Round 3 — M-OPEN BAM
27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 3 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PANDORA | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | BOHNSACK | MINA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | ZEN | BEIJING TRINERGY | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | MOSTINGAN | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | MIKLAGARD | LEGEANKA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | SJODAL | OPTIMISTS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | NI LLIV | TUPPEN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | BADGER | THE PATRIOTS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | CAYNE | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | GOLD | VIDIGAL | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | PUNCH | MELWOOD | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | BERGEN AK | YABBIES | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | WARD PLATT | HOFFEMAN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ANITAS SANS | ROSENTHAL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | VI E KLAR | TEAM ATLANTIC | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | GAMMA GRAFISK | MALUISH | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | WITO | MELBOURNE 1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | TOGRAM | ALZADA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | PASSO DOUBLE | SANBORN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | TAKK | KIBE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | KURTS ANGELS | TOMFOOLERY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | SILVERFOX | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | DARLING | MARIE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | MAHAFFEY | NONSTOP | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | SOLHEIM | MIXED | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | ROSSARD | LES MISERABLES | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | GRAIZER | TRONDERMIX | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 3↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 3 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R3 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MIKLAGARD | 11.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 2 | TEAM ATLANTIC | 10.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 3 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 9.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 3 | GRAIZER | 9.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 3 | MALUISH | 9.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 3 | WARD PLATT | 9.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 7 | GOLD | 8.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 7 | KIBE | 8.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 7 | SOLHEIM | 8.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 10 | SILVERFOX | 7.40 | 2.40 | 3 |
| 11 | BADGER | 7.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 11 | BOHNSACK | 7.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 11 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 7.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 11 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 7.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 11 | DARLING | 7.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 11 | MELWOOD | 7.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 11 | NI LLIV | 7.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 11 | SJODAL | 7.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 11 | VI E KLAR | 7.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 11 | VIDIGAL | 7.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 11 | WITO | 7.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 11 | YABBIES | 7.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 23 | MAHAFFEY | 6.40 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 23 | ROSSARD | 6.40 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 25 | ALZADA | 6.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 25 | BERGEN AK | 6.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 25 | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 6.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 25 | MIXED | 6.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 25 | NONSTOP | 6.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 25 | SANBORN | 6.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 25 | TRONDERMIX | 6.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 25 | TUPPEN | 6.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 33 | CAYNE | 5.80 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 34 | GAMMA GRAFISK | 5.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 34 | KURTS ANGELS | 5.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 34 | MELBOURNE 1 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 34 | OPTIMISTS | 5.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 34 | PASSO DOUBLE | 5.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 34 | PUNCH | 5.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 34 | TAKK | 5.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 34 | THE PATRIOTS | 5.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 34 | TOMFOOLERY | 5.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 43 | LEGEANKA | 4.20 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 44 | ANITAS SANS | 4.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 44 | LES MISERABLES | 4.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 44 | MINA | 4.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 44 | MOSTINGAN | 4.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 44 | ROSENTHAL | 4.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 44 | TOGRAM | 4.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 50 | HOFFEMAN | 2.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 50 | MARIE | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 50 | PANDORA | 2.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 53 | ZEN | 1.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 3 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R3 | BAM% |
|---|
PANDORA vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 1 : 3 VP (match 23463) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PANDORA | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | |
| 5 | 3♠ | E | ♣K | -3 | 150 | 53% | 4♣ | S | ♥K | +1 | 150 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 3♣ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 55% | 3♠ | E | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3♠ | E | -3 | 150 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♣ | S | +1 | 150 | 53% | ||||
