Skip to content

🌐 All championships 🏠 Categories 🔍 Players ▲ Top

Tables

← Cumulative standings Round 6 results & standings results standings Round 6 board records

Match protocols

1. MOSTINGAN – INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 2. LEGEANKA – ZEN 3. OPTIMISTS – BOHNSACK 4. TUPPEN – PANDORA 5. MINA – THE PATRIOTS 6. BEIJING TRINERGY – CHINA GEELY AUTO 7. BRIDGE OF KING F1 – VIDIGAL 8. MIKLAGARD – PUNCH 9. SJODAL – YABBIES 10. NI LLIV – HOFFEMAN 11. ANITAS SANS – BADGER 12. CAYNE – TEAM ATLANTIC 13. GOLD – GAMMA GRAFISK 14. WITO – MELWOOD 15. BERGEN AK – ALZADA 16. SANBORN – WARD PLATT 17. TAKK – ROSENTHAL 18. VI E KLAR – KURTS ANGELS 19. MALUISH – BYE 20. MARIE – MELBOURNE 1 21. NONSTOP – TOGRAM 22. PASSO DOUBLE – SOLHEIM 23. KIBE – LES MISERABLES 24. TOMFOOLERY – GRAIZER 25. TRONDERMIX – SILVERFOX 26. DARLING – ROSSARD 27. MIXED – MAHAFFEY

Rounds

Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8 Round 9 Round 10 Round 11 Round 12 Round 13 Round 14 Round 15 Round 16 Round 17 Round 18 Round 19 Round 20 Round 21 Round 22 Round 23 Round 24 Round 25

Round 6 — M-OPEN BAM

27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records

Round 6 results↑ top

Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.

Table	Home team	Visiting team	BAM (home)	BAM (visit)	VP (home)	VP (visit)
1	MOSTINGAN	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
2	LEGEANKA	ZEN	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
3	OPTIMISTS	BOHNSACK	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
4	TUPPEN	PANDORA	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
5	MINA	THE PATRIOTS	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
6	BEIJING TRINERGY	CHINA GEELY AUTO	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
7	BRIDGE OF KING F1	VIDIGAL	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
8	MIKLAGARD	PUNCH	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
9	SJODAL	YABBIES	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
10	NI LLIV	HOFFEMAN	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
11	ANITAS SANS	BADGER	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
12	CAYNE	TEAM ATLANTIC	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
13	GOLD	GAMMA GRAFISK	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
14	WITO	MELWOOD	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
15	BERGEN AK	ALZADA	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
16	SANBORN	WARD PLATT	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
17	TAKK	ROSENTHAL	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
18	VI E KLAR	KURTS ANGELS	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
19	MALUISH	BYE	0	0	2.40	0.00	protocol →
20	MARIE	MELBOURNE 1	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
21	NONSTOP	TOGRAM	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
22	PASSO DOUBLE	SOLHEIM	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
23	KIBE	LES MISERABLES	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
24	TOMFOOLERY	GRAIZER	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
25	TRONDERMIX	SILVERFOX	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
26	DARLING	ROSSARD	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
27	MIXED	MAHAFFEY	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →

Standings after round 6↑ top

Cumulative board-a-match points through round 6 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players

