Skip to content

🌐 All championships 🏠 Categories 🔍 Players ▲ Top

Tables

← Cumulative standings Round 7 results & standings results standings Round 7 board records

Match protocols

1. LEGEANKA – INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 2. OPTIMISTS – MOSTINGAN 3. TUPPEN – ZEN 4. THE PATRIOTS – BOHNSACK 5. PANDORA – CHINA GEELY AUTO 6. MINA – VIDIGAL 7. BEIJING TRINERGY – PUNCH 8. BRIDGE OF KING F1 – YABBIES 9. MIKLAGARD – HOFFEMAN 10. SJODAL – ANITAS SANS 11. TEAM ATLANTIC – NI LLIV 12. BADGER – GAMMA GRAFISK 13. CAYNE – WITO 14. ALZADA – GOLD 15. MELWOOD – SANBORN 16. TAKK – BERGEN AK 17. WARD PLATT – KURTS ANGELS 18. ROSENTHAL – BYE 19. VI E KLAR – MARIE 20. NONSTOP – MALUISH 21. SOLHEIM – MELBOURNE 1 22. TOGRAM – LES MISERABLES 23. PASSO DOUBLE – GRAIZER 24. KIBE – TRONDERMIX 25. ROSSARD – TOMFOOLERY 26. SILVERFOX – MIXED 27. MAHAFFEY – DARLING

Rounds

Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 Round 4 Round 5 Round 6 Round 7 Round 8 Round 9 Round 10 Round 11 Round 12 Round 13 Round 14 Round 15 Round 16 Round 17 Round 18 Round 19 Round 20 Round 21 Round 22 Round 23 Round 24 Round 25

Round 7 — M-OPEN BAM

27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records

Round 7 results↑ top

Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.

Table	Home team	Visiting team	BAM (home)	BAM (visit)	VP (home)	VP (visit)
1	LEGEANKA	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
2	OPTIMISTS	MOSTINGAN	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
3	TUPPEN	ZEN	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
4	THE PATRIOTS	BOHNSACK	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
5	PANDORA	CHINA GEELY AUTO	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
6	MINA	VIDIGAL	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
7	BEIJING TRINERGY	PUNCH	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
8	BRIDGE OF KING F1	YABBIES	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
9	MIKLAGARD	HOFFEMAN	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
10	SJODAL	ANITAS SANS	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
11	TEAM ATLANTIC	NI LLIV	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
12	BADGER	GAMMA GRAFISK	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →
13	CAYNE	WITO	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
14	ALZADA	GOLD	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
15	MELWOOD	SANBORN	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
16	TAKK	BERGEN AK	0	4	0.00	4.00	protocol →
17	WARD PLATT	KURTS ANGELS	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
18	ROSENTHAL	BYE	0	0	2.40	0.00	protocol →
19	VI E KLAR	MARIE	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
20	NONSTOP	MALUISH	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
21	SOLHEIM	MELBOURNE 1	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
22	TOGRAM	LES MISERABLES	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
23	PASSO DOUBLE	GRAIZER	1	3	1.00	3.00	protocol →
24	KIBE	TRONDERMIX	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
25	ROSSARD	TOMFOOLERY	4	0	4.00	0.00	protocol →
26	SILVERFOX	MIXED	2	2	2.00	2.00	protocol →
27	MAHAFFEY	DARLING	3	1	3.00	1.00	protocol →

Standings after round 7↑ top

Cumulative board-a-match points through round 7 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players

