Round 23 — M-OPEN BAM
27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 23 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KURTS ANGELS | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BYE | TAKK | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 3 | MARIE | SANBORN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | NONSTOP | ALZADA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | WITO | SOLHEIM | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GAMMA GRAFISK | LES MISERABLES | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | TEAM ATLANTIC | GRAIZER | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | ANITAS SANS | TRONDERMIX | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | HOFFEMAN | ROSSARD | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | YABBIES | MIXED | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | MAHAFFEY | PUNCH | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | VIDIGAL | DARLING | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | SILVERFOX | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | TOMFOOLERY | THE PATRIOTS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | TUPPEN | KIBE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | PASSO DOUBLE | OPTIMISTS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | TOGRAM | LEGEANKA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | MOSTINGAN | MELBOURNE 1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | ZEN | MALUISH | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | VI E KLAR | BOHNSACK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | ROSENTHAL | PANDORA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | MINA | WARD PLATT | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | BEIJING TRINERGY | BERGEN AK | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | MELWOOD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | GOLD | MIKLAGARD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | SJODAL | CAYNE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | BADGER | NI LLIV | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 23↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 23 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R23 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GRAIZER | 59.00 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 1 | SANBORN | 59.00 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 3 | GAMMA GRAFISK | 57.40 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 3 | MOSTINGAN | 57.40 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 5 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 55.00 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 6 | ALZADA | 54.40 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 6 | MAHAFFEY | 54.40 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 6 | SJODAL | 54.40 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 9 | ROSENTHAL | 54.20 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 10 | KIBE | 53.40 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 11 | PUNCH | 52.60 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 12 | BADGER | 52.40 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 12 | YABBIES | 52.40 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 14 | KURTS ANGELS | 51.00 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 15 | TAKK | 50.40 | 2.40 | 23 |
| 16 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 50.00 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 17 | ROSSARD | 49.40 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 18 | MIKLAGARD | 49.00 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 19 | SOLHEIM | 48.60 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 20 | SILVERFOX | 48.40 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 20 | VIDIGAL | 48.40 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 22 | DARLING | 48.20 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 23 | TUPPEN | 48.00 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 24 | GOLD | 47.60 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 25 | BOHNSACK | 47.40 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 26 | MARIE | 47.20 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 27 | WARD PLATT | 47.00 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 28 | CAYNE | 46.80 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 28 | MELWOOD | 46.80 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 30 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 45.40 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 30 | MALUISH | 45.40 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 30 | WITO | 45.40 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 33 | PASSO DOUBLE | 45.00 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 33 | TOMFOOLERY | 45.00 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 33 | TRONDERMIX | 45.00 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 36 | ZEN | 44.00 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 37 | ANITAS SANS | 43.40 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 38 | BERGEN AK | 43.20 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 39 | MINA | 42.40 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 40 | LES MISERABLES | 42.00 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 40 | MELBOURNE 1 | 42.00 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 42 | NONSTOP | 41.00 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 43 | OPTIMISTS | 40.40 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 44 | MIXED | 39.80 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 45 | TOGRAM | 39.40 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 46 | NI LLIV | 38.00 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 47 | THE PATRIOTS | 36.40 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 48 | HOFFEMAN | 36.00 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 49 | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 33.80 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 50 | TEAM ATLANTIC | 33.00 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 51 | LEGEANKA | 32.20 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 52 | PANDORA | 30.00 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 53 | VI E KLAR | 28.00 | 2.00 | 23 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 23 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R23 | BAM% |
|---|
KURTS ANGELS vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 1 : 3 VP (match 24003) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KURTS ANGELS | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | |
| 15 | 4♦ | W | ♣A | +1 | 150 | 74% | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥6 | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥K | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 4♦ | W | +1 | 150 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs TAKK 0 : 2.4 VP (match 24004)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | TAKK | |
| 15 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| 16 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| 16 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARIE vs SANBORN 2 : 2 VP (match 24005) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARIE | SANBORN | |
| 15 | 3♦ | W | ♣A | +2 | 150 | 74% | 2♠ | E | ♣A | = | 110 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 6♠ | N | ♥Q | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 87% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONSTOP vs ALZADA 2 : 2 VP (match 24006) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONSTOP | ALZADA | |
| 15 | 3♦ | W | ♣A | +2 | 150 | 74% | 4♦ | W | ♣A | +1 | 150 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♣9 | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♦ | W | +1 | 150 | 74% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WITO vs SOLHEIM 1 : 3 VP (match 24007) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WITO | SOLHEIM | |
| 15 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2♠ | W | ♣A | = | 110 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♦4 | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥K | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 87% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAMMA GRAFISK vs LES MISERABLES 3 : 1 VP (match 24008) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAMMA GRAFISK | LES MISERABLES | |
| 15 | 4♠ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 95% | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥K | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM ATLANTIC vs GRAIZER 0 : 4 VP (match 24009) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM ATLANTIC | GRAIZER | |
