Round 9 — M-OPEN BAM
27 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 9 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TUPPEN | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | THE PATRIOTS | OPTIMISTS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | LEGEANKA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | VIDIGAL | MOSTINGAN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | ZEN | PUNCH | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BOHNSACK | YABBIES | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | PANDORA | HOFFEMAN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | MINA | ANITAS SANS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | BEIJING TRINERGY | TEAM ATLANTIC | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | GAMMA GRAFISK | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | WITO | MIKLAGARD | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | SJODAL | ALZADA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | NI LLIV | SANBORN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | TAKK | BADGER | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | CAYNE | KURTS ANGELS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | BYE | GOLD | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 17 | MARIE | MELWOOD | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | BERGEN AK | NONSTOP | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | WARD PLATT | SOLHEIM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | LES MISERABLES | ROSENTHAL | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | GRAIZER | VI E KLAR | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | MALUISH | TRONDERMIX | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | MELBOURNE 1 | ROSSARD | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | TOGRAM | MIXED | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | MAHAFFEY | PASSO DOUBLE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | KIBE | DARLING | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | SILVERFOX | TOMFOOLERY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 9↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 9 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R9 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MIKLAGARD | 26.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 2 | YABBIES | 24.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 3 | GRAIZER | 23.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 3 | KURTS ANGELS | 23.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 3 | MOSTINGAN | 23.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 6 | ALZADA | 22.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 6 | CHINA GEELY AUTO | 22.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 6 | SANBORN | 22.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 6 | SJODAL | 22.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 10 | MAHAFFEY | 21.40 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 11 | BEIJING TRINERGY | 21.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 11 | NONSTOP | 21.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 11 | PUNCH | 21.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 11 | SOLHEIM | 21.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 11 | TEAM ATLANTIC | 21.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 11 | TRONDERMIX | 21.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 11 | WARD PLATT | 21.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 18 | SILVERFOX | 20.40 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 19 | BADGER | 20.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 19 | LES MISERABLES | 20.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 21 | GOLD | 19.40 | 2.40 | 9 |
| 21 | KIBE | 19.40 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 21 | ROSSARD | 19.40 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 24 | TUPPEN | 19.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 24 | VIDIGAL | 19.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 26 | BOHNSACK | 18.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 26 | DARLING | 18.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 26 | THE PATRIOTS | 18.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 26 | WITO | 18.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 30 | CAYNE | 17.80 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 31 | ROSENTHAL | 17.40 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 32 | GAMMA GRAFISK | 17.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 32 | MIXED | 17.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 34 | BERGEN AK | 16.40 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 35 | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | 16.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 35 | PASSO DOUBLE | 16.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 35 | TOMFOOLERY | 16.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 35 | ZEN | 16.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 39 | MALUISH | 15.40 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 40 | ANITAS SANS | 15.00 | 3.00 | 9 |
| 40 | MARIE | 15.00 | 4.00 | 9 |
| 40 | MELBOURNE 1 | 15.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 40 | OPTIMISTS | 15.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 44 | TOGRAM | 14.40 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 45 | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | 14.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 46 | HOFFEMAN | 13.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 46 | MELWOOD | 13.00 | 0.00 | 9 |
| 46 | MINA | 13.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 46 | NI LLIV | 13.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 46 | TAKK | 13.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 46 | VI E KLAR | 13.00 | 1.00 | 9 |
| 52 | PANDORA | 12.00 | 2.00 | 9 |
| 53 | LEGEANKA | 10.20 | 1.00 | 9 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 9 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R9 | BAM% |
|---|
TUPPEN vs INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN 2 : 2 VP (match 23625) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TUPPEN | INOVENTIO KOLBOTTEN | |
| 17 | 2NT | N | ♣5 | = | 120 | 84% | 4♣ | E | ♥7 | -3 | 150 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦K | = | 620 | 61% | 4♠x | E | ♥K | -3 | 500 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2NT | N | = | 120 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | E | -3 | 150 | 96% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THE PATRIOTS vs OPTIMISTS 3 : 1 VP (match 23626) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THE PATRIOTS | OPTIMISTS | |
| 17 | 2NT | N | ♣5 | = | 120 | 84% | 1♥ | N | ♦6 | +1 | 110 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2NT | N | = | 120 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 1♥ | N | +1 | 110 | 71% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA GEELY AUTO vs LEGEANKA 3 : 1 VP (match 23627) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA GEELY AUTO | LEGEANKA | |
| 17 | 4♥ | N | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 3NT | N | ♣7 | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -2 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VIDIGAL vs MOSTINGAN 1 : 3 VP (match 23628) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VIDIGAL | MOSTINGAN | |
| 17 | 2♥ | N | ♦4 | = | 110 | 71% | 2NT | E | ♠4 | -3 | 150 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♣7 | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | -3 | 150 | 96% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZEN vs PUNCH 2 : 2 VP (match 23629) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZEN | PUNCH | |
| 17 | 2NT | N | ♣7 | = | 120 | 84% | 3NT | N | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | ♥K | -2 | 100 | 91% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2NT | N | = | 120 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BOHNSACK vs YABBIES 1 : 3 VP (match 23630) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BOHNSACK | YABBIES | |
| 17 | 3NT | N | ♣7 | -2 | 100 | 91% | 3NT | N | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥ | N | ♥3 | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3NT | N | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PANDORA vs HOFFEMAN 2 : 2 VP (match 23631) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PANDORA | HOFFEMAN | |