Place	Team	Pts	R7	Pld
1	MIKLAGARD	21.00	4.00	7
2	GRAIZER	18.00	3.00	7
2	MOSTINGAN	18.00	4.00	7
2	SJODAL	18.00	4.00	7
2	TEAM ATLANTIC	18.00	3.00	7
2	YABBIES	18.00	4.00	7
7	ALZADA	17.00	4.00	7
7	BOHNSACK	17.00	2.00	7
7	CHINA GEELY AUTO	17.00	1.00	7
7	NONSTOP	17.00	2.00	7
7	SANBORN	17.00	3.00	7
7	WARD PLATT	17.00	2.00	7
13	KIBE	16.40	2.00	7
14	KURTS ANGELS	16.00	2.00	7
15	CAYNE	15.80	4.00	7
16	MALUISH	15.40	2.00	7
16	ROSSARD	15.40	4.00	7
18	BADGER	15.00	3.00	7
18	GAMMA GRAFISK	15.00	1.00	7
18	PUNCH	15.00	3.00	7
18	SOLHEIM	15.00	1.00	7
18	WITO	15.00	0.00	7
23	SILVERFOX	14.40	2.00	7
24	BEIJING TRINERGY	14.00	1.00	7
24	DARLING	14.00	1.00	7
24	GOLD	14.00	0.00	7
24	TOMFOOLERY	14.00	0.00	7
24	TRONDERMIX	14.00	2.00	7
24	TUPPEN	14.00	3.00	7
24	VIDIGAL	14.00	2.00	7
31	MAHAFFEY	13.40	3.00	7
31	ROSENTHAL	13.40	2.40	7
33	BERGEN AK	13.00	4.00	7
33	LES MISERABLES	13.00	2.00	7
33	MELBOURNE 1	13.00	3.00	7
33	MIXED	13.00	2.00	7
33	THE PATRIOTS	13.00	2.00	7
38	TOGRAM	12.40	2.00	7
39	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN	12.00	4.00	7
39	MELWOOD	12.00	1.00	7
39	PASSO DOUBLE	12.00	1.00	7
39	VI E KLAR	12.00	2.00	7
39	ZEN	12.00	1.00	7
44	BRIDGE OF KING F1	11.00	0.00	7
44	HOFFEMAN	11.00	0.00	7
44	MINA	11.00	2.00	7
44	TAKK	11.00	0.00	7
48	ANITAS SANS	10.00	0.00	7
48	NI LLIV	10.00	1.00	7
48	OPTIMISTS	10.00	0.00	7
48	PANDORA	10.00	3.00	7
52	MARIE	9.00	2.00	7
53	LEGEANKA	8.20	0.00	7

Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.

Round 7 board-a-match standings↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	R7	BAM%

LEGEANKA vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 0 : 4 VP (match 23571) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	LEGEANKA	INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN
13	2♦	W	♣2	+2		130	86%	5♦	W	♣2	-2	200		100%		2
14	6♠	W	♦Q	=		980	86%	7♠x	E	♥6	-1	100		99%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS0.0							NS+2.0	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	2♦	W	+2		130	86%		2
13	5♦	W	-2	200		100%		2
14	6♠	W	=		980	86%		2
14	7♠x	E	-1	100		99%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS0.0	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+2.0	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

OPTIMISTS vs MOSTINGAN 0 : 4 VP (match 23572) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	OPTIMISTS	MOSTINGAN
13	2NT	E	♣3	+1		150	72%	4♦	W	♣2	=		130	86%		2
14	6♣	E	♦10	=		920	74%	4♠	W	♦2	+2		480	76%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.1							NS+1.2	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	2NT	E	+1		150	72%		2
13	4♦	W	=		130	86%		2
14	6♣	E	=		920	74%		2
14	4♠	W	+2		480	76%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.1	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+1.2	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TUPPEN vs ZEN 3 : 1 VP (match 23573) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TUPPEN	ZEN
13	3NT	W	♣2	+1		630	76%	4♥	W	♥6	+1		650	84%	2
14	4♠	E	♠6	+2		480	76%	4♠	E	♦6	+2		480	76%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.0							NS-0.2	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3NT	W	+1		630	76%	2
13	4♥	W	+1		650	84%	2
14	4♠	E	+2		480	76%	1	1
14	4♠	E	+2		480	76%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.0	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.2	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

THE PATRIOTS vs BOHNSACK 2 : 2 VP (match 23574) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	THE PATRIOTS	BOHNSACK
13	2♥	W	♥6	+3		200	51%	3NT	E	♠5	=		600	62%	2
14	6♠	W	♦Q	=		980	86%	3NT	E	♦10	+2		460	90%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.7							NS+0.6	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	2♥	W	+3		200	51%	2
13	3NT	E	=		600	62%	2
14	6♠	W	=		980	86%		2
14	3NT	E	+2		460	90%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.7	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.6	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