Place	Team	Pts	R6	Pld
1	MIKLAGARD	17.00	1.00	6
2	CHINA GEELY AUTO	16.00	3.00	6
3	BOHNSACK	15.00	3.00	6
3	GRAIZER	15.00	0.00	6
3	NONSTOP	15.00	3.00	6
3	TEAM ATLANTIC	15.00	2.00	6
3	WARD PLATT	15.00	0.00	6
3	WITO	15.00	3.00	6
9	KIBE	14.40	2.00	6
10	GAMMA GRAFISK	14.00	4.00	6
10	GOLD	14.00	0.00	6
10	KURTS ANGELS	14.00	3.00	6
10	MOSTINGAN	14.00	4.00	6
10	SANBORN	14.00	4.00	6
10	SJODAL	14.00	0.00	6
10	SOLHEIM	14.00	2.00	6
10	TOMFOOLERY	14.00	4.00	6
10	YABBIES	14.00	4.00	6
19	MALUISH	13.40	2.40	6
20	ALZADA	13.00	4.00	6
20	BEIJING TRINERGY	13.00	1.00	6
20	DARLING	13.00	2.00	6
23	SILVERFOX	12.40	4.00	6
24	BADGER	12.00	2.00	6
24	PUNCH	12.00	3.00	6
24	TRONDERMIX	12.00	0.00	6
24	VIDIGAL	12.00	2.00	6
28	CAYNE	11.80	2.00	6
29	ROSSARD	11.40	2.00	6
30	BRIDGE OF KING F1	11.00	2.00	6
30	HOFFEMAN	11.00	4.00	6
30	LES MISERABLES	11.00	2.00	6
30	MELWOOD	11.00	1.00	6
30	MIXED	11.00	2.00	6
30	PASSO DOUBLE	11.00	2.00	6
30	ROSENTHAL	11.00	3.00	6
30	TAKK	11.00	1.00	6
30	THE PATRIOTS	11.00	2.00	6
30	TUPPEN	11.00	2.00	6
30	ZEN	11.00	4.00	6
41	MAHAFFEY	10.40	2.00	6
41	TOGRAM	10.40	1.00	6
43	ANITAS SANS	10.00	2.00	6
43	MELBOURNE 1	10.00	2.00	6
43	OPTIMISTS	10.00	1.00	6
43	VI E KLAR	10.00	1.00	6
47	BERGEN AK	9.00	0.00	6
47	MINA	9.00	2.00	6
47	NI LLIV	9.00	0.00	6
50	LEGEANKA	8.20	0.00	6
51	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN	8.00	0.00	6
52	MARIE	7.00	2.00	6
52	PANDORA	7.00	2.00	6

Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.

Round 6 board-a-match standings↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	R6	BAM%

MOSTINGAN vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 4 : 0 VP (match 23544) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MOSTINGAN	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN
11	2NT	S	♠9	=	120		55%	4♦x	N	♣K	-2		300	97%	2
12	3NT	E	♥2	+2		460	73%	6♦	W	♣9	=		920	73%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.5							NS-1.4	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	2NT	S	=	120		55%	2
11	4♦x	N	-2		300	97%	2
12	3NT	E	+2		460	73%	2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.5	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.4	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

LEGEANKA vs ZEN 0 : 4 VP (match 23545) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	LEGEANKA	ZEN
11	2NT	N	♠6	+1	150		60%	3NT	S	♠8	=	400		74%		2
12	5♦	W	♣9	+1		420	92%	2♦	W	♣9	+5		190	98%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+1.0							NS+1.4	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	2NT	N	+1	150		60%		2
11	3NT	S	=	400		74%		2
12	5♦	W	+1		420	92%		2
12	2♦	W	+5		190	98%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+1.0	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+1.4	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