| 17 | 3♥ | N | ♣7 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2NT | E | ♥J | -2 | 100 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 2♥ | N | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 84% | 6♥x | S | ♦K | -2 | 500 | 98% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | -2 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| 18 | 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 6♥x | S | -2 | 500 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MINA vs ANITAS SANS 1 : 3 VP (match 23632) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MINA | ANITAS SANS | |
| 17 | 3NT | N | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1♥ | N | ♣3 | +1 | 110 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 1♥ | N | +1 | 110 | 71% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BEIJING TRINERGY vs TEAM ATLANTIC 3 : 1 VP (match 23633) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BEIJING TRINERGY | TEAM ATLANTIC | |
| 17 | 3NT | N | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 3♠ | S | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 2♥ | S | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 84% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRIDGE OF KING F1 vs GAMMA GRAFISK 3 : 1 VP (match 23634) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRIDGE OF KING F1 | GAMMA GRAFISK | |
| 17 | 2♥ | E | ♦2 | -3 | 150 | 96% | 4♥ | S | ♣8 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥ | N | ♣6 | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS0.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WITO vs MIKLAGARD 1 : 3 VP (match 23635) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WITO | MIKLAGARD | |
| 17 | 4♥ | N | ♣5 | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2♠ | S | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♥ | N | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 92% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SJODAL vs ALZADA 1 : 3 VP (match 23636) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SJODAL | ALZADA | |
| 17 | 3NT | N | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1♥ | N | ♠5 | +1 | 110 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 1♥ | N | +1 | 110 | 71% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NI LLIV vs SANBORN 1 : 3 VP (match 23637) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NI LLIV | SANBORN | |
| 17 | 3♠ | S | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 3♠ | S | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 1NT | S | ♣4 | +3 | 180 | 78% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 1NT | S | +3 | 180 | 78% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TAKK vs BADGER 1 : 3 VP (match 23638) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAKK | BADGER | |
| 17 | 3NT | S | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 3NT | N | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 3♥ | S | ♦A | +1 | 170 | 84% | 4♥ | S | ♦K | = | 620 | 61% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAYNE vs KURTS ANGELS 0 : 4 VP (match 23639) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAYNE | KURTS ANGELS | |
| 17 | 3NT | N | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1♥ | N | ♣5 | +1 | 110 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 2♠ | W | ♥10 | -1 | 50 | 94% | 4♥ | S | ♦K | = | 620 | 61% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 1♥ | N | +1 | 110 | 71% | ||||
| 18 | 2♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BYE vs GOLD 0 : 2.4 VP (match 23640)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BYE | GOLD | |
| 17 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| 18 | – | — | – | — | ||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| 18 | – | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MARIE vs MELWOOD 4 : 0 VP (match 23641) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MARIE | MELWOOD | |
| 17 | 3NT | N | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 4♥ | N | ♣5 | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 3NT | S | ♣2 | +1 | 630 | 98% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -2 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 18 | 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 98% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BERGEN AK vs NONSTOP 1 : 3 VP (match 23642) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BERGEN AK | NONSTOP | |
| 17 | 3NT | N | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2NT | N | ♣4 | = | 120 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♣3 | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | = | 120 | 84% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WARD PLATT vs SOLHEIM 2 : 2 VP (match 23643) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WARD PLATT | SOLHEIM | |
| 17 | 2NT | N | ♣5 | = | 120 | 84% | 2NT | N | ♣6 | = | 120 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2NT | N | = | 120 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2NT | N | = | 120 | 84% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LES MISERABLES vs ROSENTHAL 3 : 1 VP (match 23644) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LES MISERABLES | ROSENTHAL | |
| 17 | 1♥ | N | ♣10 | +1 | 110 | 71% | 3♠ | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS0.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 1♥ | N | +1 | 110 | 71% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GRAIZER vs VI E KLAR 3 : 1 VP (match 23645) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GRAIZER | VI E KLAR | |
| 17 | 3NT | N | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2NT | N | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 2♥ | S | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 84% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MALUISH vs TRONDERMIX 0 : 4 VP (match 23646) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MALUISH | TRONDERMIX | |
| 17 | 2NT | N | ♣2 | -2 | 100 | 91% | 3NT | N | ♣7 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 3♥ | N | ♣2 | +1 | 170 | 84% | 4♥ | S | ♦K | = | 620 | 61% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS0.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2NT | N | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MELBOURNE 1 vs ROSSARD 0 : 4 VP (match 23647) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MELBOURNE 1 | ROSSARD | |
| 17 | 3♠ | S | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 91% | 3NT | N | ♣7 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 3♣x | S | ♥A | -3 | 800 | 100% | 5♥x | S | ♦A | -1 | 200 | 96% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 3♣x | S | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 5♥x | S | -1 | 200 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TOGRAM vs MIXED 1 : 3 VP (match 23648) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TOGRAM | MIXED | |
| 17 | 3NT | N | ♣5 | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2♥ | N | ♣2 | = | 110 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♦K | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3NT | N | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 71% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAHAFFEY vs PASSO DOUBLE 4 : 0 VP (match 23649) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAHAFFEY | PASSO DOUBLE | |
| 17 | 2NT | N | ♣5 | = | 120 | 84% | 4♥x | N | ♣5 | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 3♠ | E | ♥K | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-1.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 2NT | N | = | 120 | 84% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | N | -3 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIBE vs DARLING 0 : 4 VP (match 23650) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIBE | DARLING | |
| 17 | 4♥ | N | ♣5 | -2 | 100 | 91% | 3NT | S | ♠Q | = | 400 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥x | S | ♦A | = | 790 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+2.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 4♥ | N | -2 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 100% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | S | = | 790 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SILVERFOX vs TOMFOOLERY 2 : 2 VP (match 23651) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SILVERFOX | TOMFOOLERY | |
| 17 | 3♠ | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 61% | 3NT | N | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♦A | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 17 | 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 18 | 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|