PANDORA vs CHINA GEELY AUTO 3 : 1 VP (match 23575) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	PANDORA	CHINA GEELY AUTO
13	1NT	E	♣2	+1		120	98%	3NT	E	♠3	+2		660	92%	2
14	3NT	E	♣2	+3		490	55%	4NT	E	♦10	+2		490	55%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.9							NS-0.9	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	1NT	E	+1		120	98%	2
13	3NT	E	+2		660	92%	2
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	1	1
14	4NT	E	+2		490	55%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.9	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.9	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MINA vs VIDIGAL 2 : 2 VP (match 23576) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MINA	VIDIGAL
13	3NT	W	♣5	+2		660	92%	3♦	W	♣5	+1		130	86%		2
14	4♠	E	♦10	+2		480	76%	3NT	E	♦2	+3		490	55%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.3							NS+0.6	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3NT	W	+2		660	92%		2
13	3♦	W	+1		130	86%		2
14	4♠	E	+2		480	76%	2
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.3	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.6	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BEIJING TRINERGY vs PUNCH 1 : 3 VP (match 23577) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BEIJING TRINERGY	PUNCH
13	3NT	W	♣5	+2		660	92%	4♥	W	♥2	=		620	68%		2
14	3NT	E	♣2	+3		490	55%	3NT	E	♦9	+3		490	55%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.9							NS-0.5	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3NT	W	+2		660	92%		2
13	4♥	W	=		620	68%		2
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	1	1
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.9	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BRIDGE OF KING F1 vs YABBIES 0 : 4 VP (match 23578) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BRIDGE OF KING F1	YABBIES
13	3NT	E	♦7	+1		630	76%	1NT	W	♣5	+4		210	55%		2
14	4♠	W	♥J	+2		480	76%	7♠x	W	♠A	-1	100		99%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.0							NS+0.9	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3NT	E	+1		630	76%		2
13	1NT	W	+4		210	55%		2
14	4♠	W	+2		480	76%		2
14	7♠x	W	-1	100		99%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.0	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.9	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MIKLAGARD vs HOFFEMAN 4 : 0 VP (match 23579) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MIKLAGARD	HOFFEMAN
13	3♦	W	♣2	+2		150	72%	2♥	W	♣2	+2		170	63%	2
14	4♠	E	♠6	+2		480	76%	6♠	E	♠8	=		980	86%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.9							NS-0.5	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3♦	W	+2		150	72%	2
13	2♥	W	+2		170	63%	2
14	4♠	E	+2		480	76%	2
14	6♠	E	=		980	86%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.9	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.5	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

SJODAL vs ANITAS SANS 4 : 0 VP (match 23580) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	SJODAL	ANITAS SANS
13	3NT	E	♦Q	+1		630	76%	3NT	W	♣4	+2		660	92%	2
14	3NT	E	♦10	+3		490	55%	6♠	W	♦2	=		980	86%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.6							NS-1.6	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3NT	E	+1		630	76%	2
13	3NT	W	+2		660	92%	2
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	2
14	6♠	W	=		980	86%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.6	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.6	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TEAM ATLANTIC vs NI LLIV 3 : 1 VP (match 23581) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TEAM ATLANTIC	NI LLIV
13	1NT	W	♣2	+3		180	54%	1NT	W	♣2	+3		180	54%	1	1
14	4♠	E	♦6	+2		480	76%	3NT	E	♥3	+3		490	55%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.6							NS-0.0	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	1NT	W	+3		180	54%	1	1
13	1NT	W	+3		180	54%	1	1
14	4♠	E	+2		480	76%	2
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.6	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.0	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

BADGER vs GAMMA GRAFISK 3 : 1 VP (match 23582) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	BADGER	GAMMA GRAFISK
13	3NT	E	♠2	+2		660	92%	4♥	W	♣2	+2		680	100%	2
14	3NT	E	♠8	+3		490	55%	3NT	E	♥2	+3		490	55%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.9							NS-1.1	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3NT	E	+2		660	92%	2
13	4♥	W	+2		680	100%	2
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	1	1
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.9	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.1	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

