| Stage | # | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualification | 34 | 96 | 7394.13 | 53.49% | 11 | 10 |
| Semifinal A | 16 | 96 | 4000.91 | 53.43% | 13 | 9 |
| Final | 2 | 50 | 667.55 | 55.63% | 8 | 5 |
| Session | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualification · session 1 | 16 | 1172.73 | 53.89% | 4 | 2 |
| Qualification · session 2 | 16 | 994.58 | 45.71% | 1 | 2 |
| Qualification · session 3 | 16 | 978.64 | 44.97% | 0 | 2 |
| Qualification · session 4 | 16 | 1506.46 | 61.94% | 3 | 1 |
| Qualification · session 5 | 16 | 1436.86 | 59.08% | 3 | 1 |
| Qualification · session 6 | 16 | 1304.86 | 53.65% | 0 | 2 |
| Semifinal A · session 1 | 16 | 719.60 | 57.66% | 1 | 0 |
| Semifinal A · session 2 | 16 | 557.67 | 44.69% | 0 | 0 |
| Semifinal A · session 3 | 16 | 581.00 | 46.55% | 2 | 4 |
| Semifinal A · session 4 | 16 | 721.72 | 57.83% | 3 | 1 |
| Semifinal A · session 5 | 16 | 757.00 | 60.66% | 4 | 2 |
| Semifinal A · session 6 | 16 | 663.92 | 53.20% | 3 | 2 |
| Final · session 1 | 16 | 212.80 | 55.42% | 3 | 2 |
| Final · session 2 | 16 | 179.00 | 46.61% | 3 | 3 |
| Final · session 3 | 18 | 275.75 | 63.83% | 2 | 0 |
| Against par | Boards |
|---|---|
| +4.75% | 242 |
| Player | Leads | n | Declarer | n | Defence | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱WIANKOWSKI Piotr | 85.9% | 71 | 65.5% | 58 | 88.6% | 132 |
| 🇵🇱WIANKOWSKA Agnieszka | 85.2% | 61 | 80.8% | 52 | 88.6% | 132 |
Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts. Leads, declarer play and defence are charged to the player: where a protocol says a pair sat N-S its first name sat North and its second South, E-W the same, and the declarer's seat does the rest. Against par is a pair result, so it stays with the pair.