| Stage | # | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualification | 109 | 96 | 6632.35 | 47.98% | 6 | 9 |
| Semifinal B | 2 | 96 | 4036.68 | 56.82% | 22 | 4 |
| Final | 19 | 50 | 563.80 | 46.98% | 4 | 7 |
| Session | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualification · session 1 | 16 | 1464.92 | 67.32% | 4 | 0 |
| Qualification · session 2 | 16 | 740.99 | 34.05% | 0 | 4 |
| Qualification · session 3 | 16 | 1184.49 | 54.43% | 1 | 0 |
| Qualification · session 4 | 16 | 1244.54 | 51.17% | 0 | 0 |
| Qualification · session 5 | 16 | 1170.55 | 48.13% | 1 | 1 |
| Qualification · session 6 | 16 | 826.86 | 34.00% | 0 | 4 |
| Semifinal B · session 1 | 16 | 788.60 | 66.60% | 4 | 0 |
| Semifinal B · session 2 | 16 | 734.00 | 61.99% | 4 | 0 |
| Semifinal B · session 3 | 16 | 718.57 | 60.69% | 6 | 2 |
| Semifinal B · session 4 | 16 | 608.51 | 51.39% | 3 | 1 |
| Semifinal B · session 5 | 16 | 544.00 | 45.95% | 2 | 1 |
| Semifinal B · session 6 | 16 | 643.00 | 54.31% | 3 | 0 |
| Final · session 1 | 16 | 141.80 | 36.93% | 0 | 3 |
| Final · session 2 | 16 | 184.00 | 47.92% | 2 | 2 |
| Final · session 3 | 18 | 238.00 | 55.09% | 2 | 2 |
| Against par | Boards |
|---|---|
| +3.78% | 241 |
| Player | Leads | n | Declarer | n | Defence | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇹🇷SUZER Ugurcan | 83.3% | 66 | 75.9% | 54 | 85.0% | 120 |
| 🇹🇷ATES Ebru | 77.8% | 54 | 80.6% | 67 | 85.0% | 120 |
Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts. Leads, declarer play and defence are charged to the player: where a protocol says a pair sat N-S its first name sat North and its second South, E-W the same, and the declarer's seat does the rest. Against par is a pair result, so it stays with the pair.