CAYNE vs WITO 4 : 0 VP (match 23583) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	CAYNE	WITO
13	3♦	W	♣2	+1		130	86%	3NT	E	♣3	+1		630	76%	2
14	4♥	W	♦Q	+1		450	94%	3NT	E	♠8	+3		490	55%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+1.6							NS-0.6	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3♦	W	+1		130	86%	2
13	3NT	E	+1		630	76%	2
14	4♥	W	+1		450	94%	2
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+1.6	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.6	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

ALZADA vs GOLD 4 : 0 VP (match 23584) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	ALZADA	GOLD
13	2♥	W	♣2	+2		170	63%	3NT	E	♣3	=		600	62%	2
14	4♠	W	♦2	+2		480	76%	6♠	E	♠6	=		980	86%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.8							NS-1.0	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	2♥	W	+2		170	63%	2
13	3NT	E	=		600	62%	2
14	4♠	W	+2		480	76%	2
14	6♠	E	=		980	86%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.8	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.0	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MELWOOD vs SANBORN 1 : 3 VP (match 23585) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MELWOOD	SANBORN
13	3NT	E	♠5	+1		630	76%	1NT	E	♣3	+4		210	55%		2
14	6♠	W	♦2	=		980	86%	6♠	E	♦5	=		980	86%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-1.3							NS-0.8	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3NT	E	+1		630	76%		2
13	1NT	E	+4		210	55%		2
14	6♠	W	=		980	86%	1	1
14	6♠	E	=		980	86%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-1.3	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.8	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TAKK vs BERGEN AK 0 : 4 VP (match 23586) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TAKK	BERGEN AK
13	1NT	E	♠6	+3		180	54%	2♥	W	♣3	+2		170	63%		2
14	6NT	E	♦10	=		990	99%	4♠	E	♦10	+2		480	76%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.9							NS+0.8	0	4

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	1NT	E	+3		180	54%		2
13	2♥	W	+2		170	63%		2
14	6NT	E	=		990	99%		2
14	4♠	E	+2		480	76%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.9	0	4
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.8	0	4

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

WARD PLATT vs KURTS ANGELS 2 : 2 VP (match 23587) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	WARD PLATT	KURTS ANGELS
13	3NT	W	♣5	+2		660	92%	4♥	W	♣2	=		620	68%		2
14	3NT	E	♠8	+3		490	55%	6NT	E	♦10	=		990	99%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.9							NS-1.3	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3NT	W	+2		660	92%		2
13	4♥	W	=		620	68%		2
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	2
14	6NT	E	=		990	99%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.9	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-1.3	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

ROSENTHAL vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 23588)↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	ROSENTHAL	BYE
13	–		—					–		—
14	–		—					–		—
Σ	BAM / points						NS0.0							NS0.0	0	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	–
13	–
14	–
14	–
Σ	BAM Open					NS0.0	0	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS0.0	0	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

VI E KLAR vs MARIE 2 : 2 VP (match 23589) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	VI E KLAR	MARIE
13	3♦	W	♦2	+3		170	63%	3NT	E	♠2	=		600	62%	2
14	3NT	E	♥3	+3		490	55%	4♥	W	♦Q	=		420	96%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.2							NS+0.7	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3♦	W	+3		170	63%	2
13	3NT	E	=		600	62%	2
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%		2
14	4♥	W	=		420	96%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.2	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.7	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

NONSTOP vs MALUISH 2 : 2 VP (match 23590) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	NONSTOP	MALUISH
13	3NT	E	♠5	+1		630	76%	1NT	W	♣5	+3		180	54%		2
14	3NT	E	♦10	+3		490	55%	6♠	E	♦10	=		980	86%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.6							NS-0.6	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3NT	E	+1		630	76%		2
13	1NT	W	+3		180	54%		2
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	2
14	6♠	E	=		980	86%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.6	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.6	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

SOLHEIM vs MELBOURNE 1 1 : 3 VP (match 23591) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	SOLHEIM	MELBOURNE 1
13	3NT	E	♠5	+1		630	76%	3♦	E	♣2	+1		130	86%		2
14	3NT	E	♠8	+3		490	55%	3NT	E	♦2	+3		490	55%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.6							NS+0.6	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3NT	E	+1		630	76%		2
13	3♦	E	+1		130	86%		2
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	1	1
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.6	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.6	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