| 15 | 3♦ | W | ♣A | +2 | 150 | 74% | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥K | +1 | 450 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | +1 | 450 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ANITAS SANS vs TRONDERMIX 3 : 1 VP (match 24010) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ANITAS SANS | TRONDERMIX | |
| 15 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 3♦ | E | ♣A | +2 | 150 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | +2 | 150 | 74% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOFFEMAN vs ROSSARD 1 : 3 VP (match 24011) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOFFEMAN | ROSSARD | |
| 15 | 4♣x | S | ♦A | -2 | 500 | 98% | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥2 | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥2 | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 4♣x | S | -2 | 500 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YABBIES vs MIXED 3 : 1 VP (match 24012) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YABBIES | MIXED | |
| 15 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 3♦ | W | ♣A | +2 | 150 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥K | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥K | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 74% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAHAFFEY vs PUNCH 1 : 3 VP (match 24013) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAHAFFEY | PUNCH | |
| 15 | 2♦ | W | ♣A | +3 | 150 | 74% | 4♦ | W | ♣K | +1 | 150 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | 5♠ | S | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 4♠ | S | ♥A | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♦ | W | +3 | 150 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♦ | W | +1 | 150 | 74% | ||||
| 16 | 5♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VIDIGAL vs DARLING 2 : 2 VP (match 24014) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VIDIGAL | DARLING | |
| 15 | 2♠ | E | ♣K | = | 110 | 87% | 2♠ | W | ♣A | = | 110 | 87% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥K | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 87% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 87% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA GEELY AUTO vs SILVERFOX 3 : 1 VP (match 24015) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA GEELY AUTO | SILVERFOX | |
| 15 | 2♠ | E | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 3♦ | W | ♣A | +2 | 150 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | ♣A | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 74% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TOMFOOLERY vs THE PATRIOTS 2 : 2 VP (match 24016) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TOMFOOLERY | THE PATRIOTS | |
| 15 | 3NT | S | ♠A | +1 | 630 | 100% | 2♠ | E | ♣6 | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | +1 | 450 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 63% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | +1 | 450 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TUPPEN vs KIBE 4 : 0 VP (match 24017) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TUPPEN | KIBE | |
| 15 | 2♠ | W | ♥J | = | 110 | 87% | 2♠ | E | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 6♠ | N | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 63% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PASSO DOUBLE vs OPTIMISTS 1 : 3 VP (match 24018) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PASSO DOUBLE | OPTIMISTS | |
| 15 | 3♦ | W | ♣A | +2 | 150 | 74% | 2♦ | W | ♣A | +3 | 150 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | 6♠ | S | ♥8 | -2 | 100 | 95% | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | +1 | 450 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♦ | W | +3 | 150 | 74% | ||||
| 16 | 6♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | +1 | 450 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TOGRAM vs LEGEANKA 1 : 3 VP (match 24019) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TOGRAM | LEGEANKA | |
| 15 | 3♦ | W | ♣K | +2 | 150 | 74% | 3♦ | W | ♣A | +2 | 150 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♦4 | +1 | 450 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 74% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | +1 | 450 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MOSTINGAN vs MELBOURNE 1 2 : 2 VP (match 24020) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MOSTINGAN | MELBOURNE 1 | |
| 15 | 4♠ | E | ♦4 | = | 420 | 96% | 3♥ | W | ♣A | -4 | 200 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 52% | 6♠ | S | ♥5 | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | W | -4 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZEN vs MALUISH 1 : 3 VP (match 24021) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZEN | MALUISH | |
| 15 | 2♠ | E | ♥6 | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2♠ | W | ♣K | = | 110 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 87% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VI E KLAR vs BOHNSACK 2 : 2 VP (match 24022) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VI E KLAR | BOHNSACK | |
| 15 | 3♦x | E | ♣A | +2 | 670 | 100% | 2♠ | W | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | +1 | 450 | 95% | 4♠ | S | ♥K | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3♦x | E | +2 | 670 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 95% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | +1 | 450 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ROSENTHAL vs PANDORA 1 : 3 VP (match 24023) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ROSENTHAL | PANDORA | |
| 15 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2♠ | W | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | 4♣ | N | ♠3 | = | 130 | 86% | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | ||||
| 16 | 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MINA vs WARD PLATT 1 : 3 VP (match 24024) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MINA | WARD PLATT | |
| 15 | 2♠ | E | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | 6♠ | N | ♥3 | -2 | 100 | 95% | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | ||||
| 16 | 6♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BEIJING TRINERGY vs BERGEN AK 3 : 1 VP (match 24025) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BEIJING TRINERGY | BERGEN AK | |
| 15 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 3♦ | W | ♣A | +2 | 150 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥2 | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥3 | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 74% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRIDGE OF KING F1 vs MELWOOD 2 : 2 VP (match 24026) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | MELWOOD | |
| 15 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 3♣ | N | ♦Q | -3 | 300 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥K | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥A | +1 | 450 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | -3 | 300 | 94% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | +1 | 450 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOLD vs MIKLAGARD 2 : 2 VP (match 24027) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOLD | MIKLAGARD | |
| 15 | 2♠ | W | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 63% | 3♦ | E | ♣6 | +2 | 150 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 6♠ | S | ♥3 | -2 | 100 | 95% | 4♠ | S | ♥K | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | +2 | 150 | 74% | ||||
| 16 | 6♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SJODAL vs CAYNE 2 : 2 VP (match 24028) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SJODAL | CAYNE | |
| 15 | 3♦ | W | ♣A | +2 | 150 | 74% | 4♦ | E | ♣2 | +1 | 150 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥3 | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♦ | E | +1 | 150 | 74% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BADGER vs NI LLIV 3 : 1 VP (match 24029) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BADGER | NI LLIV | |
| 15 | 2♠ | W | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 63% | 3♦ | W | ♣A | +2 | 150 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 4♠ | S | ♥8 | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 15 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 74% | ||||
| 16 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|