Round 21 — M-OPEN BAM
27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 21 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SANBORN | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | TAKK | ALZADA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | KURTS ANGELS | WITO | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | BYE | GAMMA GRAFISK | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 5 | TEAM ATLANTIC | MARIE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | ANITAS SANS | NONSTOP | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | HOFFEMAN | SOLHEIM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | YABBIES | LES MISERABLES | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | PUNCH | GRAIZER | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | VIDIGAL | TRONDERMIX | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | ROSSARD | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | THE PATRIOTS | MIXED | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | TUPPEN | MAHAFFEY | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | DARLING | OPTIMISTS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | LEGEANKA | SILVERFOX | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | TOMFOOLERY | MOSTINGAN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | KIBE | ZEN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | BOHNSACK | PASSO DOUBLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | PANDORA | TOGRAM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | MELBOURNE 1 | MINA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | MALUISH | BEIJING TRINERGY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | VI E KLAR | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | MIKLAGARD | ROSENTHAL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | SJODAL | WARD PLATT | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | BERGEN AK | NI LLIV | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | BADGER | MELWOOD | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | GOLD | CAYNE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 21↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 21 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R21 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SANBORN | 57.00 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 2 | MOSTINGAN | 54.40 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 3 | GRAIZER | 53.00 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 4 | KIBE | 51.40 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 4 | MAHAFFEY | 51.40 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 4 | SJODAL | 51.40 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 7 | ROSENTHAL | 51.20 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 8 | GAMMA GRAFISK | 50.40 | 2.40 | 21 |
| 9 | ALZADA | 50.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 50.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 11 | SILVERFOX | 47.40 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 12 | PUNCH | 46.60 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 13 | YABBIES | 46.40 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 14 | KURTS ANGELS | 46.00 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 14 | MIKLAGARD | 46.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 16 | BADGER | 45.40 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 16 | BOHNSACK | 45.40 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 16 | ROSSARD | 45.40 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 19 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 45.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 20 | CAYNE | 44.80 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 21 | TAKK | 44.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 22 | WITO | 43.20 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 23 | TRONDERMIX | 43.00 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 24 | VIDIGAL | 42.40 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 25 | DARLING | 42.20 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 26 | MARIE | 42.00 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 26 | WARD PLATT | 42.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 28 | MELWOOD | 41.80 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 29 | GOLD | 41.60 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 29 | SOLHEIM | 41.60 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 31 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 41.40 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 32 | LES MISERABLES | 41.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 32 | PASSO DOUBLE | 41.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 32 | TOMFOOLERY | 41.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 32 | ZEN | 41.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 36 | MALUISH | 40.40 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 37 | TUPPEN | 40.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 38 | BERGEN AK | 39.20 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 39 | NONSTOP | 39.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 40 | MIXED | 38.80 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 41 | MINA | 37.40 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 42 | NI LLIV | 37.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 43 | ANITAS SANS | 36.40 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 43 | TOGRAM | 36.40 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 45 | MELBOURNE 1 | 36.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 46 | OPTIMISTS | 35.40 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 47 | THE PATRIOTS | 34.40 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 48 | HOFFEMAN | 33.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 48 | TEAM ATLANTIC | 33.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 50 | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 30.80 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 51 | LEGEANKA | 27.20 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 52 | VI E KLAR | 26.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 53 | PANDORA | 25.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 21 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R21 | BAM% |
|---|
SANBORN vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 4 : 0 VP (match 23949) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SANBORN | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | |
| 11 | 4♥ | S | ♥5 | +2 | 480 | 63% | 6♥ | S | ♠J | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 2♠ | S | ♥9 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| 12 | 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TAKK vs ALZADA 1 : 3 VP (match 23950) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAKK | ALZADA | |
| 11 | 3NT | S | ♦J | +3 | 490 | 89% | 6♥ | S | ♦10 | = | 980 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 2♠ | S | ♥9 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 3♠ | N | ♣Q | = | 140 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+1.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | S | +3 | 490 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | S | = | 980 | 98% | ||||
| 12 | 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KURTS ANGELS vs WITO 4 : 0 VP (match 23951) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KURTS ANGELS | WITO | |
| 11 | 6♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 980 | 98% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♥ | W | ♠6 | -3 | 150 | 84% | 3♣ | E | ♣9 | -2 | 100 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 6♥ | S | = | 980 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | ||||
| 12 | 4♥ | W | -3 | 150 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | -2 | 100 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs GAMMA GRAFISK 0 : 2.4 VP (match 23952)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | GAMMA GRAFISK | |
| 11 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| 12 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| 12 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM ATLANTIC vs MARIE 0 : 4 VP (match 23953) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM ATLANTIC | MARIE | |
| 11 | 6♥ | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 86% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | S | ♥3 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2NT | S | ♥2 | = | 120 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 6♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | S | = | 120 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ANITAS SANS vs NONSTOP 4 : 0 VP (match 23954) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ANITAS SANS | NONSTOP | |
| 11 | 4♥ | S | ♥5 | +2 | 480 | 63% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | = | 420 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 2♠ | S | ♦10 | +4 | 230 | 92% | 1NT | S | ♥7 | +1 | 120 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 76% | ||||
| 12 | 2♠ | S | +4 | 230 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOFFEMAN vs SOLHEIM 2 : 2 VP (match 23955) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOFFEMAN | SOLHEIM | |
| 11 | 4♥ | N | ♦J | +2 | 480 | 63% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 4♠ | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2♠ | S | ♥8 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | N | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 66% | ||||
| 12 | 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YABBIES vs LES MISERABLES 2 : 2 VP (match 23956) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YABBIES | LES MISERABLES | |
| 11 | 4♥ | S | ♣A | +2 | 480 | 63% | 6♥ | S | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 2NT | S | ♥2 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2♠ | S | ♥7 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | S | -2 | 100 | 98% | ||||
| 12 | 2NT | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PUNCH vs GRAIZER 0 : 4 VP (match 23957) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PUNCH | GRAIZER | |
| 11 | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 66% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♥ | E | ♥5 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2♠ | S | ♦10 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | ||||
| 12 | 3♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VIDIGAL vs TRONDERMIX 0 : 4 VP (match 23958) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VIDIGAL | TRONDERMIX | |
| 11 | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 66% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♥ | E | ♣9 | -2 | 100 | 59% | 2♠ | S | ♦10 | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | ||||
| 12 | 3♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ROSSARD vs CHINA GEELY AUTO 2 : 2 VP (match 23959) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ROSSARD | CHINA GEELY AUTO | |
| 11 | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 480 | 63% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 2NT | S | ♥7 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 3♥ | W | ♠10 | -2 | 100 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 66% | ||||
| 12 | 2NT | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THE PATRIOTS vs MIXED 0 : 4 VP (match 23960) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THE PATRIOTS | MIXED | |
| 11 | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | +1 | 450 | 66% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 2♠ | S | ♦10 | = | 110 | 51% | 3♠x | S | ♣A | +1 | 930 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | ||||
| 12 | 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | S | +1 | 930 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TUPPEN vs MAHAFFEY 0 : 4 VP (match 23961) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TUPPEN | MAHAFFEY | |
| 11 | 6♥ | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 86% | 4♥ | N | ♣7 | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 2NT | S | ♥7 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 5♣x | E | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 6♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 480 | 63% | ||||
| 12 | 2NT | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | E | -2 | 300 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DARLING vs OPTIMISTS 2 : 2 VP (match 23962) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DARLING | OPTIMISTS | |
| 11 | 4♥ | S | ♦6 | +2 | 480 | 63% | 6♥ | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 2NT | S | ♦6 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 3♣ | E | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| 12 | 2NT | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | -2 | 100 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LEGEANKA vs SILVERFOX 2 : 2 VP (match 23963) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LEGEANKA | SILVERFOX | |
