	1
2	3NT	N	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.3	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.3	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

ANITAS SANS vs TOGRAM 2 : 2 VP (match 23424) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	ANITAS SANS	TOGRAM
1	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%	3NT	N	♦10	=	400		68%	2
2	3NT	S	♠8	+1	630		71%	3NT	S	♠8	+2	660		70%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.1							NS+0.0	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	2
1	3NT	N	=	400		68%	2
2	3NT	S	+1	630		71%		2
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.1	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.0	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TEAM ATLANTIC vs PASSO DOUBLE 4 : 0 VP (match 23425) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TEAM ATLANTIC	PASSO DOUBLE
1	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%	2NT	N	♦6	+1	150		95%	2
2	3NT	S	♦3	+2	660		70%	3NT	S	♠8	+1	630		71%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.9							NS-1.3	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	2
1	2NT	N	+1	150		95%	2
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%	2
2	3NT	S	+1	630		71%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.9	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.3	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

KIBE vs GAMMA GRAFISK 2 : 2 VP (match 23426) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	KIBE	GAMMA GRAFISK
1	2NT	N	♦6	+3	210		83%	3NT	S	♦10	+2	460		76%		2
2	4NT	N	♦A	+1	660		70%	4♥	S	♦3	-2		200	98%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.3							NS-0.4	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	2NT	N	+3	210		83%		2
1	3NT	S	+2	460		76%		2
2	4NT	N	+1	660		70%	2
2	4♥	S	-2		200	98%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.3	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.4	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TOMFOOLERY vs WITO 1 : 3 VP (match 23427) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TOMFOOLERY	WITO
1	2NT	N	♦10	+1	150		95%	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%		2
2	3NT	S	♦10	+2	660		70%	3NT	S	♦3	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.5							NS+0.9	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	2NT	N	+1	150		95%		2
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%		2
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%	1	1
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.5	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.9	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

ALZADA vs SILVERFOX 1 : 3 VP (match 23428) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	ALZADA	SILVERFOX
1	2NT	N	♦10	+3	210		83%	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%		2
2	3NT	N	♦6	+2	660		70%	3NT	N	♦7	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.3							NS+0.9	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	2NT	N	+3	210		83%		2
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%		2
2	3NT	N	+2	660		70%	1	1
2	3NT	N	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.3	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.9	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

SANBORN vs DARLING 3 : 1 VP (match 23429) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	SANBORN	DARLING
1	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%	3NT	N	♦10	=	400		68%	2
2	3NT	S	♦3	+2	660		70%	3NT	S	♦3	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.9							NS+0.0	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	2
1	3NT	N	=	400		68%	2
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%	1	1
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.9	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.0	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MAHAFFEY vs TAKK 2 : 2 VP (match 23430) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MAHAFFEY	TAKK
1	3NT	N	♦2	+2	460		76%	2♠	S	♣3	+2	170		92%	2
2	5♣	N	♦A	=	600		86%	3NT	S	♥4	+1	630		71%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.2							NS-1.3	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	2
1	2♠	S	+2	170		92%	2
2	5♣	N	=	600		86%		2
2	3NT	S	+1	630		71%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.2	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.3	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MIXED vs KURTS ANGELS 1 : 3 VP (match 23431) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MIXED	KURTS ANGELS
1	1NT	N	♦10	+4	210		83%	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%		2
2	3NT	N	♦8	+1	630		71%	3NT	N	♣7	+1	630		71%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-1.1							NS+0.1	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	1NT	N	+4	210		83%		2
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%		2
2	3NT	N	+1	630		71%	1	1
2	3NT	N	+1	630		71%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-1.1	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.1	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

ROSSARD vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 23432) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	ROSSARD	BYE
1	Adj.		—		0			Adj.		—		0			1	1
2	Adj.		—		0			Adj.		—		0			1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS0.0							NS0.0	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	Adj.			0			1	1
1	Adj.			0			1	1
2	Adj.			0			1	1
2	Adj.			0			1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS0.0	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS0.0	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MARIE vs TRONDERMIX 0 : 4 VP (match 23433) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MARIE	TRONDERMIX
1	3NT	N	♦10	=	400		68%	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%		2
2	3NT	N	♥5	=	600		86%	3NT	S	♠7	+2	660		70%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-1.1							NS+0.9	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	=	400		68%		2
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%		2
2	3NT	N	=	600		86%		2
2	3NT	S	+2	660		70%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-1.1	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.9	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

GRAIZER vs NONSTOP 2 : 2 VP (match 23434) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	GRAIZER	NONSTOP
1	3NT	N	♦6	+2	460		76%	3NT	N	♦10	=	400		68%	2
2	3NT	N	♥J	=	600		86%	3NT	S	♠7	+1	630		71%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.2							NS-0.8	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	2
1	3NT	N	=	400		68%	2
2	3NT	N	=	600		86%		2
2	3NT	S	+1	630		71%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.2	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.8	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

SOLHEIM vs LES MISERABLES 2 : 2 VP (match 23435) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	SOLHEIM	LES MISERABLES
1	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%	3NT	N	♦10	+2	460		76%	1	1
2	3NT	S	♠8	+1	630		71%	3NT	S	♠7	+1	630		71%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.1							NS+0.1	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	1	1
1	3NT	N	+2	460		76%	1	1
2	3NT	S	+1	630		71%	1	1
2	3NT	S	+1	630		71%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.1	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.1	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg