Round 24 — M-OPEN BAM
27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 24 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BYE | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 2 | MARIE | KURTS ANGELS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | NONSTOP | TAKK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SOLHEIM | SANBORN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | ALZADA | LES MISERABLES | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | WITO | GRAIZER | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | GAMMA GRAFISK | TRONDERMIX | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | TEAM ATLANTIC | ROSSARD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | ANITAS SANS | MIXED | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | HOFFEMAN | MAHAFFEY | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DARLING | YABBIES | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | PUNCH | SILVERFOX | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | VIDIGAL | TOMFOOLERY | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | KIBE | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | THE PATRIOTS | PASSO DOUBLE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | TOGRAM | TUPPEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | MELBOURNE 1 | OPTIMISTS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | LEGEANKA | MALUISH | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | MOSTINGAN | VI E KLAR | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | ROSENTHAL | ZEN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | WARD PLATT | BOHNSACK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | PANDORA | BERGEN AK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | MINA | MELWOOD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | BEIJING TRINERGY | GOLD | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CAYNE | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | MIKLAGARD | BADGER | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | NI LLIV | SJODAL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 24↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 24 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R24 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOSTINGAN | 61.40 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 2 | GRAIZER | 61.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 3 | GAMMA GRAFISK | 60.40 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 4 | SANBORN | 60.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 5 | ALZADA | 58.40 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 6 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 58.00 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 7 | ROSENTHAL | 57.20 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 8 | KIBE | 56.40 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 9 | MAHAFFEY | 55.40 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 10 | BADGER | 54.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 10 | SJODAL | 54.40 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 10 | YABBIES | 54.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 13 | PUNCH | 53.60 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 14 | TAKK | 52.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 15 | KURTS ANGELS | 52.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 16 | SOLHEIM | 51.60 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 17 | BOHNSACK | 51.40 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 17 | ROSSARD | 51.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 17 | SILVERFOX | 51.40 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 20 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 51.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 20 | MIKLAGARD | 51.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 22 | DARLING | 50.20 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 22 | MARIE | 50.20 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 24 | TUPPEN | 50.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 25 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 49.40 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 25 | VIDIGAL | 49.40 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 27 | MELWOOD | 48.80 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 28 | GOLD | 48.60 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 29 | PASSO DOUBLE | 48.00 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 29 | TOMFOOLERY | 48.00 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 31 | WITO | 47.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 32 | BERGEN AK | 47.20 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 33 | WARD PLATT | 47.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 34 | CAYNE | 46.80 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 35 | TRONDERMIX | 46.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 36 | ANITAS SANS | 45.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 36 | MALUISH | 45.40 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 38 | ZEN | 45.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 39 | MINA | 44.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 40 | OPTIMISTS | 43.40 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 41 | MELBOURNE 1 | 43.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 41 | NONSTOP | 43.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 43 | LES MISERABLES | 42.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 43 | NI LLIV | 42.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 45 | MIXED | 41.80 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 46 | TOGRAM | 41.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 47 | HOFFEMAN | 39.00 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 48 | THE PATRIOTS | 37.40 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 49 | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 36.20 | 2.40 | 24 |
| 49 | LEGEANKA | 36.20 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 51 | TEAM ATLANTIC | 35.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 52 | PANDORA | 30.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 53 | VI E KLAR | 28.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 24 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R24 | BAM% |
|---|
BYE vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 0 : 2.4 VP (match 24030)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | |
| 17 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| 18 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| 18 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARIE vs KURTS ANGELS 3 : 1 VP (match 24031) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARIE | KURTS ANGELS | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♥A | = | 420 | 61% | 3♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♠A | +2 | 680 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 80% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NONSTOP vs TAKK 2 : 2 VP (match 24032) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NONSTOP | TAKK | |
| 17 | 4♠ | S | ♦K | = | 420 | 61% | 2♠ | N | ♦A | +3 | 200 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | = | 620 | 92% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 680 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +3 | 200 | 67% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SOLHEIM vs SANBORN 3 : 1 VP (match 24033) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SOLHEIM | SANBORN | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | = | 620 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALZADA vs LES MISERABLES 4 : 0 VP (match 24034) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALZADA | LES MISERABLES | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 2♠ | N | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♣3 | +1 | 650 | 74% | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | = | 620 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 80% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WITO vs GRAIZER 2 : 2 VP (match 24035) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WITO | GRAIZER | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦K | = | 420 | 61% | 3♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦J | = | 620 | 92% | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | +1 | 650 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 80% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAMMA GRAFISK vs TRONDERMIX 3 : 1 VP (match 24036) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAMMA GRAFISK | TRONDERMIX | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 88% | 4♣x | W | ♠J | -2 | 300 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 74% | 4♥ | S | ♦2 | +1 | 650 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 4♣x | W | -2 | 300 | 62% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM ATLANTIC vs ROSSARD 2 : 2 VP (match 24037) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM ATLANTIC | ROSSARD | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 3♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 3NT | N | ♠4 | +2 | 660 | 62% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 680 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 80% | ||||