| 11 | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 480 | 63% | 6♥ | S | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♥ | W | ♠10 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 3♠ | S | ♥7 | +2 | 200 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | S | -2 | 100 | 98% | ||||
| 12 | 3♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | +2 | 200 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TOMFOOLERY vs MOSTINGAN 0 : 4 VP (match 23964) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TOMFOOLERY | MOSTINGAN | |
| 11 | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 66% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♠ | S | ♥10 | = | 140 | 69% | 3♠x | N | ♣K | = | 730 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | ||||
| 12 | 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | N | = | 730 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIBE vs ZEN 3 : 1 VP (match 23965) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIBE | ZEN | |
| 11 | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +2 | 480 | 63% | 5♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 480 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 2♠ | N | ♥6 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 3♣ | E | ♣4 | +1 | 130 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♥ | S | +1 | 480 | 63% | ||||
| 12 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | +1 | 130 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BOHNSACK vs PASSO DOUBLE 2 : 2 VP (match 23966) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BOHNSACK | PASSO DOUBLE | |
| 11 | 6♥ | N | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♠ | S | ♦10 | +1 | 170 | 88% | 2NT | S | ♥4 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 6♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 66% | ||||
| 12 | 3♠ | S | +1 | 170 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PANDORA vs TOGRAM 0 : 4 VP (match 23967) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PANDORA | TOGRAM | |
| 11 | 4♥ | N | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 66% | 3NT | S | ♣10 | +3 | 490 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♦ | N | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2♠ | S | ♥7 | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 66% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +3 | 490 | 89% | ||||
| 12 | 3♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MELBOURNE 1 vs MINA 2 : 2 VP (match 23968) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MELBOURNE 1 | MINA | |
| 11 | 4♥ | N | ♠Q | +2 | 480 | 63% | 3NT | S | ♠Q | +3 | 490 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♥ | E | ♣9 | -2 | 100 | 59% | 3♣ | E | ♣9 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | N | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +3 | 490 | 89% | ||||
| 12 | 3♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MALUISH vs BEIJING TRINERGY 2 : 2 VP (match 23969) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MALUISH | BEIJING TRINERGY | |
| 11 | 6NT | N | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 2♠ | N | ♣2 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 3♥ | W | ♠10 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 6NT | N | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | ||||
| 12 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRIDGE OF KING F1 vs VI E KLAR 4 : 0 VP (match 23970) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | VI E KLAR | |
| 11 | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 480 | 63% | 6♥ | S | ♠Q | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 2♠ | S | ♥3 | +1 | 140 | 69% | 4♠ | S | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| 12 | 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIKLAGARD vs ROSENTHAL 2 : 2 VP (match 23971) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIKLAGARD | ROSENTHAL | |
| 11 | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | +2 | 480 | 63% | 3NT | N | ♠Q | +3 | 490 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♠ | S | ♦10 | = | 140 | 69% | 2NT | N | ♥7 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +3 | 490 | 89% | ||||
| 12 | 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | -2 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SJODAL vs WARD PLATT 4 : 0 VP (match 23972) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SJODAL | WARD PLATT | |
| 11 | 3NT | S | ♣5 | +3 | 490 | 89% | 4♠ | S | ♣A | +2 | 480 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3NT | S | ♥7 | = | 600 | 96% | 3♠ | S | ♣A | = | 140 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS+0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | S | +3 | 490 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | +2 | 480 | 63% | ||||
| 12 | 3NT | S | = | 600 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BERGEN AK vs NI LLIV 1 : 3 VP (match 23973) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BERGEN AK | NI LLIV | |
| 11 | 3NT | S | ♣2 | +3 | 490 | 89% | 6♥ | S | ♦J | = | 980 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 2NT | S | ♥2 | +1 | 150 | 84% | 2NT | S | ♥9 | +1 | 150 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS+1.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 3NT | S | +3 | 490 | 89% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | S | = | 980 | 98% | ||||
| 12 | 2NT | S | +1 | 150 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2NT | S | +1 | 150 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BADGER vs MELWOOD 1 : 3 VP (match 23974) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BADGER | MELWOOD | |
| 11 | 6♥ | S | ♠J | -1 | 50 | 86% | 6♥ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 12 | 2NT | S | ♥9 | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2NT | S | ♥5 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS-1.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 6♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| 12 | 2NT | S | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | S | -2 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOLD vs CAYNE 4 : 0 VP (match 23975) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOLD | CAYNE | |
| 11 | 4♥ | S | ♦10 | = | 420 | 76% | 6♥ | S | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 12 | 3♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 140 | 69% | 2♥ | E | ♣3 | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 11 | 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | S | -2 | 100 | 98% | ||||
| 12 | 3♠ | S | = | 140 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|