OPTIMISTS vs BOHNSACK 1 : 3 VP (match 23546) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	OPTIMISTS	BOHNSACK
11	4♦x	S	♣J	-2		300	97%	3NT	S	♦3	=	400		74%		2
12	5♦	W	♦4	+2		440	85%	5♦	W	♦4	+2		440	85%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.2							NS+1.2	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	4♦x	S	-2		300	97%		2
11	3NT	S	=	400		74%		2
12	5♦	W	+2		440	85%	1	1
12	5♦	W	+2		440	85%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.2	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+1.2	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TUPPEN vs PANDORA 2 : 2 VP (match 23547) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TUPPEN	PANDORA
11	3♦	S	♠2	-1		50	74%	3♠x	E	♦7	-1	100		56%		2
12	5♦	W	♠5	+1		420	92%	6♦	W	♥A	=		920	73%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.4							NS-0.6	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3♦	S	-1		50	74%		2
11	3♠x	E	-1	100		56%		2
12	5♦	W	+1		420	92%	2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.4	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.6	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MINA vs THE PATRIOTS 2 : 2 VP (match 23548) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MINA	THE PATRIOTS
11	3NT	N	♣K	=	400		74%	3NT	N	♠6	=	400		74%	1	1
12	3NT	E	♥3	+2		460	73%	3NT	E	♥5	+2		460	73%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.9							NS+0.9	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3NT	N	=	400		74%	1	1
11	3NT	N	=	400		74%	1	1
12	3NT	E	+2		460	73%	1	1
12	3NT	E	+2		460	73%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.9	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.9	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BEIJING TRINERGY vs CHINA GEELY AUTO 1 : 3 VP (match 23549) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BEIJING TRINERGY	CHINA GEELY AUTO
11	5♦	S	♠2	-3		150	93%	3NT	N	♣K	=	400		74%		2
12	6♦	W	♣9	=		920	73%	6♦	E	♥A	=		920	73%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-1.3							NS+0.0	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	5♦	S	-3		150	93%		2
11	3NT	N	=	400		74%		2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%	1	1
12	6♦	E	=		920	73%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-1.3	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.0	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BRIDGE OF KING F1 vs VIDIGAL 2 : 2 VP (match 23550) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BRIDGE OF KING F1	VIDIGAL
11	3NT	N	♠2	=	400		74%	3NT	N	♣Q	=	400		74%	1	1
12	6♦	W	♥A	=		920	73%	6♦	W	♦4	=		920	73%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.0							NS+0.0	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3NT	N	=	400		74%	1	1
11	3NT	N	=	400		74%	1	1
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%	1	1
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.0	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.0	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MIKLAGARD vs PUNCH 1 : 3 VP (match 23551) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MIKLAGARD	PUNCH
11	3NT	N	♠6	-1		50	74%	3NT	N	♣Q	-1		50	74%	1	1
12	6♦	W	♠5	=		920	73%	5♦	W	♥A	+1		420	92%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.9							NS+0.4	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3NT	N	-1		50	74%	1	1
11	3NT	N	-1		50	74%	1	1
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%		2
12	5♦	W	+1		420	92%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.9	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.4	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

SJODAL vs YABBIES 0 : 4 VP (match 23552) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	SJODAL	YABBIES
11	3♦	N	♣K	-1		50	74%	3NT	N	♠6	+1	430		92%		2
12	6♦	W	♥A	=		920	73%	3NT	E	♥5	+3		490	58%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.9							NS+1.0	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3♦	N	-1		50	74%		2
11	3NT	N	+1	430		92%		2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%		2
12	3NT	E	+3		490	58%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.9	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+1.0	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

NI LLIV vs HOFFEMAN 0 : 4 VP (match 23553) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	NI LLIV	HOFFEMAN
11	3♠x	E	♥A	+1		630	100%	3♦	S	♠2	-1		50	74%		2
12	6♦	W	♥A	=		920	73%	3NT	W	♥J	+2		460	73%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-1.5							NS-0.0	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3♠x	E	+1		630	100%		2
11	3♦	S	-1		50	74%		2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%		2
12	3NT	W	+2		460	73%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-1.5	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.0	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

ANITAS SANS vs BADGER 2 : 2 VP (match 23554) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	ANITAS SANS	BADGER
11	3NT	S	♠2	-1		50	74%	4♥	N	♣K	-2		100	89%	2
12	6♦	E	♥J	+1		940	99%	6♦	W	♦5	=		920	73%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-1.5							NS-1.2	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3NT	S	-1		50	74%	2
11	4♥	N	-2		100	89%	2
12	6♦	E	+1		940	99%		2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-1.5	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.2	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