| 6 | 3♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BOHNSACK vs MINA 3 : 1 VP (match 23464) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BOHNSACK | MINA | |
| 5 | 3♣ | S | ♠5 | +2 | 150 | 53% | 3♣ | S | ♥K | +2 | 150 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 4♠ | E | ♥10 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 3♠ | E | ♥3 | = | 140 | 71% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3♣ | S | +2 | 150 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♣ | S | +2 | 150 | 53% | ||||
| 6 | 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZEN vs BEIJING TRINERGY 1 : 3 VP (match 23465) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZEN | BEIJING TRINERGY | |
| 5 | 3♣ | S | ♠9 | +2 | 150 | 53% | 3♣ | S | ♠5 | +2 | 150 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 5♦x | S | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 83% | 3♦x | S | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3♣ | S | +2 | 150 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♣ | S | +2 | 150 | 53% | ||||
| 6 | 5♦x | S | -2 | 300 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3♦x | S | -1 | 100 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MOSTINGAN vs BRIDGE OF KING F1 2 : 2 VP (match 23466) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MOSTINGAN | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | |
| 5 | 3NT | N | ♠K | = | 600 | 84% | 5♣ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 3♦x | S | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 54% | 4♣ | N | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 54% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♣ | S | = | 600 | 84% | ||||
| 6 | 3♦x | S | -1 | 100 | 54% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♣ | N | -2 | 100 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MIKLAGARD vs LEGEANKA 3 : 1 VP (match 23467) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MIKLAGARD | LEGEANKA | |
| 5 | 3♣ | S | ♥K | +2 | 150 | 53% | 3♣ | S | ♥A | +2 | 150 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 4♠x | E | ♦A | -2 | 500 | 100% | 3♠ | E | ♦A | = | 140 | 71% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3♣ | S | +2 | 150 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♣ | S | +2 | 150 | 53% | ||||
| 6 | 4♠x | E | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SJODAL vs OPTIMISTS 2 : 2 VP (match 23468) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SJODAL | OPTIMISTS | |
| 5 | 3NT | N | ♥3 | = | 600 | 84% | 3NT | N | ♠K | +1 | 630 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 4♣x | N | ♠Q | -2 | 300 | 83% | 5♣x | N | ♥A | -4 | 800 | 99% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 98% | ||||
| 6 | 4♣x | N | -2 | 300 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | N | -4 | 800 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NI LLIV vs TUPPEN 1 : 3 VP (match 23469) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NI LLIV | TUPPEN | |
| 5 | 4♦ | S | ♥A | = | 130 | 77% | 3NT | N | ♥3 | = | 600 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3♠ | W | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3♠ | E | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 4♦ | S | = | 130 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 84% | ||||
| 6 | 3♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BADGER vs THE PATRIOTS 2 : 2 VP (match 23470) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BADGER | THE PATRIOTS | |
| 5 | 3♥x | W | ♣2 | -3 | 500 | 69% | 3NT | N | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3♣ | N | ♠Q | -1 | 50 | 55% | 3♠ | E | ♥10 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3♥x | W | -3 | 500 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| 6 | 3♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAYNE vs CHINA GEELY AUTO 1 : 3 VP (match 23471) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAYNE | CHINA GEELY AUTO | |
| 5 | 2♣ | S | ♥A | +3 | 150 | 53% | 3♠x | E | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 4♠ | E | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 86% | 4♠ | E | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♣ | S | +3 | 150 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 69% | ||||
| 6 | 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GOLD vs VIDIGAL 1 : 3 VP (match 23472) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GOLD | VIDIGAL | |
| 5 | 3♣ | S | ♥A | +2 | 150 | 53% | 4♣ | S | ♥A | +1 | 150 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 3♣x | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 54% | 3♠ | E | ♥10 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3♣ | S | +2 | 150 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♣ | S | +1 | 150 | 53% | ||||
| 6 | 3♣x | N | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PUNCH vs MELWOOD 1 : 3 VP (match 23473) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PUNCH | MELWOOD | |
| 5 | 3NT | N | ♥9 | = | 600 | 84% | 5♣ | S | ♥K | = | 600 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 4♦x | S | ♥K | -2 | 300 | 83% | 3♠x | E | ♥10 | -1 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+1.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♣ | S | = | 600 | 84% | ||||
| 6 | 4♦x | S | -2 | 300 | 83% | 2 | ||
| 3♠x | E | -1 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BERGEN AK vs YABBIES 2 : 2 VP (match 23474) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BERGEN AK | YABBIES | |
| 5 | 3♣ | S | ♠9 | +2 | 150 | 53% | 5♣ | S | ♠5 | = | 600 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3♠ | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2♠ | E | ♥10 | = | 110 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3♣ | S | +2 | 150 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | S | = | 600 | 84% | ||||
| 6 | 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WARD PLATT vs HOFFEMAN 4 : 0 VP (match 23475) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WARD PLATT | HOFFEMAN | |
| 5 | 3NT | N | ♠Q | = | 600 | 84% | 3♣ | S | ♥A | +2 | 150 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3♠ | E | ♥5 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 3♠ | E | ♥5 | = | 140 | 71% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | S | +2 | 150 | 53% | ||||
| 6 | 3♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ANITAS SANS vs ROSENTHAL 2 : 2 VP (match 23476) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ANITAS SANS | ROSENTHAL | |
| 5 | 5♦ | S | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 93% | 4♣ | S | ♥A | = | 130 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 2♠ | E | ♦A | = | 110 | 63% | 3♣x | N | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 83% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 5♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | S | = | 130 | 77% | ||||