TOGRAM vs LES MISERABLES 2 : 2 VP (match 23592) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	TOGRAM	LES MISERABLES
13	2♦	W	♣2	+2		130	86%	3♦	W	♦2	+2		150	72%	2
14	6♠	E	♠8	=		980	86%	3NT	E	♦10	+2		460	90%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS0.0							NS+1.2	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	2♦	W	+2		130	86%	2
13	3♦	W	+2		150	72%	2
14	6♠	E	=		980	86%		2
14	3NT	E	+2		460	90%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS0.0	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+1.2	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

PASSO DOUBLE vs GRAIZER 1 : 3 VP (match 23593) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	PASSO DOUBLE	GRAIZER
13	3♦	W	♣2	+1		130	86%	3♦	W	♣2	+1		130	86%	1	1
14	3NT	E	♦6	+3		490	55%	4♠	E	♠6	+2		480	76%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.6							NS+1.2	1	3

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3♦	W	+1		130	86%	1	1
13	3♦	W	+1		130	86%	1	1
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%		2
14	4♠	E	+2		480	76%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.6	1	3
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+1.2	1	3

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

KIBE vs TRONDERMIX 2 : 2 VP (match 23594) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	KIBE	TRONDERMIX
13	3NT	E	♦3	=		600	62%	1NT	E	♣4	+4		210	55%		2
14	3NT	E	♠5	+3		490	55%	6♠	E	♠6	=		980	86%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS-0.3							NS-0.8	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3NT	E	=		600	62%		2
13	1NT	E	+4		210	55%		2
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	2
14	6♠	E	=		980	86%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS-0.3	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.8	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

ROSSARD vs TOMFOOLERY 4 : 0 VP (match 23595) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	ROSSARD	TOMFOOLERY
13	3♦	W	♣5	+1		130	86%	2♥	W	♣2	+2		170	63%	2
14	3NT	E	♠7	+2		460	90%	4♠	E	♦10	+2		480	76%	2
Σ	BAM / points						NS+1.5							NS+0.8	4	0

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3♦	W	+1		130	86%	2
13	2♥	W	+2		170	63%	2
14	3NT	E	+2		460	90%	2
14	4♠	E	+2		480	76%	2
Σ	BAM Open					NS+1.5	4	0
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.8	4	0

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

SILVERFOX vs MIXED 2 : 2 VP (match 23596) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	SILVERFOX	MIXED
13	3♦	W	♣2	+1		130	86%	3NT	W	♣2	+2		660	92%	2
14	6♠	W	♦8	=		980	86%	4♠	E	♦10	+2		480	76%		2
Σ	BAM / points						NS0.0							NS-0.3	2	2

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3♦	W	+1		130	86%	2
13	3NT	W	+2		660	92%	2
14	6♠	W	=		980	86%		2
14	4♠	E	+2		480	76%		2
Σ	BAM Open					NS0.0	2	2
Σ	BAM Closed					NS-0.3	2	2

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg

MAHAFFEY vs DARLING 3 : 1 VP (match 23597) PBN↑ top

⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.

Bd	Open room							Closed room							IMPs
Bd	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	Contract	By	Lead	Res	NS	EW	BAM	MAHAFFEY	DARLING
13	3♦	W	♣5	+1		130	86%	4♦	W	♣2	+1		150	72%	2
14	3NT	E	♠7	+3		490	55%	3NT	E	♠7	+3		490	55%	1	1
Σ	BAM / points						NS+0.6							NS+0.3	3	1

Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	BAM
Bd	Cont	By	Res	NS	EW	Butler	home	visit
13	3♦	W	+1		130	86%	2
13	4♦	W	+1		150	72%	2
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	1	1
14	3NT	E	+3		490	55%	1	1
Σ	BAM Open					NS+0.6	3	1
Σ	BAM Closed					NS+0.3	3	1

Player Butler in this match
Player	Bds	Total	Avg