CAYNE vs TEAM ATLANTIC 2 : 2 VP (match 23555) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	CAYNE	TEAM ATLANTIC
11	4♠x	E	♦7	-1	100		56%	3NT	N	♣K	=	400		74%		2
12	3NT	W	♥J	+2		460	73%	3NT	E	♥3	+3		490	58%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.3							NS+0.6	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	4♠x	E	-1	100		56%		2
11	3NT	N	=	400		74%		2
12	3NT	W	+2		460	73%	2
12	3NT	E	+3		490	58%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.3	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.6	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

GOLD vs GAMMA GRAFISK 0 : 4 VP (match 23556) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	GOLD	GAMMA GRAFISK
11	3♠x	E	♥A	-1	100		56%	3♦	N	♣K	=	110		51%		2
12	6♦	W	♥A	=		920	73%	3NT	E	♣6	+2		460	73%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.6							NS+0.5	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3♠x	E	-1	100		56%		2
11	3♦	N	=	110		51%		2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%		2
12	3NT	E	+2		460	73%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.6	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.5	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

WITO vs MELWOOD 3 : 1 VP (match 23557) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	WITO	MELWOOD
11	4♦	N	♠A	-1		50	74%	3NT	N	♠2	-1		50	74%	1	1
12	6♦	W	♥A	=		920	73%	6♦	E	♠5	+1		940	99%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.9							NS-1.5	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	4♦	N	-1		50	74%	1	1
11	3NT	N	-1		50	74%	1	1
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%	2
12	6♦	E	+1		940	99%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.9	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.5	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BERGEN AK vs ALZADA 0 : 4 VP (match 23558) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BERGEN AK	ALZADA
11	3♠x	E	♠3	-1	100		56%	3♦	N	♣K	=	110		51%		2
12	6♦	W	♦4	=		920	73%	3NT	E	♥3	+2		460	73%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.6							NS+0.5	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3♠x	E	-1	100		56%		2
11	3♦	N	=	110		51%		2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%		2
12	3NT	E	+2		460	73%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.6	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.5	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

SANBORN vs WARD PLATT 4 : 0 VP (match 23559) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	SANBORN	WARD PLATT
11	3♦	S	♠2	=	110		51%	3♦	S	♠2	-1		50	74%	2
12	4NT	E	♥5	+1		460	73%	6♦	W	♦4	=		920	73%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.5							NS-0.9	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3♦	S	=	110		51%	2
11	3♦	S	-1		50	74%	2
12	4NT	E	+1		460	73%	2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.5	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.9	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TAKK vs ROSENTHAL 1 : 3 VP (match 23560) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TAKK	ROSENTHAL
11	3NT	S	♠2	+1	430		92%	3NT	N	♣K	+1	430		92%	1	1
12	6♦	W	♠6	=		920	73%	3NT	W	♥J	+4		520	53%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.4							NS+0.9	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3NT	S	+1	430		92%	1	1
11	3NT	N	+1	430		92%	1	1
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%		2
12	3NT	W	+4		520	53%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.4	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.9	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

VI E KLAR vs KURTS ANGELS 1 : 3 VP (match 23561) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	VI E KLAR	KURTS ANGELS
11	3♦	S	♠2	-2		100	89%	3NT	N	♠4	+1	430		92%		2
12	6♦	W	♥A	=		920	73%	6♦	W	♠5	=		920	73%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-1.2							NS+0.4	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3♦	S	-2		100	89%		2
11	3NT	N	+1	430		92%		2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%	1	1
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-1.2	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.4	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MALUISH vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 23562)↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MALUISH	BYE
11	–		—					–		—
12	–		—					–		—
Σ	BAM / points						NS0.0							NS0.0	0	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	–
11	–
12	–
12	–
Σ	BAM Open					NS0.0	0	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS0.0	0	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MARIE vs MELBOURNE 1 2 : 2 VP (match 23563) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MARIE	MELBOURNE 1
11	3NT	S	♦5	=	400		74%	3NT	N	♠8	+1	430		92%		2
12	3NT	W	♠2	+3		490	58%	6♦	E	♥A	=		920	73%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.6							NS+0.4	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3NT	S	=	400		74%		2
11	3NT	N	+1	430		92%		2
12	3NT	W	+3		490	58%	2
12	6♦	E	=		920	73%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.6	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.4	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