| 6 | 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♣x | N | -2 | 300 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VI E KLAR vs TEAM ATLANTIC 1 : 3 VP (match 23477) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VI E KLAR | TEAM ATLANTIC | |
| 5 | 4♣ | S | ♠5 | +1 | 150 | 53% | 2♠ | E | ♣A | -3 | 150 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 5♣x | N | ♥A | -4 | 800 | 99% | 3♠ | W | ♦K | -3 | 300 | 96% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 4♣ | S | +1 | 150 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | E | -3 | 150 | 53% | ||||
| 6 | 5♣x | N | -4 | 800 | 99% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | W | -3 | 300 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAMMA GRAFISK vs MALUISH 1 : 3 VP (match 23478) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAMMA GRAFISK | MALUISH | |
| 5 | 3NT | N | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 93% | 5♦ | S | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 93% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 5♣x | N | ♠Q | -3 | 500 | 92% | 3♠ | E | ♥9 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 93% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| 6 | 5♣x | N | -3 | 500 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WITO vs MELBOURNE 1 2 : 2 VP (match 23479) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WITO | MELBOURNE 1 | |
| 5 | 2♠x | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 84% | 3♣ | N | ♠9 | +2 | 150 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3♦ | E | ♥10 | -3 | 300 | 96% | 3♣ | N | ♥A | -3 | 150 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♠x | E | -1 | 100 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | +2 | 150 | 53% | ||||
| 6 | 3♦ | E | -3 | 300 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | -3 | 150 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TOGRAM vs ALZADA 0 : 4 VP (match 23480) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TOGRAM | ALZADA | |
| 5 | 3NT | N | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 93% | 4♦ | S | ♥A | = | 130 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3♣ | N | ♠Q | -2 | 100 | 54% | 3♣ | N | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 55% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | S | = | 130 | 77% | ||||
| 6 | 3♣ | N | -2 | 100 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PASSO DOUBLE vs SANBORN 3 : 1 VP (match 23481) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PASSO DOUBLE | SANBORN | |
| 5 | 3♦ | S | ♥A | +1 | 130 | 77% | 3♦ | S | ♠K | +1 | 130 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 3♠ | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3♣ | N | ♥A | -3 | 150 | 77% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3♦ | S | +1 | 130 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♦ | S | +1 | 130 | 77% | ||||
| 6 | 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | N | -3 | 150 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TAKK vs KIBE 1 : 3 VP (match 23482) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAKK | KIBE | |
| 5 | 3♣ | S | ♠8 | +2 | 150 | 53% | 3NT | N | ♠K | = | 600 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 4♠ | E | ♥5 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 4♠x | E | ♥10 | -1 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3♣ | S | +2 | 150 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 84% | ||||
| 6 | 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠x | E | -1 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KURTS ANGELS vs TOMFOOLERY 2 : 2 VP (match 23483) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KURTS ANGELS | TOMFOOLERY | |
| 5 | 3NT | N | ♠K | +2 | 660 | 100% | 3♣ | S | ♠5 | +2 | 150 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3♣x | N | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 54% | 3♠ | E | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | N | +2 | 660 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | S | +2 | 150 | 53% | ||||
| 6 | 3♣x | N | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILVERFOX vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 23484)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILVERFOX | BYE | |
| 5 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| 6 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| 6 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DARLING vs MARIE 2 : 2 VP (match 23485) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DARLING | MARIE | |
| 5 | 3NT | N | ♠K | = | 600 | 84% | 3NT | N | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3♠ | E | ♥10 | = | 140 | 71% | 2♠ | W | ♦K | = | 110 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| 6 | 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAHAFFEY vs NONSTOP 2 : 2 VP (match 23486) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAHAFFEY | NONSTOP | |
| 5 | 4♦ | S | ♥A | = | 130 | 77% | 5♣ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 4♠ | E | ♥3 | -3 | 300 | 96% | 3♠ | E | ♥10 | = | 140 | 71% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 4♦ | S | = | 130 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | S | = | 600 | 84% | ||||
| 6 | 4♠ | E | -3 | 300 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SOLHEIM vs MIXED 3 : 1 VP (match 23487) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SOLHEIM | MIXED | |
| 5 | 3♠x | E | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 69% | 3NT | N | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 4♠ | E | ♥10 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3♠ | E | ♥9 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| 6 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ROSSARD vs LES MISERABLES 2 : 2 VP (match 23488) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ROSSARD | LES MISERABLES | |
| 5 | 3NT | N | ♠K | = | 600 | 84% | 5♣ | S | ♥A | = | 600 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 6♦x | S | ♥K | -3 | 500 | 92% | 4♣x | N | ♠Q | -3 | 500 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♣ | S | = | 600 | 84% | ||||
| 6 | 6♦x | S | -3 | 500 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♣x | N | -3 | 500 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GRAIZER vs TRONDERMIX 3 : 1 VP (match 23489) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GRAIZER | TRONDERMIX | |
| 5 | 3♣ | S | ♠5 | +2 | 150 | 53% | 5♦ | S | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 4♣x | N | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 92% | 4♣x | N | ♥10 | -3 | 500 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-1.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3♣ | S | +2 | 150 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | S | -1 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| 6 | 4♣x | N | -3 | 500 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♣x | N | -3 | 500 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|