| 18 | 3NT | N | +2 | 660 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ANITAS SANS vs MIXED 2 : 2 VP (match 24038) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ANITAS SANS | MIXED | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 4♣x | E | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 3NT | N | ♥2 | +2 | 660 | 62% | 6♥ | S | ♦J | = | 1430 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 4♣x | E | -2 | 300 | 62% | ||||
| 18 | 3NT | N | +2 | 660 | 62% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | S | = | 1430 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOFFEMAN vs MAHAFFEY 3 : 1 VP (match 24039) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOFFEMAN | MAHAFFEY | |
| 17 | 5♣x | E | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 96% | 4♣ | E | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♣2 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 5♥ | S | ♠2 | +1 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 5♣x | E | -3 | 500 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | E | -2 | 100 | 96% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♥ | S | +1 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DARLING vs YABBIES 2 : 2 VP (match 24040) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DARLING | YABBIES | |
| 17 | 4♠ | S | ♦7 | = | 420 | 61% | 3♣ | E | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 4♠x | E | ♥K | -7 | 1700 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | S | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | -1 | 50 | 100% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | E | -7 | 1700 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PUNCH vs SILVERFOX 1 : 3 VP (match 24041) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PUNCH | SILVERFOX | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | +1 | 650 | 74% | 4♥ | S | ♣3 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VIDIGAL vs TOMFOOLERY 1 : 3 VP (match 24042) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VIDIGAL | TOMFOOLERY | |
| 17 | 2♠ | N | ♦A | +3 | 200 | 67% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦2 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 5♥ | S | ♣3 | +1 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2♠ | N | +3 | 200 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♥ | S | +1 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIBE vs CHINA GEELY AUTO 3 : 1 VP (match 24043) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIBE | CHINA GEELY AUTO | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 88% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 680 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THE PATRIOTS vs PASSO DOUBLE 1 : 3 VP (match 24044) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THE PATRIOTS | PASSO DOUBLE | |
| 17 | 3♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 80% | 2♠ | N | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♣3 | = | 620 | 92% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 80% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TOGRAM vs TUPPEN 2 : 2 VP (match 24045) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TOGRAM | TUPPEN | |
| 17 | 4♠x | S | ♦7 | = | 590 | 99% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | N | ♦J | +2 | 680 | 67% | 6♥ | S | ♦J | = | 1430 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠x | S | = | 590 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 88% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | S | = | 1430 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MELBOURNE 1 vs OPTIMISTS 1 : 3 VP (match 24046) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MELBOURNE 1 | OPTIMISTS | |
| 17 | 3♠ | N | ♦A | +2 | 200 | 67% | 4♠ | S | ♣5 | +1 | 450 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | N | ♦J | +2 | 680 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♠ | N | +2 | 200 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | S | +1 | 450 | 88% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LEGEANKA vs MALUISH 4 : 0 VP (match 24047) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LEGEANKA | MALUISH | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 2♠ | N | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | = | 620 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 80% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MOSTINGAN vs VI E KLAR 4 : 0 VP (match 24048) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MOSTINGAN | VI E KLAR | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 3♦ | E | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♠8 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | +1 | 650 | 74% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | -2 | 100 | 96% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ROSENTHAL vs ZEN 3 : 1 VP (match 24049) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ROSENTHAL | ZEN | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 88% | 3♦x | E | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♣2 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 3♦x | E | -1 | 100 | 96% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WARD PLATT vs BOHNSACK 0 : 4 VP (match 24050) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WARD PLATT | BOHNSACK | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 4♠x | N | ♦A | = | 590 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 2♣ | S | ♣5 | = | 90 | 100% | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | N | = | 590 | 99% | ||||
| 18 | 2♣ | S | = | 90 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PANDORA vs BERGEN AK 0 : 4 VP (match 24051) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PANDORA | BERGEN AK | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♣2 | = | 420 | 61% | 4♠ | N | ♦K | +1 | 450 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | N | ♣6 | +1 | 650 | 74% | 4♥ | S | ♣3 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 88% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MINA vs MELWOOD 2 : 2 VP (match 24052) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MINA | MELWOOD | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♣3 | +1 | 650 | 74% | 4♥ | S | ♥3 | +1 | 650 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BEIJING TRINERGY vs GOLD 3 : 1 VP (match 24053) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BEIJING TRINERGY | GOLD | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 88% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♠7 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAYNE vs BRIDGE OF KING F1 0 : 4 VP (match 24054) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAYNE | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | |
| 17 | 5♣ | E | ♥A | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2♠ | N | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 74% | 5♥ | S | ♣3 | +1 | 680 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 5♣ | E | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 80% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 74% | 2 | ||
| 5♥ | S | +1 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIKLAGARD vs BADGER 2 : 2 VP (match 24055) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIKLAGARD | BADGER | |
| 17 | 3♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 80% | 3♠ | N | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 4♥ | S | ♣7 | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 80% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NI LLIV vs SJODAL 4 : 0 VP (match 24056) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NI LLIV | SJODAL | |
| 17 | 4♠ | N | ♦A | = | 420 | 61% | 2♠ | N | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 3NT | N | ♣J | +3 | 690 | 94% | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | = | 620 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 80% | ||||
| 18 | 3NT | N | +3 | 690 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|