NONSTOP vs TOGRAM 3 : 1 VP (match 23564) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	NONSTOP	TOGRAM
11	3NT	S	♥9	+1	430		92%	3NT	N	♠4	+1	430		92%	1	1
12	3NT	E	♥3	+2		460	73%	6♦	W	♦3	=		920	73%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+1.3							NS+0.4	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3NT	S	+1	430		92%	1	1
11	3NT	N	+1	430		92%	1	1
12	3NT	E	+2		460	73%	2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+1.3	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.4	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

PASSO DOUBLE vs SOLHEIM 2 : 2 VP (match 23565) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	PASSO DOUBLE	SOLHEIM
11	3♦	S	♠2	-1		50	74%	2NT	N	♣K	+2	180		63%		2
12	6NT	E	♥5	-1	50		100%	5♦	W	♥A	+1		420	92%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.5							NS+1.1	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3♦	S	-1		50	74%		2
11	2NT	N	+2	180		63%		2
12	6NT	E	-1	50		100%	2
12	5♦	W	+1		420	92%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.5	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+1.1	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

KIBE vs LES MISERABLES 2 : 2 VP (match 23566) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	KIBE	LES MISERABLES
11	3NT	N	♣K	+1	430		92%	3♦	N	♥5	+1	130		57%	2
12	6♦	W	♦4	=		920	73%	3NT	E	♣Q	+2		460	73%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.4							NS+0.6	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3NT	N	+1	430		92%	2
11	3♦	N	+1	130		57%	2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%		2
12	3NT	E	+2		460	73%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.4	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.6	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TOMFOOLERY vs GRAIZER 4 : 0 VP (match 23567) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TOMFOOLERY	GRAIZER
11	2NT	N	♣K	+1	150		60%	5♦	S	♠2	-3		150	93%	2
12	3NT	E	♣6	+2		460	73%	6♦	W	♦4	=		920	73%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.6							NS-1.3	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	2NT	N	+1	150		60%	2
11	5♦	S	-3		150	93%	2
12	3NT	E	+2		460	73%	2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.6	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.3	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TRONDERMIX vs SILVERFOX 0 : 4 VP (match 23568) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TRONDERMIX	SILVERFOX
11	2NT	S	♠2	-1		50	74%	3NT	N	♠4	+1	430		92%		2
12	6♦	W	♣9	=		920	73%	5♦	W	♥A	+1		420	92%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.9							NS+1.7	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	2NT	S	-1		50	74%		2
11	3NT	N	+1	430		92%		2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%		2
12	5♦	W	+1		420	92%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.9	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+1.7	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

DARLING vs ROSSARD 2 : 2 VP (match 23569) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	DARLING	ROSSARD
11	3NT	N	♣K	=	400		74%	3♦	N	♠2	-1		50	74%	2
12	6♦	W	♥A	=		920	73%	3NT	W	♠2	+3		490	58%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.0							NS-0.3	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3NT	N	=	400		74%	2
11	3♦	N	-1		50	74%	2
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%		2
12	3NT	W	+3		490	58%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.0	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.3	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MIXED vs MAHAFFEY 2 : 2 VP (match 23570) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MIXED	MAHAFFEY
11	3NT	N	♠4	-1		50	74%	3♦	N	♣K	-1		50	74%	1	1
12	6♦	W	♦5	=		920	73%	6♦	W	♥A	=		920	73%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.9							NS-0.9	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
11	3NT	N	-1		50	74%	1	1
11	3♦	N	-1		50	74%	1	1
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%	1	1
12	6♦	W	=		920	73%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.9	